#46 President Joe Biden
Comments
-
I assumed this as his intent as well. My point being, there are way bigger vaccine hesitancy problem areas to single out than the border population.mickeyrat said:
I think his point was more its the citizens who are more dangerous right now than migrants. and less about ethnicity.FiveBelow said:
You basically said "don’t worry about immigrants, it’s the people who live on our southern border who are the problem. That’s where the demographics come in, both of those groups are predominantly Hispanic. I just found it weirdly contradictory. The map was more of a fact check to the statement about vaccine refusal.HughFreakingDillon said:
k, I'll ask again more clearly: are you saying I'm anti Hispanic or don't have a clear understand of the demographics, or was that a general comment to anyone? because without the context of the article, I'm not sure what you are driving atFiveBelow said:
It’s an interactive map showing the vaccination percentage by county in the US. Didn’t realize it was behind a paywall, I don’t subscribe to the NYT and it allowed me to navigate the map.HughFreakingDillon said:
I'm not sure if this was directed at me, because the article is paywalled.FiveBelow said:
Either you don’t have an understanding of the demographics or you are anti Hispanic. I’m leaning one way but you never know. Looks like the border counties are holding their own.HughFreakingDillon said:
why do you care about immigrants bringing in covid when it's the people who LIVE ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER that are refusing to get the fucking vaccine or even mask up in most instances?JB16057 said:
That's awesome that hundreds of migrants have been vaccinated but what about the other thousands that are currently spreading COVID across America?mrussel1 said:Was this not the headline on "border news"?? How surprising. What's your next argument?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/hundreds-migrants-vaccinated-against-coronavirus-us-mexico-border-city-2021-08-03/
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-19-vaccine-doses.html0 -
That Disney one is terrible. Don’t think I would have known it was supposed to be him if I saw it outside the Disneyland attraction surrounded by other presidents.gvn2fly1421 said:Which one is the real Joe and which one is Disney Land Joe?
0 -
Yup. I doubt we will ever know the total truth about 911. I’ve also never followed any of all the theories people had…Halifax2TheMax said:
Sure. Put it on Joe. After Shrub in his deer in the headlights goat story cover allowed his pappy’s accomplices to fly away, but only after all other civil aviation was shut down, and POOTWH determined to release the UFO files, sure. Do you believe?Meltdown99 said:9/11 families tell Biden to skip memorial if he does not declassify files
House of Saud and repubs are complicit. Buried. “You can’t handle the truth!”
Give Peas A Chance…0 -
pouring across the border huh?
WINNFIELD, La. (AP) — Alexander Martinez says he fled from homophobia, government persecution and the notorious MS-13 gang in El Salvador only to run into abuse and harassment in America’s immigration detention system.
Since crossing the border illegally in April, the 28-year-old has bounced between six different facilities in three states. He said he contracted COVID-19, faced racist taunts and abuse from guards and was harassed by fellow detainees for being gay.
“I find myself emotionally unstable because I have suffered a lot in detention,” Martinez said last week at Winn Correctional Center in Louisiana. “I never imagined or expected to receive this inhumane treatment."
He's among a growing number of people in immigration detention centers nationwide, many of whom, like Martinez, have cleared their initial screening to seek asylum in the U.S.
The number of detainees has more than doubled since the end of February, to nearly 27,000 as of July 22, according to the most recent data from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. That’s above the roughly 22,000 detained last July under then-President Donald Trump, though it’s nowhere close to the record in August 2019, when the number of detainees exceeded 55,000, ICE data shows.
continues
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
I never said anything about ethnicity, so there was zero contradictory about it. I don't give a shit if the americans refusing to get vaxxed are brown, white, or purple. my point was there's a lot MORE americans not getting vaxxed than to worry about a few border crossers.FiveBelow said:
You basically said "don’t worry about immigrants, it’s the people who live on our southern border who are the problem. That’s where the demographics come in, both of those groups are predominantly Hispanic. I just found it weirdly contradictory. The map was more of a fact check to the statement about vaccine refusal.HughFreakingDillon said:
k, I'll ask again more clearly: are you saying I'm anti Hispanic or don't have a clear understand of the demographics, or was that a general comment to anyone? because without the context of the article, I'm not sure what you are driving atFiveBelow said:
It’s an interactive map showing the vaccination percentage by county in the US. Didn’t realize it was behind a paywall, I don’t subscribe to the NYT and it allowed me to navigate the map.HughFreakingDillon said:
I'm not sure if this was directed at me, because the article is paywalled.FiveBelow said:
Either you don’t have an understanding of the demographics or you are anti Hispanic. I’m leaning one way but you never know. Looks like the border counties are holding their own.HughFreakingDillon said:
why do you care about immigrants bringing in covid when it's the people who LIVE ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER that are refusing to get the fucking vaccine or even mask up in most instances?JB16057 said:
That's awesome that hundreds of migrants have been vaccinated but what about the other thousands that are currently spreading COVID across America?mrussel1 said:Was this not the headline on "border news"?? How surprising. What's your next argument?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/hundreds-migrants-vaccinated-against-coronavirus-us-mexico-border-city-2021-08-03/
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-19-vaccine-doses.htmlBy The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
...who are being offered the vaccine at the border anyway. And there's a still open question to one of the people here as to why they believe immigrants should be forced to vaxxed but not citizens.HughFreakingDillon said:
I never said anything about ethnicity, so there was zero contradictory about it. I don't give a shit if the americans refusing to get vaxxed are brown, white, or purple. my point was there's a lot MORE americans not getting vaxxed than to worry about a few border crossers.FiveBelow said:
You basically said "don’t worry about immigrants, it’s the people who live on our southern border who are the problem. That’s where the demographics come in, both of those groups are predominantly Hispanic. I just found it weirdly contradictory. The map was more of a fact check to the statement about vaccine refusal.HughFreakingDillon said:
k, I'll ask again more clearly: are you saying I'm anti Hispanic or don't have a clear understand of the demographics, or was that a general comment to anyone? because without the context of the article, I'm not sure what you are driving atFiveBelow said:
It’s an interactive map showing the vaccination percentage by county in the US. Didn’t realize it was behind a paywall, I don’t subscribe to the NYT and it allowed me to navigate the map.HughFreakingDillon said:
I'm not sure if this was directed at me, because the article is paywalled.FiveBelow said:
Either you don’t have an understanding of the demographics or you are anti Hispanic. I’m leaning one way but you never know. Looks like the border counties are holding their own.HughFreakingDillon said:
why do you care about immigrants bringing in covid when it's the people who LIVE ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER that are refusing to get the fucking vaccine or even mask up in most instances?JB16057 said:
That's awesome that hundreds of migrants have been vaccinated but what about the other thousands that are currently spreading COVID across America?mrussel1 said:Was this not the headline on "border news"?? How surprising. What's your next argument?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/hundreds-migrants-vaccinated-against-coronavirus-us-mexico-border-city-2021-08-03/
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-19-vaccine-doses.html0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:
I never said anything about ethnicity, so there was zero contradictory about it. I don't give a shit if the americans refusing to get vaxxed are brown, white, or purple. my point was there's a lot MORE americans not getting vaxxed than to worry about a few border crossers.FiveBelow said:
You basically said "don’t worry about immigrants, it’s the people who live on our southern border who are the problem. That’s where the demographics come in, both of those groups are predominantly Hispanic. I just found it weirdly contradictory. The map was more of a fact check to the statement about vaccine refusal.HughFreakingDillon said:
k, I'll ask again more clearly: are you saying I'm anti Hispanic or don't have a clear understand of the demographics, or was that a general comment to anyone? because without the context of the article, I'm not sure what you are driving atFiveBelow said:
It’s an interactive map showing the vaccination percentage by county in the US. Didn’t realize it was behind a paywall, I don’t subscribe to the NYT and it allowed me to navigate the map.HughFreakingDillon said:
I'm not sure if this was directed at me, because the article is paywalled.FiveBelow said:
Either you don’t have an understanding of the demographics or you are anti Hispanic. I’m leaning one way but you never know. Looks like the border counties are holding their own.HughFreakingDillon said:
why do you care about immigrants bringing in covid when it's the people who LIVE ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER that are refusing to get the fucking vaccine or even mask up in most instances?JB16057 said:
That's awesome that hundreds of migrants have been vaccinated but what about the other thousands that are currently spreading COVID across America?mrussel1 said:Was this not the headline on "border news"?? How surprising. What's your next argument?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/hundreds-migrants-vaccinated-against-coronavirus-us-mexico-border-city-2021-08-03/
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-19-vaccine-doses.htmlThe emphasis you put solely on those who live on the southern border threw me off.0 -
Not sure if this would be the correct thread, but how does everyone feel about the approved eviction moratorium extension? I, personally, think it is going to result in courts being flooded in lawsuits for a very long time with landlords trying to get compensation. Also, just saw a story out of California when a couple purchased a new house and the prior owner is refusing to leave and there is nothing the new owners can do about it. Pretty fucked up if you ask me…
I think some people have it in their heads that landlords are all crazy wealthy and have no problem forking over money to pay for “squatters”, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.Post edited by PJPOWER on0 -
Maybe instead of being forced-vexed, they should be told “no vaccine, no entry”. That way it is their decision, just like US citizens 👍mrussel1 said:
...who are being offered the vaccine at the border anyway. And there's a still open question to one of the people here as to why they believe immigrants should be forced to vaxxed but not citizens.HughFreakingDillon said:
I never said anything about ethnicity, so there was zero contradictory about it. I don't give a shit if the americans refusing to get vaxxed are brown, white, or purple. my point was there's a lot MORE americans not getting vaxxed than to worry about a few border crossers.FiveBelow said:
You basically said "don’t worry about immigrants, it’s the people who live on our southern border who are the problem. That’s where the demographics come in, both of those groups are predominantly Hispanic. I just found it weirdly contradictory. The map was more of a fact check to the statement about vaccine refusal.HughFreakingDillon said:
k, I'll ask again more clearly: are you saying I'm anti Hispanic or don't have a clear understand of the demographics, or was that a general comment to anyone? because without the context of the article, I'm not sure what you are driving atFiveBelow said:
It’s an interactive map showing the vaccination percentage by county in the US. Didn’t realize it was behind a paywall, I don’t subscribe to the NYT and it allowed me to navigate the map.HughFreakingDillon said:
I'm not sure if this was directed at me, because the article is paywalled.FiveBelow said:
Either you don’t have an understanding of the demographics or you are anti Hispanic. I’m leaning one way but you never know. Looks like the border counties are holding their own.HughFreakingDillon said:
why do you care about immigrants bringing in covid when it's the people who LIVE ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER that are refusing to get the fucking vaccine or even mask up in most instances?JB16057 said:
That's awesome that hundreds of migrants have been vaccinated but what about the other thousands that are currently spreading COVID across America?mrussel1 said:Was this not the headline on "border news"?? How surprising. What's your next argument?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/hundreds-migrants-vaccinated-against-coronavirus-us-mexico-border-city-2021-08-03/
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-19-vaccine-doses.html0 -
The implication was about people already here, not necessarily entering. Because when I said.. "wait are you saying that the Feds should go door to door and force vaccinations for immigrants?" The answer was.. "did I stutter?"PJPOWER said:
Maybe instead of being forced-vexed, they should be told “no vaccine, no entry”. That way it is their decision, just like US citizens 👍mrussel1 said:
...who are being offered the vaccine at the border anyway. And there's a still open question to one of the people here as to why they believe immigrants should be forced to vaxxed but not citizens.HughFreakingDillon said:
I never said anything about ethnicity, so there was zero contradictory about it. I don't give a shit if the americans refusing to get vaxxed are brown, white, or purple. my point was there's a lot MORE americans not getting vaxxed than to worry about a few border crossers.FiveBelow said:
You basically said "don’t worry about immigrants, it’s the people who live on our southern border who are the problem. That’s where the demographics come in, both of those groups are predominantly Hispanic. I just found it weirdly contradictory. The map was more of a fact check to the statement about vaccine refusal.HughFreakingDillon said:
k, I'll ask again more clearly: are you saying I'm anti Hispanic or don't have a clear understand of the demographics, or was that a general comment to anyone? because without the context of the article, I'm not sure what you are driving atFiveBelow said:
It’s an interactive map showing the vaccination percentage by county in the US. Didn’t realize it was behind a paywall, I don’t subscribe to the NYT and it allowed me to navigate the map.HughFreakingDillon said:
I'm not sure if this was directed at me, because the article is paywalled.FiveBelow said:
Either you don’t have an understanding of the demographics or you are anti Hispanic. I’m leaning one way but you never know. Looks like the border counties are holding their own.HughFreakingDillon said:
why do you care about immigrants bringing in covid when it's the people who LIVE ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER that are refusing to get the fucking vaccine or even mask up in most instances?JB16057 said:
That's awesome that hundreds of migrants have been vaccinated but what about the other thousands that are currently spreading COVID across America?mrussel1 said:Was this not the headline on "border news"?? How surprising. What's your next argument?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/hundreds-migrants-vaccinated-against-coronavirus-us-mexico-border-city-2021-08-03/
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-19-vaccine-doses.html0 -
This affects my business and it's a difficult thing. It made sense to me last year, but I think it's gone on too long. Now where the federal gov't has backed the loan, they can make that call. But considering the unemployment rate and the availability of jobs, I don't think the moratorium should continue. The administration didn't want to do it, but the left wing pushed them and got their first win with the admin in a very long time. My guess is that the admin would be perfectly fine with the courts ruling that the gov't can no longer implement.PJPOWER said:Not sure if this would be the correct thread, but how does everyone feel about the approved eviction moratorium extension? I, personally, think it is going to result in courts being flooded in lawsuits for a very long time with landlords trying to get compensation. Also, just saw a story out of California when a couple purchased a new house and the prior owner is refusing to leave and there is nothing the new owners can do about it. Pretty fucked up if you ask me…
I think some people have it in their heads that landlords are all crazy wealthy and have no problem forking over money to pay for “squatters”, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.0 -
mrussel1 said:
This affects my business and it's a difficult thing. It made sense to me last year, but I think it's gone on too long. Now where the federal gov't has backed the loan, they can make that call. But considering the unemployment rate and the availability of jobs, I don't think the moratorium should continue. The administration didn't want to do it, but the left wing pushed them and got their first win with the admin in a very long time. My guess is that the admin would be perfectly fine with the courts ruling that the gov't can no longer implement.PJPOWER said:Not sure if this would be the correct thread, but how does everyone feel about the approved eviction moratorium extension? I, personally, think it is going to result in courts being flooded in lawsuits for a very long time with landlords trying to get compensation. Also, just saw a story out of California when a couple purchased a new house and the prior owner is refusing to leave and there is nothing the new owners can do about it. Pretty fucked up if you ask me…
I think some people have it in their heads that landlords are all crazy wealthy and have no problem forking over money to pay for “squatters”, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.states were given moneys for rent help. Ohio hasnt distributed it by half....until those applications are processed and monies paid, and all that funding utilized, evictions should be paused._____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Agreed, and I think they are undermining themselves in the loss of support from any Realtor lobbyists. It’s not a good look using land/house owners as pawns either. Good time to be a lawyer I would guess…mrussel1 said:
This affects my business and it's a difficult thing. It made sense to me last year, but I think it's gone on too long. Now where the federal gov't has backed the loan, they can make that call. But considering the unemployment rate and the availability of jobs, I don't think the moratorium should continue. The administration didn't want to do it, but the left wing pushed them and got their first win with the admin in a very long time. My guess is that the admin would be perfectly fine with the courts ruling that the gov't can no longer implement.PJPOWER said:Not sure if this would be the correct thread, but how does everyone feel about the approved eviction moratorium extension? I, personally, think it is going to result in courts being flooded in lawsuits for a very long time with landlords trying to get compensation. Also, just saw a story out of California when a couple purchased a new house and the prior owner is refusing to leave and there is nothing the new owners can do about it. Pretty fucked up if you ask me…
I think some people have it in their heads that landlords are all crazy wealthy and have no problem forking over money to pay for “squatters”, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.0 -
That’s where the landlords/property owners are getting used as pawns and flat out screwed. I would rather see the utility companies be forced to fork over the bills for the “squatters” than the many property owners that may very likely go bankrupt over this. Why should property owners have to pay utilities for non-paying squatters that they cannot evict? The rental owners are just trying to make a living and feed their families too…mickeyrat said:mrussel1 said:
This affects my business and it's a difficult thing. It made sense to me last year, but I think it's gone on too long. Now where the federal gov't has backed the loan, they can make that call. But considering the unemployment rate and the availability of jobs, I don't think the moratorium should continue. The administration didn't want to do it, but the left wing pushed them and got their first win with the admin in a very long time. My guess is that the admin would be perfectly fine with the courts ruling that the gov't can no longer implement.PJPOWER said:Not sure if this would be the correct thread, but how does everyone feel about the approved eviction moratorium extension? I, personally, think it is going to result in courts being flooded in lawsuits for a very long time with landlords trying to get compensation. Also, just saw a story out of California when a couple purchased a new house and the prior owner is refusing to leave and there is nothing the new owners can do about it. Pretty fucked up if you ask me…
I think some people have it in their heads that landlords are all crazy wealthy and have no problem forking over money to pay for “squatters”, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.states were given moneys for rent help. Ohio hasnt distributed it by half....until those applications are processed and monies paid, and all that funding utilized, evictions should be paused.Post edited by PJPOWER on0 -
PJPOWER said:
That’s where the landlords/property owners are getting used as pawns. I would rather see the utility companies fork over the bills for the “squatters” than the many property owners that may very likely go bankrupt over this. Why should property owners have to pay utilities for non-paying squatters that they cannot evict? The rental owners are just trying to make a living and feed their families too…mickeyrat said:mrussel1 said:
This affects my business and it's a difficult thing. It made sense to me last year, but I think it's gone on too long. Now where the federal gov't has backed the loan, they can make that call. But considering the unemployment rate and the availability of jobs, I don't think the moratorium should continue. The administration didn't want to do it, but the left wing pushed them and got their first win with the admin in a very long time. My guess is that the admin would be perfectly fine with the courts ruling that the gov't can no longer implement.PJPOWER said:Not sure if this would be the correct thread, but how does everyone feel about the approved eviction moratorium extension? I, personally, think it is going to result in courts being flooded in lawsuits for a very long time with landlords trying to get compensation. Also, just saw a story out of California when a couple purchased a new house and the prior owner is refusing to leave and there is nothing the new owners can do about it. Pretty fucked up if you ask me…
I think some people have it in their heads that landlords are all crazy wealthy and have no problem forking over money to pay for “squatters”, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.states were given moneys for rent help. Ohio hasnt distributed it by half....until those applications are processed and monies paid, and all that funding utilized, evictions should be paused.not all rentals are all utilities included. some have heat and water only. really depends on the type of rental.all of this gets worked through with patience AND FUCKING ASSHOLES GETTING VAXXED._____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
It will definitely come to an end soon, but I really think some of “squaring laws” that some states have are ridiculous too and will probably be what the landlords are dealing with after the moratorium ends.mickeyrat said:PJPOWER said:
That’s where the landlords/property owners are getting used as pawns. I would rather see the utility companies fork over the bills for the “squatters” than the many property owners that may very likely go bankrupt over this. Why should property owners have to pay utilities for non-paying squatters that they cannot evict? The rental owners are just trying to make a living and feed their families too…mickeyrat said:mrussel1 said:
This affects my business and it's a difficult thing. It made sense to me last year, but I think it's gone on too long. Now where the federal gov't has backed the loan, they can make that call. But considering the unemployment rate and the availability of jobs, I don't think the moratorium should continue. The administration didn't want to do it, but the left wing pushed them and got their first win with the admin in a very long time. My guess is that the admin would be perfectly fine with the courts ruling that the gov't can no longer implement.PJPOWER said:Not sure if this would be the correct thread, but how does everyone feel about the approved eviction moratorium extension? I, personally, think it is going to result in courts being flooded in lawsuits for a very long time with landlords trying to get compensation. Also, just saw a story out of California when a couple purchased a new house and the prior owner is refusing to leave and there is nothing the new owners can do about it. Pretty fucked up if you ask me…
I think some people have it in their heads that landlords are all crazy wealthy and have no problem forking over money to pay for “squatters”, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.states were given moneys for rent help. Ohio hasnt distributed it by half....until those applications are processed and monies paid, and all that funding utilized, evictions should be paused.not all rentals are all utilities included. some have heat and water only. really depends on the type of rental.all of this gets worked through with patience AND FUCKING ASSHOLES GETTING VAXXED.0 -
The problem is that everyone thinks of landlords as corporations or large entities that can absorb the losses, but that's not true. There are millions of single unit/home or just a few home rentals out there. And while the renter received relief, no such forbearance exist between the landlord and its lender/lien holder. So it's a tough place.0
-
PJPOWER said:
It will definitely come to an end soon, but I really think some of “squaring laws” that some states have are ridiculous too and will probably be what the landlords are dealing with after the moratorium ends.mickeyrat said:PJPOWER said:
That’s where the landlords/property owners are getting used as pawns. I would rather see the utility companies fork over the bills for the “squatters” than the many property owners that may very likely go bankrupt over this. Why should property owners have to pay utilities for non-paying squatters that they cannot evict? The rental owners are just trying to make a living and feed their families too…mickeyrat said:mrussel1 said:
This affects my business and it's a difficult thing. It made sense to me last year, but I think it's gone on too long. Now where the federal gov't has backed the loan, they can make that call. But considering the unemployment rate and the availability of jobs, I don't think the moratorium should continue. The administration didn't want to do it, but the left wing pushed them and got their first win with the admin in a very long time. My guess is that the admin would be perfectly fine with the courts ruling that the gov't can no longer implement.PJPOWER said:Not sure if this would be the correct thread, but how does everyone feel about the approved eviction moratorium extension? I, personally, think it is going to result in courts being flooded in lawsuits for a very long time with landlords trying to get compensation. Also, just saw a story out of California when a couple purchased a new house and the prior owner is refusing to leave and there is nothing the new owners can do about it. Pretty fucked up if you ask me…
I think some people have it in their heads that landlords are all crazy wealthy and have no problem forking over money to pay for “squatters”, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.states were given moneys for rent help. Ohio hasnt distributed it by half....until those applications are processed and monies paid, and all that funding utilized, evictions should be paused.not all rentals are all utilities included. some have heat and water only. really depends on the type of rental.all of this gets worked through with patience AND FUCKING ASSHOLES GETTING VAXXED.top to bottom this is a prime example of corrections that need to be made overall to our systems. A real opportunity to make significant improvement. It needs to include the indirect tangential areas you might not think are associated at first glance.one thing that needs backdated is tax credit for unreimbursed employee expenses. All this work from home stuff, just how much do you think business foot the bill for. they didnt. they reduced overhead in a big way...._____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
We still have our lease payments on buildings, so we haven't reduced our expenses in the least there. We also had to go out and find hundreds of laptops that we hadn't needed before. Where we saved money was on business travel. But it's really a bunch of puts and takes.mickeyrat said:PJPOWER said:
It will definitely come to an end soon, but I really think some of “squaring laws” that some states have are ridiculous too and will probably be what the landlords are dealing with after the moratorium ends.mickeyrat said:PJPOWER said:
That’s where the landlords/property owners are getting used as pawns. I would rather see the utility companies fork over the bills for the “squatters” than the many property owners that may very likely go bankrupt over this. Why should property owners have to pay utilities for non-paying squatters that they cannot evict? The rental owners are just trying to make a living and feed their families too…mickeyrat said:mrussel1 said:
This affects my business and it's a difficult thing. It made sense to me last year, but I think it's gone on too long. Now where the federal gov't has backed the loan, they can make that call. But considering the unemployment rate and the availability of jobs, I don't think the moratorium should continue. The administration didn't want to do it, but the left wing pushed them and got their first win with the admin in a very long time. My guess is that the admin would be perfectly fine with the courts ruling that the gov't can no longer implement.PJPOWER said:Not sure if this would be the correct thread, but how does everyone feel about the approved eviction moratorium extension? I, personally, think it is going to result in courts being flooded in lawsuits for a very long time with landlords trying to get compensation. Also, just saw a story out of California when a couple purchased a new house and the prior owner is refusing to leave and there is nothing the new owners can do about it. Pretty fucked up if you ask me…
I think some people have it in their heads that landlords are all crazy wealthy and have no problem forking over money to pay for “squatters”, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.states were given moneys for rent help. Ohio hasnt distributed it by half....until those applications are processed and monies paid, and all that funding utilized, evictions should be paused.not all rentals are all utilities included. some have heat and water only. really depends on the type of rental.all of this gets worked through with patience AND FUCKING ASSHOLES GETTING VAXXED.top to bottom this is a prime example of corrections that need to be made overall to our systems. A real opportunity to make significant improvement. It needs to include the indirect tangential areas you might not think are associated at first glance.one thing that needs backdated is tax credit for unreimbursed employee expenses. All this work from home stuff, just how much do you think business foot the bill for. they didnt. they reduced overhead in a big way....0 -
Oh and employees have saved immeasurable amounts in commute savings. Also, I know for a fact that many people that were paying for daycare are not and have not in a year+. So that's a huge savings for them and costs us productivity.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help