The biggest dot is, as trump announces he is running this fall, all of us who so see him as a maniacal killer, need to ask our Republican friends and colleagues, “so you are going to vote for a murderer and cop killer?”
Murderer is quite dramatic....I'd advise against it.
Now - inciting violence that resulted in people dying.... 100%.
It would be very interesting to see where we would be if the pandemic had never happened...
1) Would trump have been re-elected? 2) If Biden had won....would the economy doing better have made 2024 more of a shoe-in?
There are plenty of reasons for a level-headed former republican (meaning pre-maga) to not vote for Trump. A crazy amount of reasons actually. And unfortunately there are also a crazy amount of reasons to not vote for Biden. For a conservative voter the issues where I see these guys losing votes are:
Trump: 1) The fact that he doesn't believe in American Democracy 2) The fact that he doesn't support our intelligence agency 3) His alignment with dictators and strong men
Biden: 1) It's the economy stupid 2) Abortion and some other cultural issues 3) Immigration
For me, it's a no brainer as if you lose American Democracy you eventually will lose many of the the other things that matter to you, including a varying number of your freedoms depending on who you are and what you believe. It's unfortunate that is the case, but that is how I see it.
I think the calculus for that changed after Hutchinson's testimony. Trump knew in advance his people had weapons, guns, spears and bear spray, trump brought them to dc and sent them to congress armed and loaded. Trump literally sent an armed militia to congress with the full knowledge they were armed and dangerous. He should have also known they also had explosives and military assault weapons in advance, as that became public knowledge on Jan 7.
For people willing to limit this now to “inciting violence” is unfair to the truth. People need to be held accountable for how they vote. And we have the right to speak honestly about that. If trumps own campaign manager says these deaths are fully and completely the responsibility of trump, by all logic the man is a maniacal killer, and we have the right to call him that. Publicly.
Perhaps. I certainly believe his words led to the deaths. I just think it's still a tough leap for some to say he is a murder. But maybe you are right.
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
It was a textbook. And I am not sure if driving an agenda or not, cause if I had read it without the outrage out there I may not have thought much of anything. I was reading them trying to find where the outrage came from and found some examples I thought made sense.
Again - it is a pretty weird thing to make the top of your (the general you) worry list.
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
How do you drive an agenda with a small % you ask? By starting off small and then slowly increasing it. It's called desensitizing.
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
How do you drive an agenda with a small % you ask? By starting off small and then slowly increasing it. It's called desensitizing.
So, are kids going to turn gay or feel guilty of their race because of a math word problem? And is that the “agenda?”
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
How do you drive an agenda with a small % you ask? By starting off small and then slowly increasing it. It's called desensitizing.
So, are kids going to turn gay or feel guilty of their race because of a math word problem? And is that the “agenda?”
So I wonder how you would feel about a math problem involving a political topic that you hold a different opinion on? Cause that's how I was trying to look at it. Then again, as I said, if I wasn't specifically looking for it I might not have noticed at all.
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
How do you drive an agenda with a small % you ask? By starting off small and then slowly increasing it. It's called desensitizing.
So, are kids going to turn gay or feel guilty of their race because of a math word problem? And is that the “agenda?”
No that won't turn them gay but it would be a good tool for a teacher to use if they wanted to groom them into it.
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
How do you drive an agenda with a small % you ask? By starting off small and then slowly increasing it. It's called desensitizing.
So, are kids going to turn gay or feel guilty of their race because of a math word problem? And is that the “agenda?”
So I wonder how you would feel about a math problem involving a political topic that you hold a different opinion on? Cause that's how I was trying to look at it. Then again, as I said, if I wasn't specifically looking for it I might not have noticed at all.
Can you post a link to the math problem that you are referring to?
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018) The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
How do you drive an agenda with a small % you ask? By starting off small and then slowly increasing it. It's called desensitizing.
So, are kids going to turn gay or feel guilty of their race because of a math word problem? And is that the “agenda?”
So I wonder how you would feel about a math problem involving a political topic that you hold a different opinion on? Cause that's how I was trying to look at it. Then again, as I said, if I wasn't specifically looking for it I might not have noticed at all.
Can you post a link to the math problem that you are referring to?
It was a while back... I think I posted a link then here...I'll take a look
Here are some. This was one that made me wonder why it was chosen. Again, I personally don;t care but trying to put myself in someone else's thought process.
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
How do you drive an agenda with a small % you ask? By starting off small and then slowly increasing it. It's called desensitizing.
So, are kids going to turn gay or feel guilty of their race because of a math word problem? And is that the “agenda?”
So I wonder how you would feel about a math problem involving a political topic that you hold a different opinion on? Cause that's how I was trying to look at it. Then again, as I said, if I wasn't specifically looking for it I might not have noticed at all.
You mean like, “ if 300 BLM’ers storm the west side of the Capitol in a stack formation at 9:03 am and 400 Antiiiiiif’ers storm the east side of the Capitol in disarray at 9:10 am, what time would they meet in the rotunda? How many of each would be indicted? And what percentage of the total number of leftist radical communist Dems do they represent?”
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
How do you drive an agenda with a small % you ask? By starting off small and then slowly increasing it. It's called desensitizing.
So, are kids going to turn gay or feel guilty of their race because of a math word problem? And is that the “agenda?”
No that won't turn them gay but it would be a good tool for a teacher to use if they wanted to groom them into it.
I knew it! Every gay person I’ve ever met was groomed into it. Best if we stop teaching math.
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
How do you drive an agenda with a small % you ask? By starting off small and then slowly increasing it. It's called desensitizing.
So, are kids going to turn gay or feel guilty of their race because of a math word problem? And is that the “agenda?”
So I wonder how you would feel about a math problem involving a political topic that you hold a different opinion on? Cause that's how I was trying to look at it. Then again, as I said, if I wasn't specifically looking for it I might not have noticed at all.
You mean like, “ if 300 BLM’ers storm the west side of the Capitol in a stack formation at 9:03 am and 400 Antiiiiiif’ers storm the east side of the Capitol in disarray at 9:10 am, what time would they meet in the rotunda? How many of each would be indicted? And what percentage of the total number of leftist radical communist Dems do they represent?”
Was kinda thinking more about media bias, abortions as birth control, welfare fraud, etc.... lots of things could be put in their that are political in nature without discussion of the topic.
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
How do you drive an agenda with a small % you ask? By starting off small and then slowly increasing it. It's called desensitizing.
So, are kids going to turn gay or feel guilty of their race because of a math word problem? And is that the “agenda?”
No that won't turn them gay but it would be a good tool for a teacher to use if they wanted to groom them into it.
I knew it! Every gay person I’ve ever met was groomed into it. Best if we stop teaching math.
Best to stop teaching woke math. Especially without the parents consent.
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
How do you drive an agenda with a small % you ask? By starting off small and then slowly increasing it. It's called desensitizing.
So, are kids going to turn gay or feel guilty of their race because of a math word problem? And is that the “agenda?”
No that won't turn them gay but it would be a good tool for a teacher to use if they wanted to groom them into it.
I knew it! Every gay person I’ve ever met was groomed into it. Best if we stop teaching math.
Best to stop teaching woke math. Especially without the parents consent.
For the other cultural issues I was referring mostly to the gender and sexuality debate and the "what's taught in school" type stuff. Meaning these are some of the issues I see as to why some conservatives have a hard time voting for Joe and Dems. And not as hard a line as you think...usually fine with lots of progress in those places, but also wonders where that finish line is. Just my assessment from the people I know, could be off base.
And shit...I forgot Guns....not sure how I forgot that issue. Way too many conservatives have been scared into thinking common sense laws are an infringement on their rights and can't get past it.
You think any dem can appeal to cons? And what is “taught in school?” CRT? Finish line? Turning your kids gay and eliminating the white race. Cons ain’t Joe’s audience.
Vs trump I do think so. I have been far more republican than democrat in my life...and I voted for Hillary and Biden. So I do think it's possible.
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
Were they textbooks? Or were they “worksheets?” I ask because Tejas, as a state with one of the largest purchaser’s of public school textbooks, has an inordinate amount of influence as it relates to textbook content, with a rigorous review process in place, and that influences what text books are purchased and what their content is throughout ‘Murica.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
How do you drive an agenda with a small % you ask? By starting off small and then slowly increasing it. It's called desensitizing.
So, are kids going to turn gay or feel guilty of their race because of a math word problem? And is that the “agenda?”
No that won't turn them gay but it would be a good tool for a teacher to use if they wanted to groom them into it.
I knew it! Every gay person I’ve ever met was groomed into it. Best if we stop teaching math.
Best to stop teaching woke math. Especially without the parents consent.
Comments
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
Have you looked at some of the questions in those math textbooks? They were clearly there to drive an agenda, and it wasn't math. For the most part I think people complaining about that are out of line and taking it too far, but there are clear examples for me that are driving a political agenda through a freakin math problem. It's probably a really small % but I hate that it gave any credibility to the complaint.
While you view it as “driving an agenda,” I view it as just more lame faux outrage to rally the masses. Like some kid is going to decide they’re gay or feel guilty about their race because of a math word problem. How do you drive an agenda with a small %?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Again - it is a pretty weird thing to make the top of your (the general you) worry list.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
Here are some. This was one that made me wonder why it was chosen. Again, I personally don;t care but trying to put myself in someone else's thought process.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Personally if it's fact based, don't care much.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/22/us/florida-math-textbooks-critical-race-theory-examples/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."