Ticket prices. This is not for you (the fans).
Options
Comments
-
Foriginal Sin said:I remember when a dime bag only cost a dime.
The price of the ticket is the price of the ticket. Not sure what’s happened in Europe but minimum wage in the U.S. has tripled since 1995. If you got a $40 ticket back then at Min Wage it was basically an 8 hour shift without taking out taxes. Tickets are $200 now or $25/hour of work in an 8 hour day. Most PJ fans are post 40 I assume and if you aren’t making at least $25/hour you’ve probably made a lot of poor career choices. The band has to pay a crew and it ain’t the same pay rate as it was in 1995 either. There are a lot of things I would love to do but cannot afford, I’m not going to Bora Bora’s message board to complain about how expensive it costs to get therePost edited by Shibari on0 -
. It is doubtful that the higher prices will benefit the band and your foundation. Ticketmaster sells tickets for €170, Eventim, a comparable company in Germany that is also not friendly, sells tickets in Berlin for €120. I highly doubt that the difference will benefit the band and its employees. Rather, it's purely TM's profit margin. We remember that they only sell tickets and wanted shipping costs even for online tickets.
2. I like the approach... anyone who doesn't make $25 an hour has made bad decisions in their life. It shows how empathetic people can be. The band once stood for everyone being able to afford their concerts, they even sued TM for it. Thanks to the well-known corrupt politics and judiciary in the USA, they lost......, we see the result today...... Art that they are only the middle class, which doesn't exist in the USA anyway, and rich can afford. The fact that the USA is known for not even having two jobs to live on is ignored. The constant advertising on NFL Network for Feeding America should shame a rich country like you. But surely they all made bad decisions. I hope for your sake that you are never affected by something that is beyond your control......stroke, chronic illness, being born poor etc...
3. You hardly see a younger audience because they simply can't afford it anymore. They save everything for one Harry Styles for 350 a ticket. How many bands can they still see?
0 -
Lerxst1992 said:I understand I am in the belly of the beast. Here are the loyalists of a terrible system. But the system is loved here because some are benefiting thousands of dollars each tour off of “market rates” and most of the money spent is being sent to airlines and hotels.
I say let’s have PJ recoup that income. One need to look no further at pj premium and broker sites to understand that every ten c ticket in high demand markets is sold at a massive discount off “market rates”, using the words or our legendary band. Argue with the band, that’s their words. A discount so massive is a price control.
simple solution.
step 1. For high demand shows, charge GA $325 and p1 $270. That’s way below “market rate.” Keep p2 at current prices. Keep tenure process.
step 2. Take 10% of inventory from buckets (verified, platinum and 10 c-3% each) and have a lottery losers bracket silent auction, minimum bid $325
That should drive odds from 5% to over 50%. Brings desire to spend in line with market rate. Will balance supply v demand.
Anyone choosing to slam this “proposal” please attest they’ve never spent $500+ on travel and incidentals for a $120 PJ ticket. I say PJ deserves some of that revenue.
Edit, since they now play two shows in high demand markets, price one at existing prices and the second one with a new procedure
0 -
demetrios said:
March 1:
Post edited by SHZA on0 -
josevolution said:I wonder if the band reads or knows about the disgruntled fans or even care anymore! Or maybe they don’t have a clue on what’s happening with this issue 🤔
Jose, they care, but it is a different industry now and I think they signed off on that.0 -
Get_Right said:josevolution said:I wonder if the band reads or knows about the disgruntled fans or even care anymore! Or maybe they don’t have a clue on what’s happening with this issue 🤔
Jose, they care, but it is a different industry now and I think they signed off on that.jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
JD87070 said:Lerxst1992 said:I understand I am in the belly of the beast. Here are the loyalists of a terrible system. But the system is loved here because some are benefiting thousands of dollars each tour off of “market rates” and most of the money spent is being sent to airlines and hotels.
I say let’s have PJ recoup that income. One need to look no further at pj premium and broker sites to understand that every ten c ticket in high demand markets is sold at a massive discount off “market rates”, using the words or our legendary band. Argue with the band, that’s their words. A discount so massive is a price control.
simple solution.
step 1. For high demand shows, charge GA $325 and p1 $270. That’s way below “market rate.” Keep p2 at current prices. Keep tenure process.
step 2. Take 10% of inventory from buckets (verified, platinum and 10 c-3% each) and have a lottery losers bracket silent auction, minimum bid $325
That should drive odds from 5% to over 50%. Brings desire to spend in line with market rate. Will balance supply v demand.
Anyone choosing to slam this “proposal” please attest they’ve never spent $500+ on travel and incidentals for a $120 PJ ticket. I say PJ deserves some of that revenue.
Edit, since they now play two shows in high demand markets, price one at existing prices and the second one with a new procedure
Its not a " piece" ....Half the revenue earned from the NY shows are from variable pricing/premium tickets. At least half. The tickets are selling because PJ has created desperation in the market.
I'm not sure fans understand how the new priority rules screwed New Yorkers by cutting odds probably 75% lower than past tours with 2 shows, so odds for a NY show could have been around 3%
Fans don't seem to understand the impact on "market rates" by having so many "unfulfilled" NYers
Were the new priority rules drawn up to maximize market rates in NY?
So if half the money they earn on that msg stage is from market rates, then yes, the ticketing system needs to do everything it can to be fair to new york0 -
Lerxst1992 said:JD87070 said:Lerxst1992 said:I understand I am in the belly of the beast. Here are the loyalists of a terrible system. But the system is loved here because some are benefiting thousands of dollars each tour off of “market rates” and most of the money spent is being sent to airlines and hotels.
I say let’s have PJ recoup that income. One need to look no further at pj premium and broker sites to understand that every ten c ticket in high demand markets is sold at a massive discount off “market rates”, using the words or our legendary band. Argue with the band, that’s their words. A discount so massive is a price control.
simple solution.
step 1. For high demand shows, charge GA $325 and p1 $270. That’s way below “market rate.” Keep p2 at current prices. Keep tenure process.
step 2. Take 10% of inventory from buckets (verified, platinum and 10 c-3% each) and have a lottery losers bracket silent auction, minimum bid $325
That should drive odds from 5% to over 50%. Brings desire to spend in line with market rate. Will balance supply v demand.
Anyone choosing to slam this “proposal” please attest they’ve never spent $500+ on travel and incidentals for a $120 PJ ticket. I say PJ deserves some of that revenue.
Edit, since they now play two shows in high demand markets, price one at existing prices and the second one with a new procedure
Its not a " piece" ....Half the revenue earned from the NY shows are from variable pricing/premium tickets. At least half. The tickets are selling because PJ has created desperation in the market.
I'm not sure fans understand how the new priority rules screwed New Yorkers by cutting odds probably 75% lower than past tours with 2 shows, so odds for a NY show could have been around 3%
Fans don't seem to understand the impact on "market rates" by having so many "unfulfilled" NYers
Were the new priority rules drawn up to maximize market rates in NY?
So if half the money they earn on that msg stage is from market rates, then yes, the ticketing system needs to do everything it can to be fair to new york0 -
20 pages.
All we need to do is realize that the Pearl Jam that was trying to keep ticket prices as low as possible is gone. Long freaking gone. THey've done a great thing for the fan club members to keep those prices reasonable compared to the rest of the ticket prices. But you aren't seeing 1995 Pearl Jam, you are seeing 2024 Pearl Jam.
You ask them to charge $110 a ticket. The scalper will buy it and sell it for $300. Makes zero sense for the band to sell the ticket for $110. I think they could possibly consider it if they knew fans were buying it and not scalping it, but that isn't how the system works anymore and they have to play inside the system. So, I think the band is happy that they can at least get 10-20% of the venue filled with 10c members paying reasonable prices and the other 80 to 90% is a free for all to all who can afford it.
If we had a choice, I think most of us would want to see a 1993 Pearl Jam show over a 2024 Pearl Jam show. Go find that new artist that fits that rising star category if you want to pay $65 for a ticket to a concert. If you want to see the legendary rock band in the late stages of their careers playing shows, then open up the wallet. They kept prices reasonable compared to their peers for a long, long time. Don't fault them for cashing in some.0 -
Flights to California: $600 x 2 = $1,200
3 nights hotel: $250 x 3 = $750
Other transit: $150
Total Price of Trip before Pearl Jam = $2,100
Pearl Jam increases prices $50 on their tickets. F you Pearl Jam, I can't afford that!0 -
bootlegger10 said:Flights to California: $600 x 2 = $1,200
3 nights hotel: $250 x 3 = $750
Other transit: $150
Total Price of Trip before Pearl Jam = $2,100
Pearl Jam increases prices $50 on their tickets. F you Pearl Jam, I can't afford that!
I also came across a comment about how touring costs would be a financial struggle. Had to double-check if I was reading The Onion.
I know an easy way to save 100% on all these costs.0 -
For those of you who read German: in today’s Sueddeutsche Zeitung a thoroughly written article about ticket pricing (that also quotes this forum) comes to the conclusion that we have to say goodbye to the distant ideal that popular music remains a good from which no one should be excluded.0
-
0 -
Danke für den Artikel.0
-
Zen23 said:Danke für den Artikel.0
-
maximumlawman said:0
-
Small translation service on my part. The most important passages. Although the title "My ticket, my ruin" and the caption under Mr. Vedder's photo say it all.
"It is first and foremost the artists who determine with their management what income they expect from a tour." Eddie Vedder.
Other interesting points:
With Pearl Jam, however, you have to bear in mind that some of the fans traditionally travel after the band and so have to buy tickets for several concerts. The fan club offers limited special prices for this, but even these are now too expensive for many. Some fans have therefore announced that after decades they will break with the traveling around. They simply couldn't afford it anymore.
"Pearl Jam, you've completely lost your way," wrote British user Chris-Drake88 in a much-noticed post on the official fan club forum. "Unlike before, you are no longer a band of the people." You can find that overly self-pitying, but the question has not been chewed over yet. If even Pearl Jam, who peddle their commitment to inclusive prices and don't offer flying disco horses or LED show stairs, charge over 170 euros for the bad seats - is that really just down to the system? Or what else?
There are no answers from the companies that have organized the group's tours now and in the past. Inquiries as to how the prices were arrived at, whether there is a dynamic pricing principle in Germany (as in the USA) and how ticket companies, promoters and artists divide up the proceeds are rejected or ignored.
Johannes Everke, Managing Director of the Federal Association of the Concert and Event Industry: "It would also be wrong to blame the ticket retailers. First and foremost, it is the artists and their management who determine what revenue they expect from a tour. What the individual tickets cost is then determined by what the organizers and artists agree on in view of the overall costs." This means that Pearl Jam also cross-finance the 200-euro seats in Berlin to a certain extent with the tickets, which the algorithm in the USA sometimes pushes up to over 1000 dollars.Post edited by Zen23 on0 -
bootlegger10 said:20 pages.
All we need to do is realize that the Pearl Jam that was trying to keep ticket prices as low as possible is gone. Long freaking gone. THey've done a great thing for the fan club members to keep those prices reasonable compared to the rest of the ticket prices. But you aren't seeing 1995 Pearl Jam, you are seeing 2024 Pearl Jam.
You ask them to charge $110 a ticket. The scalper will buy it and sell it for $300. Makes zero sense for the band to sell the ticket for $110. I think they could possibly consider it if they knew fans were buying it and not scalping it, but that isn't how the system works anymore and they have to play inside the system. So, I think the band is happy that they can at least get 10-20% of the venue filled with 10c members paying reasonable prices and the other 80 to 90% is a free for all to all who can afford it.
If we had a choice, I think most of us would want to see a 1993 Pearl Jam show over a 2024 Pearl Jam show. Go find that new artist that fits that rising star category if you want to pay $65 for a ticket to a concert. If you want to see the legendary rock band in the late stages of their careers playing shows, then open up the wallet. They kept prices reasonable compared to their peers for a long, long time. Don't fault them for cashing in some.0 -
maximumlawman said:For those of you who read German: in today’s Sueddeutsche Zeitung a thoroughly written article about ticket pricing (that also quotes this forum) comes to the conclusion that we have to say goodbye to the distant ideal that popular music remains a good from which no one should be excluded.0
-
pjl44 said:maximumlawman said:For those of you who read German: in today’s Sueddeutsche Zeitung a thoroughly written article about ticket pricing (that also quotes this forum) comes to the conclusion that we have to say goodbye to the distant ideal that popular music remains a good from which no one should be excluded.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 272 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.6K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help