Trump
Comments
-
Nah, this isnt offensive either... Even when she's conveniently not mentioning the fossil fuel industry and accepting money from them.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HtcO8ujQ5ig 0 -
What you fail to mention is that this is all of your opinion not a fact. How do you know I'm not a female, have I ever said I was a guy?PJ_Soul said:
Not sure why you quoted what is in the video. I can hear.Free said:PJ_Soul said:
Lol, there is nothing wrong with this at all, and it looks like that roomful of women in the video agree. It's kind of hilarious that anti-Hillary folks are referencing this as though people are supposed to be mad about such a harmless tongue in cheek comment. Perhaps it's above the heads of some?Free said:
Hardly. No young woman forgets this:PJ_Soul said:Very effective campaign ad on Hillary's part. I think it more belongs in the Trump thread though.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QRimyfmz0MA
"We can tell the story of how we climbed the ladder and a lot of you younger women don't think you don't have to, it's been done, it's not done. You have to help Hillary Clinton she has always been there for you and just remember: There's a special place in hell for Women who don't help each other." - a joke, nothing wrong with this at all, tongue-in-cheek comment. All the while being offended by a Pence comment. The bias is sickeningly obvious.
What Pence comment? I don't know what you're talking.
No bias is needed to know that that Albright comment isn't offensive when you watch the video. And honestly, I think I am better qualified than you to know what is offensive to women.0 -
Erm, no, it's not offensive. You know what the word offensive means, right?With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0
-
Oh good lord, are we back to that again? I have to put "IMO" at the end of everything I say again?Free said:
What you fail to mention is that this is all of your opinion not a fact. How do you know I'm not a female, have I ever said I was a guy?PJ_Soul said:
Not sure why you quoted what is in the video. I can hear.Free said:PJ_Soul said:
Lol, there is nothing wrong with this at all, and it looks like that roomful of women in the video agree. It's kind of hilarious that anti-Hillary folks are referencing this as though people are supposed to be mad about such a harmless tongue in cheek comment. Perhaps it's above the heads of some?Free said:
Hardly. No young woman forgets this:PJ_Soul said:Very effective campaign ad on Hillary's part. I think it more belongs in the Trump thread though.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QRimyfmz0MA
"We can tell the story of how we climbed the ladder and a lot of you younger women don't think you don't have to, it's been done, it's not done. You have to help Hillary Clinton she has always been there for you and just remember: There's a special place in hell for Women who don't help each other." - a joke, nothing wrong with this at all, tongue-in-cheek comment. All the while being offended by a Pence comment. The bias is sickeningly obvious.
What Pence comment? I don't know what you're talking.
No bias is needed to know that that Albright comment isn't offensive when you watch the video. And honestly, I think I am better qualified than you to know what is offensive to women.
.... are you saying you're a woman???With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Just because you aren't offended doesn't mean everyone is isn't offended. How do you not understand that?PJ_Soul said:
Oh good lord, are we back to that again? I have to put "IMO" at the end of everything I say again?Free said:
What you fail to mention is that this is all of your opinion not a fact. How do you know I'm not a female, have I ever said I was a guy?PJ_Soul said:
Not sure why you quoted what is in the video. I can hear.Free said:PJ_Soul said:
Lol, there is nothing wrong with this at all, and it looks like that roomful of women in the video agree. It's kind of hilarious that anti-Hillary folks are referencing this as though people are supposed to be mad about such a harmless tongue in cheek comment. Perhaps it's above the heads of some?Free said:
Hardly. No young woman forgets this:PJ_Soul said:Very effective campaign ad on Hillary's part. I think it more belongs in the Trump thread though.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QRimyfmz0MA
"We can tell the story of how we climbed the ladder and a lot of you younger women don't think you don't have to, it's been done, it's not done. You have to help Hillary Clinton she has always been there for you and just remember: There's a special place in hell for Women who don't help each other." - a joke, nothing wrong with this at all, tongue-in-cheek comment. All the while being offended by a Pence comment. The bias is sickeningly obvious.
What Pence comment? I don't know what you're talking.
No bias is needed to know that that Albright comment isn't offensive when you watch the video. And honestly, I think I am better qualified than you to know what is offensive to women.
.... are you saying you're a woman???0 -
Did I say that? I said I am more qualified than you to judge what is or isn't offensive to women.Free said:
Just because you aren't offended doesn't mean everyone is isn't offended. How do you not understand that?PJ_Soul said:
Oh good lord, are we back to that again? I have to put "IMO" at the end of everything I say again?Free said:
What you fail to mention is that this is all of your opinion not a fact. How do you know I'm not a female, have I ever said I was a guy?PJ_Soul said:
Not sure why you quoted what is in the video. I can hear.Free said:PJ_Soul said:
Lol, there is nothing wrong with this at all, and it looks like that roomful of women in the video agree. It's kind of hilarious that anti-Hillary folks are referencing this as though people are supposed to be mad about such a harmless tongue in cheek comment. Perhaps it's above the heads of some?Free said:
Hardly. No young woman forgets this:PJ_Soul said:Very effective campaign ad on Hillary's part. I think it more belongs in the Trump thread though.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QRimyfmz0MA
"We can tell the story of how we climbed the ladder and a lot of you younger women don't think you don't have to, it's been done, it's not done. You have to help Hillary Clinton she has always been there for you and just remember: There's a special place in hell for Women who don't help each other." - a joke, nothing wrong with this at all, tongue-in-cheek comment. All the while being offended by a Pence comment. The bias is sickeningly obvious.
What Pence comment? I don't know what you're talking.
No bias is needed to know that that Albright comment isn't offensive when you watch the video. And honestly, I think I am better qualified than you to know what is offensive to women.
.... are you saying you're a woman???With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
No, you have no idea who I am, and everyone is qualified to judge what is offensive and not to them. Stop speaking for everyone.PJ_Soul said:
Did I say that? I said I am more qualified than you to judge what is or isn't offensive to women.Free said:
Just because you aren't offended doesn't mean everyone is isn't offended. How do you not understand that?PJ_Soul said:
Oh good lord, are we back to that again? I have to put "IMO" at the end of everything I say again?Free said:
What you fail to mention is that this is all of your opinion not a fact. How do you know I'm not a female, have I ever said I was a guy?PJ_Soul said:
Not sure why you quoted what is in the video. I can hear.Free said:PJ_Soul said:
Lol, there is nothing wrong with this at all, and it looks like that roomful of women in the video agree. It's kind of hilarious that anti-Hillary folks are referencing this as though people are supposed to be mad about such a harmless tongue in cheek comment. Perhaps it's above the heads of some?Free said:
Hardly. No young woman forgets this:PJ_Soul said:Very effective campaign ad on Hillary's part. I think it more belongs in the Trump thread though.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QRimyfmz0MA
"We can tell the story of how we climbed the ladder and a lot of you younger women don't think you don't have to, it's been done, it's not done. You have to help Hillary Clinton she has always been there for you and just remember: There's a special place in hell for Women who don't help each other." - a joke, nothing wrong with this at all, tongue-in-cheek comment. All the while being offended by a Pence comment. The bias is sickeningly obvious.
What Pence comment? I don't know what you're talking.
No bias is needed to know that that Albright comment isn't offensive when you watch the video. And honestly, I think I am better qualified than you to know what is offensive to women.
.... are you saying you're a woman???0 -
Nobody listens to Cuban just like nobody listened to Trump until he threw his hat into the ring. When Cuban runs as a democrat in 2020 maybe then people will pay attention. Right now he's just a troll.PJ_Soul said:
He's not being used as a troll. Cuban is an influential person who apparently a lot of people listen to, and he is endorsing Clinton. He is a totally legitimate person for her to be "displaying" as a supporter. Like it or not, that invite is business as usual. The lady Bill Clinton had an affair with is obviously not a legit person to invite. Not in any way. Trump just happens to hate Cuban because he really wanted his endorsement himself and didn't get it, and because Cuban has told the world why he switched sides. Tough shit for Trump. He's obviously scared of Cuban's influence. I think it is actually really manipulative to try and turn Cuban into a "troll" and absolutely disgusting that Trump's reaction was to bring up Bill's old mistress and say he was going to invite her. That's Trump for you - downright dirty and disgusting. What a pig. It sure says a lot about his character.BS44325 said:
It's equal because Cuban is being used as a troll with the blessing of the Clinton campaign. Clearly she needs her own reality tv star to level the playing field.PJ_Soul said:That's insane, of course there is a difference. One is about inviting Hillary's husband's ex-lovers just to rub her nose in that, whihc is not related to her candidacy at all. The other is about inviting a very public and politically outspoken figure often referenced as someone who may run for president himself someday and who has publicly endorsed Hillary, and probably donated to her campaign. It's ridiculous that you are trying to say the two are the same. The only reason Trump is bad about it is because Cuban abandoned him and his campaign and has spoken loudly about why he switched the Clinton. He can't handle being crossed. So his comeback is to say he'll invite someone Hillary's husband fucked???? And you think that's equal? Huh?
0 -
But your vote (even if you could vote) is an unwinnable one. You would excuse any previous Clinton victim shaming as long as your candidate wins. Trump is going after this generation of women who don't tolerate victim shaming even if it occurred in the past.PJ_Soul said:
You bet it would have. As a woman I found the very suggestion offensive.mrussel1 said:
Well Pence said on Fox this morning that she isn't coming. He's the adult evidently. That move would have alienated women even more.BS44325 said:
It's Bill's mistresses and alleged rape victim who were humiliated and the question is how much did Hillary participate in that humiliation for the sake of her and Bill's political future. Millenials who may not have been aware of all this are waking up this morning and asking who is Juanita Broaddrick? Who is Gennifer Flowers? This isn't the 90's anymore. People rightful take the concepts of sexual abuse and the shaming of victims much more seriously now.Kat said:So Trump wants to humiliate Secretary Clinton before the election. I'm sure women will love that and he'll end up being President Trump, right?
"Hey fellas have you heard the news? Oh yeah.
The women in this town are being misused. Oh yeah.
Yeah I seen it all in my dreams last night. Oh yeah.
Girls leaving this town 'cause they don't treat em right-a. Oh yeah.
I'll take a train. (take a train)
Fly by plane. (fly by plane)
They're getting tired. (getting tired)
Getting sick and tired. (sick and tired)"0 -
I'm not a Hillary supporter.BS44325 said:
But your vote (even if you could vote) is an unwinnable one. You would excuse any previous Clinton victim shaming as long as your candidate wins. Trump is going after this generation of women who don't tolerate victim shaming even if it occurred in the past.PJ_Soul said:
You bet it would have. As a woman I found the very suggestion offensive.mrussel1 said:
Well Pence said on Fox this morning that she isn't coming. He's the adult evidently. That move would have alienated women even more.BS44325 said:
It's Bill's mistresses and alleged rape victim who were humiliated and the question is how much did Hillary participate in that humiliation for the sake of her and Bill's political future. Millenials who may not have been aware of all this are waking up this morning and asking who is Juanita Broaddrick? Who is Gennifer Flowers? This isn't the 90's anymore. People rightful take the concepts of sexual abuse and the shaming of victims much more seriously now.Kat said:So Trump wants to humiliate Secretary Clinton before the election. I'm sure women will love that and he'll end up being President Trump, right?
"Hey fellas have you heard the news? Oh yeah.
The women in this town are being misused. Oh yeah.
Yeah I seen it all in my dreams last night. Oh yeah.
Girls leaving this town 'cause they don't treat em right-a. Oh yeah.
I'll take a train. (take a train)
Fly by plane. (fly by plane)
They're getting tired. (getting tired)
Getting sick and tired. (sick and tired)"
The suggestion that Trump is doing anything for the benefit of women or is even capable of such is a huge fucking joke. He's a sexist pig.
No idea why you are saying he is somehow against victim shaming or appealing to those who are.
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
My guess is this generation of women care about choice, affordable healthcare and the ability to marry who you want. Which candidate offers that? Just look at SCOTUS lists by each and you'll know.BS44325 said:
But your vote (even if you could vote) is an unwinnable one. You would excuse any previous Clinton victim shaming as long as your candidate wins. Trump is going after this generation of women who don't tolerate victim shaming even if it occurred in the past.PJ_Soul said:
You bet it would have. As a woman I found the very suggestion offensive.mrussel1 said:
Well Pence said on Fox this morning that she isn't coming. He's the adult evidently. That move would have alienated women even more.BS44325 said:
It's Bill's mistresses and alleged rape victim who were humiliated and the question is how much did Hillary participate in that humiliation for the sake of her and Bill's political future. Millenials who may not have been aware of all this are waking up this morning and asking who is Juanita Broaddrick? Who is Gennifer Flowers? This isn't the 90's anymore. People rightful take the concepts of sexual abuse and the shaming of victims much more seriously now.Kat said:So Trump wants to humiliate Secretary Clinton before the election. I'm sure women will love that and he'll end up being President Trump, right?
"Hey fellas have you heard the news? Oh yeah.
The women in this town are being misused. Oh yeah.
Yeah I seen it all in my dreams last night. Oh yeah.
Girls leaving this town 'cause they don't treat em right-a. Oh yeah.
I'll take a train. (take a train)
Fly by plane. (fly by plane)
They're getting tired. (getting tired)
Getting sick and tired. (sick and tired)"0 -
People just aren't buying it. Over the years he has been a strong employer of women and placed them in positions of power both in his business and his campaign.PJ_Soul said:
I'm not a Hillary supporter.BS44325 said:
But your vote (even if you could vote) is an unwinnable one. You would excuse any previous Clinton victim shaming as long as your candidate wins. Trump is going after this generation of women who don't tolerate victim shaming even if it occurred in the past.PJ_Soul said:
You bet it would have. As a woman I found the very suggestion offensive.mrussel1 said:
Well Pence said on Fox this morning that she isn't coming. He's the adult evidently. That move would have alienated women even more.BS44325 said:
It's Bill's mistresses and alleged rape victim who were humiliated and the question is how much did Hillary participate in that humiliation for the sake of her and Bill's political future. Millenials who may not have been aware of all this are waking up this morning and asking who is Juanita Broaddrick? Who is Gennifer Flowers? This isn't the 90's anymore. People rightful take the concepts of sexual abuse and the shaming of victims much more seriously now.Kat said:So Trump wants to humiliate Secretary Clinton before the election. I'm sure women will love that and he'll end up being President Trump, right?
"Hey fellas have you heard the news? Oh yeah.
The women in this town are being misused. Oh yeah.
Yeah I seen it all in my dreams last night. Oh yeah.
Girls leaving this town 'cause they don't treat em right-a. Oh yeah.
I'll take a train. (take a train)
Fly by plane. (fly by plane)
They're getting tired. (getting tired)
Getting sick and tired. (sick and tired)"
The suggestion that Trump is doing anything for the benefit of women or is even capable of such is a huge fucking joke. He's a sexist pig.
No idea why you are saying he is somehow against victim shaming or appealing to those who are.0 -
Clinton leads women by 20 points in the latest wash po demographic assessment. ....just not buying it, eh?BS44325 said:
People just aren't buying it. Over the years he has been a strong employer of women and placed them in positions of power both in his business and his campaign.PJ_Soul said:
I'm not a Hillary supporter.BS44325 said:
But your vote (even if you could vote) is an unwinnable one. You would excuse any previous Clinton victim shaming as long as your candidate wins. Trump is going after this generation of women who don't tolerate victim shaming even if it occurred in the past.PJ_Soul said:
You bet it would have. As a woman I found the very suggestion offensive.mrussel1 said:
Well Pence said on Fox this morning that she isn't coming. He's the adult evidently. That move would have alienated women even more.BS44325 said:
It's Bill's mistresses and alleged rape victim who were humiliated and the question is how much did Hillary participate in that humiliation for the sake of her and Bill's political future. Millenials who may not have been aware of all this are waking up this morning and asking who is Juanita Broaddrick? Who is Gennifer Flowers? This isn't the 90's anymore. People rightful take the concepts of sexual abuse and the shaming of victims much more seriously now.Kat said:So Trump wants to humiliate Secretary Clinton before the election. I'm sure women will love that and he'll end up being President Trump, right?
"Hey fellas have you heard the news? Oh yeah.
The women in this town are being misused. Oh yeah.
Yeah I seen it all in my dreams last night. Oh yeah.
Girls leaving this town 'cause they don't treat em right-a. Oh yeah.
I'll take a train. (take a train)
Fly by plane. (fly by plane)
They're getting tired. (getting tired)
Getting sick and tired. (sick and tired)"
The suggestion that Trump is doing anything for the benefit of women or is even capable of such is a huge fucking joke. He's a sexist pig.
No idea why you are saying he is somehow against victim shaming or appealing to those who are.
Https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/the-demographic-groups-fueling-the-election/0 -
Interesting... you're correct, many women in trumps camp, upper level too.BS44325 said:
People just aren't buying it. Over the years he has been a strong employer of women and placed them in positions of power both in his business and his campaign.PJ_Soul said:
I'm not a Hillary supporter.BS44325 said:
But your vote (even if you could vote) is an unwinnable one. You would excuse any previous Clinton victim shaming as long as your candidate wins. Trump is going after this generation of women who don't tolerate victim shaming even if it occurred in the past.PJ_Soul said:
You bet it would have. As a woman I found the very suggestion offensive.mrussel1 said:
Well Pence said on Fox this morning that she isn't coming. He's the adult evidently. That move would have alienated women even more.BS44325 said:
It's Bill's mistresses and alleged rape victim who were humiliated and the question is how much did Hillary participate in that humiliation for the sake of her and Bill's political future. Millenials who may not have been aware of all this are waking up this morning and asking who is Juanita Broaddrick? Who is Gennifer Flowers? This isn't the 90's anymore. People rightful take the concepts of sexual abuse and the shaming of victims much more seriously now.Kat said:So Trump wants to humiliate Secretary Clinton before the election. I'm sure women will love that and he'll end up being President Trump, right?
"Hey fellas have you heard the news? Oh yeah.
The women in this town are being misused. Oh yeah.
Yeah I seen it all in my dreams last night. Oh yeah.
Girls leaving this town 'cause they don't treat em right-a. Oh yeah.
I'll take a train. (take a train)
Fly by plane. (fly by plane)
They're getting tired. (getting tired)
Getting sick and tired. (sick and tired)"
The suggestion that Trump is doing anything for the benefit of women or is even capable of such is a huge fucking joke. He's a sexist pig.
No idea why you are saying he is somehow against victim shaming or appealing to those who are.0 -
Yeah interesting point belied by data.JC29856 said:
Interesting... you're correct, many women in trumps camp, upper level too.BS44325 said:
People just aren't buying it. Over the years he has been a strong employer of women and placed them in positions of power both in his business and his campaign.PJ_Soul said:
I'm not a Hillary supporter.BS44325 said:
But your vote (even if you could vote) is an unwinnable one. You would excuse any previous Clinton victim shaming as long as your candidate wins. Trump is going after this generation of women who don't tolerate victim shaming even if it occurred in the past.PJ_Soul said:
You bet it would have. As a woman I found the very suggestion offensive.mrussel1 said:
Well Pence said on Fox this morning that she isn't coming. He's the adult evidently. That move would have alienated women even more.BS44325 said:
It's Bill's mistresses and alleged rape victim who were humiliated and the question is how much did Hillary participate in that humiliation for the sake of her and Bill's political future. Millenials who may not have been aware of all this are waking up this morning and asking who is Juanita Broaddrick? Who is Gennifer Flowers? This isn't the 90's anymore. People rightful take the concepts of sexual abuse and the shaming of victims much more seriously now.Kat said:So Trump wants to humiliate Secretary Clinton before the election. I'm sure women will love that and he'll end up being President Trump, right?
"Hey fellas have you heard the news? Oh yeah.
The women in this town are being misused. Oh yeah.
Yeah I seen it all in my dreams last night. Oh yeah.
Girls leaving this town 'cause they don't treat em right-a. Oh yeah.
I'll take a train. (take a train)
Fly by plane. (fly by plane)
They're getting tired. (getting tired)
Getting sick and tired. (sick and tired)"
The suggestion that Trump is doing anything for the benefit of women or is even capable of such is a huge fucking joke. He's a sexist pig.
No idea why you are saying he is somehow against victim shaming or appealing to those who are.0 -
It wouldn't surprise me if Trumps supporters won't even believe his own words. The cognitive dissonance of Trump supporters is astounding.BS44325 said:
People just aren't buying it. Over the years he has been a strong employer of women and placed them in positions of power both in his business and his campaign.PJ_Soul said:
I'm not a Hillary supporter.BS44325 said:
But your vote (even if you could vote) is an unwinnable one. You would excuse any previous Clinton victim shaming as long as your candidate wins. Trump is going after this generation of women who don't tolerate victim shaming even if it occurred in the past.PJ_Soul said:
You bet it would have. As a woman I found the very suggestion offensive.mrussel1 said:
Well Pence said on Fox this morning that she isn't coming. He's the adult evidently. That move would have alienated women even more.BS44325 said:
It's Bill's mistresses and alleged rape victim who were humiliated and the question is how much did Hillary participate in that humiliation for the sake of her and Bill's political future. Millenials who may not have been aware of all this are waking up this morning and asking who is Juanita Broaddrick? Who is Gennifer Flowers? This isn't the 90's anymore. People rightful take the concepts of sexual abuse and the shaming of victims much more seriously now.Kat said:So Trump wants to humiliate Secretary Clinton before the election. I'm sure women will love that and he'll end up being President Trump, right?
"Hey fellas have you heard the news? Oh yeah.
The women in this town are being misused. Oh yeah.
Yeah I seen it all in my dreams last night. Oh yeah.
Girls leaving this town 'cause they don't treat em right-a. Oh yeah.
I'll take a train. (take a train)
Fly by plane. (fly by plane)
They're getting tired. (getting tired)
Getting sick and tired. (sick and tired)"
The suggestion that Trump is doing anything for the benefit of women or is even capable of such is a huge fucking joke. He's a sexist pig.
No idea why you are saying he is somehow against victim shaming or appealing to those who are.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/politics/donald-trump-sexism-tracker-every-offensive-comment-in-one-place/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/18-real-things-donald-trump-has-said-about-women_us_55d356a8e4b07addcb442023
0 -
Ha! Yeah, he is just so respectful of women, lol. My guess is that he likes employing women because he can pay them less and thinks he can control them easier.BS44325 said:
People just aren't buying it. Over the years he has been a strong employer of women and placed them in positions of power both in his business and his campaign.PJ_Soul said:
I'm not a Hillary supporter.BS44325 said:
But your vote (even if you could vote) is an unwinnable one. You would excuse any previous Clinton victim shaming as long as your candidate wins. Trump is going after this generation of women who don't tolerate victim shaming even if it occurred in the past.PJ_Soul said:
You bet it would have. As a woman I found the very suggestion offensive.mrussel1 said:
Well Pence said on Fox this morning that she isn't coming. He's the adult evidently. That move would have alienated women even more.BS44325 said:
It's Bill's mistresses and alleged rape victim who were humiliated and the question is how much did Hillary participate in that humiliation for the sake of her and Bill's political future. Millenials who may not have been aware of all this are waking up this morning and asking who is Juanita Broaddrick? Who is Gennifer Flowers? This isn't the 90's anymore. People rightful take the concepts of sexual abuse and the shaming of victims much more seriously now.Kat said:So Trump wants to humiliate Secretary Clinton before the election. I'm sure women will love that and he'll end up being President Trump, right?
"Hey fellas have you heard the news? Oh yeah.
The women in this town are being misused. Oh yeah.
Yeah I seen it all in my dreams last night. Oh yeah.
Girls leaving this town 'cause they don't treat em right-a. Oh yeah.
I'll take a train. (take a train)
Fly by plane. (fly by plane)
They're getting tired. (getting tired)
Getting sick and tired. (sick and tired)"
The suggestion that Trump is doing anything for the benefit of women or is even capable of such is a huge fucking joke. He's a sexist pig.
No idea why you are saying he is somehow against victim shaming or appealing to those who are.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_55d356a8e4b07addcb442023
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/politics/donald-trump-sexism-tracker-every-offensive-comment-in-one-place/
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/ex-trump-employee-speaks-out-on-his-treatment-of-women-20160329
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/06/04/donald-trump-campaign-pays-women-less-than-men/VIu0v2MUJiHqhvc5C0W5dO/story.html
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I'm pretty certain the "mirrors" ad that was put out this week shows Trump's true feelings towards women. Regardless of what role he says he has given women in his business world, it's crystal clear that he's a pig.0
-
We'll see if that number holds up come election day. McCain lost women by 14 so that is definitely below standard for a republican but not unexpected considering we have the first female presidential candidate in history. There's no evidence however that the 6 point bump in numbers are related to Trump's behaviour as opposed to the historical significance of the Clinton candidacy. Either way she will need a gender gap that large to win. A McCain level gender gap might not cut it because she is doing poorly in so many other areas.mrussel1 said:
Clinton leads women by 20 points in the latest wash po demographic assessment. ....just not buying it, eh?BS44325 said:
People just aren't buying it. Over the years he has been a strong employer of women and placed them in positions of power both in his business and his campaign.PJ_Soul said:
I'm not a Hillary supporter.BS44325 said:
But your vote (even if you could vote) is an unwinnable one. You would excuse any previous Clinton victim shaming as long as your candidate wins. Trump is going after this generation of women who don't tolerate victim shaming even if it occurred in the past.PJ_Soul said:
You bet it would have. As a woman I found the very suggestion offensive.mrussel1 said:
Well Pence said on Fox this morning that she isn't coming. He's the adult evidently. That move would have alienated women even more.BS44325 said:
It's Bill's mistresses and alleged rape victim who were humiliated and the question is how much did Hillary participate in that humiliation for the sake of her and Bill's political future. Millenials who may not have been aware of all this are waking up this morning and asking who is Juanita Broaddrick? Who is Gennifer Flowers? This isn't the 90's anymore. People rightful take the concepts of sexual abuse and the shaming of victims much more seriously now.Kat said:So Trump wants to humiliate Secretary Clinton before the election. I'm sure women will love that and he'll end up being President Trump, right?
"Hey fellas have you heard the news? Oh yeah.
The women in this town are being misused. Oh yeah.
Yeah I seen it all in my dreams last night. Oh yeah.
Girls leaving this town 'cause they don't treat em right-a. Oh yeah.
I'll take a train. (take a train)
Fly by plane. (fly by plane)
They're getting tired. (getting tired)
Getting sick and tired. (sick and tired)"
The suggestion that Trump is doing anything for the benefit of women or is even capable of such is a huge fucking joke. He's a sexist pig.
No idea why you are saying he is somehow against victim shaming or appealing to those who are.
Https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/the-demographic-groups-fueling-the-election/0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help