and giving jobs to family and friends in the foundation(see do nothing daughter), and using it as a slush fund for her families expenses, and just maybe by having his speeches go from 250,000 per when she wasn't Secstate to 5 million she was. Did the speeches get FIVE HUNDRED TIMES better? I got kool aid. lol
You don't believe in capitalism and what the market will bare? You're a communist aren't you?
So is this a play by Comey to influence the election?
I mean holy shit...he says himself that he has no idea how long it will take...why now? (although he also states that they came across emails while doing another investigation)
Why didn't just give up all her emails and server earlier?
Because of ANTISEMITISM, of course. lmao
Good point, it's us despicable Jews in the basement controlling world finances and public opinion. It's so hilarious to blame one religious group for all of the world's corruption - would you like to hold us responsible for human rights violations in Chinese factories? Homelessness in America? Gun violence in Chicago? How about starvation in Africa? This is unrelated and unfounded, just like your joke about Roger Waters being assassinated by Mossad agents.
I'm not going to sit back and tolerate your unsubstantiated, rude, xenophobic party line anti-Jewish rhetoric just as I wouldn't tolerate it about any other sect. In the Israel thread, I'm more than happy to discuss the horrific subjugation and mistreatment of Palestinian peoples at the hands of Israelis (and please note that not all Jews are Zionists or Israelis, and not all Israelis or Zionists are Jews), but this is hate distributed for being hateful's sake masked in (poor) humour. Your tactic is a coward's move, your content happens to be a crock of shit, and I think you know it.
Well put Benjs. Anti-Semites need to be called out for their fearful, hateful, and ignorant rhetoric.
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Fucking troll. Get ye hence, foul beast!
Good one Will you call her corrupt openly?
How many corruption charges has Hillary been convicted of?
The same amount that Trump has been convicted of. So how many is that?
Ha. You couldn't bring yourself to answer it as "Hillary hasn't been convicted of any charges", could ya?
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Fucking troll. Get ye hence, foul beast!
Good one Will you call her corrupt openly?
How many corruption charges has Hillary been convicted of?
You don't seem to require the same level of evidence for Bush or Cheney.
Funny but Bush and Cheney are still missing 22,000,000 emails revolving around a run up to a war that cost over 4,000 American lives, hundreds of thousand of Iraqi lives, $2,000,000,000,000 and yet, and yet, no one gives a shit. Shrub's, Darth Vader's and Turd Blossom's real legacy? Making corruption, pay offs, pay to play and all the malfescence you see today acceptable. "We'll continue to create our own new reality." Hillary pales in comparison but your shrinkage prevents you from seeing that.
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Fucking troll. Get ye hence, foul beast!
Good one Will you call her corrupt openly?
How many corruption charges has Hillary been convicted of?
The same amount that Trump has been convicted of. So how many is that?
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Fucking troll. Get ye hence, foul beast!
Good one Will you call her corrupt openly?
How many corruption charges has Hillary been convicted of?
The same amount that Trump has been convicted of. So how many is that?
Ha. You couldn't bring yourself to answer it as "Hillary hasn't been convicted of any charges", could ya?
I could yes. But then I would be in that clinton amt army. No thanks.
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Fucking troll. Get ye hence, foul beast!
Good one Will you call her corrupt openly?
How many corruption charges has Hillary been convicted of?
The same amount that Trump has been convicted of. So how many is that?
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
So is this a play by Comey to influence the election?
I mean holy shit...he says himself that he has no idea how long it will take...why now? (although he also states that they came across emails while doing another investigation)
Why didn't just give up all her emails and server earlier?
Because of ANTISEMITISM, of course. lmao
Good point, it's us despicable Jews in the basement controlling world finances and public opinion. It's so hilarious to blame one religious group for all of the world's corruption - would you like to hold us responsible for human rights violations in Chinese factories? Homelessness in America? Gun violence in Chicago? How about starvation in Africa? This is unrelated and unfounded, just like your joke about Roger Waters being assassinated by Mossad agents.
I'm not going to sit back and tolerate your unsubstantiated, rude, xenophobic party line anti-Jewish rhetoric just as I wouldn't tolerate it about any other sect. In the Israel thread, I'm more than happy to discuss the horrific subjugation and mistreatment of Palestinian peoples at the hands of Israelis (and please note that not all Jews are Zionists or Israelis, and not all Israelis or Zionists are Jews), but this is hate distributed for being hateful's sake masked in (poor) humour. Your tactic is a coward's move, your content happens to be a crock of shit, and I think you know it.
Well put Benjs. Anti-Semites need to be called out for their fearful, hateful, and ignorant rhetoric.
It's the Jews? Shit, I thought it was the muslims.
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Now I am starting to wonder if you can even read. Or maybe you are on drugs? Or maybe you get some kind of sick glee out of acting like an idiot who ignores shit right in front of your face, I really don't know and really don't care.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Now I am starting to wonder if you can even read. Or maybe you are on drugs? Or maybe you get some kind of sick glee out of acting like an idiot who ignores shit right in front of your face, I really don't know and really don't care.
So again. Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Now I am starting to wonder if you can even read. Or maybe you are on drugs? Or maybe you get some kind of sick glee out of acting like an idiot who ignores shit right in front of your face, I really don't know and really don't care.
So again. Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Or maybe you are blind? Perhaps your vision aid software isn't working properly? Or maybe you banged your head today and have selective amnesia. Hmm.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Now I am starting to wonder if you can even read. Or maybe you are on drugs? Or maybe you get some kind of sick glee out of acting like an idiot who ignores shit right in front of your face, I really don't know and really don't care.
So again. Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Or maybe you are blind? Perhaps your vision aid software isn't working properly? Or maybe you banged your head today and have selective amnesia. Hmm.
Neither. I am quite certain that in your own words you have not stated that Hillary Clinton in corrupt.
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Now I am starting to wonder if you can even read. Or maybe you are on drugs? Or maybe you get some kind of sick glee out of acting like an idiot who ignores shit right in front of your face, I really don't know and really don't care.
So again. Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Or maybe you are blind? Perhaps your vision aid software isn't working properly? Or maybe you banged your head today and have selective amnesia. Hmm.
Neither. I am quite certain that in your own words you have not stated that Hillary Clinton in corrupt.
Lol. Read it again then. I'm back to the comprehension problem theory, but perhaps you can work it out eventually, troll.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Fucking troll. Get ye hence, foul beast!
Good one Will you call her corrupt openly?
How many corruption charges has Hillary been convicted of?
The same amount that Trump has been convicted of. So how many is that?
This is the Hillary thread. Stop trolling.
What is a Hillary thread? Please enlighten us.
I'm sorry, for the reading comprehension, intellectually challenged, this topic that posters are responding to is titled, "Hillary For President." Thus, posts and responses to such should be about the topic, in this case, Hillary For President. Trump being mentioned without any direct reference to Hillary For President, would appear to be a violation of the forum posting rules. My use of the term "thread" was confusing, technically misleading and perhaps not a clear and evident expression of my thought or true expression of idea. For that, I apologize.
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Now I am starting to wonder if you can even read. Or maybe you are on drugs? Or maybe you get some kind of sick glee out of acting like an idiot who ignores shit right in front of your face, I really don't know and really don't care.
So again. Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Or maybe you are blind? Perhaps your vision aid software isn't working properly? Or maybe you banged your head today and have selective amnesia. Hmm.
Neither. I am quite certain that in your own words you have not stated that Hillary Clinton in corrupt.
Lol. Read it again then. I'm back to the comprehension problem theory, but perhaps you can work it out eventually, troll.
Is it that hard for you to say or not say that Hillary Clinton is corrupt? I don't understand your name calling to me.
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Now I am starting to wonder if you can even read. Or maybe you are on drugs? Or maybe you get some kind of sick glee out of acting like an idiot who ignores shit right in front of your face, I really don't know and really don't care.
So again. Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Or maybe you are blind? Perhaps your vision aid software isn't working properly? Or maybe you banged your head today and have selective amnesia. Hmm.
Neither. I am quite certain that in your own words you have not stated that Hillary Clinton in corrupt.
Lol. Read it again then. I'm back to the comprehension problem theory, but perhaps you can work it out eventually, troll.
Is it that hard for you to say or not say that Hillary Clinton is corrupt? I don't understand your name calling to me.
Bullshit. She answered it in the affirmative the first time you asked, nobody here is dumb enough to fall for the crude tricks of a cave troll. Be gone ye dweller of bridges!
Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
0
Options
unsung
I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Now I am starting to wonder if you can even read. Or maybe you are on drugs? Or maybe you get some kind of sick glee out of acting like an idiot who ignores shit right in front of your face, I really don't know and really don't care.
So again. Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Or maybe you are blind? Perhaps your vision aid software isn't working properly? Or maybe you banged your head today and have selective amnesia. Hmm.
Neither. I am quite certain that in your own words you have not stated that Hillary Clinton in corrupt.
Lol. Read it again then. I'm back to the comprehension problem theory, but perhaps you can work it out eventually, troll.
Is it that hard for you to say or not say that Hillary Clinton is corrupt? I don't understand your name calling to me.
Bullshit. She answered it in the affirmative the first time you asked, nobody here is dumb enough to fall for the crude tricks of a cave troll. Be gone ye dweller of bridges!
Your Shakespearean insults tickle me pink. Now, Do you think Hillary is corrupt or not?
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Now I am starting to wonder if you can even read. Or maybe you are on drugs? Or maybe you get some kind of sick glee out of acting like an idiot who ignores shit right in front of your face, I really don't know and really don't care.
So again. Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Or maybe you are blind? Perhaps your vision aid software isn't working properly? Or maybe you banged your head today and have selective amnesia. Hmm.
Neither. I am quite certain that in your own words you have not stated that Hillary Clinton in corrupt.
Lol. Read it again then. I'm back to the comprehension problem theory, but perhaps you can work it out eventually, troll.
Is it that hard for you to say or not say that Hillary Clinton is corrupt? I don't understand your name calling to me.
Bullshit. She answered it in the affirmative the first time you asked, nobody here is dumb enough to fall for the crude tricks of a cave troll. Be gone ye dweller of bridges!
Your Shakespearean insults tickle me pink. Now, Do you think Hillary is corrupt or not?
When I have fears that I may cease to be Before my pen has gleaned my teeming brain, Before high-pilèd books, in charactery, Hold like rich garners the full ripened grain; When I behold, upon the night’s starred face, Huge cloudy symbols of a high romance, And think that I may never live to trace Their shadows with the magic hand of chance; And when I feel, fair creature of an hour, That I shall never look upon thee more, Never have relish in the faery power Of unreflecting love—then on the shore Of the wide world I stand alone, and think Till love and fame to nothingness do sink.
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Now I am starting to wonder if you can even read. Or maybe you are on drugs? Or maybe you get some kind of sick glee out of acting like an idiot who ignores shit right in front of your face, I really don't know and really don't care.
So again. Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Or maybe you are blind? Perhaps your vision aid software isn't working properly? Or maybe you banged your head today and have selective amnesia. Hmm.
Neither. I am quite certain that in your own words you have not stated that Hillary Clinton in corrupt.
Lol. Read it again then. I'm back to the comprehension problem theory, but perhaps you can work it out eventually, troll.
Is it that hard for you to say or not say that Hillary Clinton is corrupt? I don't understand your name calling to me.
Bullshit. She answered it in the affirmative the first time you asked, nobody here is dumb enough to fall for the crude tricks of a cave troll. Be gone ye dweller of bridges!
Your Shakespearean insults tickle me pink. Now, Do you think Hillary is corrupt or not?
When I have fears that I may cease to be Before my pen has gleaned my teeming brain, Before high-pilèd books, in charactery, Hold like rich garners the full ripened grain; When I behold, upon the night’s starred face, Huge cloudy symbols of a high romance, And think that I may never live to trace Their shadows with the magic hand of chance; And when I feel, fair creature of an hour, That I shall never look upon thee more, Never have relish in the faery power Of unreflecting love—then on the shore Of the wide world I stand alone, and think Till love and fame to nothingness do sink.
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Now I am starting to wonder if you can even read. Or maybe you are on drugs? Or maybe you get some kind of sick glee out of acting like an idiot who ignores shit right in front of your face, I really don't know and really don't care.
So again. Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Or maybe you are blind? Perhaps your vision aid software isn't working properly? Or maybe you banged your head today and have selective amnesia. Hmm.
Neither. I am quite certain that in your own words you have not stated that Hillary Clinton in corrupt.
Lol. Read it again then. I'm back to the comprehension problem theory, but perhaps you can work it out eventually, troll.
Is it that hard for you to say or not say that Hillary Clinton is corrupt? I don't understand your name calling to me.
Bullshit. She answered it in the affirmative the first time you asked, nobody here is dumb enough to fall for the crude tricks of a cave troll. Be gone ye dweller of bridges!
Your Shakespearean insults tickle me pink. Now, Do you think Hillary is corrupt or not?
When I have fears that I may cease to be Before my pen has gleaned my teeming brain, Before high-pilèd books, in charactery, Hold like rich garners the full ripened grain; When I behold, upon the night’s starred face, Huge cloudy symbols of a high romance, And think that I may never live to trace Their shadows with the magic hand of chance; And when I feel, fair creature of an hour, That I shall never look upon thee more, Never have relish in the faery power Of unreflecting love—then on the shore Of the wide world I stand alone, and think Till love and fame to nothingness do sink.
But you say that only the demise of the system will bring about change, so then the worst candidate should hasten it.
In turn begin anew.
Maybe in a couple of hundred years it could evolve in a positive direction. Not in our lifetime. But I don't consider the collapse of the government (likely to be replaced by something even worse) is the best option. Not at all. I don't know why you would assume that such a thing would result in any kind of improvement. Seems crazy.
No one is assuming anything. Just responding to your thoughts. Don't know why you would think that. lol
How do you know what unsung is or isn't assuming any better than me then?
I can assume the unsung will call Hillary corrupt openly. I can't assume you will. Will you?
I'm not fucking playing this game with you. Stop asking me a question I already answered the first time.
I'll take that as a no.
Then I'll take that as proof that you have a very real comprehension problem. You may want to see a doctor about that.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Now I am starting to wonder if you can even read. Or maybe you are on drugs? Or maybe you get some kind of sick glee out of acting like an idiot who ignores shit right in front of your face, I really don't know and really don't care.
So again. Please state that Hillary is corrupt. If you can't I will know where you stand.
Or maybe you are blind? Perhaps your vision aid software isn't working properly? Or maybe you banged your head today and have selective amnesia. Hmm.
Neither. I am quite certain that in your own words you have not stated that Hillary Clinton in corrupt.
Lol. Read it again then. I'm back to the comprehension problem theory, but perhaps you can work it out eventually, troll.
Is it that hard for you to say or not say that Hillary Clinton is corrupt? I don't understand your name calling to me.
Bullshit. She answered it in the affirmative the first time you asked, nobody here is dumb enough to fall for the crude tricks of a cave troll. Be gone ye dweller of bridges!
Your Shakespearean insults tickle me pink. Now, Do you think Hillary is corrupt or not?
When I have fears that I may cease to be Before my pen has gleaned my teeming brain, Before high-pilèd books, in charactery, Hold like rich garners the full ripened grain; When I behold, upon the night’s starred face, Huge cloudy symbols of a high romance, And think that I may never live to trace Their shadows with the magic hand of chance; And when I feel, fair creature of an hour, That I shall never look upon thee more, Never have relish in the faery power Of unreflecting love—then on the shore Of the wide world I stand alone, and think Till love and fame to nothingness do sink.
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Anti-Semites need to be called out for their fearful, hateful, and ignorant rhetoric.
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
But then I would be in that clinton amt army.
No thanks.
Please enlighten us.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
If you can't I will know where you stand.
Please state that Hillary is corrupt.
If you can't I will know where you stand.
I am quite certain that in your own words you have not stated that Hillary Clinton in corrupt.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I don't understand your name calling to me.
An equivalent question would be:
PJFan, do you still beat your wife?
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
But godamn,
Now,
Do you think Hillary is corrupt or not?
Before my pen has gleaned my teeming brain,
Before high-pilèd books, in charactery,
Hold like rich garners the full ripened grain;
When I behold, upon the night’s starred face,
Huge cloudy symbols of a high romance,
And think that I may never live to trace
Their shadows with the magic hand of chance;
And when I feel, fair creature of an hour,
That I shall never look upon thee more,
Never have relish in the faery power
Of unreflecting love—then on the shore
Of the wide world I stand alone, and think
Till love and fame to nothingness do sink.
Who knew it?
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/44488