Official 2023 Ticket Lottery Results Thread

1117118120122123278

Comments

  • bbiggsbbiggs Posts: 6,945
    Sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you 
    Sometimes you're the hammer, sometimes you're the nail.  A lot of us became nails today.

  • Hurls15Hurls15 Posts: 161
    It would be entirely reasonable that the first pass for each event would be drawing “Reserved Only” for seats, as some/many would have specified that option for physical/health reasons (along with the fact that —without a “GA Only” option—they’re the only ones who listed a specific preference). It’s common in this type of thing to assign the most restrictive set first. If enough people checked that option (including many who likely ALSO checked “GA/Reserved”), then there may not have been many Reserved seats left once they got to drawing Reserved seats for people who only checked “GA/Reserved” and didn’t get GA. 
    I think that is a good hypothesis on how the algorithm was set up.  But someone who was Selecting the GA or RES option only wouldn't have thought that if they didn't get GA that their RES request would be subordinate to someone who chose RES only.  That's the frustrating part. 
  • NewfieintheUSANewfieintheUSA Posts: 2,414
    It would be entirely reasonable that the first pass for each event would be drawing “Reserved Only” for seats, as some/many would have specified that option for physical/health reasons (along with the fact that —without a “GA Only” option—they’re the only ones who listed a specific preference). It’s common in this type of thing to assign the most restrictive set first. If enough people checked that option (including many who likely ALSO checked “GA/Reserved”), then there may not have been many Reserved seats left once they got to drawing Reserved seats for people who only checked “GA/Reserved” and didn’t get GA. 
    Exact this is not reasonable at all
    Oh?
    Why would it be reasonable to select from the Reserved only entries first for Reserved seats before selecting from the GA Reserved entries? It's not reasonable at all.
  • bbiggsbbiggs Posts: 6,945
    Still trying to wrap my head around - and there will never be an answer - how folks had Reserved Chicago as a third and fourth option and got seats but many people had them as 1 or 2 and didn’t.  Mind boggling.
    It is unexplainable despite the fact that many are trying to do so.

  • KevinmanKevinman Posts: 1,909
    bbiggs said:
    Sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you 
    Sometimes you're the hammer, sometimes you're the nail.  A lot of us became nails today.

    Many more got screwed
    I am lost, I'm no guide, but I'm by your side

    06.27.98  Alpine Valley
    10.08.00  Alpine Valley
    09.23.02  Chicago
    06.18.03  Chicago | 06.21.03  Alpine Valley
    10.03.04  Grand Rapids
    10.05.05  Chicago
    05.16.06  Chicago | 05.17.06  Chicago | 06.29.06  Milwaukee
    08.02.07  Chicago | 08.05.07  Chicago
    08.23.09  Chicago | 08.24.09  Chicago
    05.07.10  Noblesville | 05.09.10  Cleveland
    09.03.11  Alpine Valley | 09.04.11  Alpine Valley
    07.19.13  Chicago
    10.17.14  Moline
    08.20.16  Chicago
    08.18.18  Chicago
    09.18.22  St. Louis
    09.05.23 Chicago
  • machinehummachinehum Posts: 166
    edited April 2023
     
    Post edited by machinehum on
  • Save Who said:
    Well at least the Tigers won tonight
    Bullpen is looking good.
  • NewfieintheUSANewfieintheUSA Posts: 2,414
    bbiggs said:
    Still trying to wrap my head around - and there will never be an answer - how folks had Reserved Chicago as a third and fourth option and got seats but many people had them as 1 or 2 and didn’t.  Mind boggling.
    It is unexplainable despite the fact that many are trying to do so.

    Exactly 
  • RatherStarvedRatherStarved Posts: 4,873
    Kevinman said:
    bbiggs said:
    Sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you 
    Sometimes you're the hammer, sometimes you're the nail.  A lot of us became nails today.

    Many more got screwed
    Hall of fame reply 
    PJ: 2013: London (ON); Buffalo; 2014: Cincinnati; 2016: Sunrise, Miami, Toronto 1-2, Wrigley 2; 2018: London (UK) 1, Milan, Padova, Sea 2, Wrigley 1-2, Fenway 1-2; 2021: SHN, Ohana, Ohana Encore 1-2; 2022: LA 1-2, Phx, Oak 1-2, Fresno, Copenhagen, Hyde Park 1-2; Quebec, Ottawa, Hamilton, Toronto; MSG, Camden, Nashville, Louisville, St. Louis, OKC; 2023: St. Paul 1-2, Chicago 1-2; Fort Worth 2; Austin 1-2; 2024:  Vancouver 1-2, LV 1-2, LA 1-2, Napa, Barcelona 1-2
     
    EV Solo: 2017 Louisville and Franklin, 2018 Ohana, 2019 Innings Fest, Berlin, Düsseldorf, Dublin and Ohana; 2021 Ohana Friday (from beach) and Saturday; 2022 Earthlings Newark; 2023 Innings Fest and Benoraya 1-2.

    Gutted:  London 2 2018, Sacramento 2022, Noblesville 2023
  • rscreechrscreech Posts: 7
    Austin n1 sec 211 693xxx at 7:52 pm est

    Still waiting to hear anything on Indy…
  • machinehummachinehum Posts: 166
    edited April 2023
     
    Post edited by machinehum on
  • I’m still curious where they’re hiding the Chicago side/behind stage and the Indy lawn tickets
    Chicago 8/23/09, Wrigley 8/18/18, St. Louis 9/18/22, OKC 9/20/22
    St. Paul 9/2/23 Chicago 9/5-9/7 23
    EV Chicago 2/9 - 2/10/22
  • camhendycamhendy Posts: 164
    I chose one show because that's all I could afford. My Ten Club number is 323xxx and I ended up in well back in section 115 in Austin. I clicked the GA/reserved option for the show. Not going to complain too much. Pearl Jam hasn't been within an hour of me in nine years, and I'll be in the building for it. Though, I did have much better seats through Ten Club in 2013 when they played Dallas. Like, way better.
    Is this Austin 1? I haven't read this whole forum but I wonder if something weird happened there. I had it first priority and didn't receive confirmation until a few hours ago. Same thoughts seat wise
    2013: London
    2016: Ottawa
    2018: Wrigley 1 & 2
    2022: Ottawa, Hamilton, Toronto
    2023: Innings Fest (EV), Ft Worth 1 & 2, Austin 1 & 2
    2024: Seattle 1 & 2


  • NewfieintheUSANewfieintheUSA Posts: 2,414
    It would be entirely reasonable that the first pass for each event would be drawing “Reserved Only” for seats, as some/many would have specified that option for physical/health reasons (along with the fact that —without a “GA Only” option—they’re the only ones who listed a specific preference). It’s common in this type of thing to assign the most restrictive set first. If enough people checked that option (including many who likely ALSO checked “GA/Reserved”), then there may not have been many Reserved seats left once they got to drawing Reserved seats for people who only checked “GA/Reserved” and didn’t get GA. 
    Exact this is not reasonable at all
    Oh?
    Why would it be reasonable to select from the Reserved only entries first for Reserved seats before selecting from the GA Reserved entries? It's not reasonable at all.
    I said why in the very first sentence: “ some/many would have specified that option for physical/health reasons”. 
    But that still doesn't make it reasonable. If they were going to do it that way, it makes no sense to get rid of the GA only option. 
  • eyeameyeam Western Mass. Posts: 38
    edited April 2023
    FWIW, I requested reserved seats for 1. Indianapolis; 2. Chicago 1; 3. Chicago 2; including side/rear for Chicago. I haven’t received any email whether positive or negative. Not sure what to make of it, but I’m clinging to (dwindling) hope.  #218xxx
    Post edited by eyeam on
    Hartford ’98. Columbus ’00. Seattle 2 ’02. Albany, Buffalo, Montreal, Hershey ’03. Boston 1 ’04. Montreal, Ottawa, St. John’s 1 ’05. Toronto 1,2, Albany, Camden 1,2 ’06. Camden 1,2, Hartford, Mansfield 1,2 ’08. Toronto, Chicago 1, Phila 1-4 ’09. Columbus, Cleveland, Buffalo, Hartford, Boston ’10. Missoula ’12. Worcester 2, Hartford ’13. Fenway 1,2 ’16. Québec City, Ottawa ’20. Québec City, Ottawa, Camden ’22. Chicago 1,2, Noblesville ’23. Missoula, Noblesville, Fenway 1,2  ’24.
    EV Montreal 1,2 ’08. Albany 1,2, Baltimore 1,2, Nashville 1,2 ’09. Hartford ’11.
  • RyanRyan Posts: 1,095
    riley540 said:
    About 12 hours in now. Still waiting my my only pick… St. Paul night 1. There’s still time. Slow and steady wins the race 
    And I got St. Paul 1 with my 4th pick.
    But I didn’t get Austin 1 with my 2nd pick, or St Paul 2 with my third pick.
    2003 - June 15 Fargo
    2005 - Sept 1 George, Sept 8 Winnipeg
    2006 - May 9/10 Toronto, June 26/27 St. Paul, July 22/23 George, Oct 21/22 Mountain View
    2007 - Aug 2/5 Chicago
    2008 - June 22 Washington, June 24/25 New York
    2009 - Aug 21 Toronto, Aug 23/24 Chicago, Sept 21/22 Seattle, Oct 27/28/30/31 Philadelphia
    2010 - May 15 Hartford, May 17 Boston, Oct 23/24 Mountain View
    2011 - Sept 3/4 Alpine Valley, Sept 11/12 Toronto, Sept 17 Winnipeg, Sept 19 Saskatoon
    2012 - Sept 30 Missoula
    2013 - July 16 London, July 19 Chicago, Oct 12 Buffalo, Dec 2 Calgary, Dec 4 Vancouver, Dec 6 Seattle
    2014 - Oct 16 Detroit, Oct 19 St. Paul, Oct 20 Milwaukee
    2015 - Sept 23 (Colbert)/Sept 26, New York
    2016 - Apr 28/29 Philadelphia, May 10/12 Toronto, Aug 20/22 Chicago
  • IlliniGuy76IlliniGuy76 Posts: 563
    It would be entirely reasonable that the first pass for each event would be drawing “Reserved Only” for seats, as some/many would have specified that option for physical/health reasons (along with the fact that —without a “GA Only” option—they’re the only ones who listed a specific preference). It’s common in this type of thing to assign the most restrictive set first. If enough people checked that option (including many who likely ALSO checked “GA/Reserved”), then there may not have been many Reserved seats left once they got to drawing Reserved seats for people who only checked “GA/Reserved” and didn’t get GA. 
    Exact this is not reasonable at all
    Oh?
    Why would it be reasonable to select from the Reserved only entries first for Reserved seats before selecting from the GA Reserved entries? It's not reasonable at all.
    I said why in the very first sentence: “ some/many would have specified that option for physical/health reasons”. 
    I didn’t choose OR as I’ve been dealing with a nerve issue in my leg - I can’t stand in GA. 
    Again choosing OR doesn’t at all explain how ppl had 3rd and 4tj choices. And got seats but those with 1/2 didn’t; OR doesn’t explain that.
    or you can come to terms and realize
    you're the only one who can forgive yourself oh yeah...
    makes much more sense to live in the present tense...

    1995:  7/11 (Chicago) 2009: 8/23, 8/24 (Chicago) 2010:  5/9 (Cleveland) 2013 7/19 (Chicago) 2016: 4/9 (Miami), 5/1 (NYC), 8/20 & 8/22 (Chicago)
    2018: 8/18 (Chicago) & 8/20 (Chicago) 2022:  9/11 (NYC), 9/18 (STL) 2023:  9/5 (Chicago), 9/7 (Chicago) 2024:  8/29 (Chicago), 8/31 (Chicago)

  • KevinmanKevinman Posts: 1,909
    I’m still curious where they’re hiding the Chicago side/behind stage and the Indy lawn tickets
    Good question…..I think tomorrow will bring more tickets awarded…..probably not any answers though
    I am lost, I'm no guide, but I'm by your side

    06.27.98  Alpine Valley
    10.08.00  Alpine Valley
    09.23.02  Chicago
    06.18.03  Chicago | 06.21.03  Alpine Valley
    10.03.04  Grand Rapids
    10.05.05  Chicago
    05.16.06  Chicago | 05.17.06  Chicago | 06.29.06  Milwaukee
    08.02.07  Chicago | 08.05.07  Chicago
    08.23.09  Chicago | 08.24.09  Chicago
    05.07.10  Noblesville | 05.09.10  Cleveland
    09.03.11  Alpine Valley | 09.04.11  Alpine Valley
    07.19.13  Chicago
    10.17.14  Moline
    08.20.16  Chicago
    08.18.18  Chicago
    09.18.22  St. Louis
    09.05.23 Chicago
  • Evel KEvel K Posts: 526
    It would be entirely reasonable that the first pass for each event would be drawing “Reserved Only” for seats, as some/many would have specified that option for physical/health reasons (along with the fact that —without a “GA Only” option—they’re the only ones who listed a specific preference). It’s common in this type of thing to assign the most restrictive set first. If enough people checked that option (including many who likely ALSO checked “GA/Reserved”), then there may not have been many Reserved seats left once they got to drawing Reserved seats for people who only checked “GA/Reserved” and didn’t get GA. 
    You’re nuts, but thank you for your perspective!
    I mean, I’ve been doing this for a living for 30 years, but whatever floats your boat. 
    Indy was my only show. Picked Reserved Only and scored. 
    Things were different then
  • machinehummachinehum Posts: 166
    edited April 2023
     
    Post edited by machinehum on
  • riley540riley540 Denver Colorado Posts: 1,132
    Ryan said:
    riley540 said:
    About 12 hours in now. Still waiting my my only pick… St. Paul night 1. There’s still time. Slow and steady wins the race 
    And I got St. Paul 1 with my 4th pick.
    But I didn’t get Austin 1 with my 2nd pick, or St Paul 2 with my third pick.
    Jeez Ryan, making me feel even better over here!! Lol. Congrats! Something weird happened on the back end. Super happy for everyone who got picked regardless 
  • darwinstheorydarwinstheory Posts: 6,276
    ZoSoTim said:
    TonyB said:
    I put in Indy Deer Creek GA res and got section F front row behind the Board.  247xxx
    I put in Indy GA Res and got jack shit
    Put in for:
    Chi 2
    Chi 1
    Indy 
    StP 2

    And also recieved jack shit.

    My fiancé put in for 
    Chi 1
    Indy
    Chi 2
     
    And worse than receiving jack shit, she received jack shit and still has me as a fiancé. 
    I’ll take her to the FTW shows. Does she put out? ;)
    What's your credit score? :rofl:
    "A smart monkey doesn't monkey around with another monkey's monkey" - Darwin's Theory
  • EA17313EA17313 Posts: 62
    Are people who are saying they didn’t get it say that because they were explicitly rejected or because they just haven’t heard back yet? 
  • riley540riley540 Denver Colorado Posts: 1,132
    EA17313 said:
    Are people who are saying they didn’t get it say that because they were explicitly rejected or because they just haven’t heard back yet? 
    Haven’t heard back yet 
  • JC29866JC29866 Posts: 85
    Red 81 said:
    JC29866 said:
    I got both Chicago 1 (1st priority) and Chicago 2 (2nd priority),  great seats in 101 1st row ..#168xxx

    Clicked all boxes as 10club advised…

    The system works!   
    Really, tell that to someone who had Chicago 2 as priority 1 and didnt get a ticket. (clicked all boxes as well)
    It’s a lottery.  I’ve been shut out many times over the years, and won many times as well.  The lottery is a chance for everyone,  not a guarantee.  If you don’t hit the Powerball jackpot, you can’t blame the nice lady pulling the number balls. 
  • PJNBPJNB Posts: 13,424
    It would be entirely reasonable that the first pass for each event would be drawing “Reserved Only” for seats, as some/many would have specified that option for physical/health reasons (along with the fact that —without a “GA Only” option—they’re the only ones who listed a specific preference). It’s common in this type of thing to assign the most restrictive set first. If enough people checked that option (including many who likely ALSO checked “GA/Reserved”), then there may not have been many Reserved seats left once they got to drawing Reserved seats for people who only checked “GA/Reserved” and didn’t get GA. 
    Exact this is not reasonable at all
    Oh?
    Why would it be reasonable to select from the Reserved only entries first for Reserved seats before selecting from the GA Reserved entries? It's not reasonable at all.
    I said why in the very first sentence: “ some/many would have specified that option for physical/health reasons”. 
    Lol what am I even reading here. 
  • NewfieintheUSANewfieintheUSA Posts: 2,414
    JC29866 said:
    Red 81 said:
    JC29866 said:
    I got both Chicago 1 (1st priority) and Chicago 2 (2nd priority),  great seats in 101 1st row ..#168xxx

    Clicked all boxes as 10club advised…

    The system works!   
    Really, tell that to someone who had Chicago 2 as priority 1 and didnt get a ticket. (clicked all boxes as well)
    It’s a lottery.  I’ve been shut out many times over the years, and won many times as well.  The lottery is a chance for everyone,  not a guarantee.  If you don’t hit the Powerball jackpot, you can’t blame the nice lady pulling the number balls. 
    But in this lottery noone with a priority 2 should win ahead of a priority one for the same seat type
  • Anybody know when the emails are coming out to “claim” the tix? Got both Ft Worth reserved. Member number in 700ks. Had one in the 3-400ks but boned myself by letting my membership lapse
    Wrigley 7/19/2013
    Philadelphia 10/22/2013
    Baltimore 10/27/2013
    Hampton 4/18/2016
    Ft. Worth 9/13/2023
    Ft. Worth 9/15/2023
    Wrigley 8/31/2024
    Baltimore 9/12/2024
    Fenway 9/15/2024
  • NewfieintheUSANewfieintheUSA Posts: 2,414
    PJNB said:
    It would be entirely reasonable that the first pass for each event would be drawing “Reserved Only” for seats, as some/many would have specified that option for physical/health reasons (along with the fact that —without a “GA Only” option—they’re the only ones who listed a specific preference). It’s common in this type of thing to assign the most restrictive set first. If enough people checked that option (including many who likely ALSO checked “GA/Reserved”), then there may not have been many Reserved seats left once they got to drawing Reserved seats for people who only checked “GA/Reserved” and didn’t get GA. 
    Exact this is not reasonable at all
    Oh?
    Why would it be reasonable to select from the Reserved only entries first for Reserved seats before selecting from the GA Reserved entries? It's not reasonable at all.
    I said why in the very first sentence: “ some/many would have specified that option for physical/health reasons”. 
    Lol what am I even reading here. 
    Who knows
  • KevinmanKevinman Posts: 1,909
    JC29866 said:
    Red 81 said:
    JC29866 said:
    I got both Chicago 1 (1st priority) and Chicago 2 (2nd priority),  great seats in 101 1st row ..#168xxx

    Clicked all boxes as 10club advised…

    The system works!   
    Really, tell that to someone who had Chicago 2 as priority 1 and didnt get a ticket. (clicked all boxes as well)
    It’s a lottery.  I’ve been shut out many times over the years, and won many times as well.  The lottery is a chance for everyone,  not a guarantee.  If you don’t hit the Powerball jackpot, you can’t blame the nice lady pulling the number balls. 
    What’s the point of priority then?   It doesn’t make sense.
    I am lost, I'm no guide, but I'm by your side

    06.27.98  Alpine Valley
    10.08.00  Alpine Valley
    09.23.02  Chicago
    06.18.03  Chicago | 06.21.03  Alpine Valley
    10.03.04  Grand Rapids
    10.05.05  Chicago
    05.16.06  Chicago | 05.17.06  Chicago | 06.29.06  Milwaukee
    08.02.07  Chicago | 08.05.07  Chicago
    08.23.09  Chicago | 08.24.09  Chicago
    05.07.10  Noblesville | 05.09.10  Cleveland
    09.03.11  Alpine Valley | 09.04.11  Alpine Valley
    07.19.13  Chicago
    10.17.14  Moline
    08.20.16  Chicago
    08.18.18  Chicago
    09.18.22  St. Louis
    09.05.23 Chicago
Sign In or Register to comment.