There is no upside to Biden releasing 4 decades of senate papers. That would be a huge mistake regardless of this Tara Reade deal.
I agree on the Senate papers, but he should sit down for an interview and offer some explanation. Better to get it out of the way sooner than later. Even if it's a softball interview with a handpicked MSNBC interviewer that can help him through the interview and try to ensure he come out looking good.
There is no upside to Biden releasing 4 decades of senate papers. That would be a huge mistake regardless of this Tara Reade deal.
Maybe. I'm just kinda surprised they aren't public already. They have been turned over to a university and he has been out of the Senate for 12 years.
It's usually connected to the actual retirement of public life. Gore still has never released his, to my knowledge. Romney sealed his before he ran for president. I don't believe Kerry opened his up either. While the intention is for historians, it's ripe for misuse by political operatives, obviously.
There is no upside to Biden releasing 4 decades of senate papers. That would be a huge mistake regardless of this Tara Reade deal.
Maybe. I'm just kinda surprised they aren't public already. They have been turned over to a university and he has been out of the Senate for 12 years.
It's usually connected to the actual retirement of public life. Gore still has never released his, to my knowledge. Romney sealed his before he ran for president. I don't believe Kerry opened his up either. While the intention is for historians, it's ripe for misuse by political operatives, obviously.
My worry is that some Democratic strategist who has been wrong about everything since Al Gore gets in Biden's ear and convinces him that he needs to get in front of this by saying something, by taking responsibility for something, by apologizing for something, and we get a tear-filled interview in which Biden apologizes for "mistakes" in the past but never states what those are, etc, as if that will fix anything. And I worry about this even if he didn't do it, and I remain unconvinced that he did. Hell, Al Franken apologized and ever since has been claiming he didn't do it.
Splitting hairs? I read the original NYT and WaPo articles and came to the same conclusion. Sexual harassment, made to feel uncomfortable, asked to serve drinks, inappropriate touching? Maybe. Sexual assault? Not likely that it happened for all the reasons I've previously listed.
I expect Team Trump Treason to remain mum, even if asked, and allow his surrogates to keep hammering away at Sleepy Woke Joe. That's how a whisper campaign is designed to work. The Pakistani news agency report of the after midnight podcast of the original allegation gets picked up by the wire services and the opposition keeps screaming until the lame stream media picks it up and reports on it, as is happening now. All for someone who has "been trying to tell her story since 1993," and has, "no intention of filing a civil suit." Justice, political style.
This is coming from a self proclaimed propaganda detector on Twitter so you know it is the smoking gun everyone has been after. Alert the press, @lizburgh has cracked the case!! I just realized she has a goal for a new laptop and is only 54% there, I beg of you all to please go help her get this laptop so she can detect all of the propaganda.
This is coming from a self proclaimed propaganda detector on Twitter so you know it is the smoking gun everyone has been after. Alert the press, @lizburgh has cracked the case!!
Once the bulk of the papers and tapes from the five and one-half years Richard Nixon served in the White House are released, his presidency will become the best documented one in United States history. Because of Nixon's unprecedented forced resignation from office in 1974, little about his truncated administration appears normal in retrospect, including the complicated problems surrounding his presidential papers. The sheer magnitude of the collection overwhelms scholars and the Nixon White House papers and tapes released to date. There are 40 million pages of documents and 4,000 hours of secretly recorded conversations, 5,312 microforms, 2.2 million feet of film, and 2,000 pages of oral histories in the Nixon presidential collection. (It would take a single person almost two years of non-stop listening for eight hours a day just to hear all of the tapes without taking time to review or analyze them.) At the beginning of 1995, a little over five million documents (5.5 million) out of the 40 million (including 1.5 million of the most sensitive abuse of power documents) and sixty-three hours of White House Tapes (out of the 4,000 hours), accompanied by 2,700 pages of transcripts had been made public. There are no transcripts for the remaining tapes? only a 27,000-page log to make selective listening easier for researchers and the general public. Unlike other presidential papers, Watergate-related congressional legislation and a web of litigation has complicated the release for research of this unique collection of Nixon White House documents and tapes.1
It is pretty wild how many Inception layers deep people are willing to go rather than just accept another person has different views than they do
Oh, I get that people have different views but many of those different views aren’t grounded in reality or facts. Carry on.
This would apply directly to your regular inane ramblings about how a third party candidate can't be elected to office
Amash will never be President
Maybe not, but as of this morning there is officially a Libertarian House Rep. Let's all keep an eye on the Constitution today and see if it spontaneously combusts.
This is coming from a self proclaimed propaganda detector on Twitter so you know it is the smoking gun everyone has been after. Alert the press, @lizburgh has cracked the case!!
This is coming from a self proclaimed propaganda detector on Twitter so you know it is the smoking gun everyone has been after. Alert the press, @lizburgh has cracked the case!! I just realized she has a goal for a new laptop and is only 54% there, I beg of you all to please go help her get this laptop so she can detect all of the propaganda.
As a libtard, I am doing what I am supposed to be doing and believing women. That said, tweets written by a US-born lawyer in a very ESL style is the first thing that's made me question this. These are really fishy. You mock the tweeter of this, but unless she doctored those tweets, I'd be curious as to why it's irrelevant.
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
I'm glad I never said I believe all women. Women are humans, like men. They lie, they tell the truth. They exaggerate, they minimize. Whoever thought of that hashtag should be summarily beaten due to stupidity and short sighted-ness.
I'm glad I never said I believe all women. Women are humans, like men. They lie, they tell the truth. They exaggerate, they minimize. Whoever thought of that hashtag should be summarily beaten due to stupidity and short sighted-ness.
"Believe all women" should be "Hear out all women." Not as catchy, but still.
It is pretty wild how many Inception layers deep people are willing to go rather than just accept another person has different views than they do
Oh, I get that people have different views but many of those different views aren’t grounded in reality or facts. Carry on.
This would apply directly to your regular inane ramblings about how a third party candidate can't be elected to office
Amash will never be President
Maybe not, but as of this morning there is officially a Libertarian House Rep. Let's all keep an eye on the Constitution today and see if it spontaneously combusts.
A Libertarian who was elected as a Republican. A Libertarian who still has to vote yay or nay, and will always side with Republican party lines when push comes to shove.
Libertarians now hold 0.2% of the House seats, while the major parties hold the other 99.8%. Nice job torpedoing your political career Amash. Just like Rand Paul, he'll never be taken seriously in the halls of Congress again. Unless he decides to completely stick to his guns and become a Democrat. Until that happens, he's rendered himself powerless
This doesn't change the fundamentals of US gov't. We are not set up as a multi-party system. We do not have a Parliamentary system.
We are still a 2 party system; Checks and balances are still in the 3 branches. Amash will never be President.
Is that really her account? If it is, it does seem fishy. Says she joined Twitter in October of '18, just before the election cycle started to heat up. But didn't make her first tweet until March 1st of this year with what looks like a broken English tweet about a her daughter, complete with an emoji. It has a picture of someone supposed to be her daughter with a weird white outline around it, almost as if it was cropped from some website. All her tweets are written in a strange fashion. I dunno. Seems weird to me....
This is coming from a self proclaimed propaganda detector on Twitter so you know it is the smoking gun everyone has been after. Alert the press, @lizburgh has cracked the case!! I just realized she has a goal for a new laptop and is only 54% there, I beg of you all to please go help her get this laptop so she can detect all of the propaganda.
As a libtard, I am doing what I am supposed to be doing and believing women. That said, tweets written by a US-born lawyer in a very ESL style is the first thing that's made me question this. These are really fishy. You mock the tweeter of this, but unless she doctored those tweets, I'd be curious as to why it's irrelevant.
And where was she when Biden was running as VP? A heartbeat away from the oval....why not then?
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018) The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
Is that really her account? If it is, it does seem fishy. Says she joined Twitter in October of '18, just before the election cycle started to heat up. But didn't make her first tweet until March 1st of this year with what looks like a broken English tweet about a her daughter, complete with an emoji. It has a picture of someone supposed to be her daughter with a weird white outline around it, almost as if it was cropped from some website. All her tweets are written in a strange fashion. I dunno. Seems weird to me....
Then I clicked on her website link in her bio and this happened:
I'm glad I never said I believe all women. Women are humans, like men. They lie, they tell the truth. They exaggerate, they minimize. Whoever thought of that hashtag should be summarily beaten due to stupidity and short sighted-ness.
Absolutely never bought "believe all women" Hear all women. Listen to all accusations. Give all women the benefit of doubt even, but not believe all women.
This is coming from a self proclaimed propaganda detector on Twitter so you know it is the smoking gun everyone has been after. Alert the press, @lizburgh has cracked the case!! I just realized she has a goal for a new laptop and is only 54% there, I beg of you all to please go help her get this laptop so she can detect all of the propaganda.
As a libtard, I am doing what I am supposed to be doing and believing women. That said, tweets written by a US-born lawyer in a very ESL style is the first thing that's made me question this. These are really fishy. You mock the tweeter of this, but unless she doctored those tweets, I'd be curious as to why it's irrelevant.
The point is a certain user posted that spreading opinions that are not factual make you a liar and a fraud. The same user then presents an opinion from a twitter user and assumes it is factual. This has nothing to do with women.
This is coming from a self proclaimed propaganda detector on Twitter so you know it is the smoking gun everyone has been after. Alert the press, @lizburgh has cracked the case!! I just realized she has a goal for a new laptop and is only 54% there, I beg of you all to please go help her get this laptop so she can detect all of the propaganda.
As a libtard, I am doing what I am supposed to be doing and believing women. That said, tweets written by a US-born lawyer in a very ESL style is the first thing that's made me question this. These are really fishy. You mock the tweeter of this, but unless she doctored those tweets, I'd be curious as to why it's irrelevant.
The point is a certain user posted that spreading opinions that are not factual make you a liar and a fraud. The same user then presents an opinion from a twitter user and assumes it is factual. This has nothing to do with women.
Look at the twitter account for yourself. It's quite odd.
The twitter account kind of reminds of that twitter account that magically popped up 4 years from a guy who claimed to be Bill Clinton's son from when he impregnated some random woman in Arkansas. That looked like it was operated by Russian bots as well.
Comments
Maybe. I'm just kinda surprised they aren't public already. They have been turned over to a university and he has been out of the Senate for 12 years.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
Gotcha. Makes sense.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
This is coming and it will be a disaster.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/29/politics/joe-biden-tara-reade-new-york-times/index.html
Splitting hairs? I read the original NYT and WaPo articles and came to the same conclusion. Sexual harassment, made to feel uncomfortable, asked to serve drinks, inappropriate touching? Maybe. Sexual assault? Not likely that it happened for all the reasons I've previously listed.
I expect Team Trump Treason to remain mum, even if asked, and allow his surrogates to keep hammering away at Sleepy Woke Joe. That's how a whisper campaign is designed to work. The Pakistani news agency report of the after midnight podcast of the original allegation gets picked up by the wire services and the opposition keeps screaming until the lame stream media picks it up and reports on it, as is happening now. All for someone who has "been trying to tell her story since 1993," and has, "no intention of filing a civil suit." Justice, political style.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
there's nothing there, but it sure gets the mouth-breathers riled up
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Once the bulk of the papers and tapes from the five and one-half years Richard Nixon served in the White House are released, his presidency will become the best documented one in United States history. Because of Nixon's unprecedented forced resignation from office in 1974, little about his truncated administration appears normal in retrospect, including the complicated problems surrounding his presidential papers. The sheer magnitude of the collection overwhelms scholars and the Nixon White House papers and tapes released to date. There are 40 million pages of documents and 4,000 hours of secretly recorded conversations, 5,312 microforms, 2.2 million feet of film, and 2,000 pages of oral histories in the Nixon presidential collection. (It would take a single person almost two years of non-stop listening for eight hours a day just to hear all of the tapes without taking time to review or analyze them.) At the beginning of 1995, a little over five million documents (5.5 million) out of the 40 million (including 1.5 million of the most sensitive abuse of power documents) and sixty-three hours of White House Tapes (out of the 4,000 hours), accompanied by 2,700 pages of transcripts had been made public. There are no transcripts for the remaining tapes? only a 27,000-page log to make selective listening easier for researchers and the general public. Unlike other presidential papers, Watergate-related congressional legislation and a web of litigation has complicated the release for research of this unique collection of Nixon White House documents and tapes.1
https://www.jstor.org/stable/27551564?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Libertarians now hold 0.2% of the House seats, while the major parties hold the other 99.8%. Nice job torpedoing your political career Amash. Just like Rand Paul, he'll never be taken seriously in the halls of Congress again. Unless he decides to completely stick to his guns and become a Democrat. Until that happens, he's rendered himself powerless
This doesn't change the fundamentals of US gov't. We are not set up as a multi-party system. We do not have a Parliamentary system.
We are still a 2 party system; Checks and balances are still in the 3 branches. Amash will never be President.
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
Hear all women. Listen to all accusations. Give all women the benefit of doubt even, but not believe all women.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."