agree post #90 is officially recognized and noted as the one...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
...in the 9/11 attacks and there was irrefutable evidence, what would the US public do you think?
Probably the same as what happened here after The Dismissal cate. Fuck all.
And what kind of irrefutable evidence could they provide now anyway?
It's all subjective. You can't even get people to agree what happened here, there's no way they'd do bugger all even if the majority of them did agree.
NOPE!!!
*~You're IT Bert!~*
Hold on to the thread
The currents will shift
0
g under p
Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
I read through this entire thread (I've been away walking the beach under our full moonlight down here in South Florida) and a comedian could certainly use this in their comedy routine.
If this came to light......Back in DC security forces would move up to DEFCON 6 and there is no such thing. All hell would break loose, similar to the blackout of 77' in Brooklyn, NYC....I was there.
Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
Just as you don't know what happened to flight 77 and all aboard, I don't know why there isn't more debris or evidence. That's what I meant in my original post in this thread that there are a lot of unanswered questions. But as I said, I prefer not to fill those voids with science fiction..
Why don't you take a stab at answering some of those unanswered questions instead of belittling those that do? oh no, don't ask questions or jeffbr will call you a nutter. Sheeple like YOU are the reason the truth will never come out. You can admit that there are a lot of questions, but can't even look at any alternative explanations without starting with the insults and questioning people's sanity. With that attitude, I have a feeling that if someone dropped the smoking gun on your lap, you still wouldn't believe. And THAT is why there would be no revolution if one appeared....there would still be a huge percentage of people that just don't WANT to believe. (WMD, anyone?)
if you ever find time to get your head out of your ass, try and study the structural engineering of the construction of building 7. my guess is you no nothing about it..
Structural engineer now too, huh? you wear a lot of hats amigo.
don't pretend like you're any different than anyone else that has read up on WTC7. There are experts on both sides of this story, so don't pretend your opinions have more weight. You are digesting what you read like anyone else.
Why don't you take a stab at answering some of those unanswered questions instead of belittling those that do? oh no, don't ask questions or jeffbr will call you a nutter. Sheeple like YOU are the reason the truth will never come out. You can admit that there are a lot of questions, but can't even look at any alternative explanations without starting with the insults and questioning people's sanity. With that attitude, I have a feeling that if someone dropped the smoking gun on your lap, you still wouldn't believe. And THAT is why there would be no revolution if one appeared....there would still be a huge percentage of people that just don't WANT to believe. (WMD, anyone?)
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and figure that your reading comprehension skills are subpar. I stated as clearly as possible that I didn't have the answers, but that I also didn't feel the need to fill the void with fairy tales. People who question aren't nutters. People who "know the truth" no matter how outlandish and sci-fi are the nutters.
And you lambast people who "don't WANT to believe", but I think the converse exists here as well. There are plenty of people tho want to believe that this was an inside job, and will create whatever outlandish tales they can to attempt to back reinforce that belief.
"I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
You could take some people back in a time machine...show them exactly what happened close up and get everyone to personally confess and they still wouldn't believe what was represented outside the media.
One thing is for certain here either way, something has been done on purpose, whether it's the with holding of information or the act itself. One of the two is intentional and for a reason. This is highly abnormal consisidering the scope of the tragedy.
It just don't add up Gus...
It it's all legit....let the information flow out...and lets all move on.
But no. Genie in a bottle... There's a reason for that. But even that's a secret. Secret secrets...
someone is pissing up my leg here.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and figure that your reading comprehension skills are subpar. I stated as clearly as possible that I didn't have the answers, but that I also didn't feel the need to fill the void with fairy tales. People who question aren't nutters. People who "know the truth" no matter how outlandish and sci-fi are the nutters.
And you lambast people who "don't WANT to believe", but I think the converse exists here as well. There are plenty of people tho want to believe that this was an inside job, and will create whatever outlandish tales they can to attempt to back reinforce that belief.
I have yet to tell an outlandish tale, I just said I don't think an airliner hit the pentagon. I've also said why. So why don't you explain to us why you believe the government when they said the plane vaporized. Cause that shit is a fairy tale. Where are the two 6,000lbs plane engines? poof! Vaporized! Right...
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and figure that your reading comprehension skills are subpar. I stated as clearly as possible that I didn't have the answers, but that I also didn't feel the need to fill the void with fairy tales. People who question aren't nutters. People who "know the truth" no matter how outlandish and sci-fi are the nutters.
And you lambast people who "don't WANT to believe", but I think the converse exists here as well. There are plenty of people tho want to believe that this was an inside job, and will create whatever outlandish tales they can to attempt to back reinforce that belief.
Has anyone in this thread said they "know the truth" about what happened? That's why you're part of the problem. It's pretty easy to say you don't know the answers. But if no one ever raises an alternative opinion on what happened, how will you ever find the truth? Even tho you agree with LikeAnOcean's statement, you still call people nutters. But compared to the official report, what he says is "nutter". So you are judging harshly based on semantics and personal opinion.
Of course the "obverse" exists (me no comprehend?). I am only one step further than you....I believe the answers should be:
1.Yes, some of them 2.some of them - definitely, and 3.duh. I don't pretend to KNOW...but I don't waste my energy insulting people with differing views. I pretty much quoted you just to call you a sheep since you like the nutter phrase so much. I think I'm going to find a neat-o catch phrase to insult people with every time they talk about something they saw on the idiot box and took as gospel.
I have yet to tell an outlandish tale, I just said I don't think an airliner hit the pentagon.
That is an outlandish tale. People saw a plane hit the Pentagon. People were on it. Where are the people who were on that flight, if a plane didn't crash? Was there rapture right before the plane hit or what? Sounds about as plausible as anything you're considering ...
everybody wants the most they can possibly get
for the least they could possibly do
That is an outlandish tale. People saw a plane hit the Pentagon. People were on it. Where are the people who were on that flight, if a plane didn't crash? Was there rapture right before the plane hit or what? Sounds about as plausible as anything you're considering ...
You are believing eye witnesses? That is your only source? Did you know there are numerous reports of another low flying aircraft in the area, some also say that they saw a smaller plane hit the pentagon. So we have conflicting reports, let's look at the crash site. Where is the wreckage of a passenger airliner? How does a plane and everything on board vaporize? I really want to know.
Look, you're not going to convince me there was some vast government conspiracy to blow up the Pentagon. You just aren't.
So I've got nothing more to say here.
hahaha.....and therein lies the rub.
Can't come up with a retort and you just basically say fuck you and walk away.....EXACTLY why nothing would happen if government complicity was proven.
You are believing eye witnesses? That is your only source? Did you know there are numerous reports of another low flying aircraft in the area, some also say that they saw a smaller plane hit the pentagon. So we have conflicting reports, let's look at the crash site. Where is the wreckage of a passenger airliner? How does a plane and everything on board vaporize? I really want to know.
Kucinich saw a UFO...so a plane hit the pentagon...
hehe
Oh .....hold...on...wait a sec...maybe a UFO hit the pentagon?!...
Thats it!
yes ...brainstorming!
hi-five.
It was a flying salami...probably a kosher. This explains why the engines cooked in the fire and the CIA agents unknowingly ate the engines with a little mustard thinking it was a staffed buffet function.
Also steel can evaporate pretty fast just in air sometimes you know... Strange things happen at the entrance to the porthole to hell...
The porthole follows Cheney like a shadow and he was there that day.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
hahaha.....and therein lies the rub.
Can't come up with a retort and you just basically say fuck you and walk away.....EXACTLY why nothing would happen if government complicity was proven.
Jesus Christ, you people are warped. If government complicity was PROVEN it would be one thing. But nothing has been PROVEN, has it? Just a bunch of crackpot conjecture, trying to tell me the government blew up the Pentagon, knocked down the WTC towers, and talked Osama bin Laden into taking credit.
I thought the Bush administration is the most incompetent administration in the history of the country. yet they pulled this off? Apparently, Bush is a fucking diabolical genius.
Give me a break. I'm not walking away because I don't have a retort. I'm walking away because the whole idea is ludicrous. The more logical theory: The dude that already tried to blow up the WTC once actually pulled it off.
If someone told me, "The sky is made of spaghetti" I wouldn't bother myself with arguing with them. I'd just walk away. And maybe call a mental health professional.
everybody wants the most they can possibly get
for the least they could possibly do
Look, you're not going to convince me there was some vast government conspiracy to blow up the Pentagon. You just aren't.
So I've got nothing more to say here.
Yeah I guess not, your narrow minded pro USA ego would explode if you actually looked at any of the evidence. "I know what happened on 9/11 cause the government told me so."
Jesus Christ, you people are warped. If government complicity was PROVEN it would be one thing. But nothing has been PROVEN, has it? Just a bunch of crackpot conjecture, trying to tell me the government blew up the Pentagon, knocked down the WTC towers, and talked Osama bin Laden into taking credit.
I thought the Bush administration is the most incompetent administration in the history of the country. yet they pulled this off? Apparently, Bush is a fucking diabolical genius.
Give me a break. I'm not walking away because I don't have a retort. I'm walking away because the whole idea is ludicrous. The more logical theory: The dude that already tried to blow up the WTC once actually pulled it off.
If someone told me, "The sky is made of spaghetti" I wouldn't bother myself with arguing with them. I'd just walk away. And maybe call a mental health professional.
wtf are you talking about? you're doing exactly what I was talkinga bout....you can't answer a question, so you go on the attack.... There are legit questions coming from both sides...why do the people on your side of the argument get so fucking defensive? Why the insults?
Seriously...you know the problems that people see with what you're saying, but you ignore them...
the Bin Laden video is questionable at best. The ONLY time he's admitted it, as far as I know...and he's denied involvement many times.
The Bush administration has a lot of brilliant people in it, just cause they're 'led' by a monkey doesn't mean they aren't capable of pulling the wool over people's eyes...Iraq proved that.
The first WTC attack had alleged US involvement....
But you ignore these things because, "you're never going to convince me there was some vast government conspiracy". I'm not trying to convince you of anything...just have some respect.
and all the evidence overwhelmingly leads to el queda. conspiracy wackos only ask a bunch of questions that have no answers.
That is why they are very good questions to ask.
Gee all they have to do is give back all the tapes they took from the flight path of the pentagon crash so the public can actually see a plane!
Oh and as one of my buds pointed out over dinner last evening....How do you pick the pentagon out from 30 thou with the communication on how to get there turned off? We could see a lucky shot at the towers if you happened to be flying along the coast with very, very good eyesight. But how about the pentagon with no navigation and some very tight turns? See jlew and how you'd march on Washington. There is a very valid question that has no answer. Oh boy us crackheads and our questions. I suppose the FAA were still showing the way to the pentagon ala the flight path the plane was already on? Right!!!
I've also said why. So why don't you explain to us why you believe the government when they said the plane vaporized.
no you havent. prove this statement. you cant. and guess what else......take a guess as to what happens to most of a plane flying at 500+mph and hits one of the most solid concrete structures ever built. I'll give you 2 guesses, smart people only need one.
Gee all they have to do is give back all the tapes they took from the flight path of the pentagon crash so the public can actually see a plane!
Oh and as one of my buds pointed out over dinner last evening....How do you pick the pentagon out from 30 thou with the communication on how to get there turned off? We could see a lucky shot at the towers if you happened to be flying along the coast with very, very good eyesight. But how about the pentagon with no navigation and some very tight turns? See jlew and how you'd march on Washington. There is a very valid question that has no answer. Oh boy us crackheads and our questions. I suppose the FAA were still showing the way to the pentagon ala the flight path the plane was already on? Right!!!
Comments
Ha, you're too much, man. You really take yourself too seriously. Threatening people on a message board, and then acting like the victim. Good one.
agree post #90 is officially recognized and noted as the one...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
a little soft music may help....
hehe
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
ooooo ... burn.
for the least they could possibly do
The US public would do nothing. Why? I am not sure... maybe they can't read.
See: 9/11 Commission Report
It's like the who farted thing...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
hmm... doubt it... im not that easily played.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Probably the same as what happened here after The Dismissal cate. Fuck all.
And what kind of irrefutable evidence could they provide now anyway?
It's all subjective. You can't even get people to agree what happened here, there's no way they'd do bugger all even if the majority of them did agree.
*~You're IT Bert!~*
Hold on to the thread
The currents will shift
If this came to light......Back in DC security forces would move up to DEFCON 6 and there is no such thing. All hell would break loose, similar to the blackout of 77' in Brooklyn, NYC....I was there.
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
Why don't you take a stab at answering some of those unanswered questions instead of belittling those that do? oh no, don't ask questions or jeffbr will call you a nutter. Sheeple like YOU are the reason the truth will never come out. You can admit that there are a lot of questions, but can't even look at any alternative explanations without starting with the insults and questioning people's sanity. With that attitude, I have a feeling that if someone dropped the smoking gun on your lap, you still wouldn't believe. And THAT is why there would be no revolution if one appeared....there would still be a huge percentage of people that just don't WANT to believe. (WMD, anyone?)
Structural engineer now too, huh? you wear a lot of hats amigo.
don't pretend like you're any different than anyone else that has read up on WTC7. There are experts on both sides of this story, so don't pretend your opinions have more weight. You are digesting what you read like anyone else.
Do I think our government was behind 911?.. No.
Do I think they knew it was going to happen?.. Maybe.
Did they use our fears to push an agenda?.. Definitely.
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and figure that your reading comprehension skills are subpar. I stated as clearly as possible that I didn't have the answers, but that I also didn't feel the need to fill the void with fairy tales. People who question aren't nutters. People who "know the truth" no matter how outlandish and sci-fi are the nutters.
And you lambast people who "don't WANT to believe", but I think the converse exists here as well. There are plenty of people tho want to believe that this was an inside job, and will create whatever outlandish tales they can to attempt to back reinforce that belief.
This is exactly what I think, as well. Nicely said.
One thing is for certain here either way, something has been done on purpose, whether it's the with holding of information or the act itself. One of the two is intentional and for a reason. This is highly abnormal consisidering the scope of the tragedy.
It just don't add up Gus...
It it's all legit....let the information flow out...and lets all move on.
But no. Genie in a bottle... There's a reason for that. But even that's a secret. Secret secrets...
someone is pissing up my leg here.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I have yet to tell an outlandish tale, I just said I don't think an airliner hit the pentagon. I've also said why. So why don't you explain to us why you believe the government when they said the plane vaporized. Cause that shit is a fairy tale. Where are the two 6,000lbs plane engines? poof! Vaporized! Right...
Has anyone in this thread said they "know the truth" about what happened? That's why you're part of the problem. It's pretty easy to say you don't know the answers. But if no one ever raises an alternative opinion on what happened, how will you ever find the truth? Even tho you agree with LikeAnOcean's statement, you still call people nutters. But compared to the official report, what he says is "nutter". So you are judging harshly based on semantics and personal opinion.
Of course the "obverse" exists (me no comprehend?). I am only one step further than you....I believe the answers should be:
1.Yes, some of them 2.some of them - definitely, and 3.duh. I don't pretend to KNOW...but I don't waste my energy insulting people with differing views. I pretty much quoted you just to call you a sheep since you like the nutter phrase so much. I think I'm going to find a neat-o catch phrase to insult people with every time they talk about something they saw on the idiot box and took as gospel.
That is an outlandish tale. People saw a plane hit the Pentagon. People were on it. Where are the people who were on that flight, if a plane didn't crash? Was there rapture right before the plane hit or what? Sounds about as plausible as anything you're considering ...
for the least they could possibly do
a plane disappearing during the complete chaos of every plane in NA being grounded, while multiple war game simulations ocur?.....
OR...
Massive steel jet engines evaporating, shrinking and changing makes because of an explosion?
just sayin.
You are believing eye witnesses? That is your only source? Did you know there are numerous reports of another low flying aircraft in the area, some also say that they saw a smaller plane hit the pentagon. So we have conflicting reports, let's look at the crash site. Where is the wreckage of a passenger airliner? How does a plane and everything on board vaporize? I really want to know.
You have a better one?
Look, you're not going to convince me there was some vast government conspiracy to blow up the Pentagon. You just aren't.
So I've got nothing more to say here.
for the least they could possibly do
hahaha.....and therein lies the rub.
Can't come up with a retort and you just basically say fuck you and walk away.....EXACTLY why nothing would happen if government complicity was proven.
Kucinich saw a UFO...so a plane hit the pentagon...
hehe
Oh .....hold...on...wait a sec...maybe a UFO hit the pentagon?!...
Thats it!
yes ...brainstorming!
hi-five.
It was a flying salami...probably a kosher. This explains why the engines cooked in the fire and the CIA agents unknowingly ate the engines with a little mustard thinking it was a staffed buffet function.
Also steel can evaporate pretty fast just in air sometimes you know... Strange things happen at the entrance to the porthole to hell...
The porthole follows Cheney like a shadow and he was there that day.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Jesus Christ, you people are warped. If government complicity was PROVEN it would be one thing. But nothing has been PROVEN, has it? Just a bunch of crackpot conjecture, trying to tell me the government blew up the Pentagon, knocked down the WTC towers, and talked Osama bin Laden into taking credit.
I thought the Bush administration is the most incompetent administration in the history of the country. yet they pulled this off? Apparently, Bush is a fucking diabolical genius.
Give me a break. I'm not walking away because I don't have a retort. I'm walking away because the whole idea is ludicrous. The more logical theory: The dude that already tried to blow up the WTC once actually pulled it off.
If someone told me, "The sky is made of spaghetti" I wouldn't bother myself with arguing with them. I'd just walk away. And maybe call a mental health professional.
for the least they could possibly do
Yeah I guess not, your narrow minded pro USA ego would explode if you actually looked at any of the evidence. "I know what happened on 9/11 cause the government told me so."
wtf are you talking about? you're doing exactly what I was talkinga bout....you can't answer a question, so you go on the attack.... There are legit questions coming from both sides...why do the people on your side of the argument get so fucking defensive? Why the insults?
Seriously...you know the problems that people see with what you're saying, but you ignore them...
the Bin Laden video is questionable at best. The ONLY time he's admitted it, as far as I know...and he's denied involvement many times.
The Bush administration has a lot of brilliant people in it, just cause they're 'led' by a monkey doesn't mean they aren't capable of pulling the wool over people's eyes...Iraq proved that.
The first WTC attack had alleged US involvement....
But you ignore these things because, "you're never going to convince me there was some vast government conspiracy". I'm not trying to convince you of anything...just have some respect.
That is why they are very good questions to ask.
Gee all they have to do is give back all the tapes they took from the flight path of the pentagon crash so the public can actually see a plane!
Oh and as one of my buds pointed out over dinner last evening....How do you pick the pentagon out from 30 thou with the communication on how to get there turned off? We could see a lucky shot at the towers if you happened to be flying along the coast with very, very good eyesight. But how about the pentagon with no navigation and some very tight turns? See jlew and how you'd march on Washington. There is a very valid question that has no answer. Oh boy us crackheads and our questions. I suppose the FAA were still showing the way to the pentagon ala the flight path the plane was already on? Right!!!
you have taken the prize for the two most opposite statements in the history of this message board.
no you havent. prove this statement. you cant. and guess what else......take a guess as to what happens to most of a plane flying at 500+mph and hits one of the most solid concrete structures ever built. I'll give you 2 guesses, smart people only need one.
http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm
http://antiprotester.blogspot.com/2006/07/flight-77-simulation-demolishes.html
and the ever popular http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=6
and I'll ask again, something that all I have gotten is a LOL from you.
what the fuck is this??
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/Flight_77_wreckage_at_Pentagon.jpg/800px-Flight_77_wreckage_at_Pentagon.jpg&imgrefurl=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Flight_77_wreckage_at_Pentagon.jpg&h=600&w=800&sz=144&hl=en&start=1&um=1&tbnid=o2SUB15SKq5CnM:&tbnh=107&tbnw=143&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dlight%2B77%2Bwreckage%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN
dude you really need to work on your english.
I wouldn't expect a real answer from you my man. Typical when you are painted in a corner and don't have a valid answer. What is next say I'm gay?