I've never seen her look so uncomfortable ever. She was a Bernie supporter who converted to Hillary with an acceptable response of intense boo'ing. To say she didn't Look pissed is to have not seen it at all. And her comment? It was in response to the boo'ing; she was pissed.
I'm not sure she was mad that they were booing her. She's a stand up comic, she can handle hecklers. She was making the point that the Sanders people won't quit whining about Bernie losing. So she called them out. I thought she did a fine job. Plus dropped a bababoiey on them.
Yes, she's a woman. No woman has ever been a major party's nominee. So yes, she is the first person to do it based on the fact that she is a woman.
Are you trying to give new information? Because we knew way back when she announced entered the campaign that if she wins, she would be the first woman.
will myself to find a home, a home within myself we will find a way, we will find our place
Yes, she's a woman. No woman has ever been a major party's nominee. So yes, she is the first person to do it based on the fact that she is a woman.
Are you trying to give new information? Because we knew way back when she announced entered the campaign that if she wins, she would be the first woman.
Is restive what we call ex Bernie fans now? It was unclear whether Sanders would interrupt the process to ask that Clinton’s nomination be approved by acclamation. That’s what she did on Obama’s behalf in 2008 to indicate their rivalry was truly over.
Sanders suggested Tuesday he wouldn’t rush to make that gesture early, mindful that cutting off his restive voters could cause an outcry.
Oh I know but there are many voters for Hillary that deep down are only voting because she is a woman. This fact alone will be her downfall. I would like to add a picture of Trump
Oh I know but there are many voters for Hillary that deep down are only voting because she is a woman. This fact alone will be her downfall. I would like to add a picture of Trump
here.
She's ruining it for real women who can handle the job like Jill Stein.
Oh I know but there are many voters for Hillary that deep down are only voting because she is a woman. This fact alone will be her downfall. I would like to add a picture of Trump
here.
She's ruining it for real women who couldn't handle the job like Jill Stein.
Agreed. Jill Stein could not handle the job. She couldn't even inspire MA to vote her in as a state delegate.
Oh I know but there are many voters for Hillary that deep down are only voting because she is a woman. This fact alone will be her downfall. I would like to add a picture of Trump
here.
She's ruining it for real women who couldn't handle the job like Jill Stein.
Agreed. Jill Stein could not handle the job. She couldn't even inspire MA to vote her in as a state delegate.
I don't think that's what Free meant.
“The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
So... You think the State department can approve uranium sales to a foreign government without the approval of the department of homeland security, the DOD, and ultimately the POTUS. Okay. I guess that's what happens when you get news from Brietbart. Amazing that Hillary was actually dictator for four years, not chief diplomat.
I don't know what's worse sometimes---the huge amount of people having no problem supporting the Clintons because their marriages too are mainly business only (infidelity can always be overlooked--let's face it--that's the reality of long-term marriage these days)----OR the huge amount of self-righteous Republican women who criticize Hillary for her decision to stay with Bill long before the e-mail nonsense, but ironically have been married forever and have husbands who have been cheating on them behind their backs all these years. There is so much hypocrisy in this country.
I don't know what's worse sometimes---the huge amount of people having no problem supporting the Clintons because their marriages too are mainly business only (infidelity can always be overlooked--let's face it--that's the reality of long-term marriage these days)----OR the huge amount of self-righteous Republican women who criticize Hillary for her decision to stay with Bill long before the e-mail nonsense, but ironically have been married forever and have husbands who have been cheating on them behind their backs all these years. There is so much hypocrisy in this country.
I guess I don't pretend to understand other people's marriages. That is between them and none of our business. I do find it ironic that Hillary is criticized for staying with Bill for richer or poor, good times and in bad, and criticized by the party of "family values".
I don't know what's worse sometimes---the huge amount of people having no problem supporting the Clintons because their marriages too are mainly business only (infidelity can always be overlooked--let's face it--that's the reality of long-term marriage these days)----OR the huge amount of self-righteous Republican women who criticize Hillary for her decision to stay with Bill long before the e-mail nonsense, but ironically have been married forever and have husbands who have been cheating on them behind their backs all these years. There is so much hypocrisy in this country.
I guess I don't pretend to understand other people's marriages. That is between them and none of our business. I do find it ironic that Hillary is criticized for staying with Bill for richer or poor, good times and in bad, and criticized by the party of "family values".
Whenever I've asked my Republican family why they hate Hillary so much, it is usually because of the lying--"can't trust her", they say--the e-mails--things like that--decisions she made as a Senator after Bill's reign. So the whole infidelity thing really is small potatoes with them, I guess. BUT the fact that it was so public and out there-----I wonder how many outstanding Republican presidents were unfaithful as well--but some of these ignorant Republican women just go on living in their naive bubble. I actually have a hard time looking at any marriage nowadays as what it used to stand for in that area. As far as their "You can't trust her" motto they have going...PLEASE-- You can't trust Trump either hyprocrits who are voting for him and the whole time saying "Atleast its not Hillary"--get over your fucking selves.
I don't know what's worse sometimes---the huge amount of people having no problem supporting the Clintons because their marriages too are mainly business only (infidelity can always be overlooked--let's face it--that's the reality of long-term marriage these days)----OR the huge amount of self-righteous Republican women who criticize Hillary for her decision to stay with Bill long before the e-mail nonsense, but ironically have been married forever and have husbands who have been cheating on them behind their backs all these years. There is so much hypocrisy in this country.
I guess I don't pretend to understand other people's marriages. That is between them and none of our business. I do find it ironic that Hillary is criticized for staying with Bill for richer or poor, good times and in bad, and criticized by the party of "family values".
Whenever I've asked my Republican family why they hate Hillary so much, it is usually because of the lying--"can't trust her", they say--the e-mails, whatever questionable scam the Clintons were involved in Arkansas--can't think of the name--things like that--decisions she made as a Senator after Bill's reign. So the whole infidelity thing really is small potatoes with them, I guess. BUT the fact that it was so public and out there-----I wonder how many outstanding Republican presidents were unfaithful as well--but some of these ignorant Republican women just go on living in their naive bubble. I actually have a hard time looking at any marriage nowadays as what it used to stand for in that area. As far as their "You can't trust her" motto they have going...PLEASE-- You can't trust Trump either hyprocrits who are voting for him and the whole time saying "Atleast its not Hillary"--get over your fucking selves.
Yeah, how can someone throw a rock at HRC's marriage and not bat an eye at what Trump has done with his?
I don't know what's worse sometimes---the huge amount of people having no problem supporting the Clintons because their marriages too are mainly business only (infidelity can always be overlooked--let's face it--that's the reality of long-term marriage these days)----OR the huge amount of self-righteous Republican women who criticize Hillary for her decision to stay with Bill long before the e-mail nonsense, but ironically have been married forever and have husbands who have been cheating on them behind their backs all these years. There is so much hypocrisy in this country.
I guess I don't pretend to understand other people's marriages. That is between them and none of our business. I do find it ironic that Hillary is criticized for staying with Bill for richer or poor, good times and in bad, and criticized by the party of "family values".
Whenever I've asked my Republican family why they hate Hillary so much, it is usually because of the lying--"can't trust her", they say--the e-mails, whatever questionable scam the Clintons were involved in Arkansas--can't think of the name--things like that--decisions she made as a Senator after Bill's reign. So the whole infidelity thing really is small potatoes with them, I guess. BUT the fact that it was so public and out there-----I wonder how many outstanding Republican presidents were unfaithful as well--but some of these ignorant Republican women just go on living in their naive bubble. I actually have a hard time looking at any marriage nowadays as what it used to stand for in that area. As far as their "You can't trust her" motto they have going...PLEASE-- You can't trust Trump either hyprocrits who are voting for him and the whole time saying "Atleast its not Hillary"--get over your fucking selves.
Yeah, how can someone throw a rock at HRC's marriage and not bat an eye at what Trump has done with his?
Clinton and the DNC Claimed donations were helping the Democratic Party, but in all reality the majority of all the money would make its way back to Hillary the crook. I know others have posted reports of this already with greater details
Comments
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/how-a-trump-presidency-would-impact-canadas-economy/article31115880/
(insert picture of the clintons and Trump playing golf)
http://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/politics/democrats-nominate-hillary-clinton-for-president/ar-BBuVEHl?li=AAggNb9&ocid=mailsignout
The press does http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/hillary-clinton-about-to-make-history-as-first-female-nominee/article31120013/
Hillary Clinton became the first woman to lead a major U.S. political party toward the White House, a triumphant moment for Democrats to relish before plunging into a bruising general election against Republican Donald Trump
Are you trying to give new information? Because we knew way back when she announced entered the campaign that if she wins, she would be the first woman.
we will find a way, we will find our place
It was unclear whether Sanders would interrupt the process to ask that Clinton’s nomination be approved by acclamation. That’s what she did on Obama’s behalf in 2008 to indicate their rivalry was truly over.
Sanders suggested Tuesday he wouldn’t rush to make that gesture early, mindful that cutting off his restive voters could cause an outcry.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/hillary-clinton-about-to-make-history-as-first-female-nominee/article31120013/
Oh yay!
The lease credible speaker up there!
This fact alone will be her downfall.
I would like to add a picture of Trump
here.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/terry-mcauliffe-hillary-clinton-tpp-trade-226253
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/07/25/flashback-clintons-loved-russia-enough-sell-uranium/
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-07-26/dnc-attempted-to-conceal-details-of-hillary-clinton-funding-deal