Gay Marriage Ban

1192022242537

Comments

  • JonnyPistachio
    JonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    MayDay10 thanks for those stats -- the trends will continue.
    And Puremagic, you're hired as the AMT official lawyer. Makes sense to me.
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • ComeToTX
    ComeToTX Austin Posts: 8,072
    pandora wrote:
    ComeToTX wrote:
    Slavery happened in our past. We changed that. It's really not that difficult. The longer it goes on the more embarrassed we will be about it later.
    that was a war though :shock:

    and the rest of the world only 10 nations accept gay unions, only 6 states here
    there is a long way to go ...
    give equal rights to gay civil unions today!

    Ok. Civil Rights then. Let's only go back a few decades. There's zero difference.
    This show, another show, a show here and a show there.
  • MayDay10
    MayDay10 Posts: 11,862
    the wolf wrote:
    So where are all these "preservers of marriage"?


    they meet weekly in someone's tree fort in East bumfuck Alabama.
  • JonnyPistachio
    JonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    MayDay10 wrote:
    the wolf wrote:
    So where are all these "preservers of marriage"?


    they meet weekly in someone's tree fort in East bumfuck Alabama.

    Don't give tree forts a bad name! ;)
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • JonnyPistachio
    JonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    If some new term, or civil union is created (lets face it, that wont happen though) for equal rights for gay marriage (for discussions sake)...lets call it EGAIRRAM...that will be the gay marriage term (of equal rights).

    If EGAIRRAM is passed, I promise to legally divorce my wife and get re-unionized with her under federal or state EGAIRRAM. Will straight people be allowed to marry under this new definition/term??

    This doesnt sound like it makes a lot of sense^^^...
    ...but I’d be willing to abandon traditional marriage if a new type union is created, especially if traditional marriage is in the business of excluding people.
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    pandora wrote:
    pandora wrote:
    ..
    I am also for equal rights for all and am very fine with marriage remaining as it was intended to be between a man and a woman ... I would cast for my vote for that today if it meant equal rights for gay unions
    right now and stop the marriage battle. I have a feeling others would do the same.

    The light is not what you think :D


    and there we have it folks.... finally. pandora isnt a marriage preserver but she thinks marriage should remain the dominion of man-woman couples.

    thanx for the clarity.
    I just saw this, really :nono:
    fair minded as always with the wrong clarity I might add
    one that fits what you want to think ....

    so thought I would point out my remarks in color there

    never said should and said I would cast my vote today if it meant equal rights for gay unions,
    and yes it would be a wonderful victory at hand! I think it would fit nicely right here
    with Obama's recent move and it would be historical.

    seems clear to me that you think the term marriage should only pertain to marriage between a man and a woman. what is it im missing here?
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • strilo
    strilo Portland OR Posts: 496
    pandora wrote:
    I am not seeing it a totally religious division
    and I have no idea how it plays out by political persuasion.

    There are two charts showing poll numbers on those exact breakdowns, religion and political party. Let me repost:

    376mfrydeu2byekfbjf-mg.gif

    9qu3xuq5nk6ix3xjo99xcg.gif
    PORTLAND - 18 JUL 98 // TAMPA - 12 AUG 00 // PORTLAND - 02 NOV 00 // SEATTLE - 05 NOV 00 // SEATTLE - 09 DEC 02
    BERN, SWITZERLAND - 13 SEP 06 // PORTLAND - 26 SEP 09 // CHICAGO - 19 JUL 13 // PORTLAND - 29 NOV 13
    CHICAGO - 20 AUG 16 // CHICAGO - 22 AUG 16 // PHOENIX - 09 MAY 22 // CHICAGO - 05 SEP 23 // CHICAGO - 07 SEP 23
  • whygohome
    whygohome Posts: 2,305
    strilo wrote:
    pandora wrote:
    I am not seeing it a totally religious division
    and I have no idea how it plays out by political persuasion.

    There are two charts showing poll numbers on those exact breakdowns, religion and political party. Let me repost:

    376mfrydeu2byekfbjf-mg.gif

    9qu3xuq5nk6ix3xjo99xcg.gif

    Thanks for that. I'm a littler surprised by the Catholic support.
  • pandora
    pandora Posts: 21,855
    seems clear to me that you think the term marriage should only pertain to marriage between a man and a woman. what is it im missing here?
    Wrong again that is what preservers of marriage believe not me
    but you hear only what you want to hear.

    You also think I am not pro gay marriage wrong again!
    I am mostly pro gay rights though
    and don't want to have my friends waiting any longer for their civil union equal rights,
    they have waited a lifetime already.
  • pandora
    pandora Posts: 21,855
    ComeToTX wrote:
    pandora wrote:
    ComeToTX wrote:
    Slavery happened in our past. We changed that. It's really not that difficult. The longer it goes on the more embarrassed we will be about it later.
    that was a war though :shock:

    and the rest of the world only 10 nations accept gay unions, only 6 states here
    there is a long way to go ...
    give equal rights to gay civil unions today!

    Ok. Civil Rights then. Let's only go back a few decades. There's zero difference.
    totally agree
  • strilo
    strilo Portland OR Posts: 496
    You agree but you are advocating the "separate but equal" option. How is that good?
    PORTLAND - 18 JUL 98 // TAMPA - 12 AUG 00 // PORTLAND - 02 NOV 00 // SEATTLE - 05 NOV 00 // SEATTLE - 09 DEC 02
    BERN, SWITZERLAND - 13 SEP 06 // PORTLAND - 26 SEP 09 // CHICAGO - 19 JUL 13 // PORTLAND - 29 NOV 13
    CHICAGO - 20 AUG 16 // CHICAGO - 22 AUG 16 // PHOENIX - 09 MAY 22 // CHICAGO - 05 SEP 23 // CHICAGO - 07 SEP 23
  • pandora
    pandora Posts: 21,855
    The stats are great ...
    I too was surprised how close the religious support was for Catholics.

    I guess marriage is considered a religious thing for many more than I had imagined,
    I have never felt that way.

    It was a matter of lifetime love for us, something my gay friends have shared but
    without the benefit of even a civil gay union. I hope they will at least have this soon at
    this late stage in life.
  • dog-chasing-tails.jpg
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • pandora
    pandora Posts: 21,855
    strilo wrote:
    You agree but you are advocating the "separate but equal" option. How is that good?
    I am advocating rights now you would like to wait for the whole cookie jar...
    thats is fine but I have friends who can not wait
    and deserve equal civil gay union rights more than 25 years into their relationship!
    It is personal for me and I see an extended battle for the young while some of
    the older couples may need something else now.
  • Newch91
    Newch91 Posts: 17,560
    Bill Donohue, for you, ladies and gentlemen. :thumbdown:

    http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/05/1 ... criminate/
    Shows: 6.27.08 Hartford, CT/5.15.10 Hartford, CT/6.18.2011 Hartford, CT (EV Solo)/10.19.13 Brooklyn/10.25.13 Hartford
    "Becoming a Bruce fan is like hitting puberty as a musical fan. It's inevitable." - dcfaithful
  • ComeToTX
    ComeToTX Austin Posts: 8,072
    Newch91 wrote:
    Bill Donohue, for you, ladies and gentlemen. :thumbdown:

    http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/05/1 ... criminate/

    Sounds like a fun guy.
    This show, another show, a show here and a show there.
  • norm
    norm Posts: 31,146
    Newch91 wrote:
    Bill Donohue, for you, ladies and gentlemen. :thumbdown:

    http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/05/1 ... criminate/

    between this and the bristol link, you're batting a thousand posting links to major assholes today ;):lol:
  • Newch91
    Newch91 Posts: 17,560
    edited May 2012
    norm wrote:
    Newch91 wrote:
    Bill Donohue, for you, ladies and gentlemen. :thumbdown:

    http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/05/1 ... criminate/

    between this and the bristol link, you're batting a thousand posting links to major assholes today ;):lol:
    :lol: I think today I got your job. ;)

    I was going to post one by Santorum, but that one was pretty predictable.
    Post edited by Newch91 on
    Shows: 6.27.08 Hartford, CT/5.15.10 Hartford, CT/6.18.2011 Hartford, CT (EV Solo)/10.19.13 Brooklyn/10.25.13 Hartford
    "Becoming a Bruce fan is like hitting puberty as a musical fan. It's inevitable." - dcfaithful
  • This really has been one of the best reads going.

    Thanks. I've had a pretty rough week and coming home to this has been... pretty nice.

    And when I can renew my vows here in America... I want Pearl Jam to play and y'all to come.
  • norm
    norm Posts: 31,146
    This really has been one of the best reads going.

    Thanks. I've had a pretty rough week and coming home to this has been... pretty nice.

    And when I can renew my vows here in America... I want Pearl Jam to play and y'all to come.

    home? aren't you heading over the hill to george's to hang with the prez? ;):lol:
This discussion has been closed.