***The Official Philadelphia Phillies 2012 Thread***

1…532533535537538…999

Comments

  • The Fixer
    The Fixer Posts: 12,837
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    pjhawks wrote:
    i said NOT BAD - do you guys understand english? jeezus h. christ i didn't say the guy was ryan fucking howard or even jimmy fucking rollins. i said NOT BAD. if .260 sucks and replacement level then 90% of major leaguers suck according to you guys. my god.....

    Maybe the reason you like Ryan Howard so much is because you have low expectations. Morgan Ensberg hit .263 for his career for fucks sake.

    HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,941
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    I am aware of who you are talking about, point was if you think .260 is not bad, you have pretty low expectations of a hitter.

    let me define it for you in easy to understand numbers. love to see you and the fixer's definitions. feel free to explain anytime.

    when using JUST a batting average here are my definitions of how a career breaks out.

    .330 and up - once in a lifetime hall of fame level - as good as any out there
    .300 - .329 - great hitter- for sure hall of famer
    .275 - .299 - damn good to great major leaguer
    .250 - .274 - "not bad", solid major leaguer
    .226 - .249 - below average middle infielder backup type
    .225 and below - terrible, border line major league/minor league player
  • The Fixer
    The Fixer Posts: 12,837
    pjhawks wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    I am aware of who you are talking about, point was if you think .260 is not bad, you have pretty low expectations of a hitter.

    let me define it for you in easy to understand numbers. love to see you and the fixer's definitions. feel free to explain anytime.

    when using JUST a batting average here are my definitions of how a career breaks out.

    .330 and up - once in a lifetime hall of fame level - as good as any out there
    .300 - .329 - great hitter- for sure hall of famer
    .275 - .299 - damn good to great major leaguer
    .250 - .274 - "not bad", solid major leaguer
    .226 - .249 - below average middle infielder backup type
    .225 and below - terrible, border line major league/minor league player

    so freddy sanchez is going to the HOF?
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,030
    The Juggler wrote:
    you four are insufferable. jeez.

    And on that note, I am getting up on out of this bitch. It's been fun, these fuckers killed my productivity today.
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,941
    The Fixer wrote:
    pjhawks wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    I am aware of who you are talking about, point was if you think .260 is not bad, you have pretty low expectations of a hitter.

    let me define it for you in easy to understand numbers. love to see you and the fixer's definitions. feel free to explain anytime.

    when using JUST a batting average here are my definitions of how a career breaks out.

    .330 and up - once in a lifetime hall of fame level - as good as any out there
    .300 - .329 - great hitter- for sure hall of famer
    .275 - .299 - damn good to great major leaguer
    .250 - .274 - "not bad", solid major leaguer
    .226 - .249 - below average middle infielder backup type
    .225 and below - terrible, border line major league/minor league player

    so freddy sanchez is going to the HOF?

    is his career over?

    edit: and looked it up and his career average is not .300 - so uhhh try another one dbag
  • The Fixer
    The Fixer Posts: 12,837
    pjhawks wrote:
    The Fixer wrote:
    pjhawks wrote:

    let me define it for you in easy to understand numbers. love to see you and the fixer's definitions. feel free to explain anytime.

    when using JUST a batting average here are my definitions of how a career breaks out.

    .330 and up - once in a lifetime hall of fame level - as good as any out there
    .300 - .329 - great hitter- for sure hall of famer
    .275 - .299 - damn good to great major leaguer
    .250 - .274 - "not bad", solid major leaguer
    .226 - .249 - below average middle infielder backup type
    .225 and below - terrible, border line major league/minor league player

    so freddy sanchez is going to the HOF?

    is his career over?

    pretty much.

    I will stop you before you defend freddy sanchez. rico brogna was plenty for today.
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,941
    The Fixer wrote:
    pretty much.

    I will stop you before you defend freddy sanchez. rico brogna was plenty for today.

    just glaze over that you were wrong. good luck to your 3rd place Braves tonight and this weekend.
  • The Fixer
    The Fixer Posts: 12,837
    pjhawks wrote:
    The Fixer wrote:
    pretty much.

    I will stop you before you defend freddy sanchez. rico brogna was plenty for today.

    just glaze over that you were wrong. good luck to your 3rd place Braves tonight and this weekend.

    whatever his career average is, it's gotta be close to 300. Either way, calling him a 'damn good to great player' is awful too.

    you're quite the baseball analyst
  • jamminpearls
    jamminpearls Posts: 7,078
    For the 10th time i said Zach Duke would be a good pitcher on a good team. Never said anything else besides he imo could be a good 3 or solid 4 here.
    Go Birds!!!!
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,030
    Howard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • jamminpearls
    jamminpearls Posts: 7,078
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    Howard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Another moon shot!!!
    Go Birds!!!!
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,030
    jamminpearls wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    Howard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Another moon shot!!!

    Didn't see it, just saw he hit it on my phone. Timing is everything
  • jamminpearls
    jamminpearls Posts: 7,078
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    jamminpearls wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    Howard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Another moon shot!!!

    Didn't see it, just saw he hit it on my phone. Timing is everything
    Dead center blast and did u see the PJ20 tweet? Who's in? Really gonna do my all to be there.
    Go Birds!!!!
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,030
    I didn't. What is it? Gotta set this up.

    Alpine valley it is it seems?
  • jamminpearls
    jamminpearls Posts: 7,078
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    I didn't. What is it? Gotta set this up.

    Alpine valley it is it seems?
    Yeah to fly,drive,rv is the question. This trip will be in the 2k area after all said in done.
    Go Birds!!!!
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,030
    $2k? How you planning in doing it up? Driving/rv is enticing but I don't know if I have the time off work or am interested in doing it hungover on the way back, I will be there no doubt though.
  • The Fixer
    The Fixer Posts: 12,837
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    $2k? How you planning in doing it up? Driving/rv is enticing but I don't know if I have the time off work or am interested in doing it hungover on the way back, I will be there no doubt though.

    I really want to go to this. A buddy brought up the RV thing, but I'd much rather be in a hotel with bars/restaurants/air conditioning/cable tv. No desire whatsoever to go camping.

    Only been to wisconsin once (long weekend for an Eagles game). Lambeau was incredible, but wisconsin sucked (did a night in milwaukee, then 2 in Green Bay). So, I'm not thrilled with the venue selection. Doesn't seem like there are any hotels near alpine valley. Plenty of motels, which might be worse than camping. I'm 50/50 at this point.
  • Phantom Pain
    Phantom Pain Posts: 9,876
    The Fixer wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    $2k? How you planning in doing it up? Driving/rv is enticing but I don't know if I have the time off work or am interested in doing it hungover on the way back, I will be there no doubt though.

    I really want to go to this. A buddy brought up the RV thing, but I'd much rather be in a hotel with bars/restaurants/air conditioning/cable tv. No desire whatsoever to go camping.

    Only been to wisconsin once (long weekend for an Eagles game). Lambeau was incredible, but wisconsin sucked (did a night in milwaukee, then 2 in Green Bay). So, I'm not thrilled with the venue selection. Doesn't seem like there are any hotels near alpine valley. Plenty of motels, which might be worse than camping. I'm 50/50 at this point.

    I agree...absolutely horrible decision to go to Wisconsin

    Call me spoiled but I want a hotel as well and not picking cow shit out of the treads on my sneakers

    :lol:
    My drinking team has a hockey problem

    The ONLY thing better than a glass of beer is tea with Miss McGill



    A protuberance of flesh above the waistband of a tight pair of trousers
  • The Fixer
    The Fixer Posts: 12,837
    Phantom Pain wrote:
    The Fixer wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    $2k? How you planning in doing it up? Driving/rv is enticing but I don't know if I have the time off work or am interested in doing it hungover on the way back, I will be there no doubt though.

    I really want to go to this. A buddy brought up the RV thing, but I'd much rather be in a hotel with bars/restaurants/air conditioning/cable tv. No desire whatsoever to go camping.

    Only been to wisconsin once (long weekend for an Eagles game). Lambeau was incredible, but wisconsin sucked (did a night in milwaukee, then 2 in Green Bay). So, I'm not thrilled with the venue selection. Doesn't seem like there are any hotels near alpine valley. Plenty of motels, which might be worse than camping. I'm 50/50 at this point.

    I agree...absolutely horrible decision to go to Wisconsin

    Call me spoiled but I want a hotel as well and not picking cow shit out of the treads on my sneakers

    :lol:

    hahaha

    mosquitoes out the ass too. ugh

    anxious to see what other bands are playing at this thing
  • Phantom Pain
    Phantom Pain Posts: 9,876
    Yep..didnt even think of that..is it safe to smoke weed and use deet ?

    :lol:

    I'll be sitting this one out...I'm good from the Spectrum shows for awhile
    My drinking team has a hockey problem

    The ONLY thing better than a glass of beer is tea with Miss McGill



    A protuberance of flesh above the waistband of a tight pair of trousers
This discussion has been closed.

Categories