The Podesta Emails

Options
1…2223252728…68

Comments

  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617

    EMAILID 9339 John Podesta:"Some speculation that Biden will run because of Beau's loss. I think that would be a little crazy and sad but you never know. I like him and grieve for him and hope he doesn't do it for his sake." https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9339#efmAAGADJ

    EMAILID 9290 WJC (Bill Clinton) is doing a paid speech when Hillary's campaign is already in progress. Robby Mook wants the speech cancelled because it will look good, but he knows that's not the answer Hillary wants (too greedy according to mook?) " I know this is not the answer she wants, but I feel very strongly that doing the speech is a mistake--the data are very clear on the potential consequences. It will be three days after she's announced and on her first day in Iowa, where caucus goes have a sharply more negative view of Wall Street than the rest of the electorate. Wall Street ranks first for Iowans among a list of institutions that "take advantage of every day Americans" " https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9290#efmAEgALZ

    EMAILID 9545 From Cheryl Mills to John Podesta "Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That's the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seems like they will. " Wasn't Mills one of the people granted immunity by the FBI in the email case? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545

    EMAILID 9193 Plans to create an impression that Hillary has small donors to counteract the image that she is bought by people with "huge checks" (she is): "I think it could be powerful to use DipJars to galvanize small $ donations to send a strong message that there is grassroots support for Hillary at a time when she is being painted as a candidate only supported with huge checks." In this second part the use the names of donors that we provide sounds like they are planning to enter fake names as donor info, instead of the names of people who actually donated into the DipJars? Otherwise why should the names "be provided" ? "Last summer, there was concern from the campaign about the inability to capture employer information from the donors. However if you keep the suggested dollar amount low ($20 and below) and use the names of donors that we provide, you could easily ensure that nobody is going beyond the legal limits." https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9193#efmAGsAO-

    EMAILID 10205 Gonzalo Curiel the totally unbiased judge (who is a member of is a member of a "La Raza" Lawyers Association) is ruling over a case where Trump is sued. Curiel also has a wife who is apparently raving about John Podesta, the campaign manager of Crooked Hillary Clinton. Teresa L. Amott wrote this to Podesta "Carolyn Curiel was just here with a group of Purdue students that visited the debate site. She and I exchanged raves about the two of you." Podesta replies "Wow! Small world." https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10205#efmAC4AFE

    EMAILID 9272 Email production in the Benghazi committee case. State must produce some emails to the committee which will reveal Hillary either deleted or failed to turn over some emails. Nick Merrill is colluding with the State Department and wants to discuss with everyone how to best spin this story before it breaks. : "Just spoke to State a little more about this. A few updates. They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee. That said, they are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper)" They are using friendly journalists at the AP to plant stories that are good for Hillary. The State Department is doing this for Hillary who is a private citizen at this time. "On that last piece, we think it would make sense to work with State and the AP to deploy the below.. It would be good to frame this a little, and frankly to have it break tomorrow when we'll likely be close to or in the midst of a SCOTUS decision taking over the news hyenas." https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272#efmA-NA_IBEnBHeBI2BOJBOXBTe

    EMAILID 10095 This looks highly interesting, transcript of a meeting of Crooked Hillary with BLM activists: "Please note that this was not a public event, so a tight hold on the attached transcript. Thank you all." https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10095
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    OBSTRUCTION, CONSPIRACY, COLLUSION. ALL IN ONE - trey gowdy porn!

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272

    Just spoke to State a little more about this. A few updates.

    The plan at the moment is for them to do this tomorrow, first thing in the morning.

    What that means specifically is that they are going to turn over all the Blumenthal emails to the Committee that they have along with some other HRC emails that include a slightly broader set of search terms than the original batch. That of course includes the emails Sid turned over that HRC didn't, which will make clear to them that she didn't have them in the first place, deleted them, or didn't turn them over. It also includes emails that HRC had that Sid didn't, as Brian noted.

    They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee. That said, they are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper), that would lay this out before the majority on the committee has a chance to realize what they have and distort it.

  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    edited October 2016
    JC29856 said:

    OBSTRUCTION, CONSPIRACY, COLLUSION. ALL IN ONE - trey gowdy porn!

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272

    Just spoke to State a little more about this. A few updates.

    The plan at the moment is for them to do this tomorrow, first thing in the morning.

    What that means specifically is that they are going to turn over all the Blumenthal emails to the Committee that they have along with some other HRC emails that include a slightly broader set of search terms than the original batch. That of course includes the emails Sid turned over that HRC didn't, which will make clear to them that she didn't have them in the first place, deleted them, or didn't turn them over. It also includes emails that HRC had that Sid didn't, as Brian noted.

    They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee. That said, they are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper), that would lay this out before the majority on the committee has a chance to realize what they have and distort it.

    bravo.. (Emoji clapping)
    Post edited by Boxes&Books on
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Trump was right about the Judge Curiel thing!

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10205

    Carolyn Curiel was just here with a group of Purdue students that visited the debate site. She and I exchanged raves about the two of you. Also with the group was Richard Norton Smith.

    Carolyn Curiel is who

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/news/ct-ptb-curiel-trump-remarks-st-0602-20160601-story.html

    Carolyn Curiel, a former ambassador to Belize and cousin to Gonzalo, said she's meeting with him this week. She's now executive director of the Purdue Institute for Civic Communication in West Lafayette.

    Judge's wife knows Podesta. Podesta head of Hillary campaign. Obvious bias. Trump right.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    EMAILID 9408 (attachment). Clinton campaign chose funding options primarily based on an ability to hide funding/donor details:

    "The decision about which to use should be made based on how "public" you want your intentions to be....EMILY’s List is the most discreet option because donors will be hard to trace and the organization has already announced that it is putting mechanics in place to help set up your campaign....Creating a new Super PAC or working through an existing one (other than EMILY’s List) also doesn’t make sense because it carries a lot of optical baggage and makes transferring products and planning even more expensive and thorny. Donor confusion and hysteria would be a problem as well."
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited October 2016
    OFF RECORD, if pressed on whether we are essentially admitting the possibility that she deleted some emails: >>> >>> Look, we do not know what these materials are, or where they came from. Just take a look at them: many of the documents are not even formatted as emails.
    DATED 6/25/15
    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272
  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    edited October 2016
    Hey JC,

    Couldn't the Clinton camp put an end to this bombardment of facts by simply making a call and having Edward Snowden pardoned? That would mean Assange would turn himself in, to Sweden(USA aka Clinton)
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    tonifig8 said:

    Hey JC,

    Couldn't the Clinton camp put an end to this bombardment of facts by simply making a call and having Edward Snowden pardoned? That would mean Assange would turn himself in, to Sweden(USA aka Clinton)

    That would be negotiating with and pardoning a terrorist.
  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    JC29856 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    Hey JC,

    Couldn't the Clinton camp put an end to this bombardment of facts by simply making a call and having Edward Snowden pardoned? That would mean Assange would turn himself in, to Sweden(USA aka Clinton)

    That would be negotiating with and pardoning a terrorist.
    I tried.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    If Hillary takes office in January I'll match plus 4x anyone's donation to a PJ charity, if Hilliary isn't impeached within 2 years of her oath. PM dollar amount and chosen charity.
    It's strictly for fun and good causes.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    tonifig8 said:

    Hey JC,

    Couldn't the Clinton camp put an end to this bombardment of facts by simply making a call and having Edward Snowden pardoned? That would mean Assange would turn himself in, to Sweden(USA aka Clinton)

    Apparently Assange tried to cut a deal with US to release manning and have the US agree to a special UN court decide his fate as to the espionage related charges which he says otherwise he would never get a fair trial, which was declined. Assange warned that he would release hell fire. Apparently we ain't seen nothing yet!
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Special Category

    From:john.podesta@gmail.com To: cheryl.mills@gmail.com Date: 2015-03-04 20:41 Subject: Special Category

    Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That's the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seems like they will.


    Anyone think this implies and implicates Obama?
  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    JC29856 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    Hey JC,

    Couldn't the Clinton camp put an end to this bombardment of facts by simply making a call and having Edward Snowden pardoned? That would mean Assange would turn himself in, to Sweden(USA aka Clinton)

    Apparently Assange tried to cut a deal with US to release manning and have the US agree to a special UN court decide his fate as to the espionage related charges which he says otherwise he would never get a fair trial, which was declined. Assange warned that he would release hell fire. Apparently we ain't seen nothing yet!
    That's what inspired my question. Also, I was trying to help the clintonites. Maybe they could message the campaign and tell the queen to negotiate before more damage is done.
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,597
    JC29856 said:

    Special Category

    From:john.podesta@gmail.com To: cheryl.mills@gmail.com Date: 2015-03-04 20:41 Subject: Special Category

    Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That's the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seems like they will.


    Anyone think this implies and implicates Obama?

    I think the they who may not care here is the White House and Podesta is wondering if he can get them to ask for Executive Privilege. That indicates nothing implicated Obama, otherwise the White House would certainly be seeking Executive Privilege.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited October 2016
    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    Hey JC,

    Couldn't the Clinton camp put an end to this bombardment of facts by simply making a call and having Edward Snowden pardoned? That would mean Assange would turn himself in, to Sweden(USA aka Clinton)

    Apparently Assange tried to cut a deal with US to release manning and have the US agree to a special UN court decide his fate as to the espionage related charges which he says otherwise he would never get a fair trial, which was declined. Assange warned that he would release hell fire. Apparently we ain't seen nothing yet!
    That's what inspired my question. Also, I was trying to help the clintonites. Maybe they could message the campaign and tell the queen to negotiate before more damage is done.
    Assange attorneys gave the US a summary of some of the leaks they would release before the election, US said no deal, he then said he would serve out the manning sentence if US agreed to UN oversight, US declined.
    Assange attorneys said have it your way.
    So the US knew this shit was coming.
    Assange is a dead man breathing.
    Post edited by JC29856 on
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Blanket apology...I use my phone so sorry for the misspellings and incoherence.
    "I only use one devise!"
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,597
    JC29856 said:

    Blanket apology...I use my phone so sorry for the misspellings and incoherence.
    "I only use one devise!"

    Ha!
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    edited October 2016
    JC29856 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    Hey JC,

    Couldn't the Clinton camp put an end to this bombardment of facts by simply making a call and having Edward Snowden pardoned? That would mean Assange would turn himself in, to Sweden(USA aka Clinton)

    Apparently Assange tried to cut a deal with US to release manning and have the US agree to a special UN court decide his fate as to the espionage related charges which he says otherwise he would never get a fair trial, which was declined. Assange warned that he would release hell fire. Apparently we ain't seen nothing yet!
    That's what inspired my question. Also, I was trying to help the clintonites. Maybe they could message the campaign and tell the queen to negotiate before more damage is done.
    Assange attorneys gave the US a summary of some of the leaks they would release before the election, US said no deal, he then said he would serve out the manning sentence if US agreed to UN oversight, US declined.
    Assange attorneys said have it your way.
    So the US knew this shit was coming.
    Assange is a dead man breathing.
    The US govt. does not like to be fucked with. Imagine the shit Clinton will do if elected. Imagine the drone strikes Operating under secrecy. For progressive causes I'm sure.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    JC29856 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    Hey JC,

    Couldn't the Clinton camp put an end to this bombardment of facts by simply making a call and having Edward Snowden pardoned? That would mean Assange would turn himself in, to Sweden(USA aka Clinton)

    Apparently Assange tried to cut a deal with US to release manning and have the US agree to a special UN court decide his fate as to the espionage related charges which he says otherwise he would never get a fair trial, which was declined. Assange warned that he would release hell fire. Apparently we ain't seen nothing yet!
    That's what inspired my question. Also, I was trying to help the clintonites. Maybe they could message the campaign and tell the queen to negotiate before more damage is done.
    Assange attorneys gave the US a summary of some of the leaks they would release before the election, US said no deal, he then said he would serve out the manning sentence if US agreed to UN oversight, US declined.
    Assange attorneys said have it your way.
    So the US knew this shit was coming.
    Assange is a dead man breathing.
    The US govt. does not like to be fucked with. Imagine the shit Clinton will do if elected. Imagine the drone strikes Operating under secrecy. For progressive causes I'm sure.
    I don't have to imagine, I've seen it. You should start a new NSFA thread call it "War on "Terror" Collateral Damage", I'll post some pics with description.
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    No offense... but this is 17 pages of *yawn*
This discussion has been closed.

Categories