Hillary won more votes for President

mrussel1

benjs said:

mrussel1 said:

benjs said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

ledvedderman said:

JC29856 said:

It's arrogant condescending and lazy to degrade 3rd party candidates but the aleppo and world leader gaffe are inexcusable, he making Jill look bad.

She's plenty good at that on her own whenever she opens her mouth about 9/11 conspiracies.

Did she think the Saudis did it? A missile not a plane crashed the Pentagon? Flight 97 was ghost ridden?

She said all three of those things, in one run on sentence. It's true. Believe me. Many people are saying it.

On another note, I have the best structures, the best words, the biggest hands, and the best temperament.

I have the most humility of anyone in this world. People compliment me all the time about my humility. It's the best.

I feel like this needs a thread of its own... Trump vs. Trump

That reminds me of the classic Belushi SNL skit... Dueling Brandos.

rssesq

I immediately thought about this thread when I saw this.
http://imgur.com/gallery/Uskdt

Free

rssesq said:

I immediately thought about this thread when I saw this.
http://imgur.com/gallery/Uskdt

So true.

ledvedderman

And what makes you think Gary Johnson or Jill Stein actually do?

Boxes&Books

It's interesting how the Clinton camp continues to claim that they want to talk about the issues, yet they're bring up a bunch of personal matters concerning trump. Interesting strategy. It seems this whole election has been one gigantic soup opera.

This is terrible. Both candidates are to blame and both candidates have incredibly high unfavorable ratings. It isn't just Trump - it's Clinton too. Again, the American people are the real losers.

Free

ledvedderman said:

And what makes you think Gary Johnson or Jill Stein actually do?

Why is it always a "But, but... what about (insert name here)? They're screwing us, the middle class and the those who don't make living wages... the 2 chosen ones. End of story.

Go Beavers

Negative, personal attack crap will swing enough voters for a win. That's on the American public, not the candidates. We're getting what works on us. If we make it so it doesn't work, then something will change.

Gern Blansten

Go Beavers said:

Negative, personal attack crap will swing enough voters for a win. That's on the American public, not the candidates. We're getting what works on us. If we make it so it doesn't work, then something will change.

Exactly....if she could sway voters based on the difference in issues it wouldn't be a contest. Voters are too stupid to understand issues...especially when Cheeto Hitler rides both sides of every issue.

Free

tonifig8 said:

It's interesting how the Clinton camp continues to claim that they want to talk about the issues, yet they're bring up a bunch of personal matters concerning trump. Interesting strategy. It seems this whole election has been one gigantic soup opera.

This is terrible. Both candidates are to blame and both candidates have incredibly high unfavorable ratings. It isn't just Trump - it's Clinton too. Again, the American people are the real losers.

She won't talk issues or policy. She won't talk issues or policy. She won't talk issues or policy. Her favorite talking point? She talks about Trump.

Every time anyone brings it up, it gets ignored.

Cliffy6745

Hillary is currently taking questions from reporters for all the press conference Nazis

benjs

unsung said:

I dont find another politician wanting to reduce rights funny, especially one that runs as a Libertarian.

tonifig8 said:

It's interesting how the Clinton camp continues to claim that they want to talk about the issues, yet they're bring up a bunch of personal matters concerning trump. Interesting strategy. It seems this whole election has been one gigantic soup opera.

This is terrible. Both candidates are to blame and both candidates have incredibly high unfavorable ratings. It isn't just Trump - it's Clinton too. Again, the American people are the real losers.

A soup opera sounds delicious. For what it's worth - I completely agree. I think Clinton is the best of the four options, and she frustrates the hell out of me. I want to see her actually answer (and not deflect from) the questions asked about her political history. Specifically, her questionable support of corrupt governments, voting patterns in favour of self-serving intervention, and/or recognition of coup regimes in Venezuela, Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Libya, Syria, Iraq (I think I got those right).

mrussel1

benjs said:

unsung said:

I dont find another politician wanting to reduce rights funny, especially one that runs as a Libertarian.

tonifig8 said:

It's interesting how the Clinton camp continues to claim that they want to talk about the issues, yet they're bring up a bunch of personal matters concerning trump. Interesting strategy. It seems this whole election has been one gigantic soup opera.

This is terrible. Both candidates are to blame and both candidates have incredibly high unfavorable ratings. It isn't just Trump - it's Clinton too. Again, the American people are the real losers.

A soup opera sounds delicious. For what it's worth - I completely agree. I think Clinton is the best of the four options, and she frustrates the hell out of me. I want to see her actually answer (and not deflect from) the questions asked about her political history. Specifically, her questionable support of corrupt governments, voting patterns in favour of self-serving intervention, and/or recognition of coup regimes in Venezuela, Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Libya, Syria, Iraq (I think I got those right).

See this doesn't bother me. The reality is that there are very few relationships like England, Canada and France where it's easy to figure out the right thing to do and we do it. I may not agree with all the decisions the Obama admin made, but I can understand the thinking behind the decisions. It's easy to second guess 4 years later when we see the outcome.

Go Beavers

But she also knows answering those questions result in a loss or no gain, because Trump's response to those questions just needs to be his usual bloviated wind bag self and he loses nothing.

Free

Cliffy6745 said:

Hillary is currently taking questions from reporters for all the press conference Nazis

So you have no problem w/ her not answering questions that warrent a "It's Trump's fault" reply? And a link for this? This should be prime time viewership not a mid-afternoon thing.

brianlux

mrussel1 said:

benjs said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

ledvedderman said:

JC29856 said:

It's arrogant condescending and lazy to degrade 3rd party candidates but the aleppo and world leader gaffe are inexcusable, he making Jill look bad.

She's plenty good at that on her own whenever she opens her mouth about 9/11 conspiracies.

Did she think the Saudis did it? A missile not a plane crashed the Pentagon? Flight 97 was ghost ridden?

She said all three of those things, in one run on sentence. It's true. Believe me. Many people are saying it.

On another note, I have the best structures, the best words, the biggest hands, and the best temperament.

I have the most humility of anyone in this world. People compliment me all the time about my humility. It's the best.

Yes, we all love to stare into that still pond now, don't we.

mrussel1

Free said:

Cliffy6745 said:

Hillary is currently taking questions from reporters for all the press conference Nazis

So you have no problem w/ her not answering questions that war rent a "It's Trump's fault" reply? And a link for this? This should be prime time viewership not a mid-afternoon thing.

I don't think ABC want's to pre-empt the Good Wife for a presser. The POTUS doesn't even do prime time unless it's a crisis.

HughFreakingDillon

mrussel1 said:

rssesq said:

a heavy set teenage intern for the most powerful man in the world is as close to statutory R as u can get. lmao

She was 22 at the outset. Is that stat to you? Ever watch any porn? Your law degree does not serve you well.

um, yeah, either it's stat or it's not. "close" doesn't cut it.

Free

mrussel1 said:

Free said:

Cliffy6745 said:

Hillary is currently taking questions from reporters for all the press conference Nazis

So you have no problem w/ her not answering questions that war rent a "It's Trump's fault" reply? And a link for this? This should be prime time viewership not a mid-afternoon thing.

I don't think ABC want's to pre-empt the Good Wife for a presser. The POTUS doesn't even do prime time unless it's a crisis.

When exactly do you think the presidential debates are aired? Prime time for your viewing pleasure.

ledvedderman

Debates are much, much different than a candidate taking questions from the press. Newsworthy for certain, but no network is going to change their nightly lineup. There's a lot of money to lose in doing so.

Cliffy6745

haha, a prime time press conference...