his would be a nightmare for the airport janitor... with all the riders trying to shit out their last few pounds and all before they board... :think: Plus, I'd just design some helium filled underwear. Ooh, thats sounds fun.
his would be a nightmare for the airport janitor... with all the riders trying to shit out their last few pounds and all before they board... :think: Plus, I'd just design some helium filled underwear. Ooh, thats sounds fun.
Would your farts come out all squeaky?
only if you ate cheese curds
I'm going to tackle you
0
81
Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
I'd be a fan of this, and I'm sure some type of system could be developed that seems fair. (I think we can all agree we don't want the airline industry contributing to mass amounts of people developing eating -- or lack of eating -- disorders.)
Similar "taxes" or extra fees have been implemented by some companies' insurance policies for workers who smoke or are overweight ... and healthy workers pay less. That seems fair, too.
So the person who works out and has like 5% body fat, and can fit just fine in the seat should pay more?
People who lift weights/workout tend to have lower body fat percentages-muscle weighs more than fat-so essentially, it is possible that some people who are fit, would end up paying a 'fat tax' since they would weigh more than a person of the same height...their BMI would say they are overweight' but in truth, they are not overweight.
I think if you can't fit your ass into the 17" wide seat, then pay up. I'm sure there are lots of people on here that would be glad to measure bums.
The joy of life comes from our encounters with new experiences, and hence there is no greater joy than to have an endlessly changing horizon, for each day to have a new and different sun.
So the person who works out and has like 5% body fat, and can fit just fine in the seat should pay more?
People who lift weights/workout tend to have lower body fat percentages-muscle weighs more than fat-so essentially, it is possible that some people who are fit, would end up paying a 'fat tax' since they would weigh more than a person of the same height...their BMI would say they are overweight' but in truth, they are not overweight.
I think if you can't fit your ass into the 17" wide seat, then pay up. I'm sure there are lots of people on here that would be glad to measure bums.
And a company can account for that or lose business
0
81
Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
. I'm sure there are lots of people on here that would be glad to measure bums.
:think:
only if i get frist crack at selecting which ones i'm going to measure...i don't wanna be the last person in the measuring line.
hahaha...you want a crack at bums.
and at first I read 'fist crack'...
The joy of life comes from our encounters with new experiences, and hence there is no greater joy than to have an endlessly changing horizon, for each day to have a new and different sun.
Hey, whatever you are into is your own business...
I was talking about 81...
The joy of life comes from our encounters with new experiences, and hence there is no greater joy than to have an endlessly changing horizon, for each day to have a new and different sun.
The joy of life comes from our encounters with new experiences, and hence there is no greater joy than to have an endlessly changing horizon, for each day to have a new and different sun.
- Christopher McCandless
0
rick1zoo2
between a rock and a dumb place Posts: 12,632
So the person who works out and has like 5% body fat, and can fit just fine in the seat should pay more?
People who lift weights/workout tend to have lower body fat percentages-muscle weighs more than fat-so essentially, it is possible that some people who are fit, would end up paying a 'fat tax' since they would weigh more than a person of the same height...their BMI would say they are overweight' but in truth, they are not overweight.
I think if you can't fit your ass into the 17" wide seat, then pay up. I'm sure there are lots of people on here that would be glad to measure bums.
What I am saying is it could be treated like shipping a package. they weigh the package, they give you a price to send it to its destination baised on the wieght. Treat humans and there baggage just like that. some will pay more, some will pay less. It would be fair.
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe that they are free.
Abrn Hlls '98 - Clarkston 2 '03 - Grd Rpds '06 - Abrn Hlls '06 - Clvd '10 - PJ20 - Berlin 1+2 '12 - Wrigley '13 - Pitt '13- buff '13- Philly 1+2 '13 - Seattle '13
What I am saying is it could be treated like shipping a package. they weigh the package, they give you a price to send it to its destination baised on the wieght. Treat humans and there baggage just like that. some will pay more, some will pay less. It would be fair.
i realize that's the idea, but I think they are trying to encourage people to be more fit, since people seem to be ezpanding.
All I'm saying is that a person who is 5'8" and 200 lbs would pay the same amount as a body builder who is 5'5" and weighs the same amount, except one is spilling over into the other seats and crowding out their seatmates. I don't think that is all that fair. It's called 'fat tax' not 'weight tax'.
But if airlines treated humans like packages...then would they offer 'free shipping' deals?
The joy of life comes from our encounters with new experiences, and hence there is no greater joy than to have an endlessly changing horizon, for each day to have a new and different sun.
- Christopher McCandless
0
81
Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
Negative.
What about a 6'3" guy that weighs 240 and is physically fit?
Do you really want airline staff making subjective decisions about your plane fare?
Good point. I know a guy who is 6'10" and weight 350 pounds, and probably has 7% body fat. I think it's fair to make very large people pay for an extra seat if they really are big enough to disturb the person beside them and so need 2 seats - that just makes sense - but a weight tax is stupid and discriminatory. I myself am 5'10" with a large frame (and have some extra weight), but I'm not disturbing people in the seat next to me in an airplane. So why should I pay more than someone else who is skinny and 5'2"?? As long as you don't need 2 seats, the price should be the same for all.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
What I am saying is it could be treated like shipping a package. they weigh the package, they give you a price to send it to its destination baised on the wieght. Treat humans and there baggage just like that. some will pay more, some will pay less. It would be fair.
i realize that's the idea, but I think they are trying to encourage people to be more fit, since people seem to be ezpanding.
All I'm saying is that a person who is 5'8" and 200 lbs would pay the same amount as a body builder who is 5'5" and weighs the same amount, except one is spilling over into the other seats and crowding out their seatmates. I don't think that is all that fair. It's called 'fat tax' not 'weight tax'.
But if airlines treated humans like packages...then would they offer 'free shipping' deals?
FINE!
Can we at least all agree that fatasses should have to buy two seats?
0
81
Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
What I am saying is it could be treated like shipping a package. they weigh the package, they give you a price to send it to its destination baised on the wieght. Treat humans and there baggage just like that. some will pay more, some will pay less. It would be fair.
i realize that's the idea, but I think they are trying to encourage people to be more fit, since people seem to be ezpanding.
All I'm saying is that a person who is 5'8" and 200 lbs would pay the same amount as a body builder who is 5'5" and weighs the same amount, except one is spilling over into the other seats and crowding out their seatmates. I don't think that is all that fair. It's called 'fat tax' not 'weight tax'.
But if airlines treated humans like packages...then would they offer 'free shipping' deals?
FINE!
Can we at least all agree that fatasses should have to buy two seats?
don't you have enough miles to upgrade to 1st class?
What I am saying is it could be treated like shipping a package. they weigh the package, they give you a price to send it to its destination baised on the wieght. Treat humans and there baggage just like that. some will pay more, some will pay less. It would be fair.
i realize that's the idea, but I think they are trying to encourage people to be more fit, since people seem to be ezpanding.
All I'm saying is that a person who is 5'8" and 200 lbs would pay the same amount as a body builder who is 5'5" and weighs the same amount, except one is spilling over into the other seats and crowding out their seatmates. I don't think that is all that fair. It's called 'fat tax' not 'weight tax'.
But if airlines treated humans like packages...then would they offer 'free shipping' deals?
FINE!
Can we at least all agree that fatasses should have to buy two seats?
People who don't fit into one should definitely have to buy two.... isn't that already what's done?? They don't just give an extra seat to those who need it do they?
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
don't you have enough miles to upgrade to 1st class?
Depends who I'm flying. I generally fly Southwest and US Air...both have hubs in Phoenix. Southwest doesn't have first class, but they have flights on the hour to the cities I work and I love Southwest for other reasons so they are my "go to" if I can.
US Air does have first class but flying out of a hub doesn't help when it comes to upgrades. On any flight out of Phoenix, there are going to be at least 20 people on that flight with higher status than me. It happens every once in a while...mostly on connectors in other cities.
I have little "cred" on the other airlines.
People who don't fit into one should definitely have to buy two.... isn't that already what's done?? They don't just give an extra seat to those who need it do they?
It's extremely rare. I've only witnessed it once.
When Kevin Smith vs Southwest happened, I think most people assumed it happened often...it doesn't. Fatties are constantly squeezing in and the airlines/flight attendants/gate staff don't seem to care or want to make an issue out of it.
Comments
only if you ate cheese curds
I'm going to tackle you
Similar "taxes" or extra fees have been implemented by some companies' insurance policies for workers who smoke or are overweight ... and healthy workers pay less. That seems fair, too.
"Let's check Idaho."
People who lift weights/workout tend to have lower body fat percentages-muscle weighs more than fat-so essentially, it is possible that some people who are fit, would end up paying a 'fat tax' since they would weigh more than a person of the same height...their BMI would say they are overweight' but in truth, they are not overweight.
I think if you can't fit your ass into the 17" wide seat, then pay up. I'm sure there are lots of people on here that would be glad to measure bums.
- Christopher McCandless
And a company can account for that or lose business
:think:
only if i get frist crack at selecting which ones i'm going to measure...i don't wanna be the last person in the measuring line.
I'm not sure if that's a good thing.
is he hot?
hahaha...you want a crack at bums.
It's a she
and at first I read 'fist crack'...
- Christopher McCandless
Hey, whatever you are into is your own business...
I was talking about 81...
- Christopher McCandless
Sounds like you may due for a raise. :corn:
"Let's check Idaho."
Do I pull the HR card?
Do I?
:corn:
I think it's already happened...
- Christopher McCandless
:shock:
What I am saying is it could be treated like shipping a package. they weigh the package, they give you a price to send it to its destination baised on the wieght. Treat humans and there baggage just like that. some will pay more, some will pay less. It would be fair.
Abrn Hlls '98 - Clarkston 2 '03 - Grd Rpds '06 - Abrn Hlls '06 - Clvd '10 - PJ20 - Berlin 1+2 '12 - Wrigley '13 - Pitt '13- buff '13- Philly 1+2 '13 - Seattle '13
i realize that's the idea, but I think they are trying to encourage people to be more fit, since people seem to be ezpanding.
All I'm saying is that a person who is 5'8" and 200 lbs would pay the same amount as a body builder who is 5'5" and weighs the same amount, except one is spilling over into the other seats and crowding out their seatmates. I don't think that is all that fair. It's called 'fat tax' not 'weight tax'.
But if airlines treated humans like packages...then would they offer 'free shipping' deals?
- Christopher McCandless
airlines...free
I think you just stumbled onto a brilliant idea, there ... :think:
"Let's check Idaho."
Can we at least all agree that fatasses should have to buy two seats?
don't you have enough miles to upgrade to 1st class?
US Air does have first class but flying out of a hub doesn't help when it comes to upgrades. On any flight out of Phoenix, there are going to be at least 20 people on that flight with higher status than me. It happens every once in a while...mostly on connectors in other cities.
I have little "cred" on the other airlines.
When Kevin Smith vs Southwest happened, I think most people assumed it happened often...it doesn't. Fatties are constantly squeezing in and the airlines/flight attendants/gate staff don't seem to care or want to make an issue out of it.