UK tribute band getting a cease and desist

168101112

Comments

  • Merkin BallerMerkin Baller Posts: 11,940
    Their response is the most childish thing that could have come from this. 
    Crying victimhood when faced with the consequence of their own actions... they would fit in well with the modern day GOP. 
  • bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 16,092
    Legal Jam sounds petty to me.  They picked a name that will always remind of this situation of which many of their fans side with Pearl Jam.   I would pick a different name that isn’t built on a negative situation and move on. 
  • Spiritual_ChaosSpiritual_Chaos Posts: 30,869
    edited January 2021
    Is Legal Jam a pun? Is it a well known expression for being in legal trouble?
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • tino_11tino_11 Posts: 2,153
    Legal Jam is a terrible choice, haha. 

    Some better ones I’ve heard suggested here and elsewhere:
    Mookie Blaylockk (this would have been brilliant and I think legally they could actually get away with this)
    Yield 
    5 against 1 


    'F*** the pessimists. F*** 'em.' Eddie Vedder
  • xjoshfromworkxxjoshfromworkx Moline, IL Posts: 138
    Should've changed it into In A Jam because that's where they ended up with all this tomfoolery. Yet, they are technically IN a Legal Jam, but I sure wouldn't wear that on a shirt.

    Moline, IL 10-17-2014
    Wrigley #1 8-20-2016
    Wrigley #2 8-22-2016
    Wrigley #1 8-18-2018
    Wrigley #2 8-20-2018

  • Merkin BallerMerkin Baller Posts: 11,940
    edited January 2021
    .
  • Ledbetterman10Ledbetterman10 Posts: 16,941
    edited January 2021
    tino_11 said:
    Legal Jam is a terrible choice, haha. 
    Just awful. Between the ridiculous original band name with the two M's, their whiny "you broke our hearts" letter, and this new name, they're just embarrassing themselves. 
    2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024Philly 2

    Pearl Jam bootlegs:
    http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
  • Edved82Edved82 Ireland Posts: 1,279
    That whole episode is pathetic. Try setting up a tribute band called "Metallicaa" and sell merchandise under that and see how it works out. Surprised they've gotten away with it for this long.
    "...though my problems are meaningless....that don't make them go away...."
  • pjl44pjl44 Posts: 9,957
    OG Legal Jam is the subset of Ten Clubbers who are always threatening to sue over the missing singles
  • CC9172CC9172 northern new jersey Posts: 127
    It IS a trademark issue. Too close to the real thing. They should just change their name to PURL JAMM
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 38,134
    i think they should have gone with Mother Love Boner, and had a logo with a big ol'....never mind. 
    "Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk"
    -EV  8/14/93




  • I'm with PJ on this one. 
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,306
    i think they should have gone with Mother Love Boner, and had a logo with a big ol'....never mind. 
    LOL and guitarist can be Boner Goddard.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Merkin BallerMerkin Baller Posts: 11,940
    i think they should have gone with Mother Love Boner, and had a logo with a big ol'....never mind. 
    Citizen Richard 
  • mcgruff10mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 28,729
    Legal Jam?  That is pathetic.  Honking Seals would have been much better.  
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • PB11041PB11041 Earth Posts: 2,810
    pjl44 said:
    OG Legal Jam is the subset of Ten Clubbers who are always threatening to sue over the missing singles
    Best Lol Gif GIFs  Gfycat
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • 100 Pacer100 Pacer Toronto, ON Posts: 9,068
    Black Circle or nuthin’. 
    To quote the 10C from Newsletter #8: "Please understand we have a lot of members and it is very hard to please everybody. If you are one of those unhappy people...please call 1-900-IDN-TCAR."

    "Me knowing the truth, I can not concur."

    1996: Toronto - 1998: Chicago, Montreal, Barrie - 2000: Montreal, Toronto - 2002: Seattle X2 (Key Arena) - 2003: Cleveland, Buffalo, Toronto, Montreal, Seattle (Benaroya Hall) - 2004: Reading, Toledo, Grand Rapids - 2005: Kitchener, London, Hamilton, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Quebec City - 2006: Toronto X2, Albany, Hartford, Grand Rapids, Cleveland - 2007: Chicago (Vic Theatre) - 2008: NYC X2, Hartford, Mansfield X2 - 2009: Toronto, Chicago X2, Seattle X2, Philadelphia X4 - 2010: Columbus, Noblesville, Cleveland, Buffalo, Hartford - 2011: Montreal, Toronto X2, Ottawa, Hamilton - 2012: Missoula - 2013: London, Chicago, Buffalo, Hartford - 2014: Detroit, Moline - 2015: NYC (Global Citizen Festival) - 2016: Greenville, Toronto X2, Chicago 1 - 2017: Brooklyn (RRHOF Induction) - 2018: Chicago 1, Boston 1 - 2022: Fresno, Ottawa, Hamilton, Toronto, NYC, Camden - 2023: St. Paul X2, Austin X2 - 2024: Vancouver X2, Portland, Sacramento, Missoula, Noblesville, Philadelphia X2, Baltimore - 2025: Hollywood X2, Atlanta 2, Nashville X2, Pittsburgh X2
  • SHZASHZA St. Louis, MO USA Posts: 4,141
    More like Illegal Jamm 
  • Spiritual_ChaosSpiritual_Chaos Posts: 30,869
    edited January 2021
    pjl44 said:
    OG Legal Jam is the subset of Ten Clubbers who are always threatening to sue over the missing singles
    A lot of hyperbole and falsehoods in this sentence. Who would these several Ten Clubbers be? What do you mean by "always"?

    Your post does though include the classic MO of the subset of Ten Clubbers who are always ready to throw other Ten Clubbers under the bus in their classic "PLEASE DADDY LOOK AT ME! I'M A GOOD BOY!" way.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • pjl44pjl44 Posts: 9,957
    pjl44 said:
    OG Legal Jam is the subset of Ten Clubbers who are always threatening to sue over the missing singles
    A lot of hyperbole and falsehoods in this sentence. Who would these several Ten Clubbers be? What do you mean by "always"?

    Your post does though include the classic MO of the subset of Ten Clubbers who are always ready to throw other Ten Clubbers under the bus in their classic "PLEASE DADDY LOOK AT ME! I'M A GOOD BOY!" way.
    Just be grateful you made it 8 pages without any t-shirt bootlegging jabs
  • pjl44 said:
    pjl44 said:
    OG Legal Jam is the subset of Ten Clubbers who are always threatening to sue over the missing singles
    A lot of hyperbole and falsehoods in this sentence. Who would these several Ten Clubbers be? What do you mean by "always"?

    Your post does though include the classic MO of the subset of Ten Clubbers who are always ready to throw other Ten Clubbers under the bus in their classic "PLEASE DADDY LOOK AT ME! I'M A GOOD BOY!" way.
    Just be grateful you made it 8 pages without any t-shirt bootlegging jabs
    Säg vad du vill men först sjung en sång för april
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • How many weeks untill they change their name from "Legal Jam" to something else?
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • JeBurkhardtJeBurkhardt Posts: 5,027
    How many weeks untill they change their name from "Legal Jam" to something else?
    It will happen as soon as the original band Legal Jam finds out about this. 😀
  • PJNBPJNB Posts: 13,595
    What a slow news cycle this must be. The amount of attention this is getting is mind blowing. 
  • mcgruff10mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 28,729
    PJNB said:
    What a slow news cycle this must be. The amount of attention this is getting is mind blowing. 
    Right?! Talk about making a mountain out of a mole hill.  Admit you screwed up, change your name to something less lame than Legal Jam, take down the merch and move on.  End of story.  
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 38,134
    mcgruff10 said:
    PJNB said:
    What a slow news cycle this must be. The amount of attention this is getting is mind blowing. 
    Right?! Talk about making a mountain out of a mole hill.  Admit you screwed up, change your name to something less lame than Legal Jam, take down the merch and move on.  End of story.  
    is this the first time in history a tribute act put out a "statement"? LOL
    "Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk"
    -EV  8/14/93




  • How many weeks untill they change their name from "Legal Jam" to something else?
    It will happen as soon as the original band Legal Jam finds out about this. 😀
    Or Legal Jamm 
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • leespjleespj Liverpool Posts: 175
    I can understand Pearl Jam's management and lawyer's etc having an issue with Pearl Jamm but why (if true) has the band instigated this? Disappointed. If anything Tribute bands only enhance the Pearl Jam brand. Tribute bands can generate more fans of the actual genuine band or even get casual fans going to more gigs, former fans returning to the band they once loved, buying more merch etc.
    Petty if you ask me.  I really hope this is a management and legal matter rather than the band wanting it dealt with. 


    Pearl Jam

    1996-10-28, 2000-05-29, 2006-08-25, 2007-06-21, 2007-06-26, 2009-08-17, 2009-08-18, 2009-10-28, 2010-06-23, 2010-07-03, 2010-07-06, 2010-10-23, 2010-10-24, 2011-09-14, 2011-09-15, 2012-06-20, 2012-06-21, 2012-07-04, 2012-07-05, 2013-10-15, 2013-10-18, 2014-06-26, 2014-06-28, 2014-07-08, 2014-07-11, 2014-10-17, 2014-10-20, 2016-05-02, 2016-05-05, 2018-06-18, 2018-07-03, 2018-07-05, 2022-07-25.

    Eddie Vedder
     
    2012-07-28, 2012-07-30, 2012-11-15, 2017-06-11, 2019-06-25, 2019-07-03.

    Brad

    2013-02-08.






  • pjl44pjl44 Posts: 9,957
    leespj said:
    I can understand Pearl Jam's management and lawyer's etc having an issue with Pearl Jamm but why (if true) has the band instigated this? Disappointed. If anything Tribute bands only enhance the Pearl Jam brand. Tribute bands can generate more fans of the actual genuine band or even get casual fans going to more gigs, former fans returning to the band they once loved, buying more merch etc.
    Petty if you ask me.  I really hope this is a management and legal matter rather than the band wanting it dealt with. 


    They seem to be totally cool with the myriad other tribute bands who weren't dumb enough to name themselves Pearl Jamm and sell stickman t-shirts 
  • zdogbonezdogbone Posts: 117
    Missed opportunity not going with 
    PearAlegal Jam
    Three crooked hearts and swirls all around... I miss you all day
Sign In or Register to comment.