*** -- PROCESSING Your Philadelphia 76ers -- ***

The Fixer

The Juggler wrote:

The Fixer wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

how do you bet on a team and have no idea what the line is? :?

http://www.covers.com/sports/odds/lineh ... &sport=NBA

solid 1st half

I know you don't know anything about gambling, but you should look up what moneyline means.

My line was 2. You always seem to have jacked lines. does your guy use danny sheridan's lines?

I wish I used your bookie. I'd be a millionaire

really? why are you always like this? seriously. why do you have to turn every conversation into an argument? what's your problem with me?

you were talking about my line being weird...i never said anything about the money line.

and seeing as how nobody had the line at 2, safe to say the site your bookie uses sucks.

I don't know why you're always so defensive. You get weak lines. That's a good thing man.

You asked how I can bet a game and not know the line...after I said I was on the sixers moneyline. Sooo...yeah, not sure what your problem is.

All I said was I wish I had your bookie. I don't get why you think that's starting an argument. Find out if he's ready for new clients...I'd gladly sign up. Much rather bet with your guy than mine.

eeriepadave

20 point lead! Defense looks great so far. Iggy looking decent, Holiday not so much.

The Fixer

eeriepadave wrote:

20 point lead! Defense looks great so far. Iggy looking decent, Holiday not so much.

Yeah, I like holiday, but taking him over ty lawson is another pick that could hurt this team.

The Juggler

The Fixer wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

The Fixer wrote:

I know you don't know anything about gambling, but you should look up what moneyline means.

My line was 2. You always seem to have jacked lines. does your guy use danny sheridan's lines?

I wish I used your bookie. I'd be a millionaire

really? why are you always like this? seriously. why do you have to turn every conversation into an argument? what's your problem with me?

you were talking about my line being weird...i never said anything about the money line.

and seeing as how nobody had the line at 2, safe to say the site your bookie uses sucks.

I don't know why you're always so defensive. You get weak lines. That's a good thing man.

You asked how I can bet a game and not know the line...after I said I was on the sixers moneyline. Sooo...yeah, not sure what your problem is.

All I said was I wish I had your bookie. I don't get why you think that's starting an argument. Find out if he's ready for new clients...I'd gladly sign up. Much rather bet with your guy than mine.

not defensive. just curious. why do you always want to argue with me over mundane stuff. why is that?

so you bet on the money line (which is 2 words by the way) and don't look at the point spread is? how is that possible? and then you say your line was 2 and mine was weak. you're tripping over your words.

seriously though...explain to me how a line of -1 for this game, when every other major book has it there is "weak?" i want to know your thought process here.

here's covers.com showing all the major sites and vegas books matching up with the line i got or .5 off while nobody has what you say yours is: http://www.covers.com/sports/odds/lineh ... &sport=NBA

explain away

The Juggler

goes without saying, this team looks fucking good tonight

The Fixer

The Juggler wrote:

not defensive. just curious. why do you always want to argue with me over mundane stuff. why is that?

so you bet on the money line (which is 2 words by the way) and don't look at the point spread is? how is that possible? and then you say your line was 2 and mine was weak. you're tripping over your words.

seriously though...explain to me how a line of -1 for this game, when every other major book has it there is "weak?" i want to know your thought process here.

here's covers.com showing all the major sites and vegas books matching up with the line i got or .5 off while nobody has what you say yours is: http://www.covers.com/sports/odds/lineh ... &sport=NBA

explain away

I argue with you because you like to pretend to know everything about everything...when reality is you might just read or hear something and act like you have been following or doing something for long periods of time. I don't know why you're like that. I think it's an inferiority complex...you feel the need to show people how much you think you know. I think it's annoying. I don't like fake people.

I only make moneyline bets when there is value in doing so. The sixers line was -2. I costs me -130 for each half point in hoops, so I found value in taking the moneyline at -150 (I will do you a favor and calculate it for you...to get down to even, or moneyline odds, would have cost me -220...so I saved myself 700 bucks worth of juice on my 1000 dollar bet). How much does it cost you to buy half points? You seem to buy 2 points at a time so I am curious...I have never heard of someone risking as much as it would cost to buy two full points (especially to bring a line from 3 to 5 in a football game, which is just plain dumb if you ask me)

The Juggler

The Fixer wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

not defensive. just curious. why do you always want to argue with me over mundane stuff. why is that?

so you bet on the money line (which is 2 words by the way) and don't look at the point spread is? how is that possible? and then you say your line was 2 and mine was weak. you're tripping over your words.

seriously though...explain to me how a line of -1 for this game, when every other major book has it there is "weak?" i want to know your thought process here.

here's covers.com showing all the major sites and vegas books matching up with the line i got or .5 off while nobody has what you say yours is: http://www.covers.com/sports/odds/lineh ... &sport=NBA

explain away

I argue with you because you like to pretend to know everything about everything...when reality is you might just read or hear something and act like you have been following or doing something for long periods of time. I don't know why you're like that. I think it's an inferiority complex...you feel the need to show people how much you think you know. I think it's annoying. I don't like fake people.

I only make moneyline bets when there is value in doing so. The sixers line was -2. I costs me -130 for each half point in hoops, so I found value in taking the moneyline at -150 (I will do you a favor and calculate it for you...to get down to even, or moneyline odds, would have cost me -220...so I saved myself 700 bucks worth of juice on my 1000 dollar bet). How much does it cost you to buy half points? You seem to buy 2 points at a time so I am curious...I have never heard of someone risking as much as it would cost to buy two full points (especially to bring a line from 3 to 5 in a football game, which is just plain dumb if you ask me...you would have had more value on a moneyline bet...but that's just simple math and common sense, so I'm sure you knew that).

why do you think i'm pretending? you just need to learn how to have a conversation with someone. if somebody disagrees with you, there's no need take offense to it and get personal. you're too old for that stuff. you know i'm not pretending.

i understand why you took the money line. i never even asked about it. and i'm happy it looks like we're both going to win. congrats!

i asked why you think -1 was "weak" when literally every other site or vegas book had it there or within a half point. are you able to answer this question or not?

The Juggler

hopefully jrue's okay...

eeriepadave

The Juggler wrote:

hopefully jrue's okay...

i think he just bruised his knee, said he was ok. Great win

JK_Livin

Nice win. When Grant Hill is your leading scorer, you're going to be in trouble.

Jearlpam0925

If they come out of this road trip 3-2, or possibly even 4-1, would be acceptable.

The Juggler

what a bad loss last night. they got way too relaxed with that big early lead. this team can't afford to give games away like that.

make your fucking foul shots. :x

The Fixer

the turner over favors pick looked real good last night :roll:

utah didn't even have their best player

at least they get a break tonight...no ellis for GST.

as average as this sixers team is, they can absolutely win their horrendous division

The Juggler

well that was a dominating win.

beating the hornets on wednesday to go 3-2 on this trip would be a great way to start this season. weird that they have so many days off between then.


spencer hawes is 3rd in the league in rebounding


just got tix to the home opener friday

eeriepadave

The Juggler wrote:

well that was a dominating win.

beating the hornets on wednesday to go 3-2 on this trip would be a great way to start this season. weird that they have so many days off between then.


spencer hawes is 3rd in the league in rebounding


just got tix to the home opener friday

awesome man!

I didn't even knew they played last night Thought their last game was the one against Utah. Yeah 3-2 would be a good way to finish, i think they can do it.

The Juggler

eeriepadave wrote:

The Juggler wrote:

well that was a dominating win.

beating the hornets on wednesday to go 3-2 on this trip would be a great way to start this season. weird that they have so many days off between then.


spencer hawes is 3rd in the league in rebounding


just got tix to the home opener friday

awesome man!

I didn't even knew they played last night Thought their last game was the one against Utah. Yeah 3-2 would be a good way to finish, i think they can do it.

yeah we had people over last night and a lot of us put a lot of money on the sixers to make the night even more interesting.....good time had by all ....though i'm afraid to see what my basement looks like. we we're playing beer pong till 3-ish

RiotZact

According to ESPN's power rankings after one week they think that the sixers are the 9th best team in the league, get the 3 seed and that Hawes may be the most improved player........ :shock:

http://espn.go.com/nba/powerrankings/_/year/2012/week/1

eeriepadave

RiotZact wrote:

According to ESPN's power rankings after one week they think that the sixers are the 9th best team in the league, get the 3 seed and that Hawes may be the most improved player........ :shock:

http://espn.go.com/nba/powerrankings/_/year/2012/week/1

Well in their 2 wins they have been dominate. And their losses have been close. I'll take it.

The Juggler

eeriepadave wrote:

RiotZact wrote:

According to ESPN's power rankings after one week they think that the sixers are the 9th best team in the league, get the 3 seed and that Hawes may be the most improved player........ :shock:

http://espn.go.com/nba/powerrankings/_/year/2012/week/1

Well in their 2 wins they have been dominate. And their losses have been close. I'll take it.

12 and 12 for hawes so far on 68% shooting. not a bad start

81

congrads on leading the league in point differential :shock: