casual sex

13468911

Comments

  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    dunkman wrote:
    with no underwear as well... :):):):):):):)

    even better. nothing like taking advantage of an opportunity i say. :D

    i knew there was a reason i loved scotland. i knew it couldn't have been just for the bay city rollers. and ewan macgregor :D:p
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    even better. nothing like taking advantage of an opportunity i say. :D


    absolutely... which is why i have glued mirrors onto the top of all my shoes :)
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    this is what scottish women wear

    and here is me in my kilt
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    dunkman wrote:

    oh my dunk. i had to go fan myself. :D:D

    a funny scotsman who would have thunk it. :p
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    oh my dunk. i had to go fan myself. :D:D

    a funny scotsman who would have thunk it. :p


    a saucy aussie woman who puts cream eclairs between her boobs and forces me to eat it whilst making tiger noises... who would have thunked that!!! :p... :confused:
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • CollinCollin Posts: 4,931
    yeah, but eventually someone always wants more or gets jealous and then feelings get hurt.

    I wouldn't say that's always the case, but I can imagine it happens a lot.
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    dunkman wrote:
    a saucy aussie woman who puts cream eclairs between her boobs and forces me to eat it whilst making tiger noises... who would have thunked that!!! :p... :confused:

    dairy makes me logey. but about those tiger noises...... :p
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • CollinCollin Posts: 4,931
    know1 wrote:
    I have little respect for people who treat sex so casually.
    know1 wrote:
    For a variety of reasons. Among them that it cheapens the experience, it's selfish, demonstrates that someone lacks self-restraint, I think it should be saved for marriage, etc., etc.

    Do you feel the same way when we're talking about people how have casual sex with a friend, someone they have known for years?

    Does that cheapen the experience as well. How does that make it selfish?
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    dairy makes me logey. but about those tiger noises...... :p

    ah well... i'll just use my own home made cream... its dairy-free :)
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    dunkman wrote:
    ah well... i'll just use my own home made cream... its dairy-free :)

    yes. i'm sure it is dunk. :rolleyes:
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Q: But if women don't want a relationship, shouldn't they be able to have no-strings-attached sex as easily as men?

    A: They can. But just because they can doesn't mean they should.



    what the hell does that mean? i can and i will. there is no should. if all i want is sex then that's all i'm gonna get. why do people have to make it so complicated with their mumbo jumbo.

    becos it seems many of them are getting depressed as a result. it didn't say women never should, it says they shouldn't do it just becos they can. they should be honest with themselves about what they really want. and that goes for men as well.

    should 11 year olds be fucking just becos they're capable and everything they see in society tells them to?
  • cornnifercornnifer Posts: 2,130
    Collin wrote:
    True. I'd say there's a huge difference between the two.

    HUGE difference? not really. casual sex severtal times with the same partner is simply a series of one night stands with the same person. "Fuck Buddies", if you will. Sex within the boundaries of a serious, comitted relationship is not casual.
    "When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."
  • cornnifercornnifer Posts: 2,130
    well yeah, i think the only reason i mentioned alcohol was to illustrate just how undesirable this sexual lifestyle is. .

    Besides the fact that it is completely unattractive. i've passed on having sex with my WIFE when she was drunk. On more than one occasion. Its a turn-off.

    Sleep it off for a few hours and when you wake up, if you're still in the mood, my dick will still be hard. :)
    "When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."
  • CollinCollin Posts: 4,931
    cornnifer wrote:
    HUGE difference? not really. casual sex severtal times with the same partner is simply a series of one night stands with the same person. "Fuck Buddies", if you will. Sex within the boundaries of a serious, comitted relationship is not casual.

    "Fuck buddies" and one-night-stands are no the same thing, imo. Just as friends and complete strangers aren't the same thing, imo.
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • Collin wrote:
    "Fuck buddies" and one-night-stands are no the same thing, imo. Just as friends and complete strangers aren't the same thing, imo.


    i agree. but for those who dont: what is the difference between "fuck-buddies" and "lovers"..?

    i dont see how anyone can criticize "priviledged-friends" or whatever, sicne that indeed does require some form of interactive relationship.

    i was wondering yesterday if anyone would mention "open-relationships", which in some cases includes "married-couples", but i havent seen anything said yet.--i'm curious what the consensus is around here regarding such "situations",...???
    we don’t know just where our bones will rest,
    to dust i guess,
    forgotten and absorbed into the earth below,..
  • cornnifercornnifer Posts: 2,130
    i agree. but for those who dont: what is the difference between "fuck-buddies" and "lovers"..?

    i dont see how anyone can criticize "priviledged-friends" or whatever, sicne that indeed does require some form of interactive relationship.

    i was wondering yesterday if anyone would mention "open-relationships", which in some cases includes "married-couples", but i havent seen anything said yet.--i'm curious what the consensus is around here regarding such "situations",...???

    What is the difference between "fuck Buddies" and "lovers"?! uhhh... for starters the LOVE part! As a matter of fact i sort of resent it went someone refers to the warm body they happen to be casually fucking this week as their "lover". What bullshit. Be honest call them your "fucker". Thats really all they are.
    While i'm on a roll, i also am not really fond of the term "making love". You're not making LOVE. You're fucking. Period. And if you are fucking somebody you are in love with already, (first of all, good for you), secondly, you're still not MAKING love, the love is already there. You may be EXPRESSING love (sex is an absolutely beautiful way to do that), but you're not MAKING anything.


    Open relationships = "fuck buddies" see above for explanation. Anyone "married" and in one of these style relationships is absolutely pitiful. In fact not really "married" at all. Marriage is not a paper and tax filing status. "Married is a true commitment. i don't care who i offend with this oppinion. i really don't.
    "When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."
  • cornnifer wrote:
    What is the difference between "fuck Buddies" and "lovers"?! uhhh... for starters the LOVE part! As a matter of fact i sort of resent it went someone refers to the warm body they happen to be casually fucking this week as their "lover". What bullshit. Be honest call them your "fucker". Thats really all they are.
    While i'm on a roll, i also am not really fond of the term "making love". You're not making LOVE. You're fucking. Period. And if you are fucking somebody you are in love with already, (first of all, good for you), secondly, you're still not MAKING love, the love is already there. You may be EXPRESSING love (sex is an absolutely beautiful way to do that), but you're not MAKING anything.


    Open relationships = "fuck buddies" see above for explanation. Anyone "married" and in one of these style relationships is absolutely pitiful. In fact not really "married" at all. Marriage is not a paper and tax filing status. "Married is a true commitment. i don't care who i offend with this oppinion. i really don't.


    that was awwesome.

    i dont agree with most of what youve said, but you havent offended me either since really none of it applies to me personally.

    i think youre generalizing far too much to have your opinions taken seriously by anyone with a respectable level of intelligence [i hope that doesnt offend u!].

    so, uh, youre an expert on "MAKING love"? personally i feel i can always improve in that regard, if ya wanna pm me some tips or pointers or whatever.

    next, if sex is such a beautiful way of expressing love, where is the inherent negativity in friends sharing in that sort of connection without feeling a need to get married? in this view marriage is a sort of paper-trail commitment, because any two people can make, share, fuck, or express love without including the ridiculous authority of priestdom.

    now these arent necessarily my private feelings regarding these topics, but i do think this is a very interesting and valid conversation, especially given globalization and the inevitable assimilation [clash] of ideas and cultures.
    we don’t know just where our bones will rest,
    to dust i guess,
    forgotten and absorbed into the earth below,..
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    cornnifer wrote:
    What is the difference between "fuck Buddies" and "lovers"?! uhhh... for starters the LOVE part! As a matter of fact i sort of resent it went someone refers to the warm body they happen to be casually fucking this week as their "lover". What bullshit. Be honest call them your "fucker". Thats really all they are.
    While i'm on a roll, i also am not really fond of the term "making love". You're not making LOVE. You're fucking. Period. And if you are fucking somebody you are in love with already, (first of all, good for you), secondly, you're still not MAKING love, the love is already there. You may be EXPRESSING love (sex is an absolutely beautiful way to do that), but you're not MAKING anything.


    Open relationships = "fuck buddies" see above for explanation. Anyone "married" and in one of these style relationships is absolutely pitiful. In fact not really "married" at all. Marriage is not a paper and tax filing status. "Married is a true commitment. i don't care who i offend with this oppinion. i really don't.

    When a person has sex they are exchanging pheramones with the other person. Chemicals flow through their brain and create a unique chemical bond to that person. Essentially "making love" biochemically. This happens regardless of whether they phenomenologically feel in-love with the person.

    Besides that I agree, and it should be "Fucking" simply to create that distinction between casual sex and "Making Love" which is commonly attributed to sex between in-love participants.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • brain of cbrain of c Posts: 5,213
    cornnifer wrote:
    Besides the fact that it is completely unattractive. i've passed on having sex with my WIFE when she was drunk. On more than one occasion. Its a turn-off.

    :)

    i never turn your wife down when she's drunk.
  • tooferztooferz Posts: 135
    cornnifer wrote:
    What is the difference between "fuck Buddies" and "lovers"?! uhhh... for starters the LOVE part! As a matter of fact i sort of resent it went someone refers to the warm body they happen to be casually fucking this week as their "lover". What bullshit. Be honest call them your "fucker". Thats really all they are.
    While i'm on a roll, i also am not really fond of the term "making love". You're not making LOVE. You're fucking. Period. And if you are fucking somebody you are in love with already, (first of all, good for you), secondly, you're still not MAKING love, the love is already there. You may be EXPRESSING love (sex is an absolutely beautiful way to do that), but you're not MAKING anything.

    to be friends of the sort to be fuck buddies would have to involve love and trust most of the time i'd think. fb's aren't usually week long deals....they usually cover months or years so there would almost have to be love there. so why can't they express love that way? friends of the same sex express love thru hugs n kisses or big bearlike manly hugs. a friendship that encompasses love and sex doesn't necessarily need to involve a contract of sorts to be right or good.
  • lucylespianlucylespian Posts: 2,403
    cornnifer wrote:
    What is the difference between "fuck Buddies" and "lovers"?! uhhh... for starters the LOVE part! As a matter of fact i sort of resent it went someone refers to the warm body they happen to be casually fucking this week as their "lover". What bullshit. Be honest call them your "fucker". Thats really all they are.
    While i'm on a roll, i also am not really fond of the term "making love". You're not making LOVE. You're fucking. Period. And if you are fucking somebody you are in love with already, (first of all, good for you), secondly, you're still not MAKING love, the love is already there. You may be EXPRESSING love (sex is an absolutely beautiful way to do that), but you're not MAKING anything.


    Open relationships = "fuck buddies" see above for explanation. Anyone "married" and in one of these style relationships is absolutely pitiful. In fact not really "married" at all. Marriage is not a paper and tax filing status. "Married is a true commitment. i don't care who i offend with this oppinion. i really don't.

    WEll it's a funny thing, but LOVE is by it's very nature a momentary thing. You do actually generate love when you fuck, even if it's a complete stranger. There is joy, and passion and great connection. When that is lacking, it is the people failing as people there, not something inherently wrong with teh act. On the other hand teh last tihng that disappears from a failing relationship is sex, and people, esp amrried people will continue to fuck long after they come to detest each other. Why ??? Cos they actually feel good while they are doing it, and they feel the echo of LOPVE wioth that partner.
    MAke-up sex is a great example of this.
    I have had plenty of casual sex in my younger years, and I tell you I really strongly disagree with this whole, "women fortify themselves with alcohol to withstand the emotional trauma" which they then inflict on themselves crap. A sample size of seven women proves nothing, it's just a brief bit of bench racing. So she picked one chick eho does that, big deal. Maybe that chick needs to stop being part of the ME generation and sort out her intimacy and attachment issues.
    Music is not a competetion.
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    becos it seems many of them are getting depressed as a result. it didn't say women never should, it says they shouldn't do it just becos they can. they should be honest with themselves about what they really want. and that goes for men as well.

    should 11 year olds be fucking just becos they're capable and everything they see in society tells them to?

    so they drunk, fuck and then get buyers remorse and get depressed?

    here's a tip girls: don't drink. simple. if you can't be in control of yourselves even while drinking then perhaps you shouldn't be drinking in the first place.

    no i don't think 11 year olds should be fucking. and that's hardly comparative. but i'm sure you already know that. :)
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • lucylespianlucylespian Posts: 2,403
    so they drunk, fuck and then get buyers remorse and get depressed?

    here's a tip girls: don't drink. simple. if you can't be in control of yourselves even while drinking then perhaps you shouldn't be drinking in the first place.

    no i don't think 11 year olds should be fucking. and that's hardly comparative. but i'm sure you already know that. :)

    It's a neat littel fact that small amount s of alcohol make girlsd horny, giving rise to teh famous expression " leg-opener". LOL !!

    I think what you said about get drunk, have sex, wake up to some beery slob and feel remorseful scenario is much more likely than the get drunk so you can stand it one.
    Most of the girls I had casual sex with woke up feeling like having one for the road, rather than remorseful, but then I always did focus on having a good time by giving them a good time.
    You never know, they might tell a friend, nothing like a word of mouth recomendation.
    Music is not a competetion.
  • It's a neat littel fact that small amount s of alcohol make girlsd horny, giving rise to teh famous expression " leg-opener". LOL !!

    I think what you said about get drunk, have sex, wake up to some beery slob and feel remorseful scenario is much more likely than the get drunk so you can stand it one.
    Most of the girls I had casual sex with woke up feeling like having one for the road, rather than remorseful, but then I always did focus on having a good time by giving them a good time.
    You never know, they might tell a friend, nothing like a word of mouth recomendation.

    Exactly !...lol..I'm inthe same boat... and nothing like morning sex before you part ways !
    Master of Zen
  • ScubascottScubascott Posts: 815
    Exactly !...lol..I'm inthe same boat... and nothing like morning sex before you part ways !

    Except for the stinky breath part. I've never met anyone who doesn't have foul breath when they wake up in the morning, especially if they've had a big night on the piss the night before. . .
    It doesn't matter if you're male, female, or confused; black, white, brown, red, green, yellow; gay, lesbian; redneck cop, stoned; ugly; military style, doggy style; fat, rich or poor; vegetarian or cannibal; bum, hippie, virgin; famous or drunk-you're either an asshole or you're not!

    -C Addison
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    Maybe that chick needs to stop being part of the ME generation and sort out her intimacy and attachment issues.

    i think that is kinda the whole point of the article. i mean, just becos a small number of people have drug problems or depression or were sexually abused, does that mean we shouldn't talk about it or try to help people out of it?
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    so they drunk, fuck and then get buyers remorse and get depressed?

    here's a tip girls: don't drink. simple. if you can't be in control of yourselves even while drinking then perhaps you shouldn't be drinking in the first place.

    no i don't think 11 year olds should be fucking. and that's hardly comparative. but i'm sure you already know that. :)

    that seems to be what the article is saying. all im saying is what you just said... do what you want, just be sure it's ACTUALLY what you want. not what society tells you will make you feel better.
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    that seems to be what the article is saying. all im saying is what you just said... do what you want, just be sure it's ACTUALLY what you want. not what society tells you will make you feel better.

    well there you go conor, we're in agreeance. wanna buy me a drink? :D:D:p
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    well there you go conor, we're in agreeance. wanna buy me a drink? :D:D:p

    i would, but i was raised catholic so i ALREADY feel guilty :)
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    i would, but i was raised catholic so i ALREADY feel guilty :)
    so... you can't buy girls drinks? i don't rememeber hearing that during confirmation. :)
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
Sign In or Register to comment.