Potential Ticketmaster Draw Issues
Comments
-
Removal of GA-only option and then priority (because it was too confusing for TM and 10C) was supposed to eliminate these conspiracy theories.Post edited by AmishGuy91 on0
-
You people are all cherry picking. You choose to only pay attention to the people who got GA to multiple shows rather than all of the people who did not.End of story.0
-
I'm not cherry picking, I'm pointing out how this new system is unfairmookieblalock said:You people are all cherry picking. You choose to only pay attention to the people who got GA to multiple shows rather than all of the people who did not.End of story.0 -
One thing to keep in mind. Both here and on Facebook, there are people complaining this morning who never actually entered the lottery. They registered for Verified Fan and thought that was the lottery, or they went to add a show on the last day and cancelled out all their previous picks. Not saying that describes any of you, but it does happen each year.___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
I entered the lottery, trust me, have my confirmationJimmyV said:One thing to keep in mind. Both here and on Facebook, there are people complaining this morning who never actually entered the lottery. They registered for Verified Fan and thought that was the lottery, or they went to add a show on the last day and cancelled out all their previous picks. Not saying that describes any of you, but it does happen each year.0 -
I believe you. I think most people who spend time here probably did. Facebook is another story.NewfieintheUSA said:
I entered the lottery, trust me, have my confirmationJimmyV said:One thing to keep in mind. Both here and on Facebook, there are people complaining this morning who never actually entered the lottery. They registered for Verified Fan and thought that was the lottery, or they went to add a show on the last day and cancelled out all their previous picks. Not saying that describes any of you, but it does happen each year.___________________________________________
"...I changed by not changing at all..."0 -
10C & Ticketmaster could easily shed some light on this. A little transparency would go a long way.mookieblalock said:You people are all cherry picking. You choose to only pay attention to the people who got GA to multiple shows rather than all of the people who did not.End of story.
Right now, they're encouraging people to register for as many shows as possible and sort it all out later.
I don't want to be a Pearl Jam ticket broker. I just want 10C tix for the shows I plan to attend.0 -
True thatJimmyV said:
I believe you. I think most people who spend time here probably did. Facebook is another story.NewfieintheUSA said:
I entered the lottery, trust me, have my confirmationJimmyV said:One thing to keep in mind. Both here and on Facebook, there are people complaining this morning who never actually entered the lottery. They registered for Verified Fan and thought that was the lottery, or they went to add a show on the last day and cancelled out all their previous picks. Not saying that describes any of you, but it does happen each year.0 -
Ever since the 10c did away with the postcard system, every method they have utilized to sell tickets has been deemed “unfair” by people on the boards. And it will never change. Ever.NewfieintheUSA said:
I'm not cherry picking, I'm pointing out how this new system is unfairmookieblalock said:You people are all cherry picking. You choose to only pay attention to the people who got GA to multiple shows rather than all of the people who did not.End of story.0 -
Listen I understood the priority system and how to use it. If I selected a high demand show as my top priority and didnt win, that was on me. I could almost guarantee a win or 2 if I set my priorities right. This complete randomness is asinine.mookieblalock said:
Ever since the 10c did away with the postcard system, every method they have utilized to sell tickets has been deemed “unfair” by people on the boards. And it will never change. Ever.NewfieintheUSA said:
I'm not cherry picking, I'm pointing out how this new system is unfairmookieblalock said:You people are all cherry picking. You choose to only pay attention to the people who got GA to multiple shows rather than all of the people who did not.End of story.0 -
The system is not unfair, all members have an equal chance to win tickets to every show, for all seating levels. Each show is an individual draw with an equal chance for all members. It is the results that could be perceived as unfair as members were highly successful and others got nothing. Some people win at blackjack, some people lose their shirts. And if you selected GA/P1 for your only option and got nothing you should not be surprised.0
-
How is a system where one person wins GA to the same 4 shows I put in for and I get nothing not unfair?Get_Right said:The system is not unfair, all members have an equal chance to win tickets to every show, for all seating levels. Each show is an individual draw with an equal chance for all members. It is the results that could be perceived as unfair as members were highly successful and others got nothing. Some people win at blackjack, some people lose their shirts. And if you selected GA/P1 for your only option and got nothing you should not be surprised.0 -
Again; this goes back to not understanding basic statistics. Also, there weren’t a majority of people winning 4 GA shows. Some did. Most did not. Some got shut out completely, most did not get shut out completely. It’s really that simple.NewfieintheUSA said:
How is a system where one person wins GA to the same 4 shows I put in for and I get nothing not unfair?Get_Right said:The system is not unfair, all members have an equal chance to win tickets to every show, for all seating levels. Each show is an individual draw with an equal chance for all members. It is the results that could be perceived as unfair as members were highly successful and others got nothing. Some people win at blackjack, some people lose their shirts. And if you selected GA/P1 for your only option and got nothing you should not be surprised.0 -
NewfieintheUSA said:
How is a system where one person wins GA to the same 4 shows I put in for and I get nothing not unfair?Get_Right said:The system is not unfair, all members have an equal chance to win tickets to every show, for all seating levels. Each show is an individual draw with an equal chance for all members. It is the results that could be perceived as unfair as members were highly successful and others got nothing. Some people win at blackjack, some people lose their shirts. And if you selected GA/P1 for your only option and got nothing you should not be surprised.
As I said, it is the results that may be unfair, but the method of randomly selecting from the entire pool for each show is not. You did not get picked from the pool of tickets with the highest demand and the lowest likelihood of success. Especially if it was one of the major cities. Your request did not get picked and someone else's did. That is all there is to it.0 -
That's my point exactly, a system that allows this is BS.Get_Right said:NewfieintheUSA said:
How is a system where one person wins GA to the same 4 shows I put in for and I get nothing not unfair?Get_Right said:The system is not unfair, all members have an equal chance to win tickets to every show, for all seating levels. Each show is an individual draw with an equal chance for all members. It is the results that could be perceived as unfair as members were highly successful and others got nothing. Some people win at blackjack, some people lose their shirts. And if you selected GA/P1 for your only option and got nothing you should not be surprised.
As I said, it is the results that may be unfair, but the method of randomly selecting from the entire pool for each show is not. You did not get picked from the pool of tickets with the highest demand and the lowest likelihood of success. Especially if it was one of the major cities. Your request did not get picked and someone else's did. That is all there is to it.0 -
It sucks when you lose and it's great when you win.
It would be great if it worked out that we all get about 50% of what we put in for, but it doesn't. I've been completely shut out a few times when putting in for only home shows or what I really wanted, so last leg I put in for 5 shows to make sure I got something and got all 5
. Then got to choose where I really wanted to travel and where it made the most sense, since it wasn't realistic to go to Chicago, St Paul, and Austin for me. Ended up doing back to back in Austin. This time around I got 2 out of 4, no MSG
when in the past I probably only would have put in for MSG................
Randall's Island 9/29/96, Continental Arena 9/8/98, MSG 9/10/98, Jones Beach 8/23/00, 8/24/00, 8/25/00, Nassau Coliseum 4/30/03, MSG 7/8/03, 7/9/03, Continental Arena 6/1/06, 6/3/06, MSG 6/24/08, 6/25/08, Spectrum 10/30/09, 10/31/09, MSG 5/20/10, 5/21/10, PJ20 9/3/11, 9/4/11, Charlottesville 10/29/13, Charlotte 10/30/13, Global Citizen 9/26/15, Raleigh 4/20/16 Baltimore 3/28/20 Austin 9/18/23, 9/19/23, Forum 5/21/24, Baltimore 9/12/24, Fenway 9/17/24, Nashville 5/6/25, 5/8/250 -
I understand basic statistics, trust me. Applied math major here. My point is they shouldn't have a system that allows these types of outcomes.mookieblalock said:
Again; this goes back to not understanding basic statistics. Also, there weren’t a majority of people winning 4 GA shows. Some did. Most did not. Some got shut out completely, most did not get shut out completely. It’s really that simple.NewfieintheUSA said:
How is a system where one person wins GA to the same 4 shows I put in for and I get nothing not unfair?Get_Right said:The system is not unfair, all members have an equal chance to win tickets to every show, for all seating levels. Each show is an individual draw with an equal chance for all members. It is the results that could be perceived as unfair as members were highly successful and others got nothing. Some people win at blackjack, some people lose their shirts. And if you selected GA/P1 for your only option and got nothing you should not be surprised.0 -
NewfieintheUSA said:
That's my point exactly, a system that allows this is BS.Get_Right said:NewfieintheUSA said:
How is a system where one person wins GA to the same 4 shows I put in for and I get nothing not unfair?Get_Right said:The system is not unfair, all members have an equal chance to win tickets to every show, for all seating levels. Each show is an individual draw with an equal chance for all members. It is the results that could be perceived as unfair as members were highly successful and others got nothing. Some people win at blackjack, some people lose their shirts. And if you selected GA/P1 for your only option and got nothing you should not be surprised.
As I said, it is the results that may be unfair, but the method of randomly selecting from the entire pool for each show is not. You did not get picked from the pool of tickets with the highest demand and the lowest likelihood of success. Especially if it was one of the major cities. Your request did not get picked and someone else's did. That is all there is to it.
I do agree and think that the most feasible solution is to limit the number of requests or wins for each member. Adding any other levels of complexity such as seniority or priority would likely be rejected by TM.0 -
TM does priority for other bandsGet_Right said:NewfieintheUSA said:
That's my point exactly, a system that allows this is BS.Get_Right said:NewfieintheUSA said:
How is a system where one person wins GA to the same 4 shows I put in for and I get nothing not unfair?Get_Right said:The system is not unfair, all members have an equal chance to win tickets to every show, for all seating levels. Each show is an individual draw with an equal chance for all members. It is the results that could be perceived as unfair as members were highly successful and others got nothing. Some people win at blackjack, some people lose their shirts. And if you selected GA/P1 for your only option and got nothing you should not be surprised.
As I said, it is the results that may be unfair, but the method of randomly selecting from the entire pool for each show is not. You did not get picked from the pool of tickets with the highest demand and the lowest likelihood of success. Especially if it was one of the major cities. Your request did not get picked and someone else's did. That is all there is to it.
I do agree and think that the most feasible solution is to limit the number of requests or wins for each member. Adding any other levels of complexity such as seniority or priority would likely be rejected by TM.0 -
If you’re an applied math major, then you’re intelligent enough to see that what I am saying is factually accurate and you are complaining just to complain because it didn’t work out for you. I am sincerely sorry for your disappointment. I’ve been there as have many others over the years. There is never going to be a perfect system. People who didn’t get tickets they wanted will complain after every sale until the end of the bands touring days.NewfieintheUSA said:
I understand basic statistics, trust me. Applied math major here. My point is they shouldn't have a system that allows these types of outcomes.mookieblalock said:
Again; this goes back to not understanding basic statistics. Also, there weren’t a majority of people winning 4 GA shows. Some did. Most did not. Some got shut out completely, most did not get shut out completely. It’s really that simple.NewfieintheUSA said:
How is a system where one person wins GA to the same 4 shows I put in for and I get nothing not unfair?Get_Right said:The system is not unfair, all members have an equal chance to win tickets to every show, for all seating levels. Each show is an individual draw with an equal chance for all members. It is the results that could be perceived as unfair as members were highly successful and others got nothing. Some people win at blackjack, some people lose their shirts. And if you selected GA/P1 for your only option and got nothing you should not be surprised.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help



