Hillary won more votes for President

1…234235237239240…488

Comments

  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,457
    mrussel1 said:

    rssesq said:

    Dat da one.
    like I said, this 2 party system has given us some real winners to select from.
    Good night And Good luck America

    See ya! Can't wait for the next value add post.
    I'm pretty sure that next value add post will have a defamatory reference to the "Rothschilds" "Dershowitz" and the Federal Reserve Board. Lol lfmao roflmao

    :tired_face:
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,884
    edited September 2016
    BS44325 said:

    Victim shaming

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/enabler-or-family-defender-how-hillary-clinton-responded-to-husbands-accusers/2016/09/28/58dad5d4-6fb1-11e6-8533-6b0b0ded0253_story.html

    Hell hath no fury. Would your wife empathize with your mistress or would she be pissed as hell at both of you? And which one would she forgive first?
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,372
    mrussel1 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Victim shaming

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/enabler-or-family-defender-how-hillary-clinton-responded-to-husbands-accusers/2016/09/28/58dad5d4-6fb1-11e6-8533-6b0b0ded0253_story.html

    Hell hath no fury. Would your wife empathize with your mistress or would she be pissed as hell at both of you? And which one would she forgive first?
    In the neocon household the mistress is the slut, the wife is barefoot and pregnant and in the kitchen and the husband should be forgiven because he sinned before Jesus.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    mrussel1 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Victim shaming

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/enabler-or-family-defender-how-hillary-clinton-responded-to-husbands-accusers/2016/09/28/58dad5d4-6fb1-11e6-8533-6b0b0ded0253_story.html

    Hell hath no fury. Would your wife empathize with your mistress or would she be pissed as hell at both of you? And which one would she forgive first?
    She would leave me. Also she certainly wouldn't empathize with my mistress but she definitely wouldn't shame her for the benefit of my career either. Finally if there was a rape victim in the mix my wife probably make sure my ass went to jail and would make sure the victim got all the help she needs.
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    Halifax2TheMax said:

    mrussel1 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Victim shaming

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/enabler-or-family-defender-how-hillary-clinton-responded-to-husbands-accusers/2016/09/28/58dad5d4-6fb1-11e6-8533-6b0b0ded0253_story.html

    Hell hath no fury. Would your wife empathize with your mistress or would she be pissed as hell at both of you? And which one would she forgive first?
    In the neocon household the mistress is the slut, the wife is barefoot and pregnant and in the kitchen and the husband should be forgiven because he sinned before Jesus.
    I'm starting to realize that you don't even know what a neocon is.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,884
    BS44325 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Victim shaming

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/enabler-or-family-defender-how-hillary-clinton-responded-to-husbands-accusers/2016/09/28/58dad5d4-6fb1-11e6-8533-6b0b0ded0253_story.html

    Hell hath no fury. Would your wife empathize with your mistress or would she be pissed as hell at both of you? And which one would she forgive first?
    She would leave me. Also she certainly wouldn't empathize with my mistress but she definitely wouldn't shame her for the benefit of my career either. Finally if there was a rape victim in the mix my wife probably make sure my ass went to jail and would make sure the victim got all the help she needs.
    I did not know you had access to the rape kit from the 'victim' and confirmed the crime.

    Maybe Hillary values the vows she made in front of country and God more than your wife does (don't take that personally, not meant that way). The point is, who are we to judge that she stayed in a marriage after infidelity? Isn't that traditionally what was expected of a wife? What would 'conservatives' have said if she divorced her husband during the WH years or even after? I hope you can see that politically it was no win, therefore perhaps...maybe....just maybe.... who the fuck knows... she loves William Jefferson Clinton. Maybe...
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    mrussel1 said:

    BS44325 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    BS44325 said:

    Victim shaming

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/enabler-or-family-defender-how-hillary-clinton-responded-to-husbands-accusers/2016/09/28/58dad5d4-6fb1-11e6-8533-6b0b0ded0253_story.html

    Hell hath no fury. Would your wife empathize with your mistress or would she be pissed as hell at both of you? And which one would she forgive first?
    She would leave me. Also she certainly wouldn't empathize with my mistress but she definitely wouldn't shame her for the benefit of my career either. Finally if there was a rape victim in the mix my wife probably make sure my ass went to jail and would make sure the victim got all the help she needs.
    I did not know you had access to the rape kit from the 'victim' and confirmed the crime.

    Maybe Hillary values the vows she made in front of country and God more than your wife does (don't take that personally, not meant that way). The point is, who are we to judge that she stayed in a marriage after infidelity? Isn't that traditionally what was expected of a wife? What would 'conservatives' have said if she divorced her husband during the WH years or even after? I hope you can see that politically it was no win, therefore perhaps...maybe....just maybe.... who the fuck knows... she loves William Jefferson Clinton. Maybe...
    I am actually not judging her or him on that front at all. People cheat, stay together, break up, whatever, I actually don't think that's anyone's business and I really don't care. What I am specifically pointing to is how these mistresses and/or alleged victims were treated by the Clinton's and their staff through the media over the years. These were real people with real lives and they were made out to be worse then dirt. For me it isn't the affairs but the aftermath and what was done to these women for the sake of the Clinton's political careers. These days treating women that way would not fly and I don't think it should be given a pass.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    I never knew infidelity = rape, I never knew infidelity = sexual harassment.

    Workplace sexual infidelity

    Infidelity me, infidelity me my friend
    Infidelity me, infidelity me again




  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,383
    JC29856 said:

    I never knew infidelity = rape, I never knew infidelity = sexual harassment.

    Workplace sexual infidelity

    Infidelity me, infidelity me my friend
    Infidelity me, infidelity me again




    Do you have anything of value to add to this conversation?
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    benjs said:

    JC29856 said:

    I never knew infidelity = rape, I never knew infidelity = sexual harassment.

    Workplace sexual infidelity

    Infidelity me, infidelity me my friend
    Infidelity me, infidelity me again


    Do you have anything of value to add to this conversation?
    VAT tax = is a tax on value added at any all stages of producing a good or service.

    Hate me
    Do it and do it again
    Waste me
    Infidelity me, my friend
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,884
    edited September 2016

    I am actually not judging her or him on that front at all. People cheat, stay together, break up, whatever, I actually don't think that's anyone's business and I really don't care. What I am specifically pointing to is how these mistresses and/or alleged victims were treated by the Clinton's and their staff through the media over the years. These were real people with real lives and they were made out to be worse then dirt. For me it isn't the affairs but the aftermath and what was done to these women for the sake of the Clinton's political careers. These days treating women that way would not fly and I don't think it should be given a pass.


    In general, I definitely agree with you. Gennifer Flowers may not be the best example as I believe she is the one that brought this into the open after she sold her story to Star magazine, if I'm not mistaken. I don't recall the Paula Jones stuff as much and I'm pretty sure the Clinton machine never attacked Monica. Regardless, you are right. This wouldn't fly today.
    The problem for Trump politically, is that this part of the story is complex and not as easily distilled down to "Ms Piggy" and "Ms Housekeeping". Clinton also would not go on a show the next day and defend like Trump did, keeping it alive for a few days. It will be interesting (in a bad way) to see if he really plays it out. The floating of the story, the threat, the Eric Trump bringing it up in interviews may be their way of trying to get the political capital without the candidate getting damaged by it.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited September 2016
    Has to do with rape culture or what some would call infidelity culture. Sexual harassment and rape still aren't taken as serious as it should be especially on campuses and in armed forces. The feminist candidate did what is often still done today, victim blame and shame.
    Would your daughters rather be?
    1. Directly called fat or ugly
    2. Sexually/infidelity harassed
    3. Shamed for being fat ugly or sexually/infidelity harassed
    Post edited by JC29856 on
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    Yeah, because that makes any of them okay.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • rssesq
    rssesq Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
    a heavy set teenage intern for the most powerful man in the world is as close to statutory R as u can get. lmao
  • rssesq
    rssesq Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
    cigars COUNT! carry on HRC peeps
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    You do know that Monica was in her twenties, correct?
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,250
    mrussel1 said:


    I am actually not judging her or him on that front at all. People cheat, stay together, break up, whatever, I actually don't think that's anyone's business and I really don't care. What I am specifically pointing to is how these mistresses and/or alleged victims were treated by the Clinton's and their staff through the media over the years. These were real people with real lives and they were made out to be worse then dirt. For me it isn't the affairs but the aftermath and what was done to these women for the sake of the Clinton's political careers. These days treating women that way would not fly and I don't think it should be given a pass.

    In general, I definitely agree with you. Gennifer Flowers may not be the best example as I believe she is the one that brought this into the open after she sold her story to Star magazine, if I'm not mistaken. I don't recall the Paula Jones stuff as much and I'm pretty sure the Clinton machine never attacked Monica. Regardless, you are right. This wouldn't fly today.
    The problem for Trump politically, is that this part of the story is complex and not as easily distilled down to "Ms Piggy" and "Ms Housekeeping". Clinton also would not go on a show the next day and defend like Trump did, keeping it alive for a few days. It will be interesting (in a bad way) to see if he really plays it out. The floating of the story, the threat, the Eric Trump bringing it up in interviews may be their way of trying to get the political capital without the candidate getting damaged by it.

    Exactly....he even has his surrogates saying "well it was a beauty contest and she did gain a lot of weight."

    If he would have apologized it would be over. He can't apologize because he's an absolute piece of shit.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,884
    edited September 2016
    rssesq said:

    a heavy set teenage intern for the most powerful man in the world is as close to statutory R as u can get. lmao

    She was 22 at the outset. Is that stat to you? Ever watch any porn? Your law degree does not serve you well.
  • rssesq
    rssesq Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
    oh my bad, she was 22 and he was the most powerful man in the world. roflmao
    are you billing for this horrible defense?
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    In a 1999 episode of Dateline NBC, former Clinton volunteer Juanita Broaddrick alleged that in the late 1970s Bill Clinton raped her in her hotel room. According to Broaddrick, she agreed to meet with Clinton for coffee in the lobby of her hotel, but Clinton asked if they could go to her room to avoid a crowd of reporters. Once Clinton had isolated her in her hotel room, he sexually assaulted her. Broaddrick stated Clinton injured her lip by biting it during the assault.[1][2] In 1999, Clinton denied Broaddrick's allegations through his lawyer.

    Supporters of Clinton have questioned her account by noting that Broaddrick continued to support Clinton, and appear at public events on his behalf, weeks after the alleged rape.[3] In addition, Broaddrick had once signed a deposition stating that no sexual contact had occurred with Bill Clinton; although she subsequently stated that she had made this claim because "I didn't want to be forced to testify about the most horrific event of my life."

    Broaddrick's allegations resurfaced in the 2016 presidential campaign. In various media interviews, Broaddrick stated that Clinton raped her and that Hillary Clinton knew about it, and tried to threaten Broaddrick into remaining silent. She started giving some interviews in 2015 because Hillary Clinton's statement that victims of sexual assault should be believed angered her.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories