Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said that he will not discuss any leaked documents published by WikiLeaks and is calling on the rest of his party to ignore them as well.
"As our intelligence agencies have said, these leaks are an effort by a foreign government to interfere with our electoral process and I will not indulge it,” Rubio told ABC News. "Further, I want to warn my fellow Republicans who may want to capitalize politically on these leaks: Today it is the Democrats. Tomorrow it could be us."
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Every email "MUST MEAN SOMETHING"!!! Please, there's less degrees of separation between me & Kevin Bacon.
You're going to call a Presidential Candidate a widget for spending money on research and focus groups? The entire masturbatory narrative is being created in your head, it's not supported by the content of these documents. You're simply spinning to reinforce what you already believe to be true.
It's coming off as a bit conspiracy theorist-y . You know the Truth, and everyone else are sheep. If other people don’t see the Truth, it’s because they’re too dumb recognize it or possibly “in on it.” This lunatic fringe logic makes you nothing more that peddlers of fear, falsehood, and paranoia, just like the politicians you claim to oppose.
Couple things... I'm not sure what your getting at with every email must mean something? My OPINION of Hilliary being a widget isn't based on her campaign doing the research and focus groups it's that she frequently changes her position based on the information gained from the research and focus groups, HUGE difference. Before you go on about doing the will of the people, stop yourself. Are you telepathic? You know what I'm thinking? The truth vs sheep jargon totally contradicts what my head made my fingers type a few pages ago. Carry on my wayward son
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said that he will not discuss any leaked documents published by WikiLeaks and is calling on the rest of his party to ignore them as well.
"As our intelligence agencies have said, these leaks are an effort by a foreign government to interfere with our electoral process and I will not indulge it,” Rubio told ABC News. "Further, I want to warn my fellow Republicans who may want to capitalize politically on these leaks: Today it is the Democrats. Tomorrow it could be us."
Tomorrow it could be us!?!? Hahaha
Good job germ. Keep protecting them. A former BernieBro (progressive), turned #1 Clinton fanboy (sold his soul to the devil)
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said that he will not discuss any leaked documents published by WikiLeaks and is calling on the rest of his party to ignore them as well.
"As our intelligence agencies have said, these leaks are an effort by a foreign government to interfere with our electoral process and I will not indulge it,” Rubio told ABC News. "Further, I want to warn my fellow Republicans who may want to capitalize politically on these leaks: Today it is the Democrats. Tomorrow it could be us."
Tomorrow it could be us!?!? Hahaha
Good job germ. Keep protecting them. A former BernieBro (progressive), turned #1 Clinton fanboy (sold his soul to the devil)
Haha
Actually I'm the #2 Clinton fanboy. I took a day off.
I agree with Rubio. The emails shouldn't be involved but, given that there is nothing in them, I guess it doesn't matter.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Re: memo on govt reform/pulbic corruption Mar 1, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Jake Sullivan wrote about several ideas and their public support:
Increase government’s public reporting so voters know what goverment is doing ...66.. Strengthen bribery laws to ensure that politicians don’ change legislation for political donations. 62% The second idea is a favorite of mine, as you know, but REALLY dicey territory for HRC, right? Wouldn't want those bribery laws strengthened now, would we?
Neera Tanden's response:
This is a jump ball. She may be so tainted she's really vulnerable = if so, maybe a message of I've seen how this sausage is made, Crooked Hillary Clinton is "really vulnerable" on corruption, folks. According to her own staff who know her really well.
EMAILID 17375 Brent Budowsky and Podesta emailing each other, again. (they had almost 100 emails to each other in the 19 000 that came out so far). Budowsky writes:
And at a major university in Washington, D.C., where many of the kids come here because of an interest in politics and are already working as interns, there was not one student who gave enough of a damn for Hillary to open a booth, or even wear a Hillary button----I didn't see one and I was looking. This pretty much explains why CTR's paid posting campaigns were needed for Reddit and Facebook. She does not have enough real supporters who "give enough of a damn" to actively cheer and support her. This is why they need masses of paid shills here on Reddit, to create the illusion of enthusiastic support.
If there are secret Clinton talking points to surrogates to attack Bernie---and I now believe the story is true-----she is going to create ill-will that neither she nor her staff can even imagine. ..
What will happen if this continues is Bernie will get pissed off and lash back and I can write the words he will say if Clinton tactics anger him----FBI investigation and aides taking the Fifth will be among them---and it will not be pretty. Podesta responds :
We already discussed Castro. Beyond that, why do you think that story is not just a bunch of hyped up BS intended to have exactly the kind of reaction you are exhibiting? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17375
2015-09-15 Neera Tanden and John Podesta tackle the issue of Hillary in the primary. Is she a progressive or a moderate?
Neera writes:
Why did she call herself a moderate? Podesta replies:
I pushed her on this on Sunday night. She claims she didn't remember saying it. Not sure I believe her. We were speculating, that it may be a Don Baer intervention. John Podesta, the chairman of the Hillary Clinton campaign, thinks that Hillary may be lying to him here. To even think this Podesta MUST believe that Hillary is a pathological liar who just can't stop lying. Podesta simply does not believe or trust her. You know your "trustworthy" numbers must be bad when you read "Not sure I believe her" from your own goddamn campaign chairman.
Neera Tanden angrily responds
I mean it makes my life more difficult after telling every reporter I know she's actually progressive but that is really the smallest of issues. It worries me more that she doesn't seem to know what planet we are all living in at the moment. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18353
2015-09-15 Neera Tanden and John Podesta tackle the issue of Hillary in the primary. Is she a progressive or a moderate?
Neera writes:
Why did she call herself a moderate? Podesta replies:
I pushed her on this on Sunday night. She claims she didn't remember saying it. Not sure I believe her. We were speculating, that it may be a Don Baer intervention. John Podesta, the chairman of the Hillary Clinton campaign, thinks that Hillary may be lying to him here. To even think this Podesta MUST believe that Hillary is a pathological liar who just can't stop lying. Podesta simply does not believe or trust her. You know your "trustworthy" numbers must be bad when you read "Not sure I believe her" from your own goddamn campaign chairman.
Neera Tanden angrily responds
I mean it makes my life more difficult after telling every reporter I know she's actually progressive but that is really the smallest of issues. It worries me more that she doesn't seem to know what planet we are all living in at the moment. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18353
welcome to what half of America thinks about her yet the other half are to blind to see it...i mean your own campaign cant stand you and calls you a liar but there is nothing to see here
Here is a draft statement opposing TPP. It's long, but covers a lot of ground. The goal here was to minimize our vulnerability to the authenticity attack and not piss off the WH any more than necessary. Staff creates a statement about Hillary opposing TPP. Which is interesting because while staff creates this statement they admit she pushed and advocated for TPP.
Joel Benenson writes:
But the reality is HRC is more pro trade than anti and trying to turn her into something she is not could reinforce our negative around authenticity. This is an agreement that she pushed for and largely advocated for. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17724#efmAAGAD6
She was also championing TPP according to Jake Sullivan:
Glenn Thrush is at it again. In a previous email defined himself as a "hack journalist" and pleaded with Podesta "please don't tell anyone I did this" when colluding with him. Now Glenn saw a bad tweet from Podesta and he immediately feels the need to grovel at his feet:
Saw your tweet I think u know I wasn't fabricating you anything... No need for a response, but I hope u understand that I take this stuff seriously and try to be sensitive to the human impact of these shitty stories I take zero pleasure in them -- whether u folks believe me or not Cheers and good luck today Podesta's response
..my tweet was accurate so 1) maybe you should question your sources or 2) maybe you are talking to people on the inside who the pressure is getting to. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18744
2015-09-15 Neera Tanden and John Podesta tackle the issue of Hillary in the primary. Is she a progressive or a moderate?
Neera writes:
Why did she call herself a moderate? Podesta replies:
I pushed her on this on Sunday night. She claims she didn't remember saying it. Not sure I believe her. We were speculating, that it may be a Don Baer intervention. John Podesta, the chairman of the Hillary Clinton campaign, thinks that Hillary may be lying to him here. To even think this Podesta MUST believe that Hillary is a pathological liar who just can't stop lying. Podesta simply does not believe or trust her. You know your "trustworthy" numbers must be bad when you read "Not sure I believe her" from your own goddamn campaign chairman.
Neera Tanden angrily responds
I mean it makes my life more difficult after telling every reporter I know she's actually progressive but that is really the smallest of issues. It worries me more that she doesn't seem to know what planet we are all living in at the moment. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18353
You wake up at 530 am and start posting this stuff?
You may have thought I was kidding earlier about the obsession comment, but I'm going to be the honest person in here that will speak up because honestly I'm a little concerned about your mental health my friend. You seem to be overly obsessed with these WikiLeaks and it comes across as unhealthy for you... I'm not saying people should not seek out the truth, or question their leadership, but you need to step away from the computer my friend. Seriously, disconnect for a day and see how it feels. Then feel free to come back and update us on 1000's of boring emails lol
10,000+ post devoted to Talking about PJ pajamas and you want to talk crap about JC's work here... Give me a break. You are free to going back to talkin about how hot Ed looks. Nothing to see or do here.
i'm pretty sure they have not sold PJ pajamas yet, but if they do, and I post 25 pages worth of links and sensationalized commentary for days on end please try to be a friend and tell me to back off and unplug... whatever you do please do not egg me on to go deeper into the worm hole like you are doing with the OP
anyway, carry on I guess... hopefully this all works out for you guys
Glenn Thrush is at it again. In a previous email defined himself as a "hack journalist" and pleaded with Podesta "please don't tell anyone I did this" when colluding with him. Now Glenn saw a bad tweet from Podesta and he immediately feels the need to grovel at his feet:
Saw your tweet I think u know I wasn't fabricating you anything... No need for a response, but I hope u understand that I take this stuff seriously and try to be sensitive to the human impact of these shitty stories I take zero pleasure in them -- whether u folks believe me or not Cheers and good luck today Podesta's response
..my tweet was accurate so 1) maybe you should question your sources or 2) maybe you are talking to people on the inside who the pressure is getting to. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18744
Podesta decides to stonewall the WSJ. This email has the subject:Confidential . The staff is very very worried about the WSJ finding out that Hillary is already having meetings and building the campaign team in early 2014. He milks info out of the journalist which he shares with the others so they can map out what the guy knows. For some reason they are very afraid of this one. Podesta writes about the meeting with the WSJ journalist.:
He was doing a story on who wanted her to run, who didn't. Had you in the latter category Only thing I told him was there was a third category-people who thought it was her decision and would support her whatever she decided. He had you, me and Maggie meeting with her at Whitehaven. Didn't mention Plouffe. I didn't engage with him on the topic. Just let him talk and gave nothing back. They made a complete fool out of this poor WSJ guy. He should come out and set the record straight regarding this issue.
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
I wonder what the Fox News, Washington Times, WSJ, Drudge, Rush, Brietbart, et al, ratios are and have been? Don't act like conservatives don't have a TRUMPet nor have they colluded with the party aperchik.
"As our intelligence agencies have said, these leaks are an effort by a foreign government to interfere with our electoral process, and I will not indulge it,” says Intelligence Committee Member Marco Rubio
Podesta decides to stonewall the WSJ. This email has the subject:Confidential . The staff is very very worried about the WSJ finding out that Hillary is already having meetings and building the campaign team in early 2014. He milks info out of the journalist which he shares with the others so they can map out what the guy knows. For some reason they are very afraid of this one. Podesta writes about the meeting with the WSJ journalist.:
He was doing a story on who wanted her to run, who didn't. Had you in the latter category Only thing I told him was there was a third category-people who thought it was her decision and would support her whatever she decided. He had you, me and Maggie meeting with her at Whitehaven. Didn't mention Plouffe. I didn't engage with him on the topic. Just let him talk and gave nothing back. They made a complete fool out of this poor WSJ guy. He should come out and set the record straight regarding this issue.
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
that's because one is an actual story, and the other is a total non story so far...
you act like the JFK assassination and 9/11 conspiracy has been hacked and exposed LOL
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Comments
Wow...something intelligent from Rubio
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
I'm not sure what your getting at with every email must mean something?
My OPINION of Hilliary being a widget isn't based on her campaign doing the research and focus groups it's that she frequently changes her position based on the information gained from the research and focus groups, HUGE difference. Before you go on about doing the will of the people, stop yourself.
Are you telepathic? You know what I'm thinking?
The truth vs sheep jargon totally contradicts what my head made my fingers type a few pages ago.
Carry on my wayward son
Good job germ. Keep protecting them.
A former BernieBro (progressive), turned #1 Clinton fanboy (sold his soul to the devil)
Haha
I agree with Rubio. The emails shouldn't be involved but, given that there is nothing in them, I guess it doesn't matter.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Re: memo on govt reform/pulbic corruption Mar 1, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Jake Sullivan wrote about several ideas and their public support:
Increase government’s public reporting so voters know what goverment is doing ...66..
Strengthen bribery laws to ensure that politicians don’ change legislation for political donations. 62%
The second idea is a favorite of mine, as you know, but REALLY dicey territory for HRC, right?
Wouldn't want those bribery laws strengthened now, would we?
Neera Tanden's response:
This is a jump ball. She may be so tainted she's really vulnerable = if so, maybe a message of I've seen how this sausage is made,
Crooked Hillary Clinton is "really vulnerable" on corruption, folks. According to her own staff who know her really well.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17343
And at a major university in Washington, D.C., where many of the kids come here because of an interest in politics and are already working as interns, there was not one student who gave enough of a damn for Hillary to open a booth, or even wear a Hillary button----I didn't see one and I was looking.
This pretty much explains why CTR's paid posting campaigns were needed for Reddit and Facebook. She does not have enough real supporters who "give enough of a damn" to actively cheer and support her. This is why they need masses of paid shills here on Reddit, to create the illusion of enthusiastic support.
If there are secret Clinton talking points to surrogates to attack Bernie---and I now believe the story is true-----she is going to create ill-will that neither she nor her staff can even imagine. ..
What will happen if this continues is Bernie will get pissed off and lash back and I can write the words he will say if Clinton tactics anger him----FBI investigation and aides taking the Fifth will be among them---and it will not be pretty.
Podesta responds :
We already discussed Castro. Beyond that, why do you think that story is not just a bunch of hyped up BS intended to have exactly the kind of reaction you are exhibiting?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17375
EMAILID 18353
2015-09-15 Neera Tanden and John Podesta tackle the issue of Hillary in the primary. Is she a progressive or a moderate?
Neera writes:
Why did she call herself a moderate?
Podesta replies:
I pushed her on this on Sunday night. She claims she didn't remember saying it. Not sure I believe her. We were speculating, that it may be a Don Baer intervention.
John Podesta, the chairman of the Hillary Clinton campaign, thinks that Hillary may be lying to him here. To even think this Podesta MUST believe that Hillary is a pathological liar who just can't stop lying. Podesta simply does not believe or trust her. You know your "trustworthy" numbers must be bad when you read "Not sure I believe her" from your own goddamn campaign chairman.
Neera Tanden angrily responds
I mean it makes my life more difficult after telling every reporter I know she's actually progressive but that is really the smallest of issues. It worries me more that she doesn't seem to know what planet we are all living in at the moment.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18353
Sheryl Sandberg, Chief Operating Officer of Facebook writes to John Podesta May 2015:
And I still want HRC to win badly. I am still here to help as I can. She came over and was magical with my kids.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/19070
EMAILID 17724 Dan Schwerin
Here is a draft statement opposing TPP. It's long, but covers a lot of ground. The goal here was to minimize our vulnerability to the authenticity attack and not piss off the WH any more than necessary.
Staff creates a statement about Hillary opposing TPP. Which is interesting because while staff creates this statement they admit she pushed and advocated for TPP.
Joel Benenson writes:
But the reality is HRC is more pro trade than anti and trying to turn her into something she is not could reinforce our negative around authenticity. This is an agreement that she pushed for and largely advocated for.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17724#efmAAGAD6
She was also championing TPP according to Jake Sullivan:
She has concerns about where TPP will end up. But denying potus negotiating authority to finish a deal she has championed?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17992
Glenn Thrush is at it again. In a previous email defined himself as a "hack journalist" and pleaded with Podesta "please don't tell anyone I did this" when colluding with him. Now Glenn saw a bad tweet from Podesta and he immediately feels the need to grovel at his feet:
Saw your tweet I think u know I wasn't fabricating you anything... No need for a response, but I hope u understand that I take this stuff seriously and try to be sensitive to the human impact of these shitty stories I take zero pleasure in them -- whether u folks believe me or not Cheers and good luck today
Podesta's response
..my tweet was accurate so 1) maybe you should question your sources or 2) maybe you are talking to people on the inside who the pressure is getting to.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18744
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
anyway, carry on I guess... hopefully this all works out for you guys
Saw your tweet I think u know I wasn't fabricating you anything... No need for a response, but I hope u understand that I take this stuff seriously and try to be sensitive to the human impact of these shitty stories I take zero pleasure in them -- whether u folks believe me or not Cheers and good luck today
Podesta's response
..my tweet was accurate so 1) maybe you should question your sources or 2) maybe you are talking to people on the inside who the pressure is getting to.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18744
He was doing a story on who wanted her to run, who didn't. Had you in the latter category Only thing I told him was there was a third category-people who thought it was her decision and would support her whatever she decided. He had you, me and Maggie meeting with her at Whitehaven. Didn't mention Plouffe. I didn't engage with him on the topic. Just let him talk and gave nothing back.
They made a complete fool out of this poor WSJ guy. He should come out and set the record straight regarding this issue.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17556
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemian_Grove
And long before this, there was and is Yale's Skull & Bones.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"As our intelligence agencies have said, these leaks are an effort by a foreign government to interfere with our electoral process, and I will not indulge it,” says Intelligence Committee Member Marco Rubio
you act like the JFK assassination and 9/11 conspiracy has been hacked and exposed LOL
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
http://unfittorun.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/HRC_speech_summary_key_points.pdf