Well, you certainly have more faith in our crooked government than I ever will.
It's not just the government, it's the people who they ask to conduct the investigation. The investigation is done by people outside and inside the government...engineers, air traffic controllers, etc. etc. If it WAS just the government investigating the events, I'd be very skeptical about the findings. But that's not the case.
It's not just the government, it's the people who they ask to conduct the investigation. The investigation is done by people outside and inside the government...engineers, air traffic controllers, etc. etc. If it WAS just the government investigating the events, I'd be very skeptical about the findings. But that's not the case.
thank you...
Take me piece by piece..... Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
It's not just the government, it's the people who they ask to conduct the investigation. The investigation is done by people outside and inside the government...engineers, air traffic controllers, etc. etc. If it WAS just the government investigating the events, I'd be very skeptical about the findings. But that's not the case.
The 9/11 comission is simply politicians. And if the investagtion is brought on by the govt you better believe it's going to say what they think it should.
Why are independent investigations and research also backed by professionals in their field so uncredible for you?
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
well i have more faith in our governments version of what happened than i do of you and your boyfriends version....
We didn't do the original research, obviously. The more I read the more it brings up glaring questions that haven't been answered. Also I have nothing to gain by lying about it.
I don't think you're going to believe anything posted no matter what if it doesn't already fit your current stance.
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
The 9/11 comission is simply politicians. And if the investagtion is brought on by the govt you better believe it's going to say what they think it should.
Why are independent investigations and research also backed by professionals in their field so uncredible for you?
ya know.....
your boyfriend has been kind enough to share his thoughts of what he believes happened .......
remotes control planes....
explosive devices.....
government involved.....
etc.
etc.
etc.
im just curious... do you agree 100% with his theories???
or do you have any theories of your own???
Take me piece by piece..... Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
I haven't developed my own theory on why exactly the buildings collapsed, but I don't think it matters much when thinking about the event. I'm not gonna go through it all again, because I've talked about it in another thread here.
I'm just saying this discussion always goes around in circles because people cannot stick to making an argument in favor of their own theory (or a theory they agree with)...they can only stick to asking more and more questions to try and discredit certain other theories.
Well people keep asking questions about different aspects of the collaspe and then so those questions are debated again. We may know that the towers didn't fall due to the melted steel but not everyone knows that.
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
your boyfriend has been kind enough to share his thoughts of what he believes happened .......
remotes control planes....
explosive devices.....
government involved.....
etc.
etc.
etc.
im just curious... do you agree 100% with his theories???
or do you have any theories of your own???
I don't agree 100% with a lot of things especially when there are some aspects that just can't be known. It's foolish to devote yourself to one theory when it's really is just a theory. I just read what's out there. I do, however, find the official version to be very lacking and so much makes no sense. So I'll debate the points I'm familiar with until I am presented with something that causes me to change my mind. I haven't seen that yet.
Let's look at some basic questions that don't add up....
How can we believe that the Pentagon has no better surveillence than the tapes they've shown us?
Why never let any of the other tapes of the Pentagon being hit be seen? There's at least 2 more videotapes of the Pentagon being hit...one from a gas station across the street and another from a Hotel across 95.
What about all the money that was made on put options on the 2 airlines used that day?
What about the firefighters who were there that say they heard and saw explosions?
Why seal the recordings of the firefighters communications?
Why not let Sybil Edmonds speak publicly about her claims about several warnings about the attack?
What about Able Danger?
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
has anyone watch the 'the improbable collapse' video i posted?
here's another, this one's just over 10 min.... in the months before 9/11 we got 23 warnings about a terrorist attack from 11 foreign governments...some of those warnings even mentioned using planes...hmmm 2 months before the cia said a terrorist attack was imminent?? and the head of the fbi testified ashcroft told him that he didn't want to hear anymore about the warnings??? not even a month before teh fbi's leading authority on al qaeda resigns b/c of 'repeated obstructions into investigations into al qaeda'??
standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
I don't agree 100% with a lot of things especially when there are some aspects that just can't be known. It's foolish to devote yourself to one theory when it's really is just a theory. I just read what's out there. I do, however, find the official version to be very lacking and so much makes no sense. So I'll debate the points I'm familiar with until I am presented with something that causes me to change my mind. I haven't seen that yet.
Let's look at some basic questions that don't add up....
How can we believe that the Pentagon has no better surveillence than the tapes they've shown us?
Why never let any of the other tapes of the Pentagon being hit be seen? There's at least 2 more videotapes of the Pentagon being hit...one from a gas station across the street and another from a Hotel across 95.
What about all the money that was made on put options on the 2 airlines used that day?
What about the firefighters who were there that say they heard and saw explosions?
Why seal the recordings of the firefighters communications?
Why not let Sybil Edmonds speak publicly about her claims about several warnings about the attack?
What about Able Danger?
ok....so you have a lot of questions about what exactly happened that day....as im sure most of us do...
but given all the research you have obviously done...
lets here your theory......what do you believe happened???
Take me piece by piece..... Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
don't believe everything you read. there alot of nut jobs in this world.
we have every right to question any and all possible theories about this tragedy,
but i'm sorry some facts are just indisputable, and i think its time to face them.
don't believe everything you read. there alot of nut jobs in this world.
I don't.
we have every right to question any and all possible theories about this tragedy,
but i'm sorry some facts are just indisputable, and i think its time to face them.[/quote]
which undisputable facts are you talking about?
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
ok....so you have a lot of questions about what exactly happened that day....as im sure most of us do...
but given all the research you have obviously done...
lets here your theory......what do you believe happened???
I don't have a postive answer to what happened. The planes could have been controlled by remote, they could have let it happen, it could have been Islamic terrorists. I don't have any definite answers and I dont' pretend to. How can I know for sure what happened any more than you. I think the evidence supports a controlled demolition and if fire didn't bring down the towers then why did building 7 come down. And the planes took sharp turns that more than likely wouldn't be possible for amateur pilots to pull off. Also look at the percision hit at the pentagon. So it's hard for me to believe these guys could have pulled the whole thing off given the circumstances.
What's your theory then? Do you have any answers to the questions I posed?
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
To possibly settle this once and for all, why don't we pick one particular event and debate it to an end. Let's go with the Pentagon. If I can show that a plane most likely hit that building and not a missile or UAV then that would bring your "theory" to a screeching halt, would it not? I mean if that part is not a conspiracy then the rest must not be either, correct? Or if you's like we could debate the collapse of the WTC 1 or 2. Or even WTC 7. Let's pick one and stay on topic and acknowledge points made by both sides and debate them till they are resolved. Staying on topic is clearly the only way to gain any ground on this issue.
I don't agree 100% with a lot of things especially when there are some aspects that just can't be known. It's foolish to devote yourself to one theory when it's really is just a theory. I just read what's out there. I do, however, find the official version to be very lacking and so much makes no sense. So I'll debate the points I'm familiar with until I am presented with something that causes me to change my mind. I haven't seen that yet.
Let's look at some basic questions that don't add up....
How can we believe that the Pentagon has no better surveillence than the tapes they've shown us?
Why never let any of the other tapes of the Pentagon being hit be seen? There's at least 2 more videotapes of the Pentagon being hit...one from a gas station across the street and another from a Hotel across 95.
What about all the money that was made on put options on the 2 airlines used that day?
What about the firefighters who were there that say they heard and saw explosions?
Why seal the recordings of the firefighters communications?
Why not let Sybil Edmonds speak publicly about her claims about several warnings about the attack?
What about Able Danger?
reason for not releasing pentagon surveillance?? national security??? policy???
firefighters hearing explosions??? well 2 planes loaded with jet fuel just crashed in to the twin towers....i bet they heard fucking explosions...
but i dont think it was explosive devices planted in the building....
able danger?? from what i have just read...
the U.S. senate intelligence committee concluded able danger did not identify Atta or any other hijackers before the 9-11 attacks....
my theory???
im gonna go with 19 hijackers with links to al-queda and osama bin laden hijacked 4 planes
Take me piece by piece..... Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
Why never let any of the other tapes of the Pentagon being hit be seen? There's at least 2 more videotapes of the Pentagon being hit...one from a gas station across the street and another from a Hotel across 95.
national security. what did you want to see? do you believe a missile hit the pentagon?
i thought the u.s. government use remotely controlled planes...you have to pick something and go with it...you're all over the place...was it a terror attack or not? if not, this is insignificant...if so, then it shows that, at least, there is a possiblity the the u.s. government knew that this could happen and used it as the catalyst to do what they wanted to do...expand the military, instill a culture of fear in the citizenry, develop a more comprehensive military world presence, and foster a take no prisoners and ask no questons situation (a blank check) for going to war with an ideology. so, what is it? do you understand how this really pokes holes in your "internal demolition" of WTC buildings 1 and 2?
has anyone watch the 'the improbable collapse' video i posted?
here's another, this one's just over 10 min.... in the months before 9/11 we got 23 warnings about a terrorist attack from 11 foreign governments...some of those warnings even mentioned using planes...hmmm 2 months before the cia said a terrorist attack was imminent?? and the head of the fbi testified ashcroft told him that he didn't want to hear anymore about the warnings??? not even a month before teh fbi's leading authority on al qaeda resigns b/c of 'repeated obstructions into investigations into al qaeda'??
i thought the u.s. government use remotely controlled planes...you have to pick something and go with it...you're all over the place...was it a terror attack or not? if not, this is insignificant...if so, then it shows that, at least, there is a possiblity the the u.s. government knew that this could happen and used it as the catalyst to do what they wanted to do...expand the military, instill a culture of fear in the citizenry, develop a more comprehensive military world presence, and foster a take no prisoners and ask no questons situation (a blank check) for going to war with an ideology. so, what is it? do you understand how this really pokes holes in your "internal demolition" of WTC buildings 1 and 2?
i am sticking w/ it...i already stated it could have been the hijackers thought it was really a hijacking but were instead set-up...so they hijack the planes, as they planned, then control was taken over...and i never stated remote control planes were what i believed, i said it was possible.
standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
why do i have ot pick a single theory and stick w/ it? i don't know what happened any more than any of you do... i think the official story is bs. i have stated in past threads that i am torn between 3 options
-certain ppl in the govt pulled it off
-certain ppl in the govt helped pull it off
-certain ppl in the govt knew and let it happen
i don't pick 1 of those over the other, but there are possibilities to them. this does not take away from anything i posted. remote control planes COULD have happened, they ahve the technology and they could've easily have done this, just b/c i said i tcould have happened doesn't mean i 100% believe it did. and i don't understand why i'm asked what i *think* then have it turned into what can be proven...the nist theory is a theory just like the 3 above only 1 has an official governmental stamp on them.
and saturnal, i have posted several things to back up the theories.
standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/LAW/01/14/sept11.records/index.html
Her son was one of the 343 firefighters who lost their lives trying to help others caught in the twin towers of the World Trade Center after hijackers flew two jetliners into the buildings. At least 2,752 people died at Ground Zero in New York.
The group announced plans to ask the New York Court of Appeals to review a recent court decision that bars the release of certain documents related to the attack.
The group told reporters that all September 11 documents, including transcripts of internal fire department reviews and tapes of 911 calls, should be unsealed.
standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
Pentagon being hit by a plane. Woman standing in hole apparently not being burnt. Debunking "Jenga Theory". WTC 7....
You name it. As I stated before, use the search function, it is your friend.
Handball against the curtains...
i don't want to use the search function...i'm asking you for the millionth time: why did building 7 fall?
standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
i am sticking w/ it...i already stated it could have been the hijackers thought it was really a hijacking but were instead set-up...so they hijack the planes, as they planned, then control was taken over...and i never stated remote control planes were what i believed, i said it was possible.
And also, if it wasn't flown by remote control then there had to be tampered software to pull off those sharp turning maneuvers. So that lays further doubt. Of course, we have no way of proving either but they are worth discussing. I, myself, don't know how easy it would be to tamper with software vs. fly planes via remote control so I can't really say which is more feasible. Also, just because one is more feasible doesn't mean that was the way it went down, either.
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
Anyone who denies what happened on 9/11 is completely and utterly insane.
Everyone saw the planes hit the buildings. Everyone saw them explode. Everyone saw them fall. There is zero evidence to support these conspiracy claims.
This is serious, serious insanity.
They sure are funny though. They devote so much time to it and it just makes them so mad when people call them nutjobs. They hate Bush so much they cannot possibly conceive that Islamic extremists INDEPENDENTLY destroyed our buildings because they ACTUALLY WANT US OUT OF THEIR LANDS. No, it makes more sense to blame Bush so that he could have a war with Saddam and leave a pathetic legacy for his presidency. THAT makes much more sense.
This is a product of idiots living in the present and not thinking past their own shadow.
All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell
And also, if it wasn't flown by remote control then there had to be tampered software to pull off those sharp turning maneuvers. So that lays further doubt. Of course, we have no way of proving either but they are worth discussing. I, myself, don't know how easy it would be to tamper with software vs. fly planes via remote control so I can't really say which is more feasible. Also, just because one is more feasible doesn't mean that was the way it went down, either.
Hahahahahahahahahaaha
::breathes::
Hahahahahahahaahahahaha
::breaths::
::burps::
::drinks beer::
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
-Enoch Powell
Anyone who denies what happened on 9/11 is completely and utterly insane.
Everyone saw the planes hit the buildings. Everyone saw them explode. Everyone saw them fall. There is zero evidence to support these conspiracy claims.
This is serious, serious insanity.
They sure are funny though. They devote so much time to it and it just makes them so mad when people call them nutjobs. They hate Bush so much they cannot possibly conceive that Islamic extremists INDEPENDENTLY destroyed our buildings because they ACTUALLY WANT US OUT OF THEIR LANDS. No, it makes more sense to blame Bush so that he could have a war with Saddam and leave a pathetic legacy for his presidency. THAT makes much more sense.
This is a product of idiots living in the present and not thinking past their own shadow.
We are here debating this. If you have nothing but personal insults to sling around, just go away. All you're going to do is get yourself banned for acting like a hateful, little child. You really should work on some anger management.
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
And also, if it wasn't flown by remote control then there had to be tampered software to pull off those sharp turning maneuvers. So that lays further doubt. Of course, we have no way of proving either but they are worth discussing. I, myself, don't know how easy it would be to tamper with software vs. fly planes via remote control so I can't really say which is more feasible. Also, just because one is more feasible doesn't mean that was the way it went down, either.
wouldn't the software be the same...so that even with remote control, the planes could not make those maneuvers...???
i've said it before...if the government could pull this off, what makes you, or anyone, believe that your efforts are worthwhile? if they can get away with that, can't they get away with anything?
Comments
It's not just the government, it's the people who they ask to conduct the investigation. The investigation is done by people outside and inside the government...engineers, air traffic controllers, etc. etc. If it WAS just the government investigating the events, I'd be very skeptical about the findings. But that's not the case.
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
The 9/11 comission is simply politicians. And if the investagtion is brought on by the govt you better believe it's going to say what they think it should.
Why are independent investigations and research also backed by professionals in their field so uncredible for you?
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
We didn't do the original research, obviously. The more I read the more it brings up glaring questions that haven't been answered. Also I have nothing to gain by lying about it.
I don't think you're going to believe anything posted no matter what if it doesn't already fit your current stance.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
your boyfriend has been kind enough to share his thoughts of what he believes happened .......
remotes control planes....
explosive devices.....
government involved.....
etc.
etc.
etc.
im just curious... do you agree 100% with his theories???
or do you have any theories of your own???
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
Well people keep asking questions about different aspects of the collaspe and then so those questions are debated again. We may know that the towers didn't fall due to the melted steel but not everyone knows that.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
I don't agree 100% with a lot of things especially when there are some aspects that just can't be known. It's foolish to devote yourself to one theory when it's really is just a theory. I just read what's out there. I do, however, find the official version to be very lacking and so much makes no sense. So I'll debate the points I'm familiar with until I am presented with something that causes me to change my mind. I haven't seen that yet.
Let's look at some basic questions that don't add up....
How can we believe that the Pentagon has no better surveillence than the tapes they've shown us?
Why never let any of the other tapes of the Pentagon being hit be seen? There's at least 2 more videotapes of the Pentagon being hit...one from a gas station across the street and another from a Hotel across 95.
What about all the money that was made on put options on the 2 airlines used that day?
What about the firefighters who were there that say they heard and saw explosions?
Why seal the recordings of the firefighters communications?
Why not let Sybil Edmonds speak publicly about her claims about several warnings about the attack?
What about Able Danger?
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
here's another, this one's just over 10 min.... in the months before 9/11 we got 23 warnings about a terrorist attack from 11 foreign governments...some of those warnings even mentioned using planes...hmmm 2 months before the cia said a terrorist attack was imminent?? and the head of the fbi testified ashcroft told him that he didn't want to hear anymore about the warnings??? not even a month before teh fbi's leading authority on al qaeda resigns b/c of 'repeated obstructions into investigations into al qaeda'??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iswVPEZvFZM
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
but given all the research you have obviously done...
lets here your theory......what do you believe happened???
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
Because there are so few of them. They are completely out-numbered by people who say the opposite.
don't believe everything you read. there alot of nut jobs in this world.
we have every right to question any and all possible theories about this tragedy,
but i'm sorry some facts are just indisputable, and i think its time to face them.
I don't.
we have every right to question any and all possible theories about this tragedy,
but i'm sorry some facts are just indisputable, and i think its time to face them.[/quote]
which undisputable facts are you talking about?
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
I don't have a postive answer to what happened. The planes could have been controlled by remote, they could have let it happen, it could have been Islamic terrorists. I don't have any definite answers and I dont' pretend to. How can I know for sure what happened any more than you. I think the evidence supports a controlled demolition and if fire didn't bring down the towers then why did building 7 come down. And the planes took sharp turns that more than likely wouldn't be possible for amateur pilots to pull off. Also look at the percision hit at the pentagon. So it's hard for me to believe these guys could have pulled the whole thing off given the circumstances.
What's your theory then? Do you have any answers to the questions I posed?
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
well i know for a fact that i saw with my own eyes those planes
slam into those towers and kill thousands of innocent people.
i can't possibly imagine what gain our government would have by
'staging' or orchestrating such a horrific event or any part of it.
maybe i'm just being naive, but thats my opinion.
there are a lot of unanswered questions though, i will agree with that.
Hmmm...
Pentagon being hit by a plane. Woman standing in hole apparently not being burnt. Debunking "Jenga Theory". WTC 7....
You name it. As I stated before, use the search function, it is your friend.
Handball against the curtains...
How 'bout it?
firefighters hearing explosions??? well 2 planes loaded with jet fuel just crashed in to the twin towers....i bet they heard fucking explosions...
but i dont think it was explosive devices planted in the building....
able danger?? from what i have just read...
the U.S. senate intelligence committee concluded able danger did not identify Atta or any other hijackers before the 9-11 attacks....
my theory???
im gonna go with 19 hijackers with links to al-queda and osama bin laden hijacked 4 planes
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
who said we should believe what? pentagon has never claimed to not have better footage. but you know, I know they probably do.
national security. what did you want to see? do you believe a missile hit the pentagon?
investors get lucky all the time.
call me crazy but when a entire floor weighing thousands of tons crashes down on the floor below, it might, just might, sound like an explosion.
they arent.
who? what about it?
from my window to yours
i am sticking w/ it...i already stated it could have been the hijackers thought it was really a hijacking but were instead set-up...so they hijack the planes, as they planned, then control was taken over...and i never stated remote control planes were what i believed, i said it was possible.
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
-certain ppl in the govt pulled it off
-certain ppl in the govt helped pull it off
-certain ppl in the govt knew and let it happen
i don't pick 1 of those over the other, but there are possibilities to them. this does not take away from anything i posted. remote control planes COULD have happened, they ahve the technology and they could've easily have done this, just b/c i said i tcould have happened doesn't mean i 100% believe it did. and i don't understand why i'm asked what i *think* then have it turned into what can be proven...the nist theory is a theory just like the 3 above only 1 has an official governmental stamp on them.
and saturnal, i have posted several things to back up the theories.
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
why is it a matter of national security to see footage from a camera at a gas station and hotel????
ppl also profit from criminal acts all the time
what about the ones who said they saw the explosion?
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/LAW/01/14/sept11.records/index.html
Her son was one of the 343 firefighters who lost their lives trying to help others caught in the twin towers of the World Trade Center after hijackers flew two jetliners into the buildings. At least 2,752 people died at Ground Zero in New York.
The group announced plans to ask the New York Court of Appeals to review a recent court decision that bars the release of certain documents related to the attack.
The group told reporters that all September 11 documents, including transcripts of internal fire department reviews and tapes of 911 calls, should be unsealed.
http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=211335&highlight=bitch
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
i don't want to use the search function...i'm asking you for the millionth time: why did building 7 fall?
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
And also, if it wasn't flown by remote control then there had to be tampered software to pull off those sharp turning maneuvers. So that lays further doubt. Of course, we have no way of proving either but they are worth discussing. I, myself, don't know how easy it would be to tamper with software vs. fly planes via remote control so I can't really say which is more feasible. Also, just because one is more feasible doesn't mean that was the way it went down, either.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
Anyone who denies what happened on 9/11 is completely and utterly insane.
Everyone saw the planes hit the buildings. Everyone saw them explode. Everyone saw them fall. There is zero evidence to support these conspiracy claims.
This is serious, serious insanity.
They sure are funny though. They devote so much time to it and it just makes them so mad when people call them nutjobs. They hate Bush so much they cannot possibly conceive that Islamic extremists INDEPENDENTLY destroyed our buildings because they ACTUALLY WANT US OUT OF THEIR LANDS. No, it makes more sense to blame Bush so that he could have a war with Saddam and leave a pathetic legacy for his presidency. THAT makes much more sense.
This is a product of idiots living in the present and not thinking past their own shadow.
-Enoch Powell
Hahahahahahahahahaaha
::breathes::
Hahahahahahahaahahahaha
::breaths::
::burps::
::drinks beer::
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
-Enoch Powell
Do you have anything to add?
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
We are here debating this. If you have nothing but personal insults to sling around, just go away. All you're going to do is get yourself banned for acting like a hateful, little child. You really should work on some anger management.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
wouldn't the software be the same...so that even with remote control, the planes could not make those maneuvers...???
i've said it before...if the government could pull this off, what makes you, or anyone, believe that your efforts are worthwhile? if they can get away with that, can't they get away with anything?
from my window to yours