Hillary won more votes for President

1…270271273275276…488

Comments

  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    edited October 2016
    Heller vs DC dealt with voting rights? WTF?

    Read into Heller. It also clearly states that gun ownership is NOT unlimited. The gov't can regulate it.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    unsung said:

    rgambs said:

    unsung said:

    mrussel1 said:

    unsung said:

    I'm really starting to believe that we to enact standards on voting based on these two candidates.

    That sounds Constitutional.
    It's in there, right next to gun control.
    Right after "well-regulated"?
    What kind of twisted logic ignores those words printed explicitly and inserts some imaginary ones about voting control?
    What kind ignores art 1 sec VIII where it states expressly what federal powers the federal government has?
    Taht has zero to do with your argument for literacy tests and poll taxes. That's covered under the equal protection clause.
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,117
    rgambs said:

    mcgruff10 said:

    rgambs said:

    unsung said:

    mrussel1 said:

    unsung said:

    I'm really starting to believe that we to enact standards on voting based on these two candidates.

    That sounds Constitutional.
    It's in there, right next to gun control.
    Right after "well-regulated"?
    What kind of twisted logic ignores those words printed explicitly and inserts some imaginary ones about voting control?
    heller disagrees with you
    Heller isn't in the Constitution.
    So we shouldn't respect Supreme Court decisions?
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,117
    mrussel1 said:

    Heller vs DC dealt with voting rights? WTF?

    Read into Heller. It also clearly states that gun ownership is NOT unlimited. The gov't can regulate it.

    Who said heller dealt with voting rights?
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    mcgruff10 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Heller vs DC dealt with voting rights? WTF?

    Read into Heller. It also clearly states that gun ownership is NOT unlimited. The gov't can regulate it.

    Who said heller dealt with voting rights?
    I made the statement earlier that voting needed "common-sense" reform.

    Why it is being tied to this is a bit unclear to me.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    mcgruff10 said:

    rgambs said:

    mcgruff10 said:

    rgambs said:

    unsung said:

    mrussel1 said:

    unsung said:

    I'm really starting to believe that we to enact standards on voting based on these two candidates.

    That sounds Constitutional.
    It's in there, right next to gun control.
    Right after "well-regulated"?
    What kind of twisted logic ignores those words printed explicitly and inserts some imaginary ones about voting control?
    heller disagrees with you
    Heller isn't in the Constitution.
    So we shouldn't respect Supreme Court decisions?
    We're confusing arguments. Unsung argued for a literacy test. I said that was addressed in Harper and it was clearly illegal under the 14th Amendment. He said "it's right in there next to gun control".

    So yes, I think we all respect the SCOTUS decisions. That's why our gov't works still.
    1. Poll taxes and literacy tests are clearly illegal (Harper)
    2. It's unconstitutional for the District to ban firearms (Heller)
    3. Gov't can constitutionally limit ownership (Heller)
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    mcgruff10 said:

    rgambs said:

    mcgruff10 said:

    rgambs said:

    unsung said:

    mrussel1 said:

    unsung said:

    I'm really starting to believe that we to enact standards on voting based on these two candidates.

    That sounds Constitutional.
    It's in there, right next to gun control.
    Right after "well-regulated"?
    What kind of twisted logic ignores those words printed explicitly and inserts some imaginary ones about voting control?
    heller disagrees with you
    Heller isn't in the Constitution.
    So we shouldn't respect Supreme Court decisions?
    Actually I don't put much faith in them anymore.

    If you have a three headed snake how can I expect one head to keep the other two in line? They are all the same snake.
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,117
    mrussel1 said:

    mcgruff10 said:

    rgambs said:

    mcgruff10 said:

    rgambs said:

    unsung said:

    mrussel1 said:

    unsung said:

    I'm really starting to believe that we to enact standards on voting based on these two candidates.

    That sounds Constitutional.
    It's in there, right next to gun control.
    Right after "well-regulated"?
    What kind of twisted logic ignores those words printed explicitly and inserts some imaginary ones about voting control?
    heller disagrees with you
    Heller isn't in the Constitution.
    So we shouldn't respect Supreme Court decisions?
    We're confusing arguments. Unsung argued for a literacy test. I said that was addressed in Harper and it was clearly illegal under the 14th Amendment. He said "it's right in there next to gun control".

    So yes, I think we all respect the SCOTUS decisions. That's why our gov't works still.
    1. Poll taxes and literacy tests are clearly illegal (Harper)
    2. It's unconstitutional for the District to ban firearms (Heller)
    3. Gov't can constitutionally limit ownership (Heller)
    Ok that makes sense.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,117
    unsung said:

    mcgruff10 said:

    rgambs said:

    mcgruff10 said:

    rgambs said:

    unsung said:

    mrussel1 said:

    unsung said:

    I'm really starting to believe that we to enact standards on voting based on these two candidates.

    That sounds Constitutional.
    It's in there, right next to gun control.
    Right after "well-regulated"?
    What kind of twisted logic ignores those words printed explicitly and inserts some imaginary ones about voting control?
    heller disagrees with you
    Heller isn't in the Constitution.
    So we shouldn't respect Supreme Court decisions?
    Actually I don't put much faith in them anymore.

    If you have a three headed snake how can I expect one head to keep the other two in line? They are all the same snake.
    where are you from unsung? just asking, nothing behind it.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    Illinois
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,117
    unsung said:

    Illinois

    Very cool! Come to new jersey and I'll show you some real pizza!! ;)
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    Fuck that! Deep dish>>>NY style pizza

    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    mcgruff10 said:

    unsung said:

    Illinois

    Very cool! Come to new jersey and I'll show you some real pizza!! ;)
    Damn, shits getting real.

  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    ledvedderman said:

    Fuck that! Deep dish>>>NY style pizza

    As if there is competition. Deep dish > all.

    For me, nothing beats Giordano's stuffed pizza. It's good they quit delivering to my area.
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,117
    unsung said:

    mcgruff10 said:

    unsung said:

    Illinois

    Very cool! Come to new jersey and I'll show you some real pizza!! ;)
    Damn, shits getting real.

    Hell yeah bro! Step into my world. Once you go thin crust you never go back. Who the hell cuts pizza with a knive and fork?! Fold that slice!
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    unsung said:

    ledvedderman said:

    Fuck that! Deep dish>>>NY style pizza

    As if there is competition. Deep dish > all.

    For me, nothing beats Giordano's stuffed pizza. It's good they quit delivering to my area.
    A couple of months ago I went to a place in Bucktown that had amazing deep dish. I'd rival it with Giordano's. Same with a place a couple hours south of Chicago in Bloomington. Stolfa's...good shit.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    unsung said:

    ledvedderman said:

    Fuck that! Deep dish>>>NY style pizza

    As if there is competition. Deep dish > all.

    For me, nothing beats Giordano's stuffed pizza. It's good they quit delivering to my area.
    Agreed. I think it's much better than Lou's.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    A perfect nightcap to some good Chicago deep dish, Johnny Walker Blue and a Grand Reserve Gurkha!
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    The thinner the crust, the better.
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    You've crossed the line there, Free. Thems fightin' words
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
This discussion has been closed.

Categories