Whats going wrong with the world? More shootings

14546485051117

Comments

  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,668
    pandora wrote:
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    So... were you lying when you said you don't own a gun?

    I never lie ...

    are you assuming again or insulting?
    Um, no, I'm asking a question.
    What you're saying now about vicitms and scoffing at locked doors, etc, just doesn't add up if you don't own a gun. So I figured you were either lying about not having a gun, or are totally overstating your position and arguing something you don't truly believe now.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    DS1119 wrote:
    [

    You honestly think more people were killed in this country from legally obtained weapons than from cars over the past 30 years that I need to find stats? Really? :?
    I'd really like to see them if you have them.


    Really?? :lol::lol: :fp: I'll do the google search. :lol:
  • comebackgirl
    comebackgirl Posts: 9,885
    DS1119 wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:
    [

    You honestly think more people were killed in this country from legally obtained weapons than from cars over the past 30 years that I need to find stats? Really? :?
    I'd really like to see them if you have them.


    Really?? :lol::lol: :fp: I'll do the google search. :lol:
    Cool thanks for doing the legwork ;) I really don't know the numbers and I'd be interested in seeing them. I'm a numbers geek, so I like to see what the stats are in peer reviewed journals.
    tumblr_mg4nc33pIX1s1mie8o1_400.gif

    "I need your strength for me to be strong...I need your love to feel loved"
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,077
    Reports of multiple people shot in a Sikh temple in Wisconsin.

    http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/05/us/wiscon ... index.html
    looks like someone should have brought their guns to church.... that would have stopped this :roll:

    oh yeah, guns don't kill people, i forgot... silly me :fp:


    seriously, how many more of these are we going to have to hear about before we have an adult conversation about guns in this country? this thread is a microcosm of the problem. everyone is making up scenaraios and hypotheticals and suggesting things like banning cars, when the real problem is it is easier to get a gun than it is to vote in this country and something has to be done about it.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    Reports of multiple people shot in a Sikh temple in Wisconsin.

    http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/05/us/wiscon ... index.html
    looks like someone should have brought their guns to church.... that would have stopped this :roll:

    oh yeah, guns don't kill people, i forgot... silly me :fp:


    seriously, how many more of these are we going to have to hear about before we have an adult conversation about guns in this country? this thread is a microcosm of the problem. everyone is making up scenaraios and hypotheticals and suggesting things like banning cars, when the real problem is it is easier to get a gun than it is to vote in this country and something has to be done about it.


    Everything when it comes to law changing is hypothetical? :fp: :lol: If you really think banning guns or even stricter gun control will end these senseless acts of violence you are mistaken. They would just find another means. The Oklahoma bomber didn't use a gun. :lol:
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,668
    DS1119 wrote:
    I'd really like to see them if you have them.


    Really?? :lol::lol: :fp: I'll do the google search. :lol:
    Cool thanks for doing the legwork ;) I really don't know the numbers and I'd be interested in seeing them. I'm a numbers geek, so I like to see what the stats are in peer reviewed journals.
    There are certainly more deaths from auto accidents than gun deaths. But I don't see why the two should be compared. Cars have a clear benefit that outweigh the risks by a ling shot. They have a huge part in maintaining a standard of living, they keep the economy running, transport all of our goods, etc. Guns don't have any of the benefits, and therefore aren't worth the risks. I personally think it's a nonsensical comparison. And yes, cars/driving are/is way more regulated. And insured. And bullets don't have seat belts and air bags. And pedestrians and drivers at least have clear guidelines on where each h other is supposed to be. Also, if you look at it from a per capita view (how many people own or get into cars or walk down the street near cars), then guns are probably a lot more dangerous.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,077
    DS1119 wrote:
    Everything when it comes to law changing is hypothetical? :fp: :lol: If you really think banning guns or even stricter gun control will end these senseless acts of violence you are mistaken. They would just find another means. The Oklahoma bomber didn't use a gun. :lol:
    we need to have an adult conversation about it.

    why is it easier to get a gun than be able to vote?

    recent polls show that over 80% of gun owners feel it should be law to have background checks before getting guns. over 60% of gun owners feel that there should be a limit on the number of guns you can buy in a given period of time. and a large majority feel that the large 100 round magazines should be more difficult to get.

    why is that? because the legal, responsible, gun owners do not want to be besmirched by idiots like this guy in colorado, the guy in wisconsin today, the guy who shot giffords, etc....these dudes make all gun owners look bad.

    and finally,

    why does the nra find it appropriate to allow convicted felons and people on the terror watch list to be able to buy guns without any sort of limits?
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,668
    DS1119 wrote:
    mickeyrat wrote:
    your posts about cars seems to suggest your are in favor of banning them. Which, frankly, I find find strange coming from a car salesman.


    Mickey...it's just straight logic. People concentrate on these small issues...tragic, beleive me I don't want to see people hurt or killed...but they really believe banning weapons sold in this country LEGALLY AND REGULATED is the answer? Really? Add up all of the victims over the last 30 years from LEGALLY obtained weapons and I bet there were more people who died from stab fucking wounds this week alone? :lol: Lets ban the knives sold right? :fp: :lol:
    To be fair, i don't think most people are calling for a complete ban on guns (with a couple of exceptions). I think most just support way more strict regulations to reduce harm and to pull America away from it's love affair with deadly weapons.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • ComeToTX
    ComeToTX Austin Posts: 8,063
    We change driving laws all the time to protect people. Stricter BAL laws, speed limits, seat belts etc...

    We don't need to ban cars or guns we need to do more to protect people, like we've done with cars.

    Like others have said most car deaths occur because the car is not being used the way it is meant to. Guns are made to kill.
    This show, another show, a show here and a show there.
  • redrock
    redrock Posts: 18,341
    DS1119 wrote:
    everyone is making up scenaraios and hypotheticals and suggesting things like banning cars, when the real problem is it is easier to get a gun than it is to vote in this country and something has to be done about it.

    Asinine suggestions to deflect on either complete ignorance on the subject or not wishing to 'see' the actual issues as it does not fit with one's 'agenda'.

    Certainly tighter controls work - and no, I do not have stats to hand and will not google them. It has already been done on many other gun threads. If one really wants to have them, one can go through these and find them. Of course tighter controls will not eliminate gun crime - no one in this thread put this suggestion forward - but it can reduce it and certainly reduce lethal crime (or, even if not crime, suicides, accidents, etc.).

    The american citizen is no different to say the canadian or aussie or whatever. If an excitable young man gets in a fight in the US, he is more likely to use a gun against his 'opponent' - not because he is more violent but because it was easier for him to get a gun than the canadian or the aussie and thus potentially causing a death. The canadian or aussie may use a knife or his fists, still causing damage but more often than not, repairable damage.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,668
    edited August 2012
    DS1119 wrote:
    even though that's not the intended purpose of driving.


    Ask Eddie Vedder about this. I seem to remember reading about and seeing a clip in a movie about a certain whacko who wanted to drive their truck through his front door. The driver didn't have a gun. :lol:
    Eddie also wrote Glorified G and Lukin.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    Cool thanks for doing the legwork ;) I really don't know the numbers and I'd be interested in seeing them. I'm a numbers geek, so I like to see what the stats are in peer reviewed journals.


    Well the number for a 30 year period for automobiles from 1980 to 2010 is 1,697,722 souls lost. Should I even continue? :lol:
  • comebackgirl
    comebackgirl Posts: 9,885
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    There are certainly more deaths from auto accidents than gun deaths. But I don't see why the two should be compared. Cars have a clear benefit that outweigh the risks by a ling shot. They have a huge part in maintaining a standard of living, they keep the economy running, transport all of our goods, etc. Guns don't have any of the benefits, and therefore aren't worth the risks. I personally think it's a nonsensical comparison. And yes, cars/driving are/is way more regulated. And insured. And bullets don't have seat belts and air bags. And pedestrians and drivers at least have clear guidelines on where each h other is supposed to be. Also, if you look at it from a per capita view (how many people own or get into cars or walk down the street near cars), then guns are probably a lot more dangerous.
    I agree on that. I'm interested in hearing about percentages rather than whole numbers and how many guns that are used illegally were initially obtained legally.
    tumblr_mg4nc33pIX1s1mie8o1_400.gif

    "I need your strength for me to be strong...I need your love to feel loved"
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    Cars have a clear benefit that outweigh the risks by a ling shot.dangerous.


    And see. That's where the issue is. YOU feel that cars risk outweighs the benefits. Bernie Goetz would disagree with you here about that. :lol:
  • peacefrompaul
    peacefrompaul Posts: 25,293
    DS1119 wrote:
    Cool thanks for doing the legwork ;) I really don't know the numbers and I'd be interested in seeing them. I'm a numbers geek, so I like to see what the stats are in peer reviewed journals.


    Well the number for a 30 year period for automobiles from 1980 to 2010 is 1,697,722 souls lost. Should I even continue? :lol:

    Good enough?

    http://www.datamasher.org/mash-ups/fire ... #table-tab
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    DS1119 wrote:
    Everything when it comes to law changing is hypothetical? :fp: :lol: If you really think banning guns or even stricter gun control will end these senseless acts of violence you are mistaken. They would just find another means. The Oklahoma bomber didn't use a gun. :lol:
    we need to have an adult conversation about it.

    why is it easier to get a gun than be able to vote?

    recent polls show that over 80% of gun owners feel it should be law to have background checks before getting guns. over 60% of gun owners feel that there should be a limit on the number of guns you can buy in a given period of time. and a large majority feel that the large 100 round magazines should be more difficult to get.

    why is that? because the legal, responsible, gun owners do not want to be besmirched by idiots like this guy in colorado, the guy in wisconsin today, the guy who shot giffords, etc....these dudes make all gun owners look bad.

    and finally,

    why does the nra find it appropriate to allow convicted felons and people on the terror watch list to be able to buy guns without any sort of limits?


    Same reason they have all of the other rights in this country. :lol:
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:
    mickeyrat wrote:
    your posts about cars seems to suggest your are in favor of banning them. Which, frankly, I find find strange coming from a car salesman.


    Mickey...it's just straight logic. People concentrate on these small issues...tragic, beleive me I don't want to see people hurt or killed...but they really believe banning weapons sold in this country LEGALLY AND REGULATED is the answer? Really? Add up all of the victims over the last 30 years from LEGALLY obtained weapons and I bet there were more people who died from stab fucking wounds this week alone? :lol: Lets ban the knives sold right? :fp: :lol:
    To be fair, i don't think most people are calling for a complete ban on guns (with a couple of exceptions). I think most just support way more strict regulations to reduce harm and to pull America away from it's love affair with deadly weapons.


    Wow. :fp: :lol:
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    redrock wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:
    everyone is making up scenaraios and hypotheticals and suggesting things like banning cars, when the real problem is it is easier to get a gun than it is to vote in this country and something has to be done about it.

    Asinine suggestions to deflect on either complete ignorance on the subject or not wishing to 'see' the actual issues as it does not fit with one's 'agenda'.

    Certainly tighter controls work - and no, I do not have stats to hand and will not google them. It has already been done on many other gun threads. If one really wants to have them, one can go through these and find them. Of course tighter controls will not eliminate gun crime - no one in this thread put this suggestion forward - but it can reduce it and certainly reduce lethal crime (or, even if not crime, suicides, accidents, etc.).

    The american citizen is no different to say the canadian or aussie or whatever. If an excitable young man gets in a fight in the US, he is more likely to use a gun against his 'opponent' - not because he is more violent but because it was easier for him to get a gun than the canadian or the aussie and thus potentially causing a death. The canadian or aussie may use a knife or his fists, still causing damage but more often than not, repairable damage.


    You have looked at murder rtaes across the World right based on population? The US is at the lower end of that actually...well below countries that don't allow LEGALLY POSSESSED FIREARMS! :lol: :fp:
  • DS1119
    DS1119 Posts: 33,497
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:
    even though that's not the intended purpose of driving.


    Ask Eddie Vedder about this. I seem to remember reading about and seeing a clip in a movie about a certain whacko who wanted to drive their truck through his front door. The driver didn't have a gun. :lol:
    Eddie also wrote Glorified G and Lukin.


    What he wrote doesn't change the facts of what happened. :?
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,668
    DS1119 wrote:
    PJ_Soul wrote:
    DS1119 wrote:


    Mickey...it's just straight logic. People concentrate on these small issues...tragic, beleive me I don't want to see people hurt or killed...but they really believe banning weapons sold in this country LEGALLY AND REGULATED is the answer? Really? Add up all of the victims over the last 30 years from LEGALLY obtained weapons and I bet there were more people who died from stab fucking wounds this week alone? :lol: Lets ban the knives sold right? :fp: :lol:
    To be fair, i don't think most people are calling for a complete ban on guns (with a couple of exceptions). I think most just support way more strict regulations to reduce harm and to pull America away from it's love affair with deadly weapons.


    Wow. :fp: :lol:
    What?
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
This discussion has been closed.