(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
96 Randall's Island II
98 CAA
00 Virginia Beach;Camden I; Jones Beach III
05 Borgata Night I; Wachovia Center
06 Letterman Show; Webcast (guy in blue shirt), Camden I; DC
08 Camden I; Camden II; DC
09 Phillie III
10 MSG II
13 Wrigley Field
16 Phillie II
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Hillary is the most wounded after a non indictment?
Your boy just tweeted anti-semitic garbage over the weekend.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Hillary is the most wounded after a non indictment?
Your boy just tweeted anti-semitic garbage over the weekend.
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Hillary is the most wounded after a non indictment?
Your boy just tweeted anti-semitic garbage over the weekend.
Not my boy and yes she is massively wounded.
Nope...she's good. Fox News and all the nutters will freak for awhile but it's done.
Get ready for eight years of Clinton whether you like it or not.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
Bill meets AG on a plane for 30mins "coincidentally" to exchange cooking recipes
Obama meets with director of FBI privately to play a friendly game of checkers
FBI meets with Hillary privately for yoga
July 5th-no indictment...nothing to see here
what she did is criminal regardless of what the FBI decided today because they were bought and paid for with promises and money...she should lose all clearances which would eliminate her from running for president.....might as well retract the punishment of Gen. Patreaus who did less than what she has
if we get 8 years of this fraud kiss this country goodbye...hell I already did today
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
Bill meets AG on a plane for 30mins "coincidentally" to exchange cooking recipes
Obama meets with director of FBI privately to play a friendly game of checkers
FBI meets with Hillary privately for yoga
July 5th-no indictment...nothing to see here
what she did is criminal regardless of what the FBI decided today because they were bought and paid for with promises and money...she should lose all clearances which would eliminate her from running for president.....might as well retract the punishment of Gen. Patreaus who did less than what she has
if we get 8 years of this fraud kiss this country goodbye...hell I already did today
You're right. The FBI is corrupt. The AG is corrupt. The candidate is corrupt. The POTUS is corrupt.
Looks like you have two choices: 1. Go find yourself another country 2. Go occupy a wildlife refuge with 20 of your friends and see what happens.
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
Bill meets AG on a plane for 30mins "coincidentally" to exchange cooking recipes
Obama meets with director of FBI privately to play a friendly game of checkers
FBI meets with Hillary privately for yoga
July 5th-no indictment...nothing to see here
what she did is criminal regardless of what the FBI decided today because they were bought and paid for with promises and money...she should lose all clearances which would eliminate her from running for president.....might as well retract the punishment of Gen. Patreaus who did less than what she has
if we get 8 years of this fraud kiss this country goodbye...hell I already did today
So America will cease to exist if Hillary gets elected? If true, pretty big. Thanks for bringing this to our attention
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
She has lied to the media and the American people since this began. Lie after lie after lie. She may not have been indicted but it is now proven beyond all doubt that she lied. That means something and for the Hillary supporters who actually value honesty in government it will be hard for them to look the other way.
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
She has lied to the media and the American people since this began. Lie after lie after lie. She may not have been indicted but it is now proven beyond all doubt that she lied. That means something and for the Hillary supporters who actually value honesty in government it will be hard for them to look the other way.
How many emails do you send a day? I probably send 75-100. I get like 300. Quick math has me sending 75/day x 20 days per month x 12 x 4 years.. That's 72k emails. We have controls to prevent NPI (non-public information) from escaping our servers. They didn't exist in 2008, we had to self monitor. If someone were to ask me last year if I ever sent an email with NPI between 2008 and 2012 I would say, "I don't know.. not to my knowledge, or not intentionally". If it turns out I did send 30 of those over the course of 4 years (which I probably did), would that make me a liar? 30/72000 = six sigma quality.
And that's what she said. How the fuck can you know for 100% everything you did 8 years ago on email.
In the five minutes that she has allowed for questions from the media in the last year she lied in a good portion of it for sure.
The FBI investigation was a waste of time if the conclusion was that she needed to have intent to harm the US in order to charge. Everyone and their mother knew she did it to hide as much of her correspondence as possible to avoid harming herself. I don't think she has intent to harm the US, but only to help herself. So the investigation was a giant waste of time.
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
Bill meets AG on a plane for 30mins "coincidentally" to exchange cooking recipes
Obama meets with director of FBI privately to play a friendly game of checkers
FBI meets with Hillary privately for yoga
July 5th-no indictment...nothing to see here
what she did is criminal regardless of what the FBI decided today because they were bought and paid for with promises and money...she should lose all clearances which would eliminate her from running for president.....might as well retract the punishment of Gen. Patreaus who did less than what she has
if we get 8 years of this fraud kiss this country goodbye...hell I already did today
Please tell us what Petreaus was indicted for.....it was much different and CLEARLY INTENTIONAL.
Seriously....look it up and then please tell me how he did less.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
Bill meets AG on a plane for 30mins "coincidentally" to exchange cooking recipes
Obama meets with director of FBI privately to play a friendly game of checkers
FBI meets with Hillary privately for yoga
July 5th-no indictment...nothing to see here
what she did is criminal regardless of what the FBI decided today because they were bought and paid for with promises and money...she should lose all clearances which would eliminate her from running for president.....might as well retract the punishment of Gen. Patreaus who did less than what she has
if we get 8 years of this fraud kiss this country goodbye...hell I already did today
Please tell us what Petreaus was indicted for.....it was much different and CLEARLY INTENTIONAL.
Seriously....look it up and then please tell me how he did less.
He also violated the UCMJ with his extra-marital affair with the girl. His disclosure was willful and while violating the UCMJ.
0
Options
Kat
There's a lot to be said for nowhere. Posts: 4,777
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
She has lied to the media and the American people since this began. Lie after lie after lie. She may not have been indicted but it is now proven beyond all doubt that she lied. That means something and for the Hillary supporters who actually value honesty in government it will be hard for them to look the other way.
How many emails do you send a day? I probably send 75-100. I get like 300. Quick math has me sending 75/day x 20 days per month x 12 x 4 years.. That's 72k emails. We have controls to prevent NPI (non-public information) from escaping our servers. They didn't exist in 2008, we had to self monitor. If someone were to ask me last year if I ever sent an email with NPI between 2008 and 2012 I would say, "I don't know.. not to my knowledge, or not intentionally". If it turns out I did send 30 of those over the course of 4 years (which I probably did), would that make me a liar? 30/72000 = six sigma quality.
And that's what she said. How the fuck can you know for 100% everything you did 8 years ago on email.
Except you didn't intentionally set up your own server at the outset with minimal security in order to avoid transparency. There was a government system already in place that existed to catalogue and protect this data. Your claim that she instituted her own system to improve efficiency is absolutely laughable and she can't then use the deficiencies of this same system to insulate her from her lies.
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
She has lied to the media and the American people since this began. Lie after lie after lie. She may not have been indicted but it is now proven beyond all doubt that she lied. That means something and for the Hillary supporters who actually value honesty in government it will be hard for them to look the other way.
How many emails do you send a day? I probably send 75-100. I get like 300. Quick math has me sending 75/day x 20 days per month x 12 x 4 years.. That's 72k emails. We have controls to prevent NPI (non-public information) from escaping our servers. They didn't exist in 2008, we had to self monitor. If someone were to ask me last year if I ever sent an email with NPI between 2008 and 2012 I would say, "I don't know.. not to my knowledge, or not intentionally". If it turns out I did send 30 of those over the course of 4 years (which I probably did), would that make me a liar? 30/72000 = six sigma quality.
And that's what she said. How the fuck can you know for 100% everything you did 8 years ago on email.
Except you didn't intentionally set up your own server at the outset with minimal security in order to avoid transparency. There was a government system already in place that existed to catalogue and protect this data. Your claim that she instituted her own system to improve efficiency is absolutely laughable and she can't then use the deficiencies of this same system to insulate her from her lies.
It's documented that during her tenure there was no mobile use of email available at State. You had to be at a terminal. Do you travel for business? I do. I have a cell, a Surface, and an Ipad. And I use them all to work and retrieve email. If I could only get email when I got to one of my sites, I'd be fucked. That's how it was.
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
She has lied to the media and the American people since this began. Lie after lie after lie. She may not have been indicted but it is now proven beyond all doubt that she lied. That means something and for the Hillary supporters who actually value honesty in government it will be hard for them to look the other way.
How many emails do you send a day? I probably send 75-100. I get like 300. Quick math has me sending 75/day x 20 days per month x 12 x 4 years.. That's 72k emails. We have controls to prevent NPI (non-public information) from escaping our servers. They didn't exist in 2008, we had to self monitor. If someone were to ask me last year if I ever sent an email with NPI between 2008 and 2012 I would say, "I don't know.. not to my knowledge, or not intentionally". If it turns out I did send 30 of those over the course of 4 years (which I probably did), would that make me a liar? 30/72000 = six sigma quality.
And that's what she said. How the fuck can you know for 100% everything you did 8 years ago on email.
Except you didn't intentionally set up your own server at the outset with minimal security in order to avoid transparency. There was a government system already in place that existed to catalogue and protect this data. Your claim that she instituted her own system to improve efficiency is absolutely laughable and she can't then use the deficiencies of this same system to insulate her from her lies.
It's documented that during her tenure there was no mobile use of email available at State. You had to be at a terminal. Do you travel for business? I do. I have a cell, a Surface, and an Ipad. And I use them all to work and retrieve email. If I could only get email when I got to one of my sites, I'd be fucked. That's how it was.
There was no mobile for a reason. I assume you understand the difference between her job and your's?
This is the republican in him coming out in my opinion. He issued an honest opinion regarding how there was nothing to indict but still got his jab in.
What other agency would have escaped this type of criticism? Without the FBI diving into each department we will never be able to say for sure. The GOP knew that even if nothing was there they would still have ammo.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
The last thing Clinton is is wounded. She is doing jumping jacks. The fbi just handed her the presidency. It was either going to be her or sanders. Now that there will be no charges filed, Hilary is going to win.
If you think for a second that Clinton is wounded from not being indicted, you're really not paying attention to anything.
will myself to find a home, a home within myself we will find a way, we will find our place
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
She has lied to the media and the American people since this began. Lie after lie after lie. She may not have been indicted but it is now proven beyond all doubt that she lied. That means something and for the Hillary supporters who actually value honesty in government it will be hard for them to look the other way.
How many emails do you send a day? I probably send 75-100. I get like 300. Quick math has me sending 75/day x 20 days per month x 12 x 4 years.. That's 72k emails. We have controls to prevent NPI (non-public information) from escaping our servers. They didn't exist in 2008, we had to self monitor. If someone were to ask me last year if I ever sent an email with NPI between 2008 and 2012 I would say, "I don't know.. not to my knowledge, or not intentionally". If it turns out I did send 30 of those over the course of 4 years (which I probably did), would that make me a liar? 30/72000 = six sigma quality.
And that's what she said. How the fuck can you know for 100% everything you did 8 years ago on email.
Except you didn't intentionally set up your own server at the outset with minimal security in order to avoid transparency. There was a government system already in place that existed to catalogue and protect this data. Your claim that she instituted her own system to improve efficiency is absolutely laughable and she can't then use the deficiencies of this same system to insulate her from her lies.
It's documented that during her tenure there was no mobile use of email available at State. You had to be at a terminal. Do you travel for business? I do. I have a cell, a Surface, and an Ipad. And I use them all to work and retrieve email. If I could only get email when I got to one of my sites, I'd be fucked. That's how it was.
There was no mobile for a reason. I assume you understand the difference between her job and your's?
I do understand the difference although you don't since you don't know what I do. But I can assure you that our security provisions are obscene. I work in about the most scrutinized business in this country (unfairly so). The point is that the server was set up to be able to communicate efficiently. The intent was not to hide emails but not to receive secure emails. That's why out of the mounds of emails, they found 50 that had confidential plus info. That's pretty low ratio and why the FBI determined there was no 'intent' and that they could not find evidence of damage.
This is the republican in him coming out in my opinion. He issued an honest opinion regarding how there was nothing to indict but still got his jab in.
What other agency would have escaped this type of criticism? Without the FBI diving into each department we will never be able to say for sure. The GOP knew that even if nothing was there they would still have ammo.
I think you have it backwards. The "jab" was honest while the failure to indict, which is up to Lorreta Lynch and the justice department, was not honest. Comey knew that Lynch wouldn't prosecute and his very detailed statement appears to show his disgust with the result. As per below Comey clearly outlined that crimes were committed.
Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.
Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.
No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.
This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.
Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.
I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.
The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.
Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.
Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.
No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.
Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
Bill meets AG on a plane for 30mins "coincidentally" to exchange cooking recipes
Obama meets with director of FBI privately to play a friendly game of checkers
FBI meets with Hillary privately for yoga
July 5th-no indictment...nothing to see here
what she did is criminal regardless of what the FBI decided today because they were bought and paid for with promises and money...she should lose all clearances which would eliminate her from running for president.....might as well retract the punishment of Gen. Patreaus who did less than what she has
if we get 8 years of this fraud kiss this country goodbye...hell I already did today
You people said the same thing when Obama won.
Btw, Petraeus handed classified document to an author writing his biography who he was banging. He also pled guilty. If you can see the difference between him and hilary, you're not looking at the situation objectively.
will myself to find a home, a home within myself we will find a way, we will find our place
This is the republican in him coming out in my opinion. He issued an honest opinion regarding how there was nothing to indict but still got his jab in.
What other agency would have escaped this type of criticism? Without the FBI diving into each department we will never be able to say for sure. The GOP knew that even if nothing was there they would still have ammo.
I think you have it backwards. The "jab" was honest while the failure to indict, which is up to Lorreta Lynch and the justice department, was not honest. Comey knew that Lynch wouldn't prosecute and his very detailed statement appears to show his disgust with the result. As per below Comey clearly outlined that crimes were committed.
This is the republican in him coming out in my opinion. He issued an honest opinion regarding how there was nothing to indict but still got his jab in.
What other agency would have escaped this type of criticism? Without the FBI diving into each department we will never be able to say for sure. The GOP knew that even if nothing was there they would still have ammo.
I think you have it backwards. The "jab" was honest while the failure to indict, which is up to Lorreta Lynch and the justice department, was not honest. Comey knew that Lynch wouldn't prosecute and his very detailed statement appears to show his disgust with the result. As per below Comey clearly outlined that crimes were committed.
"People have been charged for far less than this." I heard Comey say that they could not find another case like this where anyone was charged. So I don't know what Rudy is talking about. Plus, unless Rudy was actively involved in the investigation, I don't know how he can say she broke any law. Did he say she was negligent or careless? I believe he said careless.
will myself to find a home, a home within myself we will find a way, we will find our place
Comments
Sort of status quo, no matter who the politician is.
They lie, we buy.
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
98 CAA
00 Virginia Beach;Camden I; Jones Beach III
05 Borgata Night I; Wachovia Center
06 Letterman Show; Webcast (guy in blue shirt), Camden I; DC
08 Camden I; Camden II; DC
09 Phillie III
10 MSG II
13 Wrigley Field
16 Phillie II
Your boy just tweeted anti-semitic garbage over the weekend.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Get ready for eight years of Clinton whether you like it or not.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.
Obama meets with director of FBI privately to play a friendly game of checkers
FBI meets with Hillary privately for yoga
July 5th-no indictment...nothing to see here
what she did is criminal regardless of what the FBI decided today because they were bought and paid for with promises and money...she should lose all clearances which would eliminate her from running for president.....might as well retract the punishment of Gen. Patreaus who did less than what she has
if we get 8 years of this fraud kiss this country goodbye...hell I already did today
Looks like you have two choices:
1. Go find yourself another country
2. Go occupy a wildlife refuge with 20 of your friends and see what happens.
http://time.com/4393705/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-james-comey/
And that's what she said. How the fuck can you know for 100% everything you did 8 years ago on email.
The FBI investigation was a waste of time if the conclusion was that she needed to have intent to harm the US in order to charge. Everyone and their mother knew she did it to hide as much of her correspondence as possible to avoid harming herself. I don't think she has intent to harm the US, but only to help herself. So the investigation was a giant waste of time.
Seriously....look it up and then please tell me how he did less.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
What other agency would have escaped this type of criticism? Without the FBI diving into each department we will never be able to say for sure. The GOP knew that even if nothing was there they would still have ammo.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
If you think for a second that Clinton is wounded from not being indicted, you're really not paying attention to anything.
we will find a way, we will find our place
Btw, Petraeus handed classified document to an author writing his biography who he was banging. He also pled guilty. If you can see the difference between him and hilary, you're not looking at the situation objectively.
we will find a way, we will find our place
If Comey had "clearly outlined that crimes were committed" he would NOT have said that...come on
Turn off Faux News.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
we will find a way, we will find our place