Hillary won more votes for President

Jason P · October 2016

Election is still a ways off and people have short memories.

unsung · October 2016

tonifig8 said:

show previous quotes
mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:
Donald Trump doesn't figure into my process, I do not support him. Besides wouldn't it be preaching to the choir?

I will however continue to point out the character flaws on the Democratic nom.
Sure, makes sense. Only Hillary figures into your calculations. You must be too embarrassed to admit you support Trump because you know he is indefensible. At least GF, PJFAN and the others can are open and honest about it.
Do you always call people liars or just those on the internet that you don't have to face?
I didn't call you a liar. That must be your subconscious telling you that. The implication is something different. And I'd be happy to tell you anything to your face too. No problem on that.
I bet.
Richmond VA. Are you close?
This exchange is terrible.
But I'll contribute towards her flight if need be.

I just asked if mrussel1 went around calling people liars to their faces, now I'm not sure what I'm being challenged to do but it certainly looks to be from an unstable person.

BTW, who's the "her"?

unsung · October 2016

mrussel1 said:

show previous quotes
unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:
Donald Trump doesn't figure into my process, I do not support him. Besides wouldn't it be preaching to the choir?

I will however continue to point out the character flaws on the Democratic nom.
Sure, makes sense. Only Hillary figures into your calculations. You must be too embarrassed to admit you support Trump because you know he is indefensible. At least GF, PJFAN and the others can are open and honest about it.
Do you always call people liars or just those on the internet that you don't have to face?
I didn't call you a liar. That must be your subconscious telling you that. The implication is something different. And I'd be happy to tell you anything to your face too. No problem on that.
I bet.
Richmond VA. Are you close?

No.

What are you implying?

rgambs · October 2016

unsung said:

show previous quotes
mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:
Donald Trump doesn't figure into my process, I do not support him. Besides wouldn't it be preaching to the choir?

I will however continue to point out the character flaws on the Democratic nom.
Sure, makes sense. Only Hillary figures into your calculations. You must be too embarrassed to admit you support Trump because you know he is indefensible. At least GF, PJFAN and the others can are open and honest about it.
Do you always call people liars or just those on the internet that you don't have to face?
I didn't call you a liar. That must be your subconscious telling you that. The implication is something different. And I'd be happy to tell you anything to your face too. No problem on that.
I bet.
Richmond VA. Are you close?
No.

What are you implying?

Mrussel isn't trying to fight you or anything lol

There's no sinister motive hidden in there

Gern Blansten · October 2016

tonifig8 said:

show previous quotes
Gern Blansten said:

tonifig8 said:

unsung said:

pjalive21 said:
More blood on the hands of Hilary...or should we say attempted?

http://www.snopes.com/julian-assange-drone-strike/

This Assange/ Wikileaks stuff is getting more intriguing by the minute

and now this......

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-laptops-clinton-aides-with-immunity-deal-sources-say.html

can we have a do over as far as the top two candidates???

Assange will release tomorrow. He should watch out for that drone strike, the Clintons don't like it when people go against them. If she wanted to assassinate him it just goes to show how unfit she is and she will do anything for power.
We should have the leak within a few hours. Should be tonight for us in the States
Miss Lippy's car...is green
It should give us something interesting to discuss. This place is full of LOL's and that's getting old.

Wow....what a blockbuster!!! LOL

mrussel1 · October 2016

unsung said:

show previous quotes
mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:
Donald Trump doesn't figure into my process, I do not support him. Besides wouldn't it be preaching to the choir?

I will however continue to point out the character flaws on the Democratic nom.
Sure, makes sense. Only Hillary figures into your calculations. You must be too embarrassed to admit you support Trump because you know he is indefensible. At least GF, PJFAN and the others can are open and honest about it.
Do you always call people liars or just those on the internet that you don't have to face?
I didn't call you a liar. That must be your subconscious telling you that. The implication is something different. And I'd be happy to tell you anything to your face too. No problem on that.
I bet.
Richmond VA. Are you close?
No.

What are you implying?

That we meet and talk about it. I don't mind being upfront. I thought I made that clear. You think I'm unstable? That's pretty funny. I'll rescind my offer then. I don't want you to be frightened.
The offer is always there for anyone else.

Gern Blansten · October 2016

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/new-mexico/#now

87.9% likelihood for Clinton as of now

unsung · October 2016

mrussel1 said:

show previous quotes
unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:
Donald Trump doesn't figure into my process, I do not support him. Besides wouldn't it be preaching to the choir?

I will however continue to point out the character flaws on the Democratic nom.
Sure, makes sense. Only Hillary figures into your calculations. You must be too embarrassed to admit you support Trump because you know he is indefensible. At least GF, PJFAN and the others can are open and honest about it.
Do you always call people liars or just those on the internet that you don't have to face?
I didn't call you a liar. That must be your subconscious telling you that. The implication is something different. And I'd be happy to tell you anything to your face too. No problem on that.
I bet.
Richmond VA. Are you close?
No.

What are you implying?
That we meet and talk about it. I don't mind being upfront. I thought I made that clear. You think I'm unstable? That's pretty funny. I'll rescind my offer then. I don't want you to be frightened.
The offer is always there for anyone else.

You don't frighten me. The entire message seems odd to me.

pjalive21 · October 2016

mrussel1 said:

show previous quotes
pjalive21 said:

mrussel1 said:

pjalive21 said:
More blood on the hands of Hilary...or should we say attempted?

http://www.snopes.com/julian-assange-drone-strike/

This Assange/ Wikileaks stuff is getting more intriguing by the minute

Did you even read this before you posted it, or are you voting for Clinton? Must be one or the other.
of course I read it and hell no im not voting for Clinton

It says the accusation is FALSE. So why are you linking to it?

when linking to it never said it was false??? it said it was unproven and there are a number of mainstream media sites that are picking up on this story....huge difference in the terminology...and from what we have learned now it doesn't appear that wiki leaks has much

Gern Blansten · October 2016

pjalive21 said:

show previous quotes
mrussel1 said:

pjalive21 said:

mrussel1 said:

pjalive21 said:
More blood on the hands of Hilary...or should we say attempted?

http://www.snopes.com/julian-assange-drone-strike/

This Assange/ Wikileaks stuff is getting more intriguing by the minute

Did you even read this before you posted it, or are you voting for Clinton? Must be one or the other.
of course I read it and hell no im not voting for Clinton

It says the accusation is FALSE. So why are you linking to it?
when linking to it never said it was false??? it said it was unproven and there are a number of mainstream media sites that are picking up on this story....huge difference in the terminology...and from what we have learned now it doesn't appear that wiki leaks has much

Can you post a link to an MSM site that reports the story?

HughFreakingDillon · October 2016

unsung said:

show previous quotes
mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:
Donald Trump doesn't figure into my process, I do not support him. Besides wouldn't it be preaching to the choir?

I will however continue to point out the character flaws on the Democratic nom.
Sure, makes sense. Only Hillary figures into your calculations. You must be too embarrassed to admit you support Trump because you know he is indefensible. At least GF, PJFAN and the others can are open and honest about it.
Do you always call people liars or just those on the internet that you don't have to face?
I didn't call you a liar. That must be your subconscious telling you that. The implication is something different. And I'd be happy to tell you anything to your face too. No problem on that.
I bet.
Richmond VA. Are you close?
No.

What are you implying?
That we meet and talk about it. I don't mind being upfront. I thought I made that clear. You think I'm unstable? That's pretty funny. I'll rescind my offer then. I don't want you to be frightened.
The offer is always there for anyone else.
You don't frighten me. The entire message seems odd to me.

you initiated the challenge. now the response taking you up on it makes him unstable? just makes you bad at playing chicken.

mrussel1 · October 2016

Wikileaks self creates controversy and then it's nothing more than a fundraising event. #suckers.
Sorry Roger Stone, Alex Jones and others on the AMT... the HRC campaign continues...

But Assange cautioned that the election leaks might not be the Clinton-buster Stone and Jones were anticipating, calling claims he is specifically stocking documents “intending to harm” the Democratic candidate “false,” saying he has been misquoted and there is an “attempt to personalize the publications.”

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/299106-no-rumored-october-surprise-at-wikileaks-anniversary-event

Boxes&Books · October 2016

HughFreakingDillon said:

show previous quotes
unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:
Donald Trump doesn't figure into my process, I do not support him. Besides wouldn't it be preaching to the choir?

I will however continue to point out the character flaws on the Democratic nom.
Sure, makes sense. Only Hillary figures into your calculations. You must be too embarrassed to admit you support Trump because you know he is indefensible. At least GF, PJFAN and the others can are open and honest about it.
Do you always call people liars or just those on the internet that you don't have to face?
I didn't call you a liar. That must be your subconscious telling you that. The implication is something different. And I'd be happy to tell you anything to your face too. No problem on that.
I bet.
Richmond VA. Are you close?
No.

What are you implying?
That we meet and talk about it. I don't mind being upfront. I thought I made that clear. You think I'm unstable? That's pretty funny. I'll rescind my offer then. I don't want you to be frightened.
The offer is always there for anyone else.
You don't frighten me. The entire message seems odd to me.
you initiated the challenge. now the response taking you up on it makes him unstable? just makes you bad at playing chicken.

Oh man.... Now everyone around here is trying to take sides....haha... Great

Boxes&Books · October 2016

Check it out unsung. I haven't read the article yet. Saw the header and immediately thought of you.

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/03/ron-paul-suggests-support-for-jill-stein-admits-he-is-disappointed-by-gary-johnson/

Boxes&Books · October 2016

mrussel1 said:

show previous quotes
tonifig8 said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:
Donald Trump doesn't figure into my process, I do not support him. Besides wouldn't it be preaching to the choir?

I will however continue to point out the character flaws on the Democratic nom.
Sure, makes sense. Only Hillary figures into your calculations. You must be too embarrassed to admit you support Trump because you know he is indefensible. At least GF, PJFAN and the others can are open and honest about it.
Do you always call people liars or just those on the internet that you don't have to face?
I didn't call you a liar. That must be your subconscious telling you that. The implication is something different. And I'd be happy to tell you anything to your face too. No problem on that.
I bet.
Richmond VA. Are you close?
This exchange is terrible.
But I'll contribute towards her flight if need be.
Ha no problem. What's so terrible? I just don't have an issue arguing politics in public. You are welcome to join. I'm in Philly next week, Chicago in two weeks, Vegas the week after and Miami after that. Happy to meet up with anyone on the AMT. Oh yeah, and back to Philly for the first TOTD show.

Dude I'm having another debate party on Sunday... If you're in Cali you need to come!

the invitation goes out to everyone else as well!

mrussel1 · October 2016

tonifig8 said:

show previous quotes
mrussel1 said:

tonifig8 said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:

mrussel1 said:

unsung said:
Donald Trump doesn't figure into my process, I do not support him. Besides wouldn't it be preaching to the choir?

I will however continue to point out the character flaws on the Democratic nom.
Sure, makes sense. Only Hillary figures into your calculations. You must be too embarrassed to admit you support Trump because you know he is indefensible. At least GF, PJFAN and the others can are open and honest about it.
Do you always call people liars or just those on the internet that you don't have to face?
I didn't call you a liar. That must be your subconscious telling you that. The implication is something different. And I'd be happy to tell you anything to your face too. No problem on that.
I bet.
Richmond VA. Are you close?
This exchange is terrible.
But I'll contribute towards her flight if need be.
Ha no problem. What's so terrible? I just don't have an issue arguing politics in public. You are welcome to join. I'm in Philly next week, Chicago in two weeks, Vegas the week after and Miami after that. Happy to meet up with anyone on the AMT. Oh yeah, and back to Philly for the first TOTD show.
Dude I'm having another debate party on Sunday... If you're in Cali you need to come!

the invitation goes out to everyone else as well!

The next debate is on Sunday night? I didn't realize that. I'm too far away unfortunately but that would be fun.

Gern Blansten · October 2016

mrussel1 said:
Wikileaks self creates controversy and then it's nothing more than a fundraising event. #suckers.
Sorry Roger Stone, Alex Jones and others on the AMT... the HRC campaign continues...

But Assange cautioned that the election leaks might not be the Clinton-buster Stone and Jones were anticipating, calling claims he is specifically stocking documents “intending to harm” the Democratic candidate “false,” saying he has been misquoted and there is an “attempt to personalize the publications.”

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/299106-no-rumored-october-surprise-at-wikileaks-anniversary-event

Fox and the GOP really push the "bombshell" rumors. It worked on tonifig8.

Boxes&Books · October 2016

Gern Blansten said:

show previous quotes
mrussel1 said:
Wikileaks self creates controversy and then it's nothing more than a fundraising event. #suckers.
Sorry Roger Stone, Alex Jones and others on the AMT... the HRC campaign continues...

But Assange cautioned that the election leaks might not be the Clinton-buster Stone and Jones were anticipating, calling claims he is specifically stocking documents “intending to harm” the Democratic candidate “false,” saying he has been misquoted and there is an “attempt to personalize the publications.”

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/299106-no-rumored-october-surprise-at-wikileaks-anniversary-event
Fox and the GOP really push the "bombshell" rumors. It worked on tonifig8.

Unfortunately I don't watch fox, or as you like to childishly call them faux. So I wasn't aware, nor did I know who those two guys were until today.

Not sure how it worked on me. I've never posted anything regarding this up coming leak, Other then let's hope it gives us something interesting to talk about. I won't lie though, me like many across the globe are hoping for more truth! and if that truth envolves Cltion even better!

sorry my former BernieBro, gone number 1 Clinton fanboy ... But You got it all wrong on this one.

Gern Blansten · October 2016

tonifig8 said:

show previous quotes
unsung said:

pjalive21 said:
More blood on the hands of Hilary...or should we say attempted?

http://www.snopes.com/julian-assange-drone-strike/

This Assange/ Wikileaks stuff is getting more intriguing by the minute

and now this......

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-laptops-clinton-aides-with-immunity-deal-sources-say.html

can we have a do over as far as the top two candidates???

Assange will release tomorrow. He should watch out for that drone strike, the Clintons don't like it when people go against them. If she wanted to assassinate him it just goes to show how unfit she is and she will do anything for power.
We should have the leak within a few hours. Should be tonight for us in the States

uh....see above please

Gern Blansten · October 2016

tonifig8 said:

show previous quotes
Gern Blansten said:

mrussel1 said:
Wikileaks self creates controversy and then it's nothing more than a fundraising event. #suckers.
Sorry Roger Stone, Alex Jones and others on the AMT... the HRC campaign continues...

But Assange cautioned that the election leaks might not be the Clinton-buster Stone and Jones were anticipating, calling claims he is specifically stocking documents “intending to harm” the Democratic candidate “false,” saying he has been misquoted and there is an “attempt to personalize the publications.”

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/299106-no-rumored-october-surprise-at-wikileaks-anniversary-event
Fox and the GOP really push the "bombshell" rumors. It worked on tonifig8.
Unfortunately I don't watch fox, or as you like to childishly call them faux. So I wasn't aware, nor did I know who those two guys were until today.

Not sure how it worked on me. I've never posted anything regarding this up coming leak, Other then let's hope it gives us something interesting to talk about. I won't lie though, me like many across the globe are hoping for more truth! and if that truth envolves Cltion even better!

sorry my former BernieBro, gone number 1 Clinton fanboy ... But You got it all wrong on this one.

except for that post about the leak....is that what you meant?

Hillary won more votes for President

Comments

Quick Links

Categories