Hillary won more votes for President
Comments
-
0 -
0 -
got any other bullshit memes?rssesq said:Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Awwww. Looks like someone learned how to share photos. All of those things must be true, you can't put untrue statements in a meme. Everybody knows that.0
-
When you can't win with policy debate, resort to the politics of personal destruction. I'm surprised Hillary wasn't listed as the founder of Boko Haram?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
That is an insult to Jack Nicholson, Heath Ledger, Jared Leto, and Cesar RomeroHughFreakingDillon said:0 -
Well...maybe not Jared Leto. Romero, Nicholson and Ledger- definitely.0
-
Oh good, so we've finally moved on to just posting funny pictures now? bc I found a couple I would like to share:
0 -
Here is a story...Gern Blansten said:
got any other bullshit memes?rssesq said:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/21/berta-caceres-name-honduran-military-hitlist-former-soldier
0 -
-
Former 5x VA Senator and elder statesman John Warner (also husband to Liz Taylor (very exclusive)) has endorsed Clinton. Not that VA was at risk, but this is a pretty substantial endorsement from a very respected senator.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/john-warner-hillary-clinton-2288190 -
A few things about this:JC29856 said:
1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted
2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters.
3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.0 -
Simply FYImrussel1 said:
A few things about this:JC29856 said:
1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted
2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters.
3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.0 -
"Since The Arizona Republic began publication in 1890, we have never endorsed a Democrat over a Republican for president. Never. This reflects a deep philosophical appreciation for conservative ideals and Republican principles.
This year is different.
The 2016 Republican candidate is not conservative and he is not qualified.
That’s why, for the first time in our history, The Arizona Republic will support a Democrat for president."0 -
Then you should post it in the FYI re: Alicia Machado thread. You know it's an irrelevant smear.JC29856 said:
Simply FYImrussel1 said:
A few things about this:JC29856 said:
1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted
2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters.
3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.0 -
Okay.mrussel1 said:
Then you should post it in the FYI re: Alicia Machado thread. You know it's an irrelevant smear.JC29856 said:
Simply FYImrussel1 said:
A few things about this:JC29856 said:
1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted
2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters.
3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.
Now what if Ms Machado is linked to the Mexican drug cartel or what if she lied about the father of her child? Is that relevant?0 -
Not particularly. He clearly fat shamed her in 96 and did it again yesterday. We are not choosing between Trump and Machado for POTUS. No matter what she has done in her life, it's irrelevant to what he did on national tv.JC29856 said:
Okay.mrussel1 said:
Then you should post it in the FYI re: Alicia Machado thread. You know it's an irrelevant smear.JC29856 said:
Simply FYImrussel1 said:
A few things about this:JC29856 said:
1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted
2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters.
3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.
Now what if Ms Machado is linked to the Mexican drug cartel or what if she lied about the father of her child? Is that relevant?0 -
Ok you're against fat shaming, me too, I'm alittle overweight myself. Do you have a position on slut shaming?mrussel1 said:
A few things about this:JC29856 said:
1. She was never indicted, tried or convicted
2. It has nothing to do with the fact that Trump clearly fat shamed her on national TV with reporters.
3. Trump has not denied any of it. When he went on Fox and Friends yesterday, he defended why he did it. He didn't deny.
Are you implying because of this situation (of which she wasn't indicted) that she deserved to be fat shamed? I'm not clear what you are trying to accomplish other than smearing someone for Trump's benefit.0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIpfWORQWhU
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help