60% of some folks eh? The next election isn't looking good for you or your 807,000 jobs.
My 807,000 jobs? I’ve been gainfully employed since I was 14.
60% of ‘Muricans are delusional. I’ll not enjoy watching ‘Murica implode from afar in November’22 and further in ‘24. Enjoy!
Tsk-tsk. Didn't we have the big "D" word debate already? My apologies if you have achieved medical clearance for its use, if so, congratulations on your accomplishment and informed diagnosis. We could use another expert around here, especially one outside of the crowded bunch of political science and infectious disease scholars.
What would you call those 'Muricans in deep denial about the 2020 election, science and facts in general? Tsk, tsk indeed.
I would have said delusional, as well. But that was before I was informed that one must be able to diagnose the condition in order to use the word.
If you’re making a diagnosis for a medical reason. I’m using it as a descriptor.
As was I when you took offense and asked if I was qualified to make that diagnosis. Anywho, this wraps up today’s lesson in hypocrisy.
And you could have said, “no, I’m not a doctor but I can describe someone as such based upon the word. Hell I can even believe it too if I want.” But you didn’t, did you?
I actually linked the definition and confirmed that it was a perfectly acceptable use of the term, much like you just did. That did not seem to suffice at the time so I was just a bit surprised to see you using the word.
Care to link to your post and our exchange? Context matters.
Just came here to say that if your barometer of approval is against Donald Trump I'd say people need to do better. Joe's in the tank for a number of reasons - and one very important one isn't because everyone all of a sudden woke up one day more conservative. Big part of it is because the people left of Joe are all also highly disappointed and disapprove. That's my two cents. Good chance Trump may not be the nom in 2024, but that doesn't make Joe's chances better. At this rate I think he loses in 4 years because 1) R nom will be someone other than Trump 2) Dems do better on referendum with a nominee with juice/hopey changey schtick 3) there won't be a Trump to ignite anyone and everyone.
Gotta pray this 1/6 commission comes with so many receipts.
This is part of the problem democrats have. I've talked about this a lot in here. Republicans are better at getting everyone in their party to fall in line no matter what. Republicans, in general, just seem to not care about anything other than voting for the person with the R next to his name so it makes things much easier for that party. For example, the guy in here today seems upset that the jobs numbers are looking good right now. Something that's good for the country is not that great for his party so he's not happy.
The dems, on the other hand, have a much bigger tent of waaaay more diverse people, which is great, but that also makes it more difficult for them to get their constituents to have the level of patience needed to stay focused on maintaining the longest view in the room. The change those on the far left want just cannot happen over night. It will take multiple election cycles.
Personally--I just wish people would make preserving our democracy priority number for the moment because if we cannot do that, nothing else will matter anyway.
And I really hope Trump gets the nomination because, yeah I agree, someone like Desantis would have better chance of winning.
Do you believe our democracy is in danger? Democrats are in full control of the national government. Are they failing at protecting or democracy? I had to hear for 4 years that Trump was destroying our democracy. If that was true, how did Democrats gain full power?
full control means a filibuster proof majority in the Senate.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
60% of some folks eh? The next election isn't looking good for you or your 807,000 jobs.
My 807,000 jobs? I’ve been gainfully employed since I was 14.
60% of ‘Muricans are delusional. I’ll not enjoy watching ‘Murica implode from afar in November’22 and further in ‘24. Enjoy!
Tsk-tsk. Didn't we have the big "D" word debate already? My apologies if you have achieved medical clearance for its use, if so, congratulations on your accomplishment and informed diagnosis. We could use another expert around here, especially one outside of the crowded bunch of political science and infectious disease scholars.
What would you call those 'Muricans in deep denial about the 2020 election, science and facts in general? Tsk, tsk indeed.
I would have said delusional, as well. But that was before I was informed that one must be able to diagnose the condition in order to use the word.
If you’re making a diagnosis for a medical reason. I’m using it as a descriptor.
As was I when you took offense and asked if I was qualified to make that diagnosis. Anywho, this wraps up today’s lesson in hypocrisy.
And you could have said, “no, I’m not a doctor but I can describe someone as such based upon the word. Hell I can even believe it too if I want.” But you didn’t, did you?
I actually linked the definition and confirmed that it was a perfectly acceptable use of the term, much like you just did. That did not seem to suffice at the time so I was just a bit surprised to see you using the word.
Care to link to your post and our exchange? Context matters.
Given that the context in both cases is a matter of opinion, I do not see the point in searching for it. If you feel so inclined, combing through my comments would probably save some time.
60% of some folks eh? The next election isn't looking good for you or your 807,000 jobs.
My 807,000 jobs? I’ve been gainfully employed since I was 14.
60% of ‘Muricans are delusional. I’ll not enjoy watching ‘Murica implode from afar in November’22 and further in ‘24. Enjoy!
Tsk-tsk. Didn't we have the big "D" word debate already? My apologies if you have achieved medical clearance for its use, if so, congratulations on your accomplishment and informed diagnosis. We could use another expert around here, especially one outside of the crowded bunch of political science and infectious disease scholars.
What would you call those 'Muricans in deep denial about the 2020 election, science and facts in general? Tsk, tsk indeed.
I would have said delusional, as well. But that was before I was informed that one must be able to diagnose the condition in order to use the word.
If you’re making a diagnosis for a medical reason. I’m using it as a descriptor.
As was I when you took offense and asked if I was qualified to make that diagnosis. Anywho, this wraps up today’s lesson in hypocrisy.
And you could have said, “no, I’m not a doctor but I can describe someone as such based upon the word. Hell I can even believe it too if I want.” But you didn’t, did you?
I actually linked the definition and confirmed that it was a perfectly acceptable use of the term, much like you just did. That did not seem to suffice at the time so I was just a bit surprised to see you using the word.
Care to link to your post and our exchange? Context matters.
Given that the context in both cases is a matter of opinion, I do not see the point in searching for it. If you feel so inclined, combing through my comments would probably save some time.
Nah, I honestly don't recall the exchange, doesn't mean it didn't happen, nor the context. But you're the one who made the Big D comparison. If I were to make the same or similar allegation of a fellow poster, I'd be prepared to link or quote it but that's just me. But hell, maybe it was five years ago?
i am so glad that my support of a candidate in one single election is not an integral part of my identity.
must be hard to be a trump supporter these days.
That's the thing most of them cannot comprehend. They seem to assume people who voted for Biden are in a cult just like they are.
If all Trump supporters are in a cult, why do they not follow his advice on taking the vaccine?
This is a fair question. It gets to the weird dynamic between Trump and his base. I’ve contended for a long time that Trump follows the base, not the opposite. He knows the language they speak and connects that way. At the same time, the bizarre rallies with the get ups, the flags, the Rambo garbage is definitely on the cult side. Also the inability to either identify or care about the obvious lies is cultish as well.
i am so glad that my support of a candidate in one single election is not an integral part of my identity.
must be hard to be a trump supporter these days.
That's the thing most of them cannot comprehend. They seem to assume people who voted for Biden are in a cult just like they are.
If all Trump supporters are in a cult, why do they not follow his advice on taking the vaccine?
Because the news outlets and radio programs they watch/listen either don’t report it, barely mention it and/or rail against it, regardless. Heck, POOTWH was booed when he mentioned it at a rally and never followed up and implored folks to get it. Kinda just shrugged his shoulders and tossed that talking point, riff, mention, whatever, to the wind.
i am so glad that my support of a candidate in one single election is not an integral part of my identity.
must be hard to be a trump supporter these days.
That's the thing most of them cannot comprehend. They seem to assume people who voted for Biden are in a cult just like they are.
If all Trump supporters are in a cult, why do they not follow his advice on taking the vaccine?
Because the news outlets and radio programs they watch/listen either don’t report it, barely mention it and/or rail against it, regardless. Heck, POOTWH was booed when he mentioned it at a rally and never followed up and implored folks to get it. Kinda just shrugged his shoulders and tossed that talking point, riff, mention, whatever, to the wind.
You are wrong. Yes, he's mentioned it at multiple rallies and was
booed. To say he never followed up is not true. He's still toting the
vaccine and boosters. Right before Christmas Trump did an interview with
Candace Owens and was pushing people to take the vaccine. He did say it
was a choice but he told people they should get it because it could
save your life. He did a ton of harm to his image by doing this but it
was the right thing to do. Candace Owens and Alex Jones are both railing
against him for saying this.
i am so glad that my support of a candidate in one single election is not an integral part of my identity.
must be hard to be a trump supporter these days.
That's the thing most of them cannot comprehend. They seem to assume people who voted for Biden are in a cult just like they are.
If all Trump supporters are in a cult, why do they not follow his advice on taking the vaccine?
Because the news outlets and radio programs they watch/listen either don’t report it, barely mention it and/or rail against it, regardless. Heck, POOTWH was booed when he mentioned it at a rally and never followed up and implored folks to get it. Kinda just shrugged his shoulders and tossed that talking point, riff, mention, whatever, to the wind.
You are wrong. Yes, he's mentioned it at multiple rallies and was
booed. To say he never followed up is not true. He's still toting the
vaccine and boosters. Right before Christmas Trump did an interview with
Candace Owens and was pushing people to take the vaccine. He did say it
was a choice but he told people they should get it because it could
save your life. He did a ton of harm to his image by doing this but it
was the right thing to do. Candace Owens and Alex Jones are both railing
against him for saying this.
It is not "whatever" to the wind.
He has done the absolute bare minimum someone in his position should be doing to encourage people to get the vaccine. Same thing with masks and social distancing while he was still president. We now know they barely even followed their own cdc's guidelines in the White House.
On the other hand, he has been working overtime since before the election even happened to sow doubts into his supporters minds that he did not lose the election. I don't think there is more proof needed that these people are in a cult than the fact that they choose to simply ignore the abundance of evidence to the contrary. The vast majority of Trump supporters believe Trump won the election simply because Trump has been repeating this lie to them literally single every chance he gets for over a year now. If you hear the man you worship repeat something over and over and over and over again.....you're going to eventually believe it is true despite what reality is. I saw one poll that said over 80% of Fox News viewers believe it. lol.
It is an enormous problem moving forward when almost half the electorate will simply not accept the results of free and fair elections anymore. I don't expect you to understand that right now, but maybe someday you will.
i am so glad that my support of a candidate in one single election is not an integral part of my identity.
must be hard to be a trump supporter these days.
That's the thing most of them cannot comprehend. They seem to assume people who voted for Biden are in a cult just like they are.
If all Trump supporters are in a cult, why do they not follow his advice on taking the vaccine?
Because the news outlets and radio programs they watch/listen either don’t report it, barely mention it and/or rail against it, regardless. Heck, POOTWH was booed when he mentioned it at a rally and never followed up and implored folks to get it. Kinda just shrugged his shoulders and tossed that talking point, riff, mention, whatever, to the wind.
You are wrong. Yes, he's mentioned it at multiple rallies and was
booed. To say he never followed up is not true. He's still toting the
vaccine and boosters. Right before Christmas Trump did an interview with
Candace Owens and was pushing people to take the vaccine. He did say it
was a choice but he told people they should get it because it could
save your life. He did a ton of harm to his image by doing this but it
was the right thing to do. Candace Owens and Alex Jones are both railing
against him for saying this.
It is not "whatever" to the wind.
Do you remember John McCain taking the microphone away from the woman who said Obama wasn’t born here and the audience began to clap and cheer? That’s how you respond to misinformation when you’re running for, in a position of power or have accepted that you’re a former POTUS. For the good of the nation and the health of your “supporters.”
60% of some folks eh? The next election isn't looking good for you or your 807,000 jobs.
My 807,000 jobs? I’ve been gainfully employed since I was 14.
60% of ‘Muricans are delusional. I’ll not enjoy watching ‘Murica implode from afar in November’22 and further in ‘24. Enjoy!
Tsk-tsk. Didn't we have the big "D" word debate already? My apologies if you have achieved medical clearance for its use, if so, congratulations on your accomplishment and informed diagnosis. We could use another expert around here, especially one outside of the crowded bunch of political science and infectious disease scholars.
What would you call those 'Muricans in deep denial about the 2020 election, science and facts in general? Tsk, tsk indeed.
I would have said delusional, as well. But that was before I was informed that one must be able to diagnose the condition in order to use the word.
If you’re making a diagnosis for a medical reason. I’m using it as a descriptor.
As was I when you took offense and asked if I was qualified to make that diagnosis. Anywho, this wraps up today’s lesson in hypocrisy.
And you could have said, “no, I’m not a doctor but I can describe someone as such based upon the word. Hell I can even believe it too if I want.” But you didn’t, did you?
I actually linked the definition and confirmed that it was a perfectly acceptable use of the term, much like you just did. That did not seem to suffice at the time so I was just a bit surprised to see you using the word.
Care to link to your post and our exchange? Context matters.
Given that the context in both cases is a matter of opinion, I do not see the point in searching for it. If you feel so inclined, combing through my comments would probably save some time.
Nah, I honestly don't recall the exchange, doesn't mean it didn't happen, nor the context. But you're the one who made the Big D comparison. If I were to make the same or similar allegation of a fellow poster, I'd be prepared to link or quote it but that's just me. But hell, maybe it was five years ago?
It’s been awhile. I just found it bizarre to question ones understanding and usage of such a common word, and for some reason it stuck with me. Just returning a little friendly fire.
60% of some folks eh? The next election isn't looking good for you or your 807,000 jobs.
My 807,000 jobs? I’ve been gainfully employed since I was 14.
60% of ‘Muricans are delusional. I’ll not enjoy watching ‘Murica implode from afar in November’22 and further in ‘24. Enjoy!
Tsk-tsk. Didn't we have the big "D" word debate already? My apologies if you have achieved medical clearance for its use, if so, congratulations on your accomplishment and informed diagnosis. We could use another expert around here, especially one outside of the crowded bunch of political science and infectious disease scholars.
What would you call those 'Muricans in deep denial about the 2020 election, science and facts in general? Tsk, tsk indeed.
I would have said delusional, as well. But that was before I was informed that one must be able to diagnose the condition in order to use the word.
If you’re making a diagnosis for a medical reason. I’m using it as a descriptor.
As was I when you took offense and asked if I was qualified to make that diagnosis. Anywho, this wraps up today’s lesson in hypocrisy.
And you could have said, “no, I’m not a doctor but I can describe someone as such based upon the word. Hell I can even believe it too if I want.” But you didn’t, did you?
I actually linked the definition and confirmed that it was a perfectly acceptable use of the term, much like you just did. That did not seem to suffice at the time so I was just a bit surprised to see you using the word.
Care to link to your post and our exchange? Context matters.
Given that the context in both cases is a matter of opinion, I do not see the point in searching for it. If you feel so inclined, combing through my comments would probably save some time.
Nah, I honestly don't recall the exchange, doesn't mean it didn't happen, nor the context. But you're the one who made the Big D comparison. If I were to make the same or similar allegation of a fellow poster, I'd be prepared to link or quote it but that's just me. But hell, maybe it was five years ago?
It’s been awhile. I just found it bizarre to question ones understanding and usage of such a common word, and for some reason it stuck with me. Just returning a little friendly fire.
I can duck and cover. For the record, I didn’t diagnose anyone. Or write a scrip for them.
i am so glad that my support of a candidate in one single election is not an integral part of my identity.
must be hard to be a trump supporter these days.
That's the thing most of them cannot comprehend. They seem to assume people who voted for Biden are in a cult just like they are.
If all Trump supporters are in a cult, why do they not follow his advice on taking the vaccine?
Because the news outlets and radio programs they watch/listen either don’t report it, barely mention it and/or rail against it, regardless. Heck, POOTWH was booed when he mentioned it at a rally and never followed up and implored folks to get it. Kinda just shrugged his shoulders and tossed that talking point, riff, mention, whatever, to the wind.
You are wrong. Yes, he's mentioned it at multiple rallies and was
booed. To say he never followed up is not true. He's still toting the
vaccine and boosters. Right before Christmas Trump did an interview with
Candace Owens and was pushing people to take the vaccine. He did say it
was a choice but he told people they should get it because it could
save your life. He did a ton of harm to his image by doing this but it
was the right thing to do. Candace Owens and Alex Jones are both railing
against him for saying this.
It is not "whatever" to the wind.
I agree here. Sure, he has done the bare minimum when it comes to promoting the vaccine, but he has promoted it, even after knowing his base wasn't receptive to it, and going on shows like Candace Owens who is dead set against it. I understand it's a low bar to applaud the guy for this, but to pivot from saying "he hasn't promoted the vaccine" to "well then he hasn't promoted it enough" is disingenuous.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
he obviously wishes he could promote it more, and is probably confused why his base hates it so much, since he loves to be able to say he "created the vaccine", so he's in an awkward spot of trying to brag about something his supporters hate.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
he obviously wishes he could promote it more, and is probably confused why his base hates it so much, since he loves to be able to say he "created the vaccine", so he's in an awkward spot of trying to brag about something his supporters hate.
I highly doubt it. He had his chance. Victim of his own circumstances. He hid that he got vaccinated and refused to join the rest of the living presidents when they all were openly promoting the safety of the vaccinations. This is like saying Trump supported the peaceful transfer of power even though he refused to attend the inauguration or acknowledge Biden won the election. He's a big fucking loser on all accounts, but then later he tries to play the fence so yeah, his asshole supporters are going to boo him because he's an inauthentic shill.
Still, the report sums up a year of historic growth in the labor market. The country averaged adding 537,000 jobs per month in 2021, making for one of the best years for the labor market in U.S. history. The market is still down by 3.6 million jobs from its pre-pandemic levels in February 2020, but gained back some 6.4 million jobs on the year. Wages also grew markedly in 2021 as record numbers of Americans have quit their jobs to find alternatives with better pay and benefits.
Still, the report sums up a year of historic growth in the labor market. The country averaged adding 537,000 jobs per month in 2021, making for one of the best years for the labor market in U.S. history. The market is still down by 3.6 million jobs from its pre-pandemic levels in February 2020, but gained back some 6.4 million jobs on the year. Wages also grew markedly in 2021 as record numbers of Americans have quit their jobs to find alternatives with better pay and benefits.
60% of some folks eh? The next election isn't looking good for you or your 807,000 jobs.
My 807,000 jobs? I’ve been gainfully employed since I was 14.
60% of ‘Muricans are delusional. I’ll not enjoy watching ‘Murica implode from afar in November’22 and further in ‘24. Enjoy!
Tsk-tsk. Didn't we have the big "D" word debate already? My apologies if you have achieved medical clearance for its use, if so, congratulations on your accomplishment and informed diagnosis. We could use another expert around here, especially one outside of the crowded bunch of political science and infectious disease scholars.
What would you call those 'Muricans in deep denial about the 2020 election, science and facts in general? Tsk, tsk indeed.
I would have said delusional, as well. But that was before I was informed that one must be able to diagnose the condition in order to use the word.
If you’re making a diagnosis for a medical reason. I’m using it as a descriptor.
As was I when you took offense and asked if I was qualified to make that diagnosis. Anywho, this wraps up today’s lesson in hypocrisy.
And you could have said, “no, I’m not a doctor but I can describe someone as such based upon the word. Hell I can even believe it too if I want.” But you didn’t, did you?
I actually linked the definition and confirmed that it was a perfectly acceptable use of the term, much like you just did. That did not seem to suffice at the time so I was just a bit surprised to see you using the word.
Care to link to your post and our exchange? Context matters.
Given that the context in both cases is a matter of opinion, I do not see the point in searching for it. If you feel so inclined, combing through my comments would probably save some time.
Nah, I honestly don't recall the exchange, doesn't mean it didn't happen, nor the context. But you're the one who made the Big D comparison. If I were to make the same or similar allegation of a fellow poster, I'd be prepared to link or quote it but that's just me. But hell, maybe it was five years ago?
It’s been awhile. I just found it bizarre to question ones understanding and usage of such a common word, and for some reason it stuck with me. Just returning a little friendly fire.
i am so glad that my support of a candidate in one single election is not an integral part of my identity.
must be hard to be a trump supporter these days.
That's the thing most of them cannot comprehend. They seem to assume people who voted for Biden are in a cult just like they are.
If all Trump supporters are in a cult, why do they not follow his advice on taking the vaccine?
Because the news outlets and radio programs they watch/listen either don’t report it, barely mention it and/or rail against it, regardless. Heck, POOTWH was booed when he mentioned it at a rally and never followed up and implored folks to get it. Kinda just shrugged his shoulders and tossed that talking point, riff, mention, whatever, to the wind.
You are wrong. Yes, he's mentioned it at multiple rallies and was
booed. To say he never followed up is not true. He's still toting the
vaccine and boosters. Right before Christmas Trump did an interview with
Candace Owens and was pushing people to take the vaccine. He did say it
was a choice but he told people they should get it because it could
save your life. He did a ton of harm to his image by doing this but it
was the right thing to do. Candace Owens and Alex Jones are both railing
against him for saying this.
It is not "whatever" to the wind.
I agree here. Sure, he has done the bare minimum when it comes to promoting the vaccine, but he has promoted it, even after knowing his base wasn't receptive to it, and going on shows like Candace Owens who is dead set against it. I understand it's a low bar to applaud the guy for this, but to pivot from saying "he hasn't promoted the vaccine" to "well then he hasn't promoted it enough" is disingenuous.
I don't know.
So he "mentioned" it rallies and answered a question from Candace Owens, on a podcast, a full year after the vaccines came out? Big deal.
Just imagine, for just a minute, that he devoted as much time and effort into getting his supporters vaccinated as he's done with convincing them of an absolute fairytale that he actually won an election that he lost by 7 millions votes. Think about it. Every time he opened his mouth, sent a tweet, or issued some kind of press release for the last 15 months he has hammered home the fact that the election was stolen from him. He has trained these people like we train our dogs. Never in the history of this country have we questioned the results of an election. Yet here we are where millions and millions and millions of people actually do believe it, without a shred of evidence supporting such nonsense.
And how, exactly, would you say he has promoted the vaccine? I don't think he has at all. Sure he has answered questions about it from time to time. But even his answers are tepid as he always has to do the "yeah but" regarding people's freedoms and shit, which just serves as green light to the unvaccinated to stay that way and put more people at risk.
Actually promoting it would be not just mentioning it at a rally. It would be holding socially distanced, outdoor rallies devoted to informing people of the benefits of vaccines, it would be using his influence on social media (all his dumb election rants still get posted and shared by millions-imagine if all of those were about the benefits of vaccines), it would be going on 60 Minutes instead of Candace Owen's podcast to talk exclusively about Covid/vaccines, it'd be getting his Fox advisors (Hannity, Tucker, and Ingraham) on board with him, it would be getting the shot on television like countless other politicians did, doing public service announcements like all the other former presidents did, and just actively making it his main talking point instead of whining about the election. All of this stuff would be actively promoting to me. Just answering questions a few times over the last year is not promotion in my estimation. At all. In fact, I bet you can probably count the number of times he's told people to get vaccinated, unprompted on one hand.
Would all this result in an additional 10-20 million more people getting vaccinated? No. Would it move the need with at least a good chuck of those folks? Yeah, I believe it would have and we'd be in a better spot right now as a result.
you're arguing a point I didn't make. Cause I agree with you. I said he has done the bare minimum. if that. maybe "promotion" was a strong word. But either way, he hasn't told people to not get it, he hasn't said "no comment" when asked, like with the favourite bible verse question.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
60% of some folks eh? The next election isn't looking good for you or your 807,000 jobs.
My 807,000 jobs? I’ve been gainfully employed since I was 14.
60% of ‘Muricans are delusional. I’ll not enjoy watching ‘Murica implode from afar in November’22 and further in ‘24. Enjoy!
Tsk-tsk. Didn't we have the big "D" word debate already? My apologies if you have achieved medical clearance for its use, if so, congratulations on your accomplishment and informed diagnosis. We could use another expert around here, especially one outside of the crowded bunch of political science and infectious disease scholars.
What would you call those 'Muricans in deep denial about the 2020 election, science and facts in general? Tsk, tsk indeed.
I would have said delusional, as well. But that was before I was informed that one must be able to diagnose the condition in order to use the word.
If you’re making a diagnosis for a medical reason. I’m using it as a descriptor.
As was I when you took offense and asked if I was qualified to make that diagnosis. Anywho, this wraps up today’s lesson in hypocrisy.
And you could have said, “no, I’m not a doctor but I can describe someone as such based upon the word. Hell I can even believe it too if I want.” But you didn’t, did you?
I actually linked the definition and confirmed that it was a perfectly acceptable use of the term, much like you just did. That did not seem to suffice at the time so I was just a bit surprised to see you using the word.
Care to link to your post and our exchange? Context matters.
Given that the context in both cases is a matter of opinion, I do not see the point in searching for it. If you feel so inclined, combing through my comments would probably save some time.
Nah, I honestly don't recall the exchange, doesn't mean it didn't happen, nor the context. But you're the one who made the Big D comparison. If I were to make the same or similar allegation of a fellow poster, I'd be prepared to link or quote it but that's just me. But hell, maybe it was five years ago?
It’s been awhile. I just found it bizarre to question ones understanding and usage of such a common word, and for some reason it stuck with me. Just returning a little friendly fire.
60% of some folks eh? The next election isn't looking good for you or your 807,000 jobs.
My 807,000 jobs? I’ve been gainfully employed since I was 14.
60% of ‘Muricans are delusional. I’ll not enjoy watching ‘Murica implode from afar in November’22 and further in ‘24. Enjoy!
Tsk-tsk. Didn't we have the big "D" word debate already? My apologies if you have achieved medical clearance for its use, if so, congratulations on your accomplishment and informed diagnosis. We could use another expert around here, especially one outside of the crowded bunch of political science and infectious disease scholars.
What would you call those 'Muricans in deep denial about the 2020 election, science and facts in general? Tsk, tsk indeed.
I would have said delusional, as well. But that was before I was informed that one must be able to diagnose the condition in order to use the word.
If you’re making a diagnosis for a medical reason. I’m using it as a descriptor.
As was I when you took offense and asked if I was qualified to make that diagnosis. Anywho, this wraps up today’s lesson in hypocrisy.
And you could have said, “no, I’m not a doctor but I can describe someone as such based upon the word. Hell I can even believe it too if I want.” But you didn’t, did you?
I actually linked the definition and confirmed that it was a perfectly acceptable use of the term, much like you just did. That did not seem to suffice at the time so I was just a bit surprised to see you using the word.
Care to link to your post and our exchange? Context matters.
Given that the context in both cases is a matter of opinion, I do not see the point in searching for it. If you feel so inclined, combing through my comments would probably save some time.
Nah, I honestly don't recall the exchange, doesn't mean it didn't happen, nor the context. But you're the one who made the Big D comparison. If I were to make the same or similar allegation of a fellow poster, I'd be prepared to link or quote it but that's just me. But hell, maybe it was five years ago?
It’s been awhile. I just found it bizarre to question ones understanding and usage of such a common word, and for some reason it stuck with me. Just returning a little friendly fire.
Seems someone has a memory issue. Might want to have that checked IMHO but remember, I’m not a doctor.
Your response to me calling you delusional. Memory seems pretty, pretty, pretty good.
You got a problem with that? Particularly when its reported in the NY
Post article that was shared and then I was accused of "assuming?" Yea,
you're right, race doesn't matter. "Delusional?" Do you know the
definition of the word and are you qualified to make that diagnosis?
you're arguing a point I didn't make. Cause I agree with you. I said he has done the bare minimum. if that. maybe "promotion" was a strong word. But either way, he hasn't told people to not get it, he hasn't said "no comment" when asked, like with the favourite bible verse question.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
you're arguing a point I didn't make. Cause I agree with you. I said he has done the bare minimum. if that. maybe "promotion" was a strong word. But either way, he hasn't told people to not get it, he hasn't said "no comment" when asked, like with the favourite bible verse question.
thinking that was meant for JB.....
It was for both. But I see where Hugh is coming from.
So my overall point to JB when he asked if it's a cult why don't they follow his advice on vaccines is that he just has not really tried convincing them to take it. And if he put in the same effort, I think a lot of them would.
Seems someone has a memory issue. Might want to have that checked IMHO but remember, I’m not a doctor.
Your response to me calling you delusional. Memory seems pretty, pretty, pretty good.
You got a problem with that? Particularly when its reported in the NY
Post article that was shared and then I was accused of "assuming?" Yea,
you're right, race doesn't matter. "Delusional?" Do you know the
definition of the word and are you qualified to make that diagnosis?
And I don’t believe you really answered that question. I didn’t say you couldn’t use the word. Nor that you used it incorrectly. You never said, in our exchange, that you were using it as a “descriptor.” Further, based on that exchange, is what I said, “delusional?” Remember the definition posted yesterday.
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
full control means a filibuster proof majority in the Senate.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
must be hard to be a trump supporter these days.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
On the other hand, he has been working overtime since before the election even happened to sow doubts into his supporters minds that he did not lose the election. I don't think there is more proof needed that these people are in a cult than the fact that they choose to simply ignore the abundance of evidence to the contrary. The vast majority of Trump supporters believe Trump won the election simply because Trump has been repeating this lie to them literally single every chance he gets for over a year now. If you hear the man you worship repeat something over and over and over and over again.....you're going to eventually believe it is true despite what reality is. I saw one poll that said over 80% of Fox News viewers believe it. lol.
It is an enormous problem moving forward when almost half the electorate will simply not accept the results of free and fair elections anymore. I don't expect you to understand that right now, but maybe someday you will.
https://apnews.com/article/voter-fraud-election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-7fcb6f134e528fee8237c7601db3328f
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
-EV 8/14/93
-EV 8/14/93
Still, the report sums up a year of historic growth in the labor market. The country averaged adding 537,000 jobs per month in 2021, making for one of the best years for the labor market in U.S. history. The market is still down by 3.6 million jobs from its pre-pandemic levels in February 2020, but gained back some 6.4 million jobs on the year. Wages also grew markedly in 2021 as record numbers of Americans have quit their jobs to find alternatives with better pay and benefits.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/01/07/december-jobs-report-unemployment/
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
July 2020
https://community.pearljam.com/discussion/comment/7231435#Comment_7231435
-EV 8/14/93
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I don't know.
So he "mentioned" it rallies and answered a question from Candace Owens, on a podcast, a full year after the vaccines came out? Big deal.
Just imagine, for just a minute, that he devoted as much time and effort into getting his supporters vaccinated as he's done with convincing them of an absolute fairytale that he actually won an election that he lost by 7 millions votes. Think about it. Every time he opened his mouth, sent a tweet, or issued some kind of press release for the last 15 months he has hammered home the fact that the election was stolen from him. He has trained these people like we train our dogs. Never in the history of this country have we questioned the results of an election. Yet here we are where millions and millions and millions of people actually do believe it, without a shred of evidence supporting such nonsense.
And how, exactly, would you say he has promoted the vaccine? I don't think he has at all. Sure he has answered questions about it from time to time. But even his answers are tepid as he always has to do the "yeah but" regarding people's freedoms and shit, which just serves as green light to the unvaccinated to stay that way and put more people at risk.
Actually promoting it would be not just mentioning it at a rally. It would be holding socially distanced, outdoor rallies devoted to informing people of the benefits of vaccines, it would be using his influence on social media (all his dumb election rants still get posted and shared by millions-imagine if all of those were about the benefits of vaccines), it would be going on 60 Minutes instead of Candace Owen's podcast to talk exclusively about Covid/vaccines, it'd be getting his Fox advisors (Hannity, Tucker, and Ingraham) on board with him, it would be getting the shot on television like countless other politicians did, doing public service announcements like all the other former presidents did, and just actively making it his main talking point instead of whining about the election. All of this stuff would be actively promoting to me. Just answering questions a few times over the last year is not promotion in my estimation. At all. In fact, I bet you can probably count the number of times he's told people to get vaccinated, unprompted on one hand.
Would all this result in an additional 10-20 million more people getting vaccinated? No. Would it move the need with at least a good chuck of those folks? Yeah, I believe it would have and we'd be in a better spot right now as a result.
-EV 8/14/93
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
thinking that was meant for JB.....
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
So my overall point to JB when he asked if it's a cult why don't they follow his advice on vaccines is that he just has not really tried convincing them to take it. And if he put in the same effort, I think a lot of them would.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©