“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Stein
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Stein
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Stein
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?
What do you think all this is for? They're warming up for impeachment to drag her name through some more mud. It's not that they actually have anything on her, they're building a narrative to try to contain Hillary to 4 years. That's why the down ticket voting is so important.
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Stein
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?
I've never been accused of being intelligent. I think things are going to happen that will change the political climate it will be unprecedented.
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Stein
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?
I've never been accused of being intelligent. I think things are going to happen that will change the political climate it will be unprecedented.
Change the political climate? Hasn't this already happened?
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothing there for christsakes... Yet
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Stein
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?
We didn't think they would impeach her husband in 1998 either. Congress is even crazier today thanks to the Tea Party. It won't happen shortly after she is inaugurated but it could definitely happen.
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said that he will not discuss any leaked documents published by WikiLeaks and is calling on the rest of his party to ignore them as well.
"As our intelligence agencies have said, these leaks are an effort by a foreign government to interfere with our electoral process and I will not indulge it,” Rubio told ABC News. "Further, I want to warn my fellow Republicans who may want to capitalize politically on these leaks: Today it is the Democrats. Tomorrow it could be us."
Marco can't help it. Hillary has released the mind worms.
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
What this tells us is that the emails are not informative. There's nothalittlre for christsakes... Yet
I wouldn't expect the media to tell admit they are lap dogs.
honest question here... if you don't mind me asking.... are you voting for Donald Trump?
I will be voting for Hillary, I think its only fair to share that if i'm asking whop you will be voting for
Stein
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
You seem too intelligent to honestly believe that today's political system will impeach Clinton. Am I wrong?
Would you like to further discuss today's political system? I wasn't sure if you meant the mechanisms or the climate. I welcome an ongoing discussion.
If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle
If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle
Who are you voting for?
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle
Who are you voting for?
was Rand Paul....as of right now im not voting for the first time in my entire life and that is depressing
If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle
Who are you voting for?
was Rand Paul....as of right now im not voting for the first time in my entire life and that is depressing
no local races to have a voice in? no marijuana legalization ballot measure you can vote yes on? lol
surely you can find a reason to vote...
I also have more faith in the American public than most people do and happen to believe that people are more informed and knowledgeable now than ever before
Here is a wonderful post for thorough discussion. Email discusses whats Hilliarys position on TPP and Glass/St plus is mentions the Gold Standard which I thought Hilliary claimed she never said. Thoughts??
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22392 1. * She has to be for TPP*. She called it the "gold standard" of trade agreements. I think opposing that would be a huge flip flop. She can say that as President she would work to change it. She can say that it can be better. But I think she should support it.
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
that's because one is an actual story, and the other is a total non story so far...
you act like the JFK assassination and 9/11 conspiracy has been hacked and exposed LOL
If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle
Who are you voting for?
was Rand Paul....as of right now im not voting for the first time in my entire life and that is depressing
Dude, vote trump. A protest vote. That simple. Don't give the bigger crook any help.
I'm a progressive and will be voting Trump to protest this crooked Hillary.
Is the staff confirming Obama knew about Hillary's email server? What if Obama knew and lied about knowing?
Suggest Philippe talk to Josh (Earnest) or Eric (Holder). They know POTUS and HRC emailed. Josh has been asked about that. Standard practice is not to confirm anything about his email, so his answer to press was that he would not comment/confirm. I recollect that Josh was also asked if POTUS ever noticed her personal email account and he said something like POTUS likely had better things to do than focus on his Cabinet's email addresses.
If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle
it has little to do with mental capacity. it has everything to do with partisanship, and fear of the other candidate, on both sides. but moreso than in any other election in history, partisanship on the R side is shifting because they all know how dangerous Trump is. and it's no that they fear he will bring down the crooked establishment. they fear he will bring down the republic as a whole. which he very well might.
If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle
Who are you voting for?
was Rand Paul....as of right now im not voting for the first time in my entire life and that is depressing
no local races to have a voice in? no marijuana legalization ballot measure you can vote yes on? lol
surely you can find a reason to vote...
I also have more faith in the American public than most people do and happen to believe that people are more informed and knowledgeable now than ever before
Ill vote those other issues for sure...im specifically talking about presidential because local issues to me are just as important
“The broadcast evening news programs ABC, NBC and CBS covered allegations against Trump by several women who claim he sexually assaulted them for more than 23 minutes on Thursday night. But revelations in the WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta which included…sympathy for Wall Street, advocation for open borders and blatant examples of media collusion ….got a whole 1 minute and 7 seconds combined.”
Ratio of negative coverage of Trump to Clinton: 23:1
In print on Thursday, it was no better. The New York Times had 11 negative stories on Trump…But zero on Clinton/WikiLeaks.
Ratio: 11:0.” (Media and Trump bias; Not even trying to hide it anymore, The Hill)
that's because one is an actual story, and the other is a total non story so far...
you act like the JFK assassination and 9/11 conspiracy has been hacked and exposed LOL
If she wins its because most people don't have the mental capacity to research the candidate they are voting for... we may disagree on this forum but ill tell you right now at least everyone can form a valid reason for why they back their candidate (which i dont have one anymore) so much respect in that matter to the people on this board which gives me a glimmer of hope
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle
Who are you voting for?
was Rand Paul....as of right now im not voting for the first time in my entire life and that is depressing
Dude, vote trump. A protest vote. That simple. Don't give the bigger crook any help.
I'm a progressive and will be voting Trump to protest this crooked Hillary.
ill be completely transparent if i do decide to vote it would be a protest vote against HRC
Since one single vote doesn't matter the question shouldn't be who are you voting for, it should be, if your vote decided the election who would you vote for? You would get different answers to those questions.
Interesting how they want to eliminate competition (Biden bloomberg warren Sanders) and opposition? Gowdy Does anyway think that illustrates a confident and strong candidate with leadership?
I would not suggest HRC or the campaign raise this directly unless the strategy is total war, but I would suggest that some of her better surrogates might call on Trey Gowdy to resign from the Ethics C'tee
Comments
Hilliary will be sworn in then impeachment proceeds will begin shortly thereafter.
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
"...they find their own group where they feel they belong — albeit one largely untethered to reality. "
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
just do your own interview of people on the street, its astounding how clueless on issues and substance that people on both sides of the aisle
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
surely you can find a reason to vote...
I also have more faith in the American public than most people do and happen to believe that people are more informed and knowledgeable now than ever before
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22392
1. * She has to be for TPP*. She called it the "gold standard" of trade agreements. I think opposing that would be a huge flip flop. She can say that as President she would work to change it. She can say that it can be better. But I think she should support it.
I'm a progressive and will be voting Trump to protest this crooked Hillary.
Suggest Philippe talk to Josh (Earnest) or Eric (Holder). They know POTUS and HRC emailed. Josh has been asked about that. Standard practice is not to confirm anything about his email, so his answer to press was that he would not comment/confirm. I recollect that Josh was also asked if POTUS ever noticed her personal email account and he said something like POTUS likely had better things to do than focus on his Cabinet's email addresses.
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/21779
www.headstonesband.com
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Podesta admits it'd be stupid to say there is a security argument for having a private email server
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23327
You would get different answers to those questions.
Does anyway think that illustrates a confident and strong candidate with leadership?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22078
I would not suggest HRC or the campaign raise this directly unless the strategy is total war, but I would suggest that some of her better surrogates might call on Trey Gowdy to resign from the Ethics C'tee