The Official Philadelphia Flyers Thread
Comments
-
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276tis pretty fucked up to have the 1/2 out west and the 7/8 in the east.
gotta figure the sharks/hawks series is for the cup.
however, if it comes down to Philly/Chicago...i'm going to have to go. that would be sick.81 is now off the air0 -
WOW JUST WOW!!!!!
UNFUCKINBELIEVABLE!!!!
I was holding the baby when they made it 4-3 I almost tossed her across the room!!!
Imagine if Gagne had 2 healthy feet !?!?!
Man what a gutsy performanceMy drinking team has a hockey problem
The ONLY thing better than a glass of beer is tea with Miss McGill
A protuberance of flesh above the waistband of a tight pair of trousers0 -
This makes me think the NHL is rigged and is trying to win back fans, because that was something out of a fucking script of a movie.0
-
Jearlpam0925 wrote:This makes me think the NHL is rigged and is trying to win back fans, because that was something out of a fucking script of a movie.
nah, not even hollywood can script a choke job like that0 -
Jearlpam0925 wrote:This makes me think the NHL is rigged and is trying to win back fans, because that was something out of a fucking script of a movie.
Lavy called in that little kid to do the USA Team speech in the 1st IntermissionMy drinking team has a hockey problem
The ONLY thing better than a glass of beer is tea with Miss McGill
A protuberance of flesh above the waistband of a tight pair of trousers0 -
The Fixer wrote:Jearlpam0925 wrote:This makes me think the NHL is rigged and is trying to win back fans, because that was something out of a fucking script of a movie.
nah, not even hollywood can script a choke job like that
Choking is blowing a 3-0 series lead. Coming back to win a game down 3-0 is fucking unreal. I'm not a hockey nerd, but I feel pride in knowing my city is only one of 4 teams in the history of major professional sports in North America with a 7 game playoff format to do this - and the latest. I hate this phrase because it's gay, but it definitely plays here - EPIC.0 -
The Fixer wrote:Jearlpam0925 wrote:This makes me think the NHL is rigged and is trying to win back fans, because that was something out of a fucking script of a movie.
nah, not even hollywood can script a choke job like that
No way man, Buttman doesn't want the Flyers to win
His dream sceanrio for the fans would have been PittMy drinking team has a hockey problem
The ONLY thing better than a glass of beer is tea with Miss McGill
A protuberance of flesh above the waistband of a tight pair of trousers0 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276anybody get a good look at the goal that was ruled no goal? Toronto has already jobbed us twice this season...so i am a bit concerned. they only gave three quick reviews from different angles81 is now off the air0
-
81 wrote:anybody get a good look at the goal that was ruled no goal? Toronto has already jobbed us twice this season...so i am a bit concerned. they only gave three quick reviews from different angles
Definitely, and I'm not one to believe in a conspiracy theories. If you could hear the Philly broadcast - they showed it a ton of times. They were sayin it without sayin it, that it was a goal.0 -
81 wrote:anybody get a good look at the goal that was ruled no goal? Toronto has already jobbed us twice this season...so i am a bit concerned. they only gave three quick reviews from different angles
I thought it was in from the angle on CSN-Philly from in front of the net
Rasks' pad was in the net and the puck was on it and then in front of it passed the line
Thankfully it didnt matter in the outcomeMy drinking team has a hockey problem
The ONLY thing better than a glass of beer is tea with Miss McGill
A protuberance of flesh above the waistband of a tight pair of trousers0 -
Jearlpam0925 wrote:81 wrote:anybody get a good look at the goal that was ruled no goal? Toronto has already jobbed us twice this season...so i am a bit concerned. they only gave three quick reviews from different angles
Definitely, and I'm not one to believe in a conspiracy theories. If you could hear the Philly broadcast - they showed it a ton of times. They were sayin it without sayin it, that it was a goal.
2 points...
1 - I'm against replay in all sports. half the time they still get the calls wrong
2 - the flyers announcers are the most biased I've ever heard, in any sport. jim jackson is a great play-by-play guy, but he cries every time a flyer hits the ice without a call. and steve coates is the chris wheeler of hockey0 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276Phantom Pain wrote:81 wrote:anybody get a good look at the goal that was ruled no goal? Toronto has already jobbed us twice this season...so i am a bit concerned. they only gave three quick reviews from different angles
I thought it was in from the angle on CSN-Philly from in front of the net
Rasks' pad was in the net and the puck was on it and then in front of it passed the line
Thankfully it didnt matter in the outcome
that's what it looked like to me in the quick shot they showed on VS.81 is now off the air0 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276The Fixer wrote:
2 - the flyers announcers are the most biased I've ever heard, in any sport. jim jackson is a great play-by-play guy, but he cries every time a flyer hits the ice without a call. and steve coates is the chris wheeler of hockey
be glad you didn't have to listen to boston guys. they are brutal.81 is now off the air0 -
The Fixer wrote:Jearlpam0925 wrote:81 wrote:anybody get a good look at the goal that was ruled no goal? Toronto has already jobbed us twice this season...so i am a bit concerned. they only gave three quick reviews from different angles
Definitely, and I'm not one to believe in a conspiracy theories. If you could hear the Philly broadcast - they showed it a ton of times. They were sayin it without sayin it, that it was a goal.
2 points...
1 - I'm against replay in all sports. half the time they still get the calls wrong
2 - the flyers announcers are the most biased I've ever heard, in any sport. jim jackson is a great play-by-play guy, but he cries every time a flyer hits the ice without a call. and steve coates is the chris wheeler of hockey
And that's why I love them. I WANT them to be biased. Clement better stay as color man. I know he's a good national guy, but he's gotta stay. The new Doernhoffer. And Jim Jackson is a great play by play guy - sounds like he should be calling a ballgame in the 1940's. And Coatsey - well, he's just drunk.
EDIT: There's a difference between being biased and towing the company line. Wheels is a pedophile that sucks penis, McCarthy as well. But Franzke and LA should be on TV and the're incredibly biased. They just don't look at everything with red colored glasses.0 -
The Fixer wrote:Jearlpam0925 wrote:81 wrote:anybody get a good look at the goal that was ruled no goal? Toronto has already jobbed us twice this season...so i am a bit concerned. they only gave three quick reviews from different angles
Definitely, and I'm not one to believe in a conspiracy theories. If you could hear the Philly broadcast - they showed it a ton of times. They were sayin it without sayin it, that it was a goal.
2 points...
1 - I'm against replay in all sports. half the time they still get the calls wrong
2 - the flyers announcers are the most biased I've ever heard, in any sport. jim jackson is a great play-by-play guy, but he cries every time a flyer hits the ice without a call. and steve coates is the chris wheeler of hockey
I dont mind replays it does help get the call right
What home home team announcers aren't homers? Have you heard that Jackass in Boston Edwards ?
They're all homers...Clement is more of a National guy being on ESPN and every other NHL Show or broadcastMy drinking team has a hockey problem
The ONLY thing better than a glass of beer is tea with Miss McGill
A protuberance of flesh above the waistband of a tight pair of trousers0 -
Jearlpam0925 wrote:The Fixer wrote:[
really, you like the over-bias (think I just made that word up)?? I like jackson...even met him at chickies after a game one night and he was cool as hell...anyone that can pull off his old stache has to be cool right?
I just wish announcers were more like kalas...you knew he was pulling for the phils, but he wasn't obnoxious about it. I think jackson borders on obnoxious. He might as well wear a flyer jersey during telecasts0 -
Oh, yeah, one more thing I want to reiterate what my uncle passed onto me when he said they were marching down Broad after Philly beat Boston for The Cup.....ahem....
ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR
WHO THE FUCK IS BOBBY ORR!!!!0 -
I still suck at quoting
yeah, I know jack edwards. he used to be on sportscenter back in the day. I don't think he's terrible.
I went to college in baltimore...the caps guys are beyond horrendous. their play by play by is now on vs a lot. forget his name...it's joe something (italian name).
jearlpam...I laughed out loud with your wheels/mccarthy analysis. mccarthy's fake laugh makes me sick to my stomach every time I hear it. he's so bad. and wheels...well there's just nothing to say0 -
The Fixer wrote:Jearlpam0925 wrote:The Fixer wrote:[
really, you like the over-bias (think I just made that word up)?? I like jackson...even met him at chickies after a game one night and he was cool as hell...anyone that can pull off his old stache has to be cool right?
I just wish announcers were more like kalas...you knew he was pulling for the phils, but he wasn't obnoxious about it. I think jackson borders on obnoxious. He might as well wear a flyer jersey during telecasts
No one can match Harry the K
If you ever hear some of the guys on TSN...they are solid
Jim Hughson I likeMy drinking team has a hockey problem
The ONLY thing better than a glass of beer is tea with Miss McGill
A protuberance of flesh above the waistband of a tight pair of trousers0 -
The Fixer wrote:I still suck at quoting
yeah, I know jack edwards. he used to be on sportscenter back in the day. I don't think he's terrible.
I went to college in baltimore...the caps guys are beyond horrendous. their play by play by is now on vs a lot. forget his name...it's joe something (italian name).
jearlpam...I laughed out loud with your wheels/mccarthy analysis. mccarthy's fake laugh makes me sick to my stomach every time I hear it. he's so bad. and wheels...well there's just nothing to say
Plus McCarthy is a Muts Reject announcer with flabby man boobsMy drinking team has a hockey problem
The ONLY thing better than a glass of beer is tea with Miss McGill
A protuberance of flesh above the waistband of a tight pair of trousers0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help