Hillary won more votes for President

mrussel1

But hey, nice non-sequitur. Let's follow up one patently false statement with another, unrelated one. Most JD's (or barred attorneys that is...) are smart enough not to put themselves in boxes with statements. You are going against that grain. Nicely done.

rssesq

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/06/16/listen-to-hillary-clinton-laugh-while-talking-about-getting-a-suspected-child-rapist-off-the-hook/

check the last line

Gern Blansten

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/

Hey man...I'm selling bridges if you want one

mrussel1

rssesq said:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/06/16/listen-to-hillary-clinton-laugh-while-talking-about-getting-a-suspected-child-rapist-off-the-hook/

check the last line

Did you read the pleadings? Did you read the motions? What about the affidavits or sworn testimony? C'mon man, you said you went to law school. Did they teach you to make judgments on hearsay accounts? Newsday writes a story and the Blaze puts their own spin on it? Do you know if either of them had attorneys research it? Fucking pathetic.

The CDF is highly respected and has been around since the early 70's, with a 23MM operating budget. Rose law firm is one of the oldest firms in the country. How about you? Where does the "Blaze" stand in that equation?

Bentleyspop

mrussel1 said:

But hey, nice non-sequitur. Let's follow up one patently false statement with another, unrelated one. Most JD's (or barred attorneys that is...) are smart enough not to put themselves in boxes with statements. You are going against that grain. Nicely done.

Just so you know....you're making valid points but arguing with a lawyer.

Don't forget what Shakespeare said about lawyers

mrussel1

Bentleyspop said:

mrussel1 said:

But hey, nice non-sequitur. Let's follow up one patently false statement with another, unrelated one. Most JD's (or barred attorneys that is...) are smart enough not to put themselves in boxes with statements. You are going against that grain. Nicely done.

Just so you know....you're making valid points but arguing with a lawyer.

Don't forget what Shakespeare said about lawyers

Ah, but he hasn't said he is a lawyer. Said he was a JD...

rssesq

Practicing over 15 years and thriving. Your Hillary scare tactics wont work on me. I aint Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinsky, Elisabeth Grayson, nor Kathleen Willey.

mrussel1

rssesq said:

Practicing over 15 years and thriving. Your Hillary scare tactics wont work on me. I aint Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinsky, Elisabeth Grayson, nor Kathleen Willey.

Scare tactics? I'm challenging your statements which are both factually incorrect. She was in private practice (you said she never received anything but gov't money) and the BS about the rapist. You of all people should know that a judge may assign you to a case and should be sympathetic to that process. Would you tank the defense if that was you in her place?

bootlegger10

unsung said:

bootlegger10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

unsung said:

Her charity contributions? That's hysterical.

She donated 1,042,000 of which 1,000,000 went to her own foundation.

And what did the foundation do with it? Do you have any idea how those foundations work?

Yes, I think we know how foundations work. After I donate to the United Way last year I called up my UW contact and asked them to contact the Secretary of State's secretary to setup a meeting. Unfortunately, John Kerry's and my schedule did not line up and didn't meet.

LOL

I'm not joking. It is what happened. Ask Gern, this stuff happens all the time.

bootlegger10

Gern Blansten said:

bootlegger10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

unsung said:

http://www.apnewsarchive.com/2016/More-than-half-of-the-people-outside-the-government-who-met-with-Hillary-Clinton-while-she-was-secretary-of-State-donated-personally-or-through-corporations-and-other-entities-to-the-Cli/id-5d63315e296f49668a0d50a3dc4e9576

Corruption at the highest level.

What was corrupt about it?

You won't give an inch will you? This is my biggest problem with this board. So many cling to their positions like they are hanging on a rope 100 feet above the ground.

I'll give an inch if there was something corrupt. What was corrupt?

So you are fine with money buying access and influence in politics as long as it promotes a liberal agenda? It may not have been illegal (based on what we know now which is probably 10% of the story), but clearly Hillary was selling her time due to her secretary of state position. Somehow they have made a $100 million because people like to here them talk....right....

Gern Blansten

mrussel1 said:

rssesq said:

Practicing over 15 years and thriving. Your Hillary scare tactics wont work on me. I aint Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinsky, Elisabeth Grayson, nor Kathleen Willey.

Scare tactics? I'm challenging your statements which are both factually incorrect. She was in private practice (you said she never received anything but gov't money) and the BS about the rapist. You of all people should know that a judge may assign you to a case and should be sympathetic to that process. Would you tank the defense if that was you in her place?

I can't imagine an attorney not fact checking his own political posts.

Gern Blansten

bootlegger10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

bootlegger10 said:

Gern Blansten said:

unsung said:

http://www.apnewsarchive.com/2016/More-than-half-of-the-people-outside-the-government-who-met-with-Hillary-Clinton-while-she-was-secretary-of-State-donated-personally-or-through-corporations-and-other-entities-to-the-Cli/id-5d63315e296f49668a0d50a3dc4e9576

Corruption at the highest level.

What was corrupt about it?

You won't give an inch will you? This is my biggest problem with this board. So many cling to their positions like they are hanging on a rope 100 feet above the ground.

I'll give an inch if there was something corrupt. What was corrupt?

So you are fine with money buying access and influence in politics as long as it promotes a liberal agenda? It may not have been illegal (based on what we know now which is probably 10% of the story), but clearly Hillary was selling her time due to her secretary of state position. Somehow they have made a $100 million because people like to here them talk....right....

Clearly? Where is the evidence? I don't disagree that she has given the right a story line to go off on ad nauseam but you don't have any proof whatsoever of "pay to play". None....zero....not there.

Edit: Clinton knew she would be running for President. She isn't stupid. Why on earth would she do anything out in the open? All of the donations to the Clinton Foundation are disclosed. That's why it has been so easy to start this conspiracy theory. The CF does great work....of course wealthy people throughout the world are going to contribute to it.

Halifax2TheMax

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/23/a-guide-to-hillary-clintons-many-illnesses-as-diagnosed-in-the-conservative-media/?wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

I heard it was Ebola.

Bentleyspop

Halifax2TheMax said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/23/a-guide-to-hillary-clintons-many-illnesses-as-diagnosed-in-the-conservative-media/?wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

I heard it was Ebola.

Not zika?

unsung

Halifax2TheMax said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/23/a-guide-to-hillary-clintons-many-illnesses-as-diagnosed-in-the-conservative-media/?wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

I heard it was Ebola.

Hoped?

PJ_Soul

unsung said:

http://www.apnewsarchive.com/2016/More-than-half-of-the-people-outside-the-government-who-met-with-Hillary-Clinton-while-she-was-secretary-of-State-donated-personally-or-through-corporations-and-other-entities-to-the-Cli/id-5d63315e296f49668a0d50a3dc4e9576

Corruption at the highest level.

That's not corrupt. It makes her seem quite industrious actually.

rssesq

see roy cohn

Gern Blansten said:

mrussel1 said:

rssesq said:

Practicing over 15 years and thriving. Your Hillary scare tactics wont work on me. I aint Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinsky, Elisabeth Grayson, nor Kathleen Willey.

Scare tactics? I'm challenging your statements which are both factually incorrect. She was in private practice (you said she never received anything but gov't money) and the BS about the rapist. You of all people should know that a judge may assign you to a case and should be sympathetic to that process. Would you tank the defense if that was you in her place?

I can't imagine an attorney not fact checking his own political posts.

PJ_Soul

Huh. I'm sure a few of you fine folks will self-identify as alt-right as defined in this article, yes?
https://news.vice.com/article/why-hillary-clinton-is-talking-about-the-fringe-alt-right-movement?utm_source=vicenewsfb

Halifax2TheMax

unsung said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/23/a-guide-to-hillary-clintons-many-illnesses-as-diagnosed-in-the-conservative-media/?wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

I heard it was Ebola.

Hoped?

You do or did?

Kat

Just click on the annotation to see more.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/25/hillary-clintons-alt-right-speech-annotated/

dignin

Kat said:

Just click on the annotation to see more.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/25/hillary-clintons-alt-right-speech-annotated/

That was a fantastic takedown.

Nice to hear it all laid out like that.

unsung

Alt-right or SJW? Both vermin.

unsung

Halifax2TheMax said:

unsung said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/23/a-guide-to-hillary-clintons-many-illnesses-as-diagnosed-in-the-conservative-media/?wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

I heard it was Ebola.

Hoped?

You do or did?

I would not wish that on ebola.

Halifax2TheMax

unsung said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

unsung said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/23/a-guide-to-hillary-clintons-many-illnesses-as-diagnosed-in-the-conservative-media/?wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

I heard it was Ebola.

Hoped?

You do or did?

I would not wish that on ebola.

Ha, ha! Made me laugh.

unsung

My job is done.

unsung

All she's doing by acknowledging the alt-right is playing the victim.

mrussel1

unsung said:

All she's doing by acknowledging the alt-right is playing the victim.

No she's not. It's quite the smart strategy. Trump tried to spend this week pivoting and she is drawing the focus back on him and tying him to the alt-right. More importantly... and this shows the doofus move for what it is... everything that Breitbart prints or has printed now is tied to Trump. This is of course because of Bannon. Everything that happens on that website is now Trump's problem.

It's fucking brilliant by the Clinton campaign.

unsung

I'm voting for Harambe.

Boxes&Books

Anyone know if Clinton has given a real Press Conference yet? Or do we still need to come here to get answers from everyone other than the candidate?

unsung

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

All she's doing by acknowledging the alt-right is playing the victim.

No she's not. It's quite the smart strategy. Trump tried to spend this week pivoting and she is drawing the focus back on him and tying him to the alt-right. More importantly... and this shows the doofus move for what it is... everything that Breitbart prints or has printed now is tied to Trump. This is of course because of Bannon. Everything that happens on that website is now Trump's problem.

It's fucking brilliant by the Clinton campaign.

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

All she's doing by acknowledging the alt-right is playing the victim.

No she's not. It's quite the smart strategy. Trump tried to spend this week pivoting and she is drawing the focus back on him and tying him to the alt-right. More importantly... and this shows the doofus move for what it is... everything that Breitbart prints or has printed now is tied to Trump. This is of course because of Bannon. Everything that happens on that website is now Trump's problem.

It's fucking brilliant by the Clinton campaign.

She went after Alex Jones too? She's desperate.