Hillary won more votes for President

Jason P

How does someone amass 650,000 emails? That doesn't seem possible.

rssesq

Jason P said:

How does someone amass 650,000 emails? That doesn't seem possible.

AIPAC gotta lotta members, lmao

rssesq

it needed to go up on this page too

rssesq said:

Tim Kaine on Comey, "A wonderful and tough carrer public servant, with the highest standards of integrity."
Pres. Obama on Comey, the investigation "couldn't have been more exhaustive."
Hillary on Comey, "I am grateful for the professionalism of the FBI."
Pelosi on Comey, "THIS IS A GREAT MAN and we are very privileged in our country to have him be Director of the FBI."
Elijah on Comey, "I hope your family is as proud of you as I am."

https://twitter.com/Morning_Joe/status/793069952567697408

Let the spineless flip floppin commence.

Gern Blansten

rssesq said:

yo gern, get off these boards and attend a few pearl jam shows will ya. 6 shows in 18 years.

18 actually (including 2 EV)

You count about as good as you politic

rssesq

stop contributing so much doe to HRC and maybe you can average 1.5 per year kid.

Bentleyspop

rssesq said:

Jason P said:

How does someone amass 650,000 emails? That doesn't seem possible.

AIPAC gotta lotta members, lmao

You're a one trick pony
Lol lmao lmfao rflmao rofl

Gern Blansten

rssesq said:

stop contributing so much doe to HRC and maybe you can average 1.5 per year kid.

Boxes&Books

JC29856 said:

Anyone try googling pathological liar or pathological lying?

hahaha!!

Boxes&Books

JC29856 said:

Podesta really really wanted to link Comey to Russia Russia Russia.

Hillary learned from her "mistake", but can't explain what was learned.

https://youtu.be/yvRYfZ67wrw

Holy Shit!! Did anyone watch this?!!

PJ_Soul

Jason P said:

How does someone amass 650,000 emails? That doesn't seem possible.

It seems completely possible to me. Even I have probably sent and received that many emails within the past 10 years, and I just have a regular office job.

Jason P

PJ_Soul said:

Jason P said:

How does someone amass 650,000 emails? That doesn't seem possible.

It seems completely possible to me. Even I have probably sent and received that many emails within the past 10 years, and I just have a regular office job.

That is a lot of emailing!

rssesq

wuts Russia got to do wit Carlos Dangerously?

Gern Blansten

JC29856

PJ_Soul said:

Jason P said:

How does someone amass 650,000 emails? That doesn't seem possible.

It seems completely possible to me. Even I have probably sent and received that many emails within the past 10 years, and I just have a regular office job.

650,000 emails are on average 16GB of data. How old is the notebook n question?

Kat

Gern Blansten said:

Seriously.
And thanks for that brain image above. That's just sad...but funny too.
Have a great week, everyone.

rssesq

they get the good stuff, mac books

PJ_Soul

Jason P said:

PJ_Soul said:

Jason P said:

How does someone amass 650,000 emails? That doesn't seem possible.

It seems completely possible to me. Even I have probably sent and received that many emails within the past 10 years, and I just have a regular office job.

That is a lot of emailing!

Yeah, well it includes all of my personal email and spam and stuff too, but I do send and receive a LOT of email for my job. It's by far the most used form of communication between people at work. I think I've read, received, and sent at least 25 emails just this morning, only 2 hours into the work day, not counting all the non-work related stuff (i.e. alerts about vinyl sales, lol), and it's super slow because it's Halloween. Calling someone to talk about something is almost unheard of at this point (but I still do it - it is actually way more efficient sometimes). The thing about email is that it is indeed a record of conversations. That has turned out to be a negative for Clinton, lol, but for most people, it is a massive benefit to have everything discussed and decided upon and sent and received recorded electronically. If someone comes to me and asks me about some minor contract that was signed or even just mentioned 6 years ago, or about an invoice that someone was asking about in 2014, I can simply do a search for it and boom, within seconds I've got all the information that everyone forgot about years ago on my screen. Some complain about email, but I definitely see the real benefit to making it your primary mode of work communication (and the benefit of never deleting them!! I would never delete an email... unless, of course, it was incriminating! ).

rssesq

Salman is a Clinton supporter? I betcha he and Billy have much in common.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/12185145/Padma-Lakshmi-lifts-the-lid-on-her-marriage-to-Salman-Rushdie.html

Gern Blansten

So at this point Nate Silver has Clinton solidly over the 270 electoral votes.

This is WITHOUT:
1. North Carolina.......Clinton currently with a 60% chance of winning
2. Nevada..................Clinton currently with a 59% chance of winning
3. Florida....................Clinton currently with a 55% chance of winning
4. Ohio........................Trump favored to win with 57% chance

JC29856

Gern Blansten said:

I almost can't wait to quote this again in 4 days!

rssesq

nate silver?

PJ_Soul

rssesq said:

nate silver?

Google it.

Boxes&Books

Kat said:

Gern Blansten said:

Seriously.
And thanks for that brain image above. That's just sad...but funny too.
Have a great week, everyone.

Why Don't we talk about how the DNC helped rig the primaries? And as soon as the DWS resigned HRC hired her on. Why don't we talk about how Clinton received debate questions in advance of the debate?

Awwwwww

Go Beavers

Nate Silver's only been referenced 400 times in the last 4 weeks in here.

Cliffy6745

Gern Blansten said:

So at this point Nate Silver has Clinton solidly over the 270 electoral votes.

This is WITHOUT:
1. North Carolina.......Clinton currently with a 60% chance of winning
2. Nevada..................Clinton currently with a 59% chance of winning
3. Florida....................Clinton currently with a 55% chance of winning
4. Ohio........................Trump favored to win with 57% chance

So over 270 without all 4 of these? Read a pretty promising article this morning about how Nevada is already in the bag based on early voting

http://www.ktnv.com/news/ralston/the-nevada-early-voting-blog

Edit. Yeah, so no Nevada, FL, NC, Ohio or IA and she carries everything else, she is at 273.

I don't see how she loses. Nate Silver's chance at winning seems very pessimistic.

PJ_Soul

Go Beavers said:

Nate Silver's only been referenced 400 times in the last 4 weeks in here.

lol, right?

pjhawks

PJ_Soul said:

Jason P said:

PJ_Soul said:

Jason P said:

How does someone amass 650,000 emails? That doesn't seem possible.

It seems completely possible to me. Even I have probably sent and received that many emails within the past 10 years, and I just have a regular office job.

That is a lot of emailing!

Yeah, well it includes all of my personal email and spam and stuff too, but I do send and receive a LOT of email for my job. It's by far the most used form of communication between people at work. I think I've read, received, and sent at least 25 emails just this morning, only 2 hours into the work day, not counting all the non-work related stuff (i.e. alerts about vinyl sales, lol), and it's super slow because it's Halloween. Calling someone to talk about something is almost unheard of at this point (but I still do it - it is actually way more efficient sometimes). The thing about email is that it is indeed a record of conversations. That has turned out to be a negative for Clinton, lol, but for most people, it is a massive benefit to have everything discussed and decided upon and sent and received recorded electronically. If someone comes to me and asks me about some minor contract that was signed or even just mentioned 6 years ago, or about an invoice that someone was asking about in 2014, I can simply do a search for it and boom, within seconds I've got all the information that everyone forgot about years ago on my screen. Some complain about email, but I definitely see the real benefit to making it your primary mode of work communication (and the benefit of never deleting them!! I would never delete an email... unless, of course, it was incriminating! ).

i said in another thread i have almost 20,000 for this year alone on my work computer and i am a million times less important than the Hillary or the Weiners so I think over a period of years it is totally plausible.

PJ_Soul

pjhawks said:

PJ_Soul said:

Jason P said:

PJ_Soul said:

Jason P said:

How does someone amass 650,000 emails? That doesn't seem possible.

It seems completely possible to me. Even I have probably sent and received that many emails within the past 10 years, and I just have a regular office job.

That is a lot of emailing!

Yeah, well it includes all of my personal email and spam and stuff too, but I do send and receive a LOT of email for my job. It's by far the most used form of communication between people at work. I think I've read, received, and sent at least 25 emails just this morning, only 2 hours into the work day, not counting all the non-work related stuff (i.e. alerts about vinyl sales, lol), and it's super slow because it's Halloween. Calling someone to talk about something is almost unheard of at this point (but I still do it - it is actually way more efficient sometimes). The thing about email is that it is indeed a record of conversations. That has turned out to be a negative for Clinton, lol, but for most people, it is a massive benefit to have everything discussed and decided upon and sent and received recorded electronically. If someone comes to me and asks me about some minor contract that was signed or even just mentioned 6 years ago, or about an invoice that someone was asking about in 2014, I can simply do a search for it and boom, within seconds I've got all the information that everyone forgot about years ago on my screen. Some complain about email, but I definitely see the real benefit to making it your primary mode of work communication (and the benefit of never deleting them!! I would never delete an email... unless, of course, it was incriminating! ).

i said in another thread i have almost 20,000 for this year alone on my work computer and i am a million times less important than the Secretary of State. Make the emails over 4 years and I can totally see 650k for someone in that position and who was then running for President.

For sure. I mean, Bush and friends made 22,000,000 emails disappear and nobody batted an eyelash, so I'm not sure why 650,000 would surprise anyone.

Gern Blansten

rssesq said:

nate silver?

Seriously?

Gern Blansten

Cliffy6745 said:

Gern Blansten said:

So at this point Nate Silver has Clinton solidly over the 270 electoral votes.

This is WITHOUT:
1. North Carolina.......Clinton currently with a 60% chance of winning
2. Nevada..................Clinton currently with a 59% chance of winning
3. Florida....................Clinton currently with a 55% chance of winning
4. Ohio........................Trump favored to win with 57% chance

So over 270 without all 4 of these? Read a pretty promising article this morning about how Nevada is already in the bag based on early voting

http://www.ktnv.com/news/ralston/the-nevada-early-voting-blog

Edit. Yeah, so no Nevada, FL, NC, Ohio or IA and she carries everything else, she is at 273.

I don't see how she loses. Nate Silver's chance at winning seems very pessimistic.

Yes....and Colorado is the Alamo for Clinton (according to Silver today {can change daily}) with Clinton currently 78% likely to win CO.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#now&stateorder