The Podesta Emails

Options
1232426282968

Comments

  • my2hands said:

    No offense... but this is 17 pages of *yawn*

    Not your cup of Tea? I find it thrilling.
    There are threads in AET that might be exciting for you.
    Perhaps what are you drinking right now?
    or
    What are you eating right now?
    or everyones favourite
    ask each other Yes or no do you like chips? for the millionth time
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    :lol:
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617

    my2hands said:

    No offense... but this is 17 pages of *yawn*

    Not your cup of Tea? I find it thrilling.
    There are threads in AET that might be exciting for you.
    Perhaps what are you drinking right now?
    or
    What are you eating right now?
    or everyones favourite
    ask each other Yes or no do you like chips? for the millionth time
    Its America where not every design style, thickness, softness and manufacturer of toilet tissue is for everybody.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited October 2016
    EMAILID 9846 Seems in some states the game was rigged against Bernie, months before primary voting ever started. In 2015 September this email assures the Clinton campaign that Bernie or Biden will lose in N.J. for sure. Poor sucker Bernie never had a chance. : "John, Huma, Just had lunch with the Chairman and his top advisor Bill Maer. Both stressed the importance of giving the Chair his reassurances for the captioned . Presently the Chair has given the line to Hillary in 20 of the 21 counties which only assures that Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders will not be a factor in N.J. Also, all of the major city mayors are aligned with us as well. With this being the commitment , I feel that you ,John, as head of the national campaign should discuss the process directly with Chairman Currie. He and his outstanding ,loyal staff , deserve that courtesy. I will be introducing the N.J. STATE COMMITTEE LEADERSHIP /HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT TEAM to the Secretary , Thursday night. They are fully committed . They will proceed with the joint fundraising agreement . John has the support of Cory Booker, Bob Menendez, Bill Pascrell, all of the most critical county chairs, mayors and legislative leaders. We must always agree that respect is mutually beneficial. Let`s wrap this up as we have key fundraisers ready to go." Bernie was cheated against in various ways, he never got the debate questions in advance like Hillary did and yet he still endorsed Crooked. Weak! https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9846#
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Tech talk

    Imbedding keystroke malware in doc files given to the FBI.

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9181

    The "super code breaking" sounds like talking out of their ass which I doubt, more likely they are talking about finding vulnerabilities in certain cryptographic algorithms used today or even quantum encryption.

    Seems obvious that this tech talk isn't coming from clowns that use unsecure servers, simple encryption and brut passwords but from top tier government schill (spy) techies.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617

    https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803

    Creating fake craigslist ad


    About us: We’re proud to maintain a “fun” and “friendly work environment, where the boss is always available to meet with his employees. Like it or not, he may greet you with a kiss on the lips or grope you under the meeting table. Interested applicants should send resume, cover letter, and headshot to jobs@trump.com
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Assange 11 years ago

    “Organizations have two choices (1) reduce their levels of abuse or dishonesty or (2) pay a heavy ‘secrecy tax’ in order to engage in inefficient but secretive processes,” the spokesperson writes. “As organizations are usually in some form of competitive equilibrium this means that, in the face of WikiLeaks, organizations that are honest will, on average, grow, while those that are dishonest and unjust will decline.”
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited October 2016
    AIPAC giving Hilliary marching orders and to do Iran dirty work list for Israel

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2016
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    JC29856 said:

    Trump was right about the Judge Curiel thing!

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10205

    Carolyn Curiel was just here with a group of Purdue students that visited the debate site. She and I exchanged raves about the two of you. Also with the group was Richard Norton Smith.

    Carolyn Curiel is who

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/news/ct-ptb-curiel-trump-remarks-st-0602-20160601-story.html

    Carolyn Curiel, a former ambassador to Belize and cousin to Gonzalo, said she's meeting with him this week. She's now executive director of the Purdue Institute for Civic Communication in West Lafayette.

    Judge's wife knows Podesta. Podesta head of Hillary campaign. Obvious bias. Trump right.

    First, I'm confused. Is Carolyn his wife or cousin?

    Second.
    So, Trump was right that Curiel's Mexican heritage made him biased because Curiel's wife/cousin? met with Podesta?

    No wonder you love this stuff, carte blanche to just make connections and conclusions whether they make sense or not!
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8086


    A TOP AIDE calculatingly inserted a passage critical of the financial industry into one of Hillary Clinton’s many highly-paid speeches to big banks, “precisely for the purpose of having something we could show people if ever asked what she was saying behind closed doors for two years to all those fat cats,” he wrote in an email posted by Wikileaks.

    In late November 2015, campaign speechwriter Dan Schwerin wrote an email to other top aides floating the idea of leaking that passage, which had come in a speech Clinton gave to Deutsche Bank in October 2014 in return for $260,000.

    “I wrote her a long riff about economic fairness and how the financial industry has lost its way,” for that purpose, Schwerin wrote. “Perhaps at some point there will be value in sharing this with a reporter and getting a story written. Upside would be that when people say she’s too close to Wall Street and has taken too much money from bankers, we can point to evidence that she wasn’t afraid to speak truth to power.”
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/leaked-email-hillary-clinton-campaign-proposed-manipulating-media-by-selectively-providing-wall-street-speeches/

    A newly leaked email shows that the Hillary Clinton campaign proposed “selectively providing” the press with Clinton’s paid speeches to Wall Street and manipulating the media coverage to make her look less supportive of Wall Street than she actually is.

    In response to the Bernie Sanders campaign and left-wing critics, Clinton pledged in the February presidential debate to “look into” releasing the transcripts of her paid speeches to Wall Street, which she had given at private events that were closed to the press.

    After more than 250 days, Clinton still has not fulfilled her promise — but WikiLeaks released excerpts of her paid speeches this week that show Clinton saying she “represented” and “had great relations” with Wall Street.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    But in terms of wanting a way to break in - couldn't we tell tech off the record that she had in mind the malware/key strokes idea (insert malware into a device that you know is a target, to capture keystrokes before they are encrypted). Or that she had in mind really super code breaking by the NSA. But not the backdoor per se?

    Isn't the discussing of hacking kind of ironic?

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9181

  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3189 The Algeria donation came soon after the Jan. 12, 2010, earthquake in Haiti, the Clinton Foundation said The foundation acknowledged it did not alert the State Department about the gift for vetting, which was required under a memorandum of understanding between the Obama administration and the Clintons in an effort to prevent foreign governments from trying to curry favor with Hillary Clinton’s State Department by donating to Bill Clinton’s philanthropy.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545

    From Podesta to Cheryl Mills (Hillary aid at state dept):

    Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That's the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seems like they will.
    THIS WAS DATED ONLY A FEW HOURS AFTER BEING SERVED SUBPOENA. HER PEOPLE (MILLS AND PODESTA) ARE DISCUSSING WHICH EMAILS TO DELETE!

    *Speculation*
    President Obama (i.e. "potus") never publicly asserted executive privilege up to this point. Choosing to delete these emails without executive privilege yet to have been asserted is intentionally undermining the congressional subpoena.
    Not only that, but it seems like Cheryl Mills is suggesting that they ask the White House to assert executive privilege, rather than it being an organic originating from the White House itself. Are they asking the WH to help cover Hillary's tracks?
    "We could get them to ask for that. They may not care..."
    Paul Combetta (Platte River IT guy) secretly askingp about stripping/replacing an "extremely VIP" email out from an email database. Obama extremely VIP? If this was communication worthy of "executive privilege", then why is being communicated through Hillary's private server, instead of using secure communications?

    In Nixon vs. USA decision by Supreme Court: Executive privilege is not valid, if the prosecutor yields a "sufficient showing" that the communication is "essential to the justice of the case".
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    rgambs said:

    JC29856 said:

    Trump was right about the Judge Curiel thing!

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10205

    Carolyn Curiel was just here with a group of Purdue students that visited the debate site. She and I exchanged raves about the two of you. Also with the group was Richard Norton Smith.

    Carolyn Curiel is who

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/news/ct-ptb-curiel-trump-remarks-st-0602-20160601-story.html

    Carolyn Curiel, a former ambassador to Belize and cousin to Gonzalo, said she's meeting with him this week. She's now executive director of the Purdue Institute for Civic Communication in West Lafayette.

    Judge's wife knows Podesta. Podesta head of Hillary campaign. Obvious bias. Trump right.

    First, I'm confused. Is Carolyn his wife or cousin?

    Second.
    So, Trump was right that Curiel's Mexican heritage made him biased because Curiel's wife/cousin? met with Podesta?

    No wonder you love this stuff, carte blanche to just make connections and conclusions whether they make sense or not!
    I agree. Lets see how Hilliary answered 25 questions from judicial watch while under oath....

    http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-releases-new-hillary-clinton-email-answers-given-oath/

    Most of the questions were objected to and the rest except for a few Hilliary "did not recall".
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    edited October 2016

    my2hands said:

    No offense... but this is 17 pages of *yawn*

    Not your cup of Tea? I find it thrilling.
    There are threads in AET that might be exciting for you.
    Perhaps what are you drinking right now?
    or
    What are you eating right now?
    or everyones favourite
    ask each other Yes or no do you like chips? for the millionth time
    Incorrect assumption...

    You find these leaks thrilling? 99% of these "leaks" I'm reading through are garbage... you guys see this as some kind of smoking gun? Most of this comes across as typical political due diligence...

    The reason the media isn't covering this stuff is because there really isn't much here... I'm no Clinton shill, believe me, but I just call it how I see it

    This is all very far from thrilling... a bad episode of Ancient Aliens is more intriguing in my opinion lol
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    JC29856 said:

    rgambs said:

    JC29856 said:

    Trump was right about the Judge Curiel thing!

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10205

    Carolyn Curiel was just here with a group of Purdue students that visited the debate site. She and I exchanged raves about the two of you. Also with the group was Richard Norton Smith.

    Carolyn Curiel is who

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/news/ct-ptb-curiel-trump-remarks-st-0602-20160601-story.html

    Carolyn Curiel, a former ambassador to Belize and cousin to Gonzalo, said she's meeting with him this week. She's now executive director of the Purdue Institute for Civic Communication in West Lafayette.

    Judge's wife knows Podesta. Podesta head of Hillary campaign. Obvious bias. Trump right.

    First, I'm confused. Is Carolyn his wife or cousin?

    Second.
    So, Trump was right that Curiel's Mexican heritage made him biased because Curiel's wife/cousin? met with Podesta?

    No wonder you love this stuff, carte blanche to just make connections and conclusions whether they make sense or not!
    I agree. Lets see how Hilliary answered 25 questions from judicial watch while under oath....

    http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-releases-new-hillary-clinton-email-answers-given-oath/

    Most of the questions were objected to and the rest except for a few Hilliary "did not recall".
    Now that is how you distract and deflect right there!
    Brilliant!
    :clap:
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited October 2016
    http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/301133-clinton-camp-steps-up-attacks-on-wikileaks-bashes-media

    The Dem response to the leaks.

    These leaks threaten our national security especially the specific leaks that threatened our national security.
    The Russians are interfering with our elections by hacking emails that prove we interfered with our elections, specifically the democratic primaries.

    ...and for anyone not familiar with the leaks the emails are just campaign minutia, the real issue is Donald super Hitler Trump.
    Post edited by JC29856 on
This discussion has been closed.