Hillary won more votes for President

Free

rssesq said:

http://imgur.com/gallery/XQ0Xy

That's great!

Gern Blansten

rssesq said:

Ya, Lester is the known single alt -right media guy on msnbc. lmao
Dude, everyone is saying what a great job he did except ..... Gern.

and....Trump's people

Did you watch? Seriously....62% to 38%, that's not good moderating

Boxes&Books

Gern Blansten said:

rssesq said:

Ya, Lester is the known single alt -right media guy on msnbc. lmao
Dude, everyone is saying what a great job he did except ..... Gern.

and....Trump's people

Did you watch? Seriously....62% to 38%, that's not good moderating

That's trump being trump. He dominated the time- and there were several times when Clinton had zero responses to his comments. Such as when he called her out on spreading the images of Obama. She gave one of her smirks and that was it.

Gern Blansten

tonifig8 said:

Gern Blansten said:

rssesq said:

Ya, Lester is the known single alt -right media guy on msnbc. lmao
Dude, everyone is saying what a great job he did except ..... Gern.

and....Trump's people

Did you watch? Seriously....62% to 38%, that's not good moderating

That's trump being trump. He dominated the time- and there were several times when Clinton had zero responses to his comments. Such as when he called her out on spreading the images of Obama. She gave one of her smirks and that was it.

That's Trump not being properly moderated. Holt wasn't assertive enough. Megan Kelley was tougher.

Boxes&Books

Gern Blansten said:

tonifig8 said:

Gern Blansten said:

rssesq said:

Ya, Lester is the known single alt -right media guy on msnbc. lmao
Dude, everyone is saying what a great job he did except ..... Gern.

and....Trump's people

Did you watch? Seriously....62% to 38%, that's not good moderating

That's trump being trump. He dominated the time- and there were several times when Clinton had zero responses to his comments. Such as when he called her out on spreading the images of Obama. She gave one of her smirks and that was it.

That's Trump not being properly moderated. Holt wasn't assertive enough. Megan Kelley was tougher.

I think that made him look more powerful and in control. Not saying it wasn't rude or out of control, but for those on the fence they might like someone who appears strong and in control to represent the country. Romney did the same during the first debate with Obama and he got a big boost.

rssesq

agreed! most Megyn's have more BALLZ than Lester's. lol

Free

tonifig8 said:

Gern Blansten said:

rssesq said:

Ya, Lester is the known single alt -right media guy on msnbc. lmao
Dude, everyone is saying what a great job he did except ..... Gern.

and....Trump's people

Did you watch? Seriously....62% to 38%, that's not good moderating

That's trump being trump. He dominated the time- and there were several times when Clinton had zero responses to his comments. Such as when he called her out on spreading the images of Obama. She gave one of her smirks and that was it.

How about when Trump called her out on the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and Bernie Sanders? She had no response.

Free

rssesq said:

agreed! most Megyn's have more BALLZ than Lester's. lol

I agree as well.

mrussel1

tonifig8 said:

Gern Blansten said:

tonifig8 said:

Gern Blansten said:

rssesq said:

Ya, Lester is the known single alt -right media guy on msnbc. lmao
Dude, everyone is saying what a great job he did except ..... Gern.

and....Trump's people

Did you watch? Seriously....62% to 38%, that's not good moderating

That's trump being trump. He dominated the time- and there were several times when Clinton had zero responses to his comments. Such as when he called her out on spreading the images of Obama. She gave one of her smirks and that was it.

That's Trump not being properly moderated. Holt wasn't assertive enough. Megan Kelley was tougher.

I think that made him look more powerful and in control. Not saying it wasn't rude or out of control, but for those on the fence they might like someone who appears strong and in control to represent the country. Romney did the same during the first debate with Obama and he got a big boost.

I'm surprised by your comments. The overwhelming feedback from the press, focus groups and polling (http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/27/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-debate-poll/index.html) believes that Clinton won the debate handily. Look at Guiliani and Christie in the spin room. They are talking about Obama losing the first debate in 2012. Trump is on TV talking about a bad mic. Guiliani is saying Trump should not debate again unless it is more 'fair'. These are all clear signs as to who the American people and the campaigns think won the debate.

Free

It doesn't matter who won the debate anyway, but Hillary is no shoe-in.

What matters is how many people decided to vote for either candidate who are undecided.

JC29856

Free said:

It doesn't matter who won the debate anyway, but Hillary is no shoe-in.

What matters is how many people decided to vote for either candidate who are undecided.

Anyone who thinks Hilliary won't be president is ignorant naive or both.
(True definition of ignorant not offensive)

PJ_Soul

tonifig8 said:

Gern Blansten said:

tonifig8 said:

Gern Blansten said:

rssesq said:

Ya, Lester is the known single alt -right media guy on msnbc. lmao
Dude, everyone is saying what a great job he did except ..... Gern.

and....Trump's people

Did you watch? Seriously....62% to 38%, that's not good moderating

That's trump being trump. He dominated the time- and there were several times when Clinton had zero responses to his comments. Such as when he called her out on spreading the images of Obama. She gave one of her smirks and that was it.

That's Trump not being properly moderated. Holt wasn't assertive enough. Megan Kelley was tougher.

I think that made him look more powerful and in control. Not saying it wasn't rude or out of control, but for those on the fence they might like someone who appears strong and in control to represent the country. Romney did the same during the first debate with Obama and he got a big boost.

Being out of control made him look more in control? Hmm. Well anyway, I don't think Trump lost anyone who was already supporting him. I don't think anything short of him kicking the bucket before the election will do that. But I don't think his horrible debate performance will have drawn in any significant number of fence-sitters either.

Free

JC29856 said:

Free said:

It doesn't matter who won the debate anyway, but Hillary is no shoe-in.

What matters is how many people decided to vote for either candidate who are undecided.

Anyone who thinks Hilliary won't be president is ignorant naive or both.
(True definition of ignorant not offensive)

... Because it's been rigged for a long time. It still doesn't negate the fact that anyone can vote for anyone of their choosing. And that should be without Nastiness from anyone else.

Gern Blansten

Free said:

JC29856 said:

Free said:

It doesn't matter who won the debate anyway, but Hillary is no shoe-in.

What matters is how many people decided to vote for either candidate who are undecided.

Anyone who thinks Hilliary won't be president is ignorant naive or both.
(True definition of ignorant not offensive)

... Because it's been rigged for a long time. It still doesn't negate the fact that anyone can vote for anyone of their choosing. And that should be without Nastiness from anyone else.

no nastiness but rigged....got it

JC29856

Free said:

JC29856 said:

Free said:

It doesn't matter who won the debate anyway, but Hillary is no shoe-in.

What matters is how many people decided to vote for either candidate who are undecided.

Anyone who thinks Hilliary won't be president is ignorant naive or both.
(True definition of ignorant not offensive)

... Because it's been rigged for a long time. It still doesn't negate the fact that anyone can vote for anyone of their choosing. And that should be without Nastiness from anyone else.

Agree

rgambs

Gern Blansten said:

Free said:

JC29856 said:

Free said:

It doesn't matter who won the debate anyway, but Hillary is no shoe-in.

What matters is how many people decided to vote for either candidate who are undecided.

Anyone who thinks Hilliary won't be president is ignorant naive or both.
(True definition of ignorant not offensive)

... Because it's been rigged for a long time. It still doesn't negate the fact that anyone can vote for anyone of their choosing. And that should be without Nastiness from anyone else.

no nastiness but rigged....got it

Hahaha yep!

VOTE FOR ANYONE OF YOUR CHOOSING!
*Clinton is corrupt and she rigged it*

rssesq

rssesq

JC29856

Chelsea
“We also have anecdotal evidence now from Colorado where some of the people who were taking marijuana for those purposes, the coroner believes, after they died, there was drug interactions with other things they were taking,” she said.

Although there is no documented evidence that marijuana has ever contributed to the death of a single human being in the thousands of years it has been used by civilizations across the globe, prohibitionists often dig deep into their sagging bags of propaganda to convince the average citizen that the effects of cannabis can be both devastating and deadly. But this is the first we have heard of marijuana potentially interacting with other drugs and causing people to suffer their untimely demise.

A recent article on InhaleMD indicates that while there can be some minor interactions when consuming cannabis in conjunction with other medications and food, there is no evidence to suggest that these types of concoctions can result in death.

Gern Blansten

rssesq said: