Hillary won more votes for President

mrussel1

rssesq said:

stoopid is as stoopid... or
greedy is as greedy...

take your pic.

Her IT admin set up a printer server, ergo she is greedy. Got it.

what dreams

BS44325 said:

The federal records act is federal law. She broke that law. The only question now is whether she will be charged and prosecuted for it.

http://observer.com/2016/05/game-over-emailgate-just-crippled-the-clinton-express/

This ain't faux news and the denial from some of you is astounding.

Totally awesome. I just started reading the IG report linked on the article you posted. On the very first page of the report there is this huge legal statement about how distributing the report outside of the Office of the Inspector General is a criminal act subject to civil or criminal penalties. According to the article "Politico obtained the report." Who's the fucking criminal? Beyond ironic, and I'm not even past the cover page.

BS44325

what dreams said:

BS44325 said:

The federal records act is federal law. She broke that law. The only question now is whether she will be charged and prosecuted for it.

http://observer.com/2016/05/game-over-emailgate-just-crippled-the-clinton-express/

This ain't faux news and the denial from some of you is astounding.

Totally awesome. I just started reading the IG report linked on the article you posted. On the very first page of the report there is this huge legal statement about how distributing the report outside of the Office of the Inspector General is a criminal act subject to civil or criminal penalties. According to the article "Politico obtained the report." Who's the fucking criminal? Beyond ironic, and I'm not even past the cover page.

Right. So the fact that you shouldn't be reading it means you should ignore it's findings. Makes a lot of sense.

what dreams

BS44325 said:

what dreams said:

BS44325 said:

The federal records act is federal law. She broke that law. The only question now is whether she will be charged and prosecuted for it.

http://observer.com/2016/05/game-over-emailgate-just-crippled-the-clinton-express/

This ain't faux news and the denial from some of you is astounding.

Totally awesome. I just started reading the IG report linked on the article you posted. On the very first page of the report there is this huge legal statement about how distributing the report outside of the Office of the Inspector General is a criminal act subject to civil or criminal penalties. According to the article "Politico obtained the report." Who's the fucking criminal? Beyond ironic, and I'm not even past the cover page.

Right. So the fact that you shouldn't be reading it means you should ignore it's findings. Makes a lot of sense.

Can you please quote the part of my statement where I've said we should ignore its findings? I never said to ignore its findings. I have consistently stated that I prefer to reserve judgment until I read the report myself. I have consistently stated that I'm waiting for the people whose full-time job it is to indict her to do their job and indict her. After reading the report tonight, I'm pretty convinced they won't. I'm trying really, really hard to be objective in this conversation, and kind.

BTW, I did finally finish reading the report, and after looking at it carefully for about five hours now, I still feel the same way I did before. Unfortunately, she made some poor judgments regarding her use of email. None of her misjudgments were illegal, and quite honestly, after reading through the details about the myriad of agencies and layers and layers of government policy involving what people are supposed to be doing -- I'd be all "fuck that" too. Reading about the entire State Department's cyber-security problems, not just hers -- I'm still convinced even if she were on a government machine, she'd be no better off. The report fully supports that assertion.

I've decided to open a new thread with my review of the report -- with a link to it so I can back up my summary with evidence, as you all like to yell at me for like I'm a 10th grader or something. You can look or not. I don't care anymore. I've done my homework, and I'm okay with my own conclusions.

Hillary for President 2016

mrussel1

^^ Good post. The violation of the State policy is not a crime. There has to be some sort of breach that opens the secrets before a crime is committed. As I've said, in almost all fed regs, there has to be an 'effect' for it to be a crime. Intent is not required, but result is. That's the role of the FBI and DOJ to determine, not the IG.

BS44325

You are all whistling past the graveyard.

Shaun King who is no conservative just devestates Hillary here:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-clinton-quit-presidential-race-email-scandal-article-1.2652342

It's over...

Bentleyspop

BS44325 said:

You are all whistling past the graveyard.

Shaun King who is no conservative just devestates Hillary here:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-clinton-quit-presidential-race-email-scandal-article-1.2652342

It's over...

Not so much a reliable and believable "journalist" either.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/02/18/youre-white-black-sports-columnist-calls-out-shaun-king-in-series-of-brutal-tweets-causing-the-activist-to-lose-it/

BS44325

Bentleyspop said:

BS44325 said:

You are all whistling past the graveyard.

Shaun King who is no conservative just devestates Hillary here:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-clinton-quit-presidential-race-email-scandal-article-1.2652342

It's over...

Not so much a reliable and believable "journalist" either.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/02/18/youre-white-black-sports-columnist-calls-out-shaun-king-in-series-of-brutal-tweets-causing-the-activist-to-lose-it/

No he isn't but he is a man of the left and her flank is abandoning her.

PJfanwillneverleave1

mrussel1

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Perhaps you missed the context of that quote.

PJfanwillneverleave1

^^^
It was very smart.

rssesq

Mrs. Carlos Danger = future first lady

Kat

I really enjoyed this article because it talks about a side of Hillary that people don't get to see enough.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/hillary-clinton-candidacy.html

Gern Blansten

Kat said:

I really enjoyed this article because it talks about a side of Hillary that people don't get to see enough.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/hillary-clinton-candidacy.html

I don't have much doubt that once she is the official nominee the opinion polls will start to shift her way.

Free

Kat said:

I really enjoyed this article because it talks about a side of Hillary that people don't get to see enough.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/hillary-clinton-candidacy.html

It fails to mention the sheer lack of support in numbers she truly has.

Keep believing.

Free

Gern Blansten said:

Kat said:

I really enjoyed this article because it talks about a side of Hillary that people don't get to see enough.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/hillary-clinton-candidacy.html

I don't have much doubt that once she is the official nominee the opinion polls will start to shift her way.

Gern Blansten

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

Kat said:

I really enjoyed this article because it talks about a side of Hillary that people don't get to see enough.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/hillary-clinton-candidacy.html

I don't have much doubt that once she is the official nominee the opinion polls will start to shift her way.

You'll be laughing at Bernie Sanders....he'll jump on the bandwagon pretty soon

Free

Gern Blansten said:

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

Kat said:

I really enjoyed this article because it talks about a side of Hillary that people don't get to see enough.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/hillary-clinton-candidacy.html

I don't have much doubt that once she is the official nominee the opinion polls will start to shift her way.

You'll be laughing at Bernie Sanders....he'll jump on the bandwagon pretty soon

This made me

Free

Hillary will never have support like this.

Free

This video doesn't show how Clinton's campaign along with the mainstream media are cheating to win. Nooooooo........

https://m.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4kwxsy/msnbc_admits_well_suppress_voting_to_help_clinton/