***The Official Philadelphia Phillies 2012 Thread***
Comments
-
just another reason to hate the howard contract. when I see that howard is gonna be around until 2017 I want to break down and cry
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/sports/ ... z0rVAMHhSA
phils have some really good prospects in A ball...cosart, colvin, singleton, santana, gose0 -
The Fixer wrote:just another reason to hate the howard contract. when I see that howard is gonna be around until 2017 I want to break down and cry
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/sports/ ... z0rVAMHhSA
phils have some really good prospects in A ball...cosart, colvin, singleton, santana, gose
dude. you're seriously sweating 2017 and some first baseman for lakewood today? seriously?
.290, 14 hrs, 51 rbi....this team has way more pressing issues than this right now.www.myspace.com0 -
The Jeagler wrote:The Fixer wrote:just another reason to hate the howard contract. when I see that howard is gonna be around until 2017 I want to break down and cry
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/sports/ ... z0rVAMHhSA
phils have some really good prospects in A ball...cosart, colvin, singleton, santana, gose
dude. you're seriously sweating 2017 and some first baseman for lakewood today? seriously?
.290, 14 hrs, 51 rbi....this team has way more pressing issues than this right now.
just saying that the contract is ridiulously bad
howard had a clutch AB on saturday too...not to mention his throws this weekend.0 -
http://deadspin.com/5568751/last-nights ... the-stairs
The blog deadspin links to has a betteer video as well. Pure awesomeness. I have probably watched it 30 times today.0 -
Cliffy6745 wrote:http://deadspin.com/5568751/last-nights-winner-the-phillies-fan-who-fell-down-the-stairs
The blog deadspin links to has a betteer video as well. Pure awesomeness. I have probably watched it 30 times today.
ha, awesome0 -
Cliffy6745 wrote:http://deadspin.com/5568751/last-nights-winner-the-phillies-fan-who-fell-down-the-stairs
The blog deadspin links to has a betteer video as well. Pure awesomeness. I have probably watched it 30 times today.
thats awesomei post on the board of a band that doesn't exsist anymore .......i need my head examined.......0 -
The Fixer wrote:The Jeagler wrote:The Fixer wrote:just another reason to hate the howard contract. when I see that howard is gonna be around until 2017 I want to break down and cry
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/sports/ ... z0rVAMHhSA
phils have some really good prospects in A ball...cosart, colvin, singleton, santana, gose
dude. you're seriously sweating 2017 and some first baseman for lakewood today? seriously?
.290, 14 hrs, 51 rbi....this team has way more pressing issues than this right now.
just saying that the contract is ridiulously bad
howard had a clutch AB on saturday too...not to mention his throws this weekend.
oh really? you don't like the contract?
4hr's in the last 5 games or so. much bigger issues to worry about right now than the R6www.myspace.com0 -
The Jeagler wrote:
oh really? you don't like the contract?
4hr's in the last 5 games or so. much bigger issues to worry about right now than the R6
he was terrible on saturday0 -
Well, that makes two Sundays at the park where I continuously yawned for three hours.0
-
What do u want Howard to do be perfect? The dudes hitting the shit out the ball and yet you come on here and bitch about him again. I bet he could have 20hrs 70rbis and you'd still bitch that his on base perc isn't high enough for your liking. Is he the greatest fielding 1st baseman not by a long shot but he does a decent job. And his hitting more then makes up for his fielding in my eyes.Go Birds!!!!0
-
jamminpearls wrote:What do u want Howard to do be perfect? The dudes hitting the shit out the ball and yet you come on here and bitch about him again. I bet he could have 20hrs 70rbis and you'd still bitch that his on base perc isn't high enough for your liking. Is he the greatest fielding 1st baseman not by a long shot but he does a decent job. And his hitting more then makes up for his fielding in my eyes.
agree and notice how the Howard bashers and obp lovers conveniently ignored The Jaegler's post about the phis winning percentage when Howard hits a homer.0 -
pjhawks wrote:jamminpearls wrote:What do u want Howard to do be perfect? The dudes hitting the shit out the ball and yet you come on here and bitch about him again. I bet he could have 20hrs 70rbis and you'd still bitch that his on base perc isn't high enough for your liking. Is he the greatest fielding 1st baseman not by a long shot but he does a decent job. And his hitting more then makes up for his fielding in my eyes.
agree and notice how the Howard bashers and obp lovers conveniently ignored The Jaegler's post about the phis winning percentage when Howard hits a homer.
I am not getting back involved with this conversation but 10 games is an incredibly small sample size.0 -
Cliffy6745 wrote:pjhawks wrote:jamminpearls wrote:What do u want Howard to do be perfect? The dudes hitting the shit out the ball and yet you come on here and bitch about him again. I bet he could have 20hrs 70rbis and you'd still bitch that his on base perc isn't high enough for your liking. Is he the greatest fielding 1st baseman not by a long shot but he does a decent job. And his hitting more then makes up for his fielding in my eyes.
agree and notice how the Howard bashers and obp lovers conveniently ignored The Jaegler's post about the phis winning percentage when Howard hits a homer.
I am not getting back involved with this conversation but 10 games is an incredibly small sample size.
agreed. that wasn't my point in posting it. just thought it was an interesting stat....then they go and bash 5 homers and the bullpen blows it. go figure.www.myspace.com0 -
pjhawks wrote:jamminpearls wrote:What do u want Howard to do be perfect? The dudes hitting the shit out the ball and yet you come on here and bitch about him again. I bet he could have 20hrs 70rbis and you'd still bitch that his on base perc isn't high enough for your liking. Is he the greatest fielding 1st baseman not by a long shot but he does a decent job. And his hitting more then makes up for his fielding in my eyes.
agree and notice how the Howard bashers and obp lovers conveniently ignored The Jaegler's post about the phis winning percentage when Howard hits a homer.
Was bored tonight so I did a little research with the top sluggers of the 4 best teams arguably since 2004 - Red Sox, Yankees, Phils and Cardinals. Between them they've won 5 of the last 6 World Series and went through game logs to see winning percentage in games in which their big slugger (Ortiz, A Rod, Howard and Pujols hit homers since 04 - for Howard 05) Not trying to prove anything - was just curious as to what were winning percentages when top sluggers homered for their teams.
Boston - Ortiz:
2004 41 homers 27-11
2005 47 homers 24-13
2006 54 homers 33-15
2007 35 homers 23-8
2008 23 homers 15-5
2009 28 homers 23-4
2010 15 homers 11-2
Overall record 156-58 .729 winning percentage
Yankees - A Rod:
2004 36 homers 25-8
2005 48 homers 31-12
2006 35 homers 20-11
2007 54 homers 35-11
2008 35 homers 23-12
2009 30 homers 20-7
2010 8 homers 6-2
Overall record 160-63 .717 winning percentage
Phillies - Howard
2005 22 homers - 16-6
2006 58 homers - 32-18
2007 47 homers - 27-15
2008 48 homers - 26-17
2009 45 homers - 26-13
2010 14 homers - 11-2
Overall record 138-71 .660 winning prcentage
Cardinals - Pujols
2004 46 homers - 32-9
2005 41 homers - 29-10
2006 49 homers - 32-12
2007 32 homers - 16-12
2008 37 homers - 25-9
2009 47 homers - 30-6
2010 15 homers - 8-3
Overall record 172-61 .738 winning percentage- Busted down the pretext
- 8/28/98
- 9/2/00
- 4/28/03, 5/3/03, 7/3/03, 7/5/03, 7/6/03, 7/9/03, 7/11/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03
- 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 10/1/04, 10/2/04
- 9/11/05, 9/12/05, 9/13/05, 9/30/05, 10/1/05, 10/3/05
- 5/12/06, 5/13/06, 5/27/06, 5/28/06, 5/30/06, 6/1/06, 6/3/06, 6/23/06, 7/22/06, 7/23/06, 12/2/06, 12/9/06
- 8/2/07, 8/5/07
- 6/19/08, 6/20/08, 6/22/08, 6/24/08, 6/25/08, 6/27/08, 6/28/08, 6/30/08, 7/1/08
- 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 9/21/09, 9/22/09, 10/27/09, 10/28/09, 10/30/09, 10/31/09
- 5/15/10, 5/17/10, 5/18/10, 5/20/10, 5/21/10, 10/23/10, 10/24/10
- 9/11/11, 9/12/11
- 10/18/13, 10/21/13, 10/22/13, 11/30/13, 12/4/130 -
Solat13 wrote:pjhawks wrote:jamminpearls wrote:What do u want Howard to do be perfect? The dudes hitting the shit out the ball and yet you come on here and bitch about him again. I bet he could have 20hrs 70rbis and you'd still bitch that his on base perc isn't high enough for your liking. Is he the greatest fielding 1st baseman not by a long shot but he does a decent job. And his hitting more then makes up for his fielding in my eyes.
agree and notice how the Howard bashers and obp lovers conveniently ignored The Jaegler's post about the phis winning percentage when Howard hits a homer.
Was bored tonight so I did a little research with the top sluggers of the 4 best teams arguably since 2004 - Red Sox, Yankees, Phils and Cardinals. Between them they've won 5 of the last 6 World Series and went through game logs to see winning percentage in games in which their big slugger (Ortiz, A Rod, Howard and Pujols hit homers since 04 - for Howard 05) Not trying to prove anything - was just curious as to what were winning percentages when top sluggers homered for their teams.
Boston - Ortiz:
2004 41 homers 27-11
2005 47 homers 24-13
2006 54 homers 33-15
2007 35 homers 23-8
2008 23 homers 15-5
2009 28 homers 23-4
2010 15 homers 11-2
Overall record 156-58 .729 winning percentage
Yankees - A Rod:
2004 36 homers 25-8
2005 48 homers 31-12
2006 35 homers 20-11
2007 54 homers 35-11
2008 35 homers 23-12
2009 30 homers 20-7
2010 8 homers 6-2
Overall record 160-63 .717 winning percentage
Phillies - Howard
2005 22 homers - 16-6
2006 58 homers - 32-18
2007 47 homers - 27-15
2008 48 homers - 26-17
2009 45 homers - 26-13
2010 14 homers - 11-2
Overall record 138-71 .660 winning prcentage
Cardinals - Pujols
2004 46 homers - 32-9
2005 41 homers - 29-10
2006 49 homers - 32-12
2007 32 homers - 16-12
2008 37 homers - 25-9
2009 47 homers - 30-6
2010 15 homers - 8-3
Overall record 172-61 .738 winning percentage
you got too much time on your hands dudewww.myspace.com0 -
Solat13 wrote:pjhawks wrote:jamminpearls wrote:What do u want Howard to do be perfect? The dudes hitting the shit out the ball and yet you come on here and bitch about him again. I bet he could have 20hrs 70rbis and you'd still bitch that his on base perc isn't high enough for your liking. Is he the greatest fielding 1st baseman not by a long shot but he does a decent job. And his hitting more then makes up for his fielding in my eyes.
agree and notice how the Howard bashers and obp lovers conveniently ignored The Jaegler's post about the phis winning percentage when Howard hits a homer.
Was bored tonight so I did a little research with the top sluggers of the 4 best teams arguably since 2004 - Red Sox, Yankees, Phils and Cardinals. Between them they've won 5 of the last 6 World Series and went through game logs to see winning percentage in games in which their big slugger (Ortiz, A Rod, Howard and Pujols hit homers since 04 - for Howard 05) Not trying to prove anything - was just curious as to what were winning percentages when top sluggers homered for their teams.
Boston - Ortiz:
2004 41 homers 27-11
2005 47 homers 24-13
2006 54 homers 33-15
2007 35 homers 23-8
2008 23 homers 15-5
2009 28 homers 23-4
2010 15 homers 11-2
Overall record 156-58 .729 winning percentage
Yankees - A Rod:
2004 36 homers 25-8
2005 48 homers 31-12
2006 35 homers 20-11
2007 54 homers 35-11
2008 35 homers 23-12
2009 30 homers 20-7
2010 8 homers 6-2
Overall record 160-63 .717 winning percentage
Phillies - Howard
2005 22 homers - 16-6
2006 58 homers - 32-18
2007 47 homers - 27-15
2008 48 homers - 26-17
2009 45 homers - 26-13
2010 14 homers - 11-2
Overall record 138-71 .660 winning prcentage
Cardinals - Pujols
2004 46 homers - 32-9
2005 41 homers - 29-10
2006 49 homers - 32-12
2007 32 homers - 16-12
2008 37 homers - 25-9
2009 47 homers - 30-6
2010 15 homers - 8-3
Overall record 172-61 .738 winning percentage
Good stuff, man. Baseball-Reference whiz you are.0 -
pjhawks wrote:jamminpearls wrote:What do u want Howard to do be perfect? The dudes hitting the shit out the ball and yet you come on here and bitch about him again. I bet he could have 20hrs 70rbis and you'd still bitch that his on base perc isn't high enough for your liking. Is he the greatest fielding 1st baseman not by a long shot but he does a decent job. And his hitting more then makes up for his fielding in my eyes.
agree and notice how the Howard bashers and obp lovers conveniently ignored The Jaegler's post about the phis winning percentage when Howard hits a homer.
there is more to baseball than hitting home runs. My point is that the guy is getting paid 25 mill a year. he better be damn near close to perfect to earn that contract. and he's not. actually he's far from it.
biggest AB of the game on saturday and he K's on 3 pitches. he's just not that good0 -
Solat13 wrote:pjhawks wrote:jamminpearls wrote:What do u want Howard to do be perfect? The dudes hitting the shit out the ball and yet you come on here and bitch about him again. I bet he could have 20hrs 70rbis and you'd still bitch that his on base perc isn't high enough for your liking. Is he the greatest fielding 1st baseman not by a long shot but he does a decent job. And his hitting more then makes up for his fielding in my eyes.
agree and notice how the Howard bashers and obp lovers conveniently ignored The Jaegler's post about the phis winning percentage when Howard hits a homer.
Was bored tonight so I did a little research with the top sluggers of the 4 best teams arguably since 2004 - Red Sox, Yankees, Phils and Cardinals. Between them they've won 5 of the last 6 World Series and went through game logs to see winning percentage in games in which their big slugger (Ortiz, A Rod, Howard and Pujols hit homers since 04 - for Howard 05) Not trying to prove anything - was just curious as to what were winning percentages when top sluggers homered for their teams.
Boston - Ortiz:
2004 41 homers 27-11
2005 47 homers 24-13
2006 54 homers 33-15
2007 35 homers 23-8
2008 23 homers 15-5
2009 28 homers 23-4
2010 15 homers 11-2
Overall record 156-58 .729 winning percentage
Yankees - A Rod:
2004 36 homers 25-8
2005 48 homers 31-12
2006 35 homers 20-11
2007 54 homers 35-11
2008 35 homers 23-12
2009 30 homers 20-7
2010 8 homers 6-2
Overall record 160-63 .717 winning percentage
Phillies - Howard
2005 22 homers - 16-6
2006 58 homers - 32-18
2007 47 homers - 27-15
2008 48 homers - 26-17
2009 45 homers - 26-13
2010 14 homers - 11-2
Overall record 138-71 .660 winning prcentage
Cardinals - Pujols
2004 46 homers - 32-9
2005 41 homers - 29-10
2006 49 homers - 32-12
2007 32 homers - 16-12
2008 37 homers - 25-9
2009 47 homers - 30-6
2010 15 homers - 8-3
Overall record 172-61 .738 winning percentage
I don't think there is a direct correlation here. Hitting a home run is one of numerous variables that goes in to winning a baseball game.
For example, we could look at adam dunn's record every time he hits a home run. His teams' record would still suck in those games.
One player hitting a home run and his team winning are virtually independent when discussing why teams win games0 -
The Fixer wrote:pjhawks wrote:jamminpearls wrote:What do u want Howard to do be perfect? The dudes hitting the shit out the ball and yet you come on here and bitch about him again. I bet he could have 20hrs 70rbis and you'd still bitch that his on base perc isn't high enough for your liking. Is he the greatest fielding 1st baseman not by a long shot but he does a decent job. And his hitting more then makes up for his fielding in my eyes.
agree and notice how the Howard bashers and obp lovers conveniently ignored The Jaegler's post about the phis winning percentage when Howard hits a homer.
there is more to baseball than hitting home runs. My point is that the guy is getting paid 25 mill a year. he better be damn near close to perfect to earn that contract. and he's not. actually he's far from it.
biggest AB of the game on saturday and he K's on 3 pitches. he's just not that good
so ignore his pure dominance of the game friday night and focus on one at bat on saturday. typical of a certain philly type fan who just constantly harps on our star players never EVER pointing out their good qualities.0 -
pjhawks wrote:The Fixer wrote:pjhawks wrote:
agree and notice how the Howard bashers and obp lovers conveniently ignored The Jaegler's post about the phis winning percentage when Howard hits a homer.
there is more to baseball than hitting home runs. My point is that the guy is getting paid 25 mill a year. he better be damn near close to perfect to earn that contract. and he's not. actually he's far from it.
biggest AB of the game on saturday and he K's on 3 pitches. he's just not that good
so ignore his pure dominance of the game friday night and focus on one at bat on saturday.
sorry, 1-6 with 3 K's on saturday. the one AB just sticks out in my mind. ya know, since it was the biggest of the game.
but he hit a HR saturday!! YAY0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help