The Golf Thread
Comments
-
I don't think Spieth is a force right now0
-
Cliffy6745 said:I don't think Spieth is a force right now0
-
Indifference71 said:Cliffy6745 said:I don't think Spieth is a force right nowwww.myspace.com0
-
The Juggler said:Indifference71 said:Cliffy6745 said:I don't think Spieth is a force right now0
-
The Juggler said:Indifference71 said:Cliffy6745 said:I don't think Spieth is a force right now
He came into the season ranked 2nd in the world and is currently 42nd in the FedEx rankings, so yea, I wouldn't say he's much of a force this year.
0 -
Just to add, Spieth hasn't won a tournament in over 12 months. Last was the 2017 British, right?
Also, I don't think Tiger is a "force" yet. He's a great story and I think he's going to win again, but I don't think anyone is scared of him right now. I'd label Tiger as competitive at this point. That said, obviously worthy of the coverage.0 -
There are so many great players now it's excellent for the game and so great to watch unfold. Many potential winners instead of just a few. I love it
this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -0 -
I hear what you guys are saying. Maybe "inconsistent" is the better way to describe his year. I don't know....I don't care how you end up there, finishing top 10 in two majors is far from a brutal year in my book. He's also got the 3rd best odds this week.
For me it takes a much longer period of time than one year to move out of the "being a force" category of player. That's why it won't shock anyone to see him win the PGA this week.
www.myspace.com0 -
The Juggler said:
I hear what you guys are saying. Maybe "inconsistent" is the better way to describe his year. I don't know....I don't care how you end up there, finishing top 10 in two majors is far from a brutal year in my book. He's also got the 3rd best odds this week.
For me it takes a much longer period of time than one year to move out of the "being a force" category of player. That's why it won't shock anyone to see him win the PGA this week.
If we're using this force language, you gotta be a serious contender to win and with where his game's at right now, I just don't think he is. See I think other sports, I get where you're coming from and would agree, but golf is so fickle if your game is off, you don't have a shot and that's how I look at him this year. Not saying he can't get back there quickly. But I'm talking people who are threats to win every time they tee off.
So yeah, now he's definitely going to win this weekend. Sounds like this course is gonna be a Firestone style leader board, so probably not, but after this convo I'll be eating my words.
0 -
Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:
I hear what you guys are saying. Maybe "inconsistent" is the better way to describe his year. I don't know....I don't care how you end up there, finishing top 10 in two majors is far from a brutal year in my book. He's also got the 3rd best odds this week.
For me it takes a much longer period of time than one year to move out of the "being a force" category of player. That's why it won't shock anyone to see him win the PGA this week.
If we're using this force language, you gotta be a serious contender to win and with where his game's at right now, I just don't think he is. See I think other sports, I get where you're coming from and would agree, but golf is so fickle if your game is off, you don't have a shot and that's how I look at him this year. Not saying he can't get back there quickly. But I'm talking people who are threats to win every time they tee off.
So yeah, now he's definitely going to win this weekend. Sounds like this course is gonna be a Firestone style leader board, so probably not, but after this convo I'll be eating my words.
Dude--he almost won the British Open a couple weeks ago... in what's considered a down year for him. He'll be fine.And it's okay that you were wrong about the Phils this year, Cliff. I won't hold that against you.
Post edited by The Juggler onwww.myspace.com0 -
The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:
I hear what you guys are saying. Maybe "inconsistent" is the better way to describe his year. I don't know....I don't care how you end up there, finishing top 10 in two majors is far from a brutal year in my book. He's also got the 3rd best odds this week.
For me it takes a much longer period of time than one year to move out of the "being a force" category of player. That's why it won't shock anyone to see him win the PGA this week.
If we're using this force language, you gotta be a serious contender to win and with where his game's at right now, I just don't think he is. See I think other sports, I get where you're coming from and would agree, but golf is so fickle if your game is off, you don't have a shot and that's how I look at him this year. Not saying he can't get back there quickly. But I'm talking people who are threats to win every time they tee off.
So yeah, now he's definitely going to win this weekend. Sounds like this course is gonna be a Firestone style leader board, so probably not, but after this convo I'll be eating my words.
Dude--he almost won the British Open a couple weeks ago... in what's considered a down year for him. He'll be fine.And it's okay that you were wrong about the Phils this year, Cliff. I won't hold that against you.
See I wasn't wrong. It's not my fault the Nats stink.0 -
The Phillies offense is as exciting to watch as boy wonder hitting driver. Ba dum ching.0
-
Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:
I hear what you guys are saying. Maybe "inconsistent" is the better way to describe his year. I don't know....I don't care how you end up there, finishing top 10 in two majors is far from a brutal year in my book. He's also got the 3rd best odds this week.
For me it takes a much longer period of time than one year to move out of the "being a force" category of player. That's why it won't shock anyone to see him win the PGA this week.
If we're using this force language, you gotta be a serious contender to win and with where his game's at right now, I just don't think he is. See I think other sports, I get where you're coming from and would agree, but golf is so fickle if your game is off, you don't have a shot and that's how I look at him this year. Not saying he can't get back there quickly. But I'm talking people who are threats to win every time they tee off.
So yeah, now he's definitely going to win this weekend. Sounds like this course is gonna be a Firestone style leader board, so probably not, but after this convo I'll be eating my words.
Dude--he almost won the British Open a couple weeks ago... in what's considered a down year for him. He'll be fine.And it's okay that you were wrong about the Phils this year, Cliff. I won't hold that against you.
See I wasn't wrong. It's not my fault the Nats stink.Finishing in the top ten in a major is nothing to sneeze at.
And, sure, the Nats struggling is the reason the Phils are on pace for 90 wins.
www.myspace.com0 -
The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:
I hear what you guys are saying. Maybe "inconsistent" is the better way to describe his year. I don't know....I don't care how you end up there, finishing top 10 in two majors is far from a brutal year in my book. He's also got the 3rd best odds this week.
For me it takes a much longer period of time than one year to move out of the "being a force" category of player. That's why it won't shock anyone to see him win the PGA this week.
If we're using this force language, you gotta be a serious contender to win and with where his game's at right now, I just don't think he is. See I think other sports, I get where you're coming from and would agree, but golf is so fickle if your game is off, you don't have a shot and that's how I look at him this year. Not saying he can't get back there quickly. But I'm talking people who are threats to win every time they tee off.
So yeah, now he's definitely going to win this weekend. Sounds like this course is gonna be a Firestone style leader board, so probably not, but after this convo I'll be eating my words.
Dude--he almost won the British Open a couple weeks ago... in what's considered a down year for him. He'll be fine.And it's okay that you were wrong about the Phils this year, Cliff. I won't hold that against you.
See I wasn't wrong. It's not my fault the Nats stink.Finishing in the top ten in a major is nothing to sneeze at.
And, sure, the Nats struggling is the reason the Phils are on pace for 90 wins.
I mean, it has some impact on it. Also the fact that there isn't a good team in the NL helps. They have more wins than I expected. Their starters are better than I expected. I don't think they are very good though. 12th best run differential in baseball. Better than I expected but general mediocrity. Their record is over achieving.0 -
Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:
I hear what you guys are saying. Maybe "inconsistent" is the better way to describe his year. I don't know....I don't care how you end up there, finishing top 10 in two majors is far from a brutal year in my book. He's also got the 3rd best odds this week.
For me it takes a much longer period of time than one year to move out of the "being a force" category of player. That's why it won't shock anyone to see him win the PGA this week.
If we're using this force language, you gotta be a serious contender to win and with where his game's at right now, I just don't think he is. See I think other sports, I get where you're coming from and would agree, but golf is so fickle if your game is off, you don't have a shot and that's how I look at him this year. Not saying he can't get back there quickly. But I'm talking people who are threats to win every time they tee off.
So yeah, now he's definitely going to win this weekend. Sounds like this course is gonna be a Firestone style leader board, so probably not, but after this convo I'll be eating my words.
Dude--he almost won the British Open a couple weeks ago... in what's considered a down year for him. He'll be fine.And it's okay that you were wrong about the Phils this year, Cliff. I won't hold that against you.
See I wasn't wrong. It's not my fault the Nats stink.Finishing in the top ten in a major is nothing to sneeze at.
And, sure, the Nats struggling is the reason the Phils are on pace for 90 wins.
I mean, it has some impact on it. Also the fact that there isn't a good team in the NL helps. They have more wins than I expected. Their starters are better than I expected. I don't think they are very good though. 12th best run differential in baseball. Better than I expected but general mediocrity. Their record is over achieving.I remember you calling them stupid for signing Arrietta. With him, they've got one of the deeper rotations in baseball with one of the game's best aces. That is the primary reason for their success thus far. They also have the best bullpen in the NL over the last 6 or 7 weeks. Offense has slowly but surely rounded into form recently as well.
Run differential is cute but they're also 41-32 vs teams over .500. Overachieving yes-but they're better than you think and a year or two ahead of schedule.
Post edited by The Juggler onwww.myspace.com0 -
The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:
I hear what you guys are saying. Maybe "inconsistent" is the better way to describe his year. I don't know....I don't care how you end up there, finishing top 10 in two majors is far from a brutal year in my book. He's also got the 3rd best odds this week.
For me it takes a much longer period of time than one year to move out of the "being a force" category of player. That's why it won't shock anyone to see him win the PGA this week.
If we're using this force language, you gotta be a serious contender to win and with where his game's at right now, I just don't think he is. See I think other sports, I get where you're coming from and would agree, but golf is so fickle if your game is off, you don't have a shot and that's how I look at him this year. Not saying he can't get back there quickly. But I'm talking people who are threats to win every time they tee off.
So yeah, now he's definitely going to win this weekend. Sounds like this course is gonna be a Firestone style leader board, so probably not, but after this convo I'll be eating my words.
Dude--he almost won the British Open a couple weeks ago... in what's considered a down year for him. He'll be fine.And it's okay that you were wrong about the Phils this year, Cliff. I won't hold that against you.
See I wasn't wrong. It's not my fault the Nats stink.Finishing in the top ten in a major is nothing to sneeze at.
And, sure, the Nats struggling is the reason the Phils are on pace for 90 wins.
I mean, it has some impact on it. Also the fact that there isn't a good team in the NL helps. They have more wins than I expected. Their starters are better than I expected. I don't think they are very good though. 12th best run differential in baseball. Better than I expected but general mediocrity. Their record is over achieving.I remember you calling them stupid for signing Arrietta. With him, they've got one of the deeper rotations in baseball with one of the game's best aces. That is the primary reason for their success thus far. They also have the best bullpen in the NL over the last 6 or 7 weeks. Offense has slowly but surely rounded into form recently as well.
Run differential is cute but they're also 41-32 vs teams over .500. Overachieving yes-but they're better than you think and a year or two ahead of schedule.
Still don’t like the arrieta signing because everything but the Phillies record tells you that they’re kinda shitty, which at the end of the day is all that really counts but winning with a run differential like that is not sustainable. And I could even see the Phillies winning a playoff series because you know what, the NL is basically triple a.
its okay. You celebrate mediocrity. The Phillies are like a good mid major basketball team.
Back to golf. Hot take. Boy wonder’s best days are behind him. Won’t ever have the ignorant confidence (I say that in a positive way) that he once had0 -
Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:
I hear what you guys are saying. Maybe "inconsistent" is the better way to describe his year. I don't know....I don't care how you end up there, finishing top 10 in two majors is far from a brutal year in my book. He's also got the 3rd best odds this week.
For me it takes a much longer period of time than one year to move out of the "being a force" category of player. That's why it won't shock anyone to see him win the PGA this week.
If we're using this force language, you gotta be a serious contender to win and with where his game's at right now, I just don't think he is. See I think other sports, I get where you're coming from and would agree, but golf is so fickle if your game is off, you don't have a shot and that's how I look at him this year. Not saying he can't get back there quickly. But I'm talking people who are threats to win every time they tee off.
So yeah, now he's definitely going to win this weekend. Sounds like this course is gonna be a Firestone style leader board, so probably not, but after this convo I'll be eating my words.
Dude--he almost won the British Open a couple weeks ago... in what's considered a down year for him. He'll be fine.And it's okay that you were wrong about the Phils this year, Cliff. I won't hold that against you.
See I wasn't wrong. It's not my fault the Nats stink.Finishing in the top ten in a major is nothing to sneeze at.
And, sure, the Nats struggling is the reason the Phils are on pace for 90 wins.
I mean, it has some impact on it. Also the fact that there isn't a good team in the NL helps. They have more wins than I expected. Their starters are better than I expected. I don't think they are very good though. 12th best run differential in baseball. Better than I expected but general mediocrity. Their record is over achieving.I remember you calling them stupid for signing Arrietta. With him, they've got one of the deeper rotations in baseball with one of the game's best aces. That is the primary reason for their success thus far. They also have the best bullpen in the NL over the last 6 or 7 weeks. Offense has slowly but surely rounded into form recently as well.
Run differential is cute but they're also 41-32 vs teams over .500. Overachieving yes-but they're better than you think and a year or two ahead of schedule.
Still don’t like the arrieta signing because everything but the Phillies record tells you that they’re kinda shitty, which at the end of the day is all that really counts but winning with a run differential like that is not sustainable. And I could even see the Phillies winning a playoff series because you know what, the NL is basically triple a.
its okay. You celebrate mediocrity. The Phillies are like a good mid major basketball team.
Back to golf. Hot take. Boy wonder’s best days are behind him. Won’t ever have the ignorant confidence (I say that in a positive way) that he once hadHa....so it seems like you put literally no stock in good pitching. Alrighty then.
Generally speaking, the better teams in the league tend to have the best records against teams with winning records. Only the Yanks and Redsox have a better winning percentage vs .500 teams than the Phils do. Phils are also 10-5 vs your AL. Onward. Upward.
www.myspace.com0 -
The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:
I hear what you guys are saying. Maybe "inconsistent" is the better way to describe his year. I don't know....I don't care how you end up there, finishing top 10 in two majors is far from a brutal year in my book. He's also got the 3rd best odds this week.
For me it takes a much longer period of time than one year to move out of the "being a force" category of player. That's why it won't shock anyone to see him win the PGA this week.
If we're using this force language, you gotta be a serious contender to win and with where his game's at right now, I just don't think he is. See I think other sports, I get where you're coming from and would agree, but golf is so fickle if your game is off, you don't have a shot and that's how I look at him this year. Not saying he can't get back there quickly. But I'm talking people who are threats to win every time they tee off.
So yeah, now he's definitely going to win this weekend. Sounds like this course is gonna be a Firestone style leader board, so probably not, but after this convo I'll be eating my words.
Dude--he almost won the British Open a couple weeks ago... in what's considered a down year for him. He'll be fine.And it's okay that you were wrong about the Phils this year, Cliff. I won't hold that against you.
See I wasn't wrong. It's not my fault the Nats stink.Finishing in the top ten in a major is nothing to sneeze at.
And, sure, the Nats struggling is the reason the Phils are on pace for 90 wins.
I mean, it has some impact on it. Also the fact that there isn't a good team in the NL helps. They have more wins than I expected. Their starters are better than I expected. I don't think they are very good though. 12th best run differential in baseball. Better than I expected but general mediocrity. Their record is over achieving.I remember you calling them stupid for signing Arrietta. With him, they've got one of the deeper rotations in baseball with one of the game's best aces. That is the primary reason for their success thus far. They also have the best bullpen in the NL over the last 6 or 7 weeks. Offense has slowly but surely rounded into form recently as well.
Run differential is cute but they're also 41-32 vs teams over .500. Overachieving yes-but they're better than you think and a year or two ahead of schedule.
Still don’t like the arrieta signing because everything but the Phillies record tells you that they’re kinda shitty, which at the end of the day is all that really counts but winning with a run differential like that is not sustainable. And I could even see the Phillies winning a playoff series because you know what, the NL is basically triple a.
its okay. You celebrate mediocrity. The Phillies are like a good mid major basketball team.
Back to golf. Hot take. Boy wonder’s best days are behind him. Won’t ever have the ignorant confidence (I say that in a positive way) that he once hadHa....so it seems like you put literally no stock in good pitching. Alrighty then.
Generally speaking, the better teams in the league tend to have the best records against teams with winning records. Only the Yanks and Redsox have a better winning percentage vs .500 teams than the Phils do. Phils are also 10-5 vs your AL. Onward. Upward.
yanks stink0 -
Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:Cliffy6745 said:The Juggler said:
I hear what you guys are saying. Maybe "inconsistent" is the better way to describe his year. I don't know....I don't care how you end up there, finishing top 10 in two majors is far from a brutal year in my book. He's also got the 3rd best odds this week.
For me it takes a much longer period of time than one year to move out of the "being a force" category of player. That's why it won't shock anyone to see him win the PGA this week.
If we're using this force language, you gotta be a serious contender to win and with where his game's at right now, I just don't think he is. See I think other sports, I get where you're coming from and would agree, but golf is so fickle if your game is off, you don't have a shot and that's how I look at him this year. Not saying he can't get back there quickly. But I'm talking people who are threats to win every time they tee off.
So yeah, now he's definitely going to win this weekend. Sounds like this course is gonna be a Firestone style leader board, so probably not, but after this convo I'll be eating my words.
Dude--he almost won the British Open a couple weeks ago... in what's considered a down year for him. He'll be fine.And it's okay that you were wrong about the Phils this year, Cliff. I won't hold that against you.
See I wasn't wrong. It's not my fault the Nats stink.Finishing in the top ten in a major is nothing to sneeze at.
And, sure, the Nats struggling is the reason the Phils are on pace for 90 wins.
I mean, it has some impact on it. Also the fact that there isn't a good team in the NL helps. They have more wins than I expected. Their starters are better than I expected. I don't think they are very good though. 12th best run differential in baseball. Better than I expected but general mediocrity. Their record is over achieving.I remember you calling them stupid for signing Arrietta. With him, they've got one of the deeper rotations in baseball with one of the game's best aces. That is the primary reason for their success thus far. They also have the best bullpen in the NL over the last 6 or 7 weeks. Offense has slowly but surely rounded into form recently as well.
Run differential is cute but they're also 41-32 vs teams over .500. Overachieving yes-but they're better than you think and a year or two ahead of schedule.
Still don’t like the arrieta signing because everything but the Phillies record tells you that they’re kinda shitty, which at the end of the day is all that really counts but winning with a run differential like that is not sustainable. And I could even see the Phillies winning a playoff series because you know what, the NL is basically triple a.
its okay. You celebrate mediocrity. The Phillies are like a good mid major basketball team.
Back to golf. Hot take. Boy wonder’s best days are behind him. Won’t ever have the ignorant confidence (I say that in a positive way) that he once hadHa....so it seems like you put literally no stock in good pitching. Alrighty then.
Generally speaking, the better teams in the league tend to have the best records against teams with winning records. Only the Yanks and Redsox have a better winning percentage vs .500 teams than the Phils do. Phils are also 10-5 vs your AL. Onward. Upward.
yanks stinkwww.myspace.com0 -
"A smart monkey doesn't monkey around with another monkey's monkey" - Darwin's Theory0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 273 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.6K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help