Pearl Jam's new album ”Dark Matter” ! Single out!

Flavafraz

I would just end up as a door stop in stones basement anyway along side the other one

igotid88

I do hope we get a theatrical release like they were going to do with Gigaton.

strilo

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

bigbiggzy

bigbiggzy said:

STONE…. WHERE. IS. THE. NEW. SINGLE??

STONE?!?!?!?  

demetrios

igotid88 said:

I do hope we get a theatrical release like they were going to do with Gigaton.

Me too. Not sure why they haven't released it yet on Blu-ray. 

BF25394

strilo said:

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

If you think Ed believes that today, you're kidding yourself.

Tim Simmons

demetrios said:

igotid88 said:

I do hope we get a theatrical release like they were going to do with Gigaton.

Me too. Not sure why they haven't released it yet on Blu-ray. 

NO UPSCALE!

Tim Simmons

BF25394 said:

strilo said:

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

If you think Ed believes that today, you're kidding yourself.

go on.

BF25394

Tim Simmons said:

BF25394 said:

strilo said:

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

If you think Ed believes that today, you're kidding yourself.

go on.

Nowadays, Ed seems to be very comfortable with the Hollywood-entertainment-industrial complex of which the Grammys are a part.

demetrios

Tim Simmons said:

demetrios said:

igotid88 said:

I do hope we get a theatrical release like they were going to do with Gigaton.

Me too. Not sure why they haven't released it yet on Blu-ray. 

NO UPSCALE!

Yes, no upscale please.

SM187650

Tour info is great but do we have any updates or rumors on this upcoming release?? Stone??? 

igotid88

BF25394 said:

Tim Simmons said:

BF25394 said:

strilo said:

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

If you think Ed believes that today, you're kidding yourself.

go on.

Nowadays, Ed seems to be very comfortable with the Hollywood-entertainment-industrial complex of which the Grammys are a part.

You can be both comfortable and not care if you win or not. I don't see them actively campaigning. Not like Taylor Swift who's main mission is to get Grammys.

Spiritual_Chaos

igotid88 said:

 Not like Taylor Swift who's main mission is to get Grammys.

Doubt that is her main mission.

eeriepadave

strilo said:

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tf9V0hwJ6qk

igotid88

Spiritual_Chaos said:

igotid88 said:

 Not like Taylor Swift who's main mission is to get Grammys.

Doubt that is her main mission.

Well one of her main missions. 

CROJAM95

Tease a riff or something

lets go

Tim Simmons

igotid88 said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

igotid88 said:

 Not like Taylor Swift who's main mission is to get Grammys.

Doubt that is her main mission.

Well one of her main missions. 

Maybe she just writes songs and everything else that comes along with it is gravy?

Tim Simmons

BF25394 said:

Tim Simmons said:

BF25394 said:

strilo said:

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

If you think Ed believes that today, you're kidding yourself.

go on.

Nowadays, Ed seems to be very comfortable with the Hollywood-entertainment-industrial complex of which the Grammys are a part.

I guess we’ll see. While I agree Ed is more comfortable with where he is, he hasn’t shown otherwise with the Grammys. 

BF25394

igotid88 said:

BF25394 said:

Tim Simmons said:

BF25394 said:

strilo said:

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

If you think Ed believes that today, you're kidding yourself.

go on.

Nowadays, Ed seems to be very comfortable with the Hollywood-entertainment-industrial complex of which the Grammys are a part.

You can be both comfortable and not care if you win or not. I don't see them actively campaigning. Not like Taylor Swift who's main mission is to get Grammys.

Not caring whether you win a Grammy, and not campaigning for one, are not the same thing as believing (or saying publicly) that a Grammy is meaningless.

Taylor Swift is a prolific and phenomenally talented artist whose main mission is clearly writing and performing songs. She doesn't write those songs to win Grammys; they give her Grammys because the songs are so good.

BF25394

Tim Simmons said:

BF25394 said:

Tim Simmons said:

BF25394 said:

strilo said:

igotid88 said:

RiotAct10 said:

I believe the Stones new album was released after the cut-off date, so it won't be eligible until next year, but the single was released before the cut-off date, so it was eligible. If Pearl Jam's album is any good (which I expect it to be, just saying) then next year I could see Watt being nominated for Producer of the Year with the Stones record and PJs records both counting for next year, along with whatever else is put out with his production (Paul McCartney perhaps?)

Pearl Jam won't get nominated unfortunately

I agree with Jeff and Ed. Grammys are fucking stupid and meaningless.

If you think Ed believes that today, you're kidding yourself.

go on.

Nowadays, Ed seems to be very comfortable with the Hollywood-entertainment-industrial complex of which the Grammys are a part.

I guess we’ll see. While I agree Ed is more comfortable with where he is, he hasn’t shown otherwise with the Grammys. 

Pearl Jam hasn't been nominated for a Grammy in over a decade, and hasn't been nominated for a high-profile Grammy in over a quarter-century, so there hasn't really been much opportunity for him to weigh in on the topic lately. 21st-century Ed does seem to believe that the Oscars are meaningful. I just think that, if he were to express a similar opinion to the one he expressed on the telecast back when he had a very different public demeanor, he would potentially offend a lot of his pals in the celebrity-industrial complex and that doesn't seem to be something he'd want to do.