THE 2013 CHICAGO BEARS!!!!!!!!!!

12357…187

Comments

  • mca47
    mca47 Posts: 13,335
    9 Big Ten teams play their home games in bigger stadiums than what Soldier Field holds.



    Dumb!
  • 81
    81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
    mca47 wrote:
    9 Big Ten teams play their home games in bigger stadiums than what Soldier Field holds.



    Dumb!

    it seats 54 more than friggen Yale. YALE. for crying out loud

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Am ... y_capacity
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg
  • mca47
    mca47 Posts: 13,335
    81 wrote:
    mca47 wrote:
    9 Big Ten teams play their home games in bigger stadiums than what Soldier Field holds.



    Dumb!

    it seats 54 more than friggen Yale. YALE. for crying out loud

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Am ... y_capacity

    While it sucks that it's small, I think we can all agree on this...

    At least we don't have to go to Green Bay Wisconsin to watch our team play!!! :D:lol:
  • 81
    81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
    as much as i am a bears fan, and thus, have to hate the packers, i must admit, i would like to check out their stadium. i further must admit, they have the best ownership group in all of sports.

    :?
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg
  • davidtrios
    davidtrios Posts: 9,732
    the packers are a well run organization. they remind me of the twins- perennial winners.

    anyway- is it monday yet? I'm ready for some more bears football (can't believe im saying that)
  • 81
    81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
    it's not monday, but football sat is right around the corner.

    hopefully, there will be a good game or two on tommorrow.

    so what are our thoughts on the bears chances monday? should be a pass fest since neither team seems able to throw the ball. i'd say GB has the better secondary, but the Bears have been better that i thought it would be so far. I've not foudn myself yelling at the safties yet. that's a good thing.

    it'd be nice to see the pass rush step it up a bit and smack rodgers around a little.
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg
  • SPEEDY MCCREADY
    SPEEDY MCCREADY Posts: 26,874
    Bears 24
    Packers 21

    overtime.....
    Take me piece by piece.....
    Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
  • davidtrios
    davidtrios Posts: 9,732
    Bears 33 Packers 24
    >My heart
    Packers 37 Bears 20
    >My brain
  • 81
    81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
    i can see them laying an egg after the last couple of games. could the be over confident with a big head? or do they come out and lay the wood to rogers. the front 4 NEED to generate some pressure all night and knock rodgers around.

    anybody what to wager how many times we see peanut slip down?
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg
  • QuarterToTen
    QuarterToTen Cincinnati, Ohio Posts: 3,650
    Green Bay 27
    Chicago 24
    Nice shirt.
  • Indifference71
    Indifference71 Chicago Posts: 14,911
    BEARS 31
    PACKERS 28
  • FearTheBeard
    FearTheBeard Posts: 666
    Rodgers 30
    Cutler 3
  • mca47
    mca47 Posts: 13,335
    81 wrote:
    i can see them laying an egg after the last couple of games. could the be over confident with a big head? or do they come out and lay the wood to rogers. the front 4 NEED to generate some pressure all night and knock rodgers around.

    anybody what to wager how many times we see peanut slip down?

    Yeah, I can't believe they still have that guy playing CB.
    While the Bears have the best D against the run, their secondary is a joke. I still think (and hope) the Bears can pull it off, but I also expect Rodgers to throw for at least 350 yds.
  • 81
    81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
    mca47 wrote:
    81 wrote:
    i can see them laying an egg after the last couple of games. could the be over confident with a big head? or do they come out and lay the wood to rogers. the front 4 NEED to generate some pressure all night and knock rodgers around.

    anybody what to wager how many times we see peanut slip down?

    Yeah, I can't believe they still have that guy playing CB.
    While the Bears have the best D against the run, their secondary is a joke. I still think (and hope) the Bears can pull it off, but I also expect Rodgers to throw for at least 350 yds.


    seems like a good day in the 2010 nfl is 475+ yards.

    this league has become basketball on roids
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg
  • IwasBit10
    IwasBit10 Posts: 646
    mca47 wrote:
    81 wrote:
    i can see them laying an egg after the last couple of games. could the be over confident with a big head? or do they come out and lay the wood to rogers. the front 4 NEED to generate some pressure all night and knock rodgers around.

    anybody what to wager how many times we see peanut slip down?

    Yeah, I can't believe they still have that guy playing CB.
    While the Bears have the best D against the run, their secondary is a joke. I still think (and hope) the Bears can pull it off, but I also expect Rodgers to throw for at least 350 yds.

    Yeah, the secondary makes me very nervous. Part of me feels like this could be a shoot-out, but then part of me feels like both D's will step-up on the big stage and it will be low scoring. Either way, it's time for the Bears to step-up. Let's go to work!!
    He floated back down 'cause he wanted to share, his key to the locks on the chains he saw everywhere.
  • Aero83_
    Aero83_ Posts: 933
    Good luck with Clay Mathews...duh Bears may need to assign two or three blockers just to slightly reduce his speed..
    ...10/31/09, 05/21/10, Peru, Los Angeles
  • Gary Carter
    Gary Carter Posts: 14,077
    bears 24
    packers 21
    Ron: I just don't feel like going out tonight
    Sammi: Wanna just break up?

  • patrickredeyes
    patrickredeyes Posts: 8,834
    Congrats on the win and being 3 and 0.

    What the f#ck is up with that gay ass song they play when Chicago scores? LOL


    Packers beat themselves plain and simple. See yea next time in Green Bay.
  • IwasBit10
    IwasBit10 Posts: 646
    patrickredeyes wrote:
    Congrats on the win and being 3 and 0.

    What the f#ck is up with that gay ass song they play when Chicago scores? LOL


    Packers beat themselves plain and simple. See yea next time in Green Bay.

    The thing is, if the Packers had won, we'd all be saying that the Bears beat themselves too. Both teams made critical mistakes. It came down to the final 3 minutes and the Bears forced Jones' fumble and drove down the field for the winning FG, so you gotta give them credit for stepping-up with the game on the line.

    I thought the Packers should have let Forte walk into the endzone on 2nd and goal. Would've at least gotten the ball back with a minute left and a timeout.

    And that song is called Bear Down, Chicago Bears. Been the fight song of the team since the '40s I think. Much better than Bang on the Drum All Day :lol:
    He floated back down 'cause he wanted to share, his key to the locks on the chains he saw everywhere.
  • 81
    81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
    i'll be honest, that was painful to watch. chicago did nothing on offense and gb couldn't finish what they started.

    and lovie should have kicked it on 4th and goal from the 1. yeah, the D held and Hester finally took anouther punt back, but i kick that fg all day long
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg

Categories