It’s great someone with a Canuck flag cares about the US House. What exactly are dems going to do with the House? Subpoena and investigate? Thats worked out really well for dems.
Instead of trying to identify why the party is shrinking and completely untouchable for voters in more that half the states and therefore no current path to take the senate, which means no path for future Justices on the Court. But let’s get that House!
Cool. Ms. Watts had built an impressive network (but never made her cause digestible to enough voters to matter for her cause on Election Day) but her focus on the house says a lot about dems lack of big picture focus.
It’s great someone with a Canuck flag cares about the US House. What exactly are dems going to do with the House? Subpoena and investigate? Thats worked out really well for dems.
Instead of trying to identify why the party is shrinking and completely untouchable for voters in more that half the states and therefore no current path to take the senate, which means no path for future Justices on the Court. But let’s get that House!
You’re so right. The House means nothing in the political system. I can’t believe anyone cares who has 50% of the branches in a bicameral system.
And of course your last paragraph points out the one immutable law in politics, business and life: you can only do one thing at a time. No way can a party try to win the House AND try “to identify why the party is shrinking”. One of the other.
It’s great someone with a Canuck flag cares about the US House. What exactly are dems going to do with the House? Subpoena and investigate? Thats worked out really well for dems.
Instead of trying to identify why the party is shrinking and completely untouchable for voters in more that half the states and therefore no current path to take the senate, which means no path for future Justices on the Court. But let’s get that House!
You’re so right. The House means nothing in the political system. I can’t believe anyone cares who has 50% of the branches in a bicameral system.
And of course your last paragraph points out the one immutable law in politics, business and life: you can only do one thing at a time. No way can a party try to win the House AND try “to identify why the party is shrinking”. One of the other.
The senate SHOULD be up for grabs next year. Losing those three red seats, and the dems sprinting to the AOC Bernie wing of the party, I don’t see how that’s possible. Without the senate, not sure what the dems will ever accomplish, especially since they can not shut down the govt to get their budgets thru. They will always need gop votes.
It’s great someone with a Canuck flag cares about the US House. What exactly are dems going to do with the House? Subpoena and investigate? Thats worked out really well for dems.
Instead of trying to identify why the party is shrinking and completely untouchable for voters in more that half the states and therefore no current path to take the senate, which means no path for future Justices on the Court. But let’s get that House!
You’re so right. The House means nothing in the political system. I can’t believe anyone cares who has 50% of the branches in a bicameral system.
And of course your last paragraph points out the one immutable law in politics, business and life: you can only do one thing at a time. No way can a party try to win the House AND try “to identify why the party is shrinking”. One of the other.
The senate SHOULD be up for grabs next year. Losing those three red seats, and the dems sprinting to the AOC Bernie wing of the party, I don’t see how that’s possible. Without the senate, not sure what the dems will ever accomplish, especially since they can not shut down the govt to get their budgets thru. They will always need gop votes.
There are enough reasonable GOP votes in the senate to keep the govt functioning.
And this is neither the first or last time a party moves to the wing in the aftermath of a general election loss. It’s all so predictable. Doom and gloom until it isn’t.
Maybe you can explain why Trump declined to extend FEMA funding in NC since it’s so bad that a MD senator should be in NC rather than supporting a resident of his state whose husband is illegally detained.
Then you can explain what crime the man was convicted of, because as far as I have read, there is no crime. And if there is no crime then you can explain why you are posting bullshit here.
” Can anyone explain to me why democrats are flying to other countries to help illegal immigrant criminals…
…but none of them came here, to Western North Carolina, to help their fellow Americans?”
Most of that sentiment is justified. But the faithful will never believe it’s their own damn fault. Based on the huge AOC Bernie rallies, the dems have opinions that are lost on most voters…
” Can anyone explain to me why democrats are flying to other countries to help illegal immigrant criminals…
…but none of them came here, to Western North Carolina, to help their fellow Americans?”
Most of that sentiment is justified. But the faithful will never believe it’s their own damn fault. Based on the huge AOC Bernie rallies, the dems have opinions that are lost on most voters…
The senator that flew to El Salvador was doing so on behalf of one of his constituents, whose husband (never been convicted of a crime), is jailed with no way out. So no, that statement isn't "justified", it's bullshit. And you've now lost your ability to see through bs and false equivalency.
And btw, now the SCOTUS has halted deportations under the Alien Act.
” Can anyone explain to me why democrats are flying to other countries to help illegal immigrant criminals…
…but none of them came here, to Western North Carolina, to help their fellow Americans?”
Most of that sentiment is justified. But the faithful will never believe it’s their own damn fault. Based on the huge AOC Bernie rallies, the dems have opinions that are lost on most voters…
The senator that flew to El Salvador was doing so on behalf of one of his constituents, whose husband (never been convicted of a crime), is jailed with no way out. So no, that statement isn't "justified", it's bullshit. And you've now lost your ability to see through bs and false equivalency.
And btw, now the SCOTUS has halted deportations under the Alien Act.
” Can anyone explain to me why democrats are flying to other countries to help illegal immigrant criminals…
…but none of them came here, to Western North Carolina, to help their fellow Americans?”
Most of that sentiment is justified. But the faithful will never believe it’s their own damn fault. Based on the huge AOC Bernie rallies, the dems have opinions that are lost on most voters…
The Brandon administration was on the ground offering assistance and the repub conspiracy machine convinced folks not to sign up or take advantage of FEMA assistance. Something about a gubmint plot to steal their land. Only 17% of those eligible for FEMA assistance signed up. Regarding infrastructure, you get what you vote for. Elections have consequences and stupid won. No sympathy.
But 30,000 ft view, it also takes time to clean up after a disaster of this magnitude. Especially in the more rural areas. Plus people are trying to deal with (what’s left of) FEMA, insurance companies, local governance. As hard and as frustrating as it is, it takes time.
But that’s the beauty and detriment of social media. Some asshole like that Twitter account (I saw it on Bluesky as well, so it’s a coordinated shitpost) can do a drive by post, lobbing some meat to the wolves, and then be on their way to stir up shit elsewhere.
There’s a reasoned and well executed ‘hey here’s an issue that needs to be dealt with’ way posting. That ain’t it.
” Can anyone explain to me why democrats are flying to other countries to help illegal immigrant criminals…
…but none of them came here, to Western North Carolina, to help their fellow Americans?”
Most of that sentiment is justified. But the faithful will never believe it’s their own damn fault. Based on the huge AOC Bernie rallies, the dems have opinions that are lost on most voters…
Comments
1996; 9/28 New York
1997: 11/14 Oakland, 11/15 Oakland
1998: 7/5 Dallas, 7/7 Albuquerque, 7/8 Phoenix, 7/10 San Diego, 7/11 Las Vegas
2000: 10/17 Dallas
2003: 4/3 OKC
2012: 11/17 Tulsa(EV), 11/18 Tulsa(EV)
2013: 11/16 OKC
2014: 10/8 Tulsa
2022: 9/20 OKC
2023: 9/13 Ft Worth, 9/15 Ft Worth
1996; 9/28 New York
1997: 11/14 Oakland, 11/15 Oakland
1998: 7/5 Dallas, 7/7 Albuquerque, 7/8 Phoenix, 7/10 San Diego, 7/11 Las Vegas
2000: 10/17 Dallas
2003: 4/3 OKC
2012: 11/17 Tulsa(EV), 11/18 Tulsa(EV)
2013: 11/16 OKC
2014: 10/8 Tulsa
2022: 9/20 OKC
2023: 9/13 Ft Worth, 9/15 Ft Worth
” Can anyone explain to me why democrats are flying to other countries to help illegal immigrant criminals…
Most of that sentiment is justified. But the faithful will never believe it’s their own damn fault. Based on the huge AOC Bernie rallies, the dems have opinions that are lost on most voters…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9N5knQaO-0
1996; 9/28 New York
1997: 11/14 Oakland, 11/15 Oakland
1998: 7/5 Dallas, 7/7 Albuquerque, 7/8 Phoenix, 7/10 San Diego, 7/11 Las Vegas
2000: 10/17 Dallas
2003: 4/3 OKC
2012: 11/17 Tulsa(EV), 11/18 Tulsa(EV)
2013: 11/16 OKC
2014: 10/8 Tulsa
2022: 9/20 OKC
2023: 9/13 Ft Worth, 9/15 Ft Worth
And btw, now the SCOTUS has halted deportations under the Alien Act.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
always on here having to point fingers at the dems, when the dems do not have any power, and they are the ones actually trying to fucking help people.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©