Groomers aka sexual predators
Comments
- 
            Lol. Is it the drag thing? Racist people is trying to make it a thing in sweden to fuel the voter base and have something new to attack. Imported wholesale from the (Obviously racist) right in the US.
 ZZZ.
 Hasnt really been fruitfull in Sweden yet though. So they are back to hating windpower and saying that there is no climate crisis."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
- 
            
 Glad to see Sweden is like a mini-US.Spiritual_Chaos said:Lol. Is it the drag thing? Racist people is trying to make it a thing in sweden to fuel the voter base and have something new to attack. Imported wholesale from the (Obviously racist) right in the US.
 ZZZ.
 Hasnt really been fruitfull in Sweden yet though. So they are back to hating windpower and saying that there is no climate crisis.0
- 
            tempo_n_groove said:
 Watch it, they'll lash you for agreeing w me!brianlux said:tempo_n_groove said:
 I'm all for a nationwide ban actually. Those things creep me out... If your kids are in them I don't know how you do it.Merkin Baller said:
 Has the state of Florida banned children's beauty pageants yet?I'm with you. Doing this to your kid is just wrong in my book: No worries, as long as they lash me to the beat!mrussel1 said: No worries, as long as they lash me to the beat!mrussel1 said:
 Don't be a victim. Maybe your sarcasm isn't so obvious.tempo_n_groove said:
 Watch it, they'll lash you for agreeing w me!brianlux said:tempo_n_groove said:
 I'm all for a nationwide ban actually. Those things creep me out... If your kids are in them I don't know how you do it.Merkin Baller said:
 Has the state of Florida banned children's beauty pageants yet?I'm with you. Doing this to your kid is just wrong in my book: 
 I think he's trying to keep it light, M.
 "It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0
- 
            brianlux said:tempo_n_groove said:
 Watch it, they'll lash you for agreeing w me!brianlux said:tempo_n_groove said:
 I'm all for a nationwide ban actually. Those things creep me out... If your kids are in them I don't know how you do it.Merkin Baller said:
 Has the state of Florida banned children's beauty pageants yet?I'm with you. Doing this to your kid is just wrong in my book: No worries, as long as they lash me to the beat!mrussel1 said: No worries, as long as they lash me to the beat!mrussel1 said:
 Don't be a victim. Maybe your sarcasm isn't so obvious.tempo_n_groove said:
 Watch it, they'll lash you for agreeing w me!brianlux said:tempo_n_groove said:
 I'm all for a nationwide ban actually. Those things creep me out... If your kids are in them I don't know how you do it.Merkin Baller said:
 Has the state of Florida banned children's beauty pageants yet?I'm with you. Doing this to your kid is just wrong in my book: 
 I think he's trying to keep it light, M. 
 0
- 
            
 good lord. you can tag people for a reason. I've been tagged and I've tagged multiple people here for their specific stance on a given subject. never once have I seen anyone cry foul over it.JB16057 said:
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."Halifax2TheMax said:Asking a poster a relevant question regarding posts they’ve made is now a personal attack? Wow.
 kat Can you clarify? At what point is this personal since I'm the one being singled out here?Post edited by Kat onYour boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
- 
            
 I always wondered what type of person flags a thread. Now I know.HughFreakingDillon said:
 good lord. you can tag people for a reason. I've been tagged and I've tagged multiple people here for their specific stance on a given subject. never once have I seen anyone cry foul over it.JB16057 said:
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."Halifax2TheMax said:Asking a poster a relevant question regarding posts they’ve made is now a personal attack? Wow.
 kat Can you clarify? At what point is this personal since I'm the one being singled out here?Post edited by Kat on0
- 
            Victimhood is a staple of the MAGA movement.0
- 
            
 tagging and flagging are different. no flag by metempo_n_groove said:
 I always wondered what type of person flags a thread. Now I know.HughFreakingDillon said:
 good lord. you can tag people for a reason. I've been tagged and I've tagged multiple people here for their specific stance on a given subject. never once have I seen anyone cry foul over it.JB16057 said:
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."Halifax2TheMax said:Asking a poster a relevant question regarding posts they’ve made is now a personal attack? Wow.
 kat Can you clarify? At what point is this personal since I'm the one being singled out here?Post edited by Kat onYour boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
- 
            
 Even racists can google ”best practise”mrussel1 said:
 Glad to see Sweden is like a mini-US.Spiritual_Chaos said:Lol. Is it the drag thing? Racist people is trying to make it a thing in sweden to fuel the voter base and have something new to attack. Imported wholesale from the (Obviously racist) right in the US.
 ZZZ.
 Hasnt really been fruitfull in Sweden yet though. So they are back to hating windpower and saying that there is no climate crisis. "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
- 
            
 Tag an admin is the same thing.HughFreakingDillon said:
 tagging and flagging are different. no flag by metempo_n_groove said:
 I always wondered what type of person flags a thread. Now I know.HughFreakingDillon said:
 good lord. you can tag people for a reason. I've been tagged and I've tagged multiple people here for their specific stance on a given subject. never once have I seen anyone cry foul over it.JB16057 said:
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."Halifax2TheMax said:Asking a poster a relevant question regarding posts they’ve made is now a personal attack? Wow.
 kat Can you clarify? At what point is this personal since I'm the one being singled out here?Post edited by Kat on0
- 
            
 I thought you meant I had flagged the thread.tempo_n_groove said:
 Tag an admin is the same thing.HughFreakingDillon said:
 tagging and flagging are different. no flag by metempo_n_groove said:
 I always wondered what type of person flags a thread. Now I know.HughFreakingDillon said:
 good lord. you can tag people for a reason. I've been tagged and I've tagged multiple people here for their specific stance on a given subject. never once have I seen anyone cry foul over it.JB16057 said:
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."Halifax2TheMax said:Asking a poster a relevant question regarding posts they’ve made is now a personal attack? Wow.
 kat Can you clarify? At what point is this personal since I'm the one being singled out here?Post edited by Kat onYour boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
- 
            
 Hell no. I know you don't do that crap.HughFreakingDillon said:
 I thought you meant I had flagged the thread.tempo_n_groove said:
 Tag an admin is the same thing.HughFreakingDillon said:
 tagging and flagging are different. no flag by metempo_n_groove said:
 I always wondered what type of person flags a thread. Now I know.HughFreakingDillon said:
 good lord. you can tag people for a reason. I've been tagged and I've tagged multiple people here for their specific stance on a given subject. never once have I seen anyone cry foul over it.JB16057 said:
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."Halifax2TheMax said:Asking a poster a relevant question regarding posts they’ve made is now a personal attack? Wow.
 kat Can you clarify? At what point is this personal since I'm the one being singled out here?Post edited by Kat on0
- 
            tempo_n_groove said:
 Hell no. I know you don't do that crap.HughFreakingDillon said:
 I thought you meant I had flagged the thread.tempo_n_groove said:
 Tag an admin is the same thing.HughFreakingDillon said:
 tagging and flagging are different. no flag by metempo_n_groove said:
 I always wondered what type of person flags a thread. Now I know.HughFreakingDillon said:
 good lord. you can tag people for a reason. I've been tagged and I've tagged multiple people here for their specific stance on a given subject. never once have I seen anyone cry foul over it.JB16057 said:
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."Halifax2TheMax said:Asking a poster a relevant question regarding posts they’ve made is now a personal attack? Wow.
 kat Can you clarify? At what point is this personal since I'm the one being singled out here?
 Reported (for naughty language).
 "It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0
- 
            
 Yet the admins went through and deleted all of the tags.... hmmm.... I was tagged 1 week after my last comment on this thread and was asked my personal opinion on a subject I wasn't talking about.HughFreakingDillon said:
 good lord. you can tag people for a reason. I've been tagged and I've tagged multiple people here for their specific stance on a given subject. never once have I seen anyone cry foul over it.JB16057 said:
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."Halifax2TheMax said:Asking a poster a relevant question regarding posts they’ve made is now a personal attack? Wow.
 kat Can you clarify? At what point is this personal since I'm the one being singled out here?
 Nothing to see here....0
- 
            But the humanity.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
 Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
 Brilliantati©0
- 
            mickeyrat said:JB16057 said:
 But I am being singled out for no relevant reason.....mickeyrat said:JB16057 said:
 Neither. Why do you have to personally attack me?mrussel1 said:Hey JB128716 do you think we should ban children from Christianity in total, or just Catholicism?
 https://wtop.com/national/2023/05/illinois-attorney-general-to-discuss-investigation-of-catholic-clergy-sexual-abuse/
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."asking your opinion is attacking you?we ARE talking about the safety and well being of children, no? A stance I recall you being for?I think the relevance was the recent discussion surrounding the link you shared of Washington states legislation about gender affirming care?this isnt a logical extension of that?
 so no repsonse to the first quote?JB16057 said:
 Yet the admins went through and deleted all of the tags.... hmmm.... I was tagged 1 week after my last comment on this thread and was asked my personal opinion on a subject I wasn't talking about.HughFreakingDillon said:
 good lord. you can tag people for a reason. I've been tagged and I've tagged multiple people here for their specific stance on a given subject. never once have I seen anyone cry foul over it.JB16057 said:
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."Halifax2TheMax said:Asking a poster a relevant question regarding posts they’ve made is now a personal attack? Wow.
 kat Can you clarify? At what point is this personal since I'm the one being singled out here?
 Nothing to see here....
 _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
 Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
 you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
 memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
 another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140
- 
            _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
 Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
 you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
 memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
 another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140
- 
            
 because you whined. the mods do that. in all my years here, I've never seen someone cry about being tagged when someone asked a question, no matter how old the comment or even if there was a gross misrepresentation of their position.JB16057 said:
 Yet the admins went through and deleted all of the tags.... hmmm.... I was tagged 1 week after my last comment on this thread and was asked my personal opinion on a subject I wasn't talking about.HughFreakingDillon said:
 good lord. you can tag people for a reason. I've been tagged and I've tagged multiple people here for their specific stance on a given subject. never once have I seen anyone cry foul over it.JB16057 said:
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."Halifax2TheMax said:Asking a poster a relevant question regarding posts they’ve made is now a personal attack? Wow.
 kat Can you clarify? At what point is this personal since I'm the one being singled out here?
 Nothing to see here....Post edited by Kat onYour boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
- 
            
 The reason why that rule is in place is for exactly this situation. It's one thing to have an ongoing conversation but to call me out a week later was only to try and catch me in a "gotcha" moment. The question was not relevant to what I was talking about. Why didn't they ask anyone else the same exact question? Because they were trying to make it personal.HughFreakingDillon said:
 because you whined. the mods do that. in all my years here, I've never seen someone cry about being tagged when someone asked a question, no matter how old the comment or even if there was a gross misrepresentation of their position.JB16057 said:
 Yet the admins went through and deleted all of the tags.... hmmm.... I was tagged 1 week after my last comment on this thread and was asked my personal opinion on a subject I wasn't talking about.HughFreakingDillon said:
 good lord. you can tag people for a reason. I've been tagged and I've tagged multiple people here for their specific stance on a given subject. never once have I seen anyone cry foul over it.JB16057 said:
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."Halifax2TheMax said:Asking a poster a relevant question regarding posts they’ve made is now a personal attack? Wow.
 kat Can you clarify? At what point is this personal since I'm the one being singled out here?
 Nothing to see here....
 The rules are the rules so sorry if I "whined" and want the rules to apply to everyone, which they clearly do not. Once again, you are discussing the person, not the topic.
 Post edited by Kat on0
- 
            
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."mickeyrat said:mickeyrat said:JB16057 said:
 But I am being singled out for no relevant reason.....mickeyrat said:JB16057 said:
 Neither. Why do you have to personally attack me?mrussel1 said:Hey JB128716 do you think we should ban children from Christianity in total, or just Catholicism?
 https://wtop.com/national/2023/05/illinois-attorney-general-to-discuss-investigation-of-catholic-clergy-sexual-abuse/
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."asking your opinion is attacking you?we ARE talking about the safety and well being of children, no? A stance I recall you being for?I think the relevance was the recent discussion surrounding the link you shared of Washington states legislation about gender affirming care?this isnt a logical extension of that?
 so no repsonse to the first quote?JB16057 said:
 Yet the admins went through and deleted all of the tags.... hmmm.... I was tagged 1 week after my last comment on this thread and was asked my personal opinion on a subject I wasn't talking about.HughFreakingDillon said:
 good lord. you can tag people for a reason. I've been tagged and I've tagged multiple people here for their specific stance on a given subject. never once have I seen anyone cry foul over it.JB16057 said:
 "Discuss the topic, not the people discussing the topic. No personal comments."Halifax2TheMax said:Asking a poster a relevant question regarding posts they’ve made is now a personal attack? Wow.
 kat Can you clarify? At what point is this personal since I'm the one being singled out here?
 Nothing to see here....
 0
This discussion has been closed.
            Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help



 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WGVgfjnLqc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WGVgfjnLqc



