The Democratic Presidential Debates
Comments
-
CorrectSpiritual_Chaos said:
And Trump is less "pure bs" right?mcgruff10 said:I m so glad more and more people are realizing sanders is nothing but pure bs.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
And still the person @mrussel1 and @cincybearcat and @mickeyrat feel the need to oppose and argue against is me.mcgruff10 said:
CorrectSpiritual_Chaos said:
And Trump is less "pure bs" right?mcgruff10 said:I m so glad more and more people are realizing sanders is nothing but pure bs.
Interesting.Enough Is Enough! We've Been Talking about Universal Health Care for 100 Years
https://youtu.be/i8VqVHORBNQ
There was an interview with Steyer after the ABC debate. He comes of as very rational. If his persona and what he says is true. And him Bernie Bro-ing every chance he can even in a debate is endearing.
Bernie giving it back to Steyer
https://youtu.be/7FC94vVG2mUPost edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Like this?mrussel1 said:
Bernie seeks to damage his opponent. You simply don't do that if you want to win in the general.
Your attacks on Bernie actions in the primary sure is aging like milk :PPost edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
You’ve got the hot takes.mcgruff10 said:
CorrectSpiritual_Chaos said:
And Trump is less "pure bs" right?mcgruff10 said:I m so glad more and more people are realizing sanders is nothing but pure bs.0 -
This gay rock is the straw that broke the camel’s back?cincybearcat said:
And the Bernie Bros are at it again. Tearing down opposition with bullshit. You know what, no longer do I just dislike bernies platform and how he campaigns. I just dislike him as a person now. High and mighty dirty old bullshitter.ecdanc said:
0 -
You really fail to comprehend my argument. Biden is not attacking Pete's character. He's attacking the experience level of Pete which is in bounds.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Like this?mrussel1 said:
Bernie seeks to damage his opponent. You simply don't do that if you want to win in the general.
Your attacks on Bernie actions in the primary sure is aging like milk :P0 -
If you are on of those collecting hot takes, you should read through the thread. You will get hot takes about if McDonalds workers should have livable wages to if working people should have the legal right to vacation.ecdanc said:
You’ve got the hot takes.mcgruff10 said:
CorrectSpiritual_Chaos said:
And Trump is less "pure bs" right?mcgruff10 said:I m so glad more and more people are realizing sanders is nothing but pure bs.
I've got a pokédex full of hot takes from just being on this board."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Time for a beer!Spiritual_Chaos said:
If you are on of those collecting hot takes, you should read through the thread. You will get hot takes about if McDonalds workers should have livable wages to if working people should have the legal right to vacation.ecdanc said:
You’ve got the hot takes.mcgruff10 said:
CorrectSpiritual_Chaos said:
And Trump is less "pure bs" right?mcgruff10 said:I m so glad more and more people are realizing sanders is nothing but pure bs.
I've got a pokédex full of hot takes from just being on this board.0 -
Awesome. You got the full rule book for what’s out of bounds and what isn’t?mrussel1 said:
You really fail to comprehend my argument. Biden is not attacking Pete's character. He's attacking the experience level of Pete which is in bounds.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Like this?mrussel1 said:
Bernie seeks to damage his opponent. You simply don't do that if you want to win in the general.
Your attacks on Bernie actions in the primary sure is aging like milk :P0 -
Yeah I got my opinion, which is what I've been sharing the whole time. Unlike some on this board, I don't believe something subjective like this is infallible. I also don't think Biden, Pete, Amy or any of them are immune from crossing the line, in my opinion. My criticism with Bernie is that it's his constant and continuous method.ecdanc said:
Awesome. You got the full rule book for what’s out of bounds and what isn’t?mrussel1 said:
You really fail to comprehend my argument. Biden is not attacking Pete's character. He's attacking the experience level of Pete which is in bounds.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Like this?mrussel1 said:
Bernie seeks to damage his opponent. You simply don't do that if you want to win in the general.
Your attacks on Bernie actions in the primary sure is aging like milk :P0 -
You have not explained my alleged hypocrisy.mrussel1 said:
Oh well, le fou is French for idiot. I didn't know it was a Disney character.Spiritual_Chaos said:
No, it's LeFoumrussel1 said:
I finished the 8th grade successfully, thank you very much. One day I'll be as learned as you...or not. And it's le fou. Or maybe we should put this whole conversation en le four.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Pretty certain this will get you some LeFou-cheering from the usual suspects. Maybe that is why you post this nonsense.mrussel1 said:
I'm pretty sure this shows that I'm mocking you.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Again, this just shows that you 1) do not understand the movement #believewomen or 2) you are mocking the movementmrussel1 said:
Evidently you don't actually believe women, since you think Warren's lying. I'm going with Warren on this one, particularly since Sanders said on stage "can we talk about this after"? He wasn't upset,, she was because he called her a liar on tv. Considering the candidate sets the tone for the supporters, and Bernie's supporters are notoriously racist, sexist bullies, it seems like the preponderance of the evidence points to Bernie having said it. I believe women, you don't.Spiritual_Chaos said:
What is my hypocrisy?mrussel1 said:
I'm mocking your hypocrisy and your re-posting of Bernie Bros bullshit that influences no one here. Stop wasting your time. If you want to have a conversation, then have one like a normal humanoid. If you're going to post bullshit, then expect to be mocked in return. It's a simple calculus.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Why are you mocking a movement to make... eh... what point exactly?mrussel1 said:
#believewomenSpiritual_Chaos said:
He said he did not say it.cincybearcat said:
I’m would have to look into more than the Bernie / Russian troll farm posts.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Please defend this, you being a Pete Pal:cincybearcat said:
And the Bernie Bros are at it again. Tearing down opposition with bullshit. You know what, no longer do I just dislike bernies platform and how he campaigns. I just dislike him as a person now. High and mighty dirty old bullshitter.ecdanc said:
still waiting for you to defend Bernie lying about Warren.
Still waiting for you defending Warrens campaign putting out lies about Bernie?
There you go.
And look into it. I check back tomorrow.
I believe you are just uneducated. Because you never answered in what way I am a hypocrite?
edit - I'm getting rusty.. les fou since it's the all the suspects.
Trying to put me down but failing once again?
So, in what way am I a Hypocrite? Or "feeling tounge-tied?" like Freddy says in The Dream Warriors.
I already explained your hypocrisy. Maybe if you ask again I'll think of a different example."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
mrussel1 said:
You really fail to comprehend my argument. Biden is not attacking Pete's character. He's attacking the experience level of Pete which is in bounds.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Like this?mrussel1 said:
Bernie seeks to damage his opponent. You simply don't do that if you want to win in the general.
Your attacks on Bernie actions in the primary sure is aging like milk :PI agree.That was exchange in the debate brought up some serious questions for me. I liked what Pete said about how times have changed and the whole notion of needing someone with a fresh approach. This is one of the things I like about Yang the most- he is very in touch with the changing world and has innovative solutions to the looming difficulties we will have in dealing with those changes effectively. I like that about Pete too. But I also like Biden's response where he talked about the value of experience and mentioned some of the successes he has been a part of. Oh to have a candidate that has both a fresh, innovative approach, and enough experience to give voters confidence! I'm wondering if Amy Klobuchar might fit that way."It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
He is mocking Pete. To damage this opponent. Did you even watch the ad? And what has Petes "experience level" to do with firing black officers and firemen? Please move your goalposts all the way to an answer on that.mrussel1 said:
You really fail to comprehend my argument. Biden is not attacking Pete's character. He's attacking the experience level of Pete which is in bounds.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Like this?mrussel1 said:
Bernie seeks to damage his opponent. You simply don't do that if you want to win in the general.
Your attacks on Bernie actions in the primary sure is aging like milk :P
Berne is shining a light on that Billionaires are cozying up to some candidates like Biden and Pete and he thinks that is not a good thing. Whether it's Pete, Biden or anyone in the race. He would go after Yang for the same thing.
But sure, try to skew it to try to not come off as a hypocrite. Notice me saying "try" twice.
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Go back and read it. You think Warren is a liar when she declared that a sexist comment was made by Bernie. I believe Warren that Bernie said what he said. So I'll retract... maybe you're not a hypocrite, maybe you are just being sexist here. I'm not sure, either way the fact remains that I believe Warren, who is a woman, and you think she's lying. And both Bernie's body language and Liz's on the stage told me everything I need to know, along with the hot mic.Spiritual_Chaos said:
You have not explained my alleged hypocrisy.mrussel1 said:
Oh well, le fou is French for idiot. I didn't know it was a Disney character.Spiritual_Chaos said:
No, it's LeFoumrussel1 said:
I finished the 8th grade successfully, thank you very much. One day I'll be as learned as you...or not. And it's le fou. Or maybe we should put this whole conversation en le four.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Pretty certain this will get you some LeFou-cheering from the usual suspects. Maybe that is why you post this nonsense.mrussel1 said:
I'm pretty sure this shows that I'm mocking you.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Again, this just shows that you 1) do not understand the movement #believewomen or 2) you are mocking the movementmrussel1 said:
Evidently you don't actually believe women, since you think Warren's lying. I'm going with Warren on this one, particularly since Sanders said on stage "can we talk about this after"? He wasn't upset,, she was because he called her a liar on tv. Considering the candidate sets the tone for the supporters, and Bernie's supporters are notoriously racist, sexist bullies, it seems like the preponderance of the evidence points to Bernie having said it. I believe women, you don't.Spiritual_Chaos said:
What is my hypocrisy?mrussel1 said:
I'm mocking your hypocrisy and your re-posting of Bernie Bros bullshit that influences no one here. Stop wasting your time. If you want to have a conversation, then have one like a normal humanoid. If you're going to post bullshit, then expect to be mocked in return. It's a simple calculus.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Why are you mocking a movement to make... eh... what point exactly?mrussel1 said:
#believewomenSpiritual_Chaos said:
He said he did not say it.cincybearcat said:
I’m would have to look into more than the Bernie / Russian troll farm posts.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Please defend this, you being a Pete Pal:cincybearcat said:
And the Bernie Bros are at it again. Tearing down opposition with bullshit. You know what, no longer do I just dislike bernies platform and how he campaigns. I just dislike him as a person now. High and mighty dirty old bullshitter.ecdanc said:
still waiting for you to defend Bernie lying about Warren.
Still waiting for you defending Warrens campaign putting out lies about Bernie?
There you go.
And look into it. I check back tomorrow.
I believe you are just uneducated. Because you never answered in what way I am a hypocrite?
edit - I'm getting rusty.. les fou since it's the all the suspects.
Trying to put me down but failing once again?
So, in what way am I a Hypocrite? Or "feeling tounge-tied?" like Freddy says in The Dream Warriors.
I already explained your hypocrisy. Maybe if you ask again I'll think of a different example.0 -
I'm sorry you don't understand the nuances of American politicking. Honestly, I'm impressed on how much you do know, as a Swede, but this fine line might be culturally too specific.Spiritual_Chaos said:
He is mocking Pete. To damage this opponent. Did you even watch the ad? And what has Petes "experience level" to do with firing black officers and firemen? Please move your goalposts all the way to an answer on that.mrussel1 said:
You really fail to comprehend my argument. Biden is not attacking Pete's character. He's attacking the experience level of Pete which is in bounds.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Like this?mrussel1 said:
Bernie seeks to damage his opponent. You simply don't do that if you want to win in the general.
Your attacks on Bernie actions in the primary sure is aging like milk :P
Berne is shining a light on that Billionaires are cozying up to some candidates like Biden and Pete and he thinks that is not a good thing. For Pete, Biden or anyone in the race.
But sure, try to skew it to try to not come off as a hypocrite. Notice me saying "try" twice.0 -
Gtfo.mrussel1 said:
#believewomenSpiritual_Chaos said:
He said he did not say it.cincybearcat said:
I’m would have to look into more than the Bernie / Russian troll farm posts.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Please defend this, you being a Pete Pal:cincybearcat said:
And the Bernie Bros are at it again. Tearing down opposition with bullshit. You know what, no longer do I just dislike bernies platform and how he campaigns. I just dislike him as a person now. High and mighty dirty old bullshitter.ecdanc said:
still waiting for you to defend Bernie lying about Warren.
Still waiting for you defending Warrens campaign putting out lies about Bernie?
There you go.
And look into it. I check back tomorrow.
“So what are people like Tanden, Doyle, and Donegan really saying when they use language previously reserved for victims of sexual abuse and harassment in this context? They're certainly not saying to believe and support sexual assault victims. The concept of womanhood has become abstracted for them, the meaning of the language has been lost. They're actually telling us what type of woman we should believe and in what context, which is exactly what "believe women" and similar language is meant to do away with.They've turned "believe women" and similar phrases into a caricature of what they were meant to be.”
www.commondreams.org/views/2020/01/15/politics-believing-women%3famp
0 -
Bernie is a sexist.ecdanc said:
Gtfo.mrussel1 said:
#believewomenSpiritual_Chaos said:
He said he did not say it.cincybearcat said:
I’m would have to look into more than the Bernie / Russian troll farm posts.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Please defend this, you being a Pete Pal:cincybearcat said:
And the Bernie Bros are at it again. Tearing down opposition with bullshit. You know what, no longer do I just dislike bernies platform and how he campaigns. I just dislike him as a person now. High and mighty dirty old bullshitter.ecdanc said:
still waiting for you to defend Bernie lying about Warren.
Still waiting for you defending Warrens campaign putting out lies about Bernie?
There you go.
And look into it. I check back tomorrow.
“So what are people like Tanden, Doyle, and Donegan really saying when they use language previously reserved for victims of sexual abuse and harassment in this context? They're certainly not saying to believe and support sexual assault victims. The concept of womanhood has become abstracted for them, the meaning of the language has been lost. They're actually telling us what type of woman we should believe and in what context, which is exactly what "believe women" and similar language is meant to do away with.They've turned "believe women" and similar phrases into a caricature of what they were meant to be.”
www.commondreams.org/views/2020/01/15/politics-believing-women%3famp
0 -
Oh look, you couldn't argue against it so instead you went in on the "you are not even american"-dig. Are you not also gonna say that I am not eligible to vote in the US election so I shouldn't even be here? Or are you waiting for LeFou to mention it in a catchy song named after you?mrussel1 said:
I'm sorry you don't understand the nuances of American politicking. Honestly, I'm impressed on how much you do know, as a Swede, but this fine line might be culturally too specific.Spiritual_Chaos said:
He is mocking Pete. To damage this opponent. Did you even watch the ad? And what has Petes "experience level" to do with firing black officers and firemen? Please move your goalposts all the way to an answer on that.mrussel1 said:
You really fail to comprehend my argument. Biden is not attacking Pete's character. He's attacking the experience level of Pete which is in bounds.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Like this?mrussel1 said:
Bernie seeks to damage his opponent. You simply don't do that if you want to win in the general.
Your attacks on Bernie actions in the primary sure is aging like milk :P
Berne is shining a light on that Billionaires are cozying up to some candidates like Biden and Pete and he thinks that is not a good thing. For Pete, Biden or anyone in the race.
But sure, try to skew it to try to not come off as a hypocrite. Notice me saying "try" twice.
Haha. But I take it that you are a hypocrite then. It's okey. We can move on. Your attack against Bernie in relations to your favorite(s) went sour in less than a day.Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
He might well be, but he’s not the one posting sexist shit here.mrussel1 said:
Bernie is a sexist.ecdanc said:
Gtfo.mrussel1 said:
#believewomenSpiritual_Chaos said:
He said he did not say it.cincybearcat said:
I’m would have to look into more than the Bernie / Russian troll farm posts.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Please defend this, you being a Pete Pal:cincybearcat said:
And the Bernie Bros are at it again. Tearing down opposition with bullshit. You know what, no longer do I just dislike bernies platform and how he campaigns. I just dislike him as a person now. High and mighty dirty old bullshitter.ecdanc said:
still waiting for you to defend Bernie lying about Warren.
Still waiting for you defending Warrens campaign putting out lies about Bernie?
There you go.
And look into it. I check back tomorrow.
“So what are people like Tanden, Doyle, and Donegan really saying when they use language previously reserved for victims of sexual abuse and harassment in this context? They're certainly not saying to believe and support sexual assault victims. The concept of womanhood has become abstracted for them, the meaning of the language has been lost. They're actually telling us what type of woman we should believe and in what context, which is exactly what "believe women" and similar language is meant to do away with.They've turned "believe women" and similar phrases into a caricature of what they were meant to be.”
www.commondreams.org/views/2020/01/15/politics-believing-women%3famp
0 -
I’m not Swedish and I think you’re being a hypocrite.mrussel1 said:
I'm sorry you don't understand the nuances of American politicking. Honestly, I'm impressed on how much you do know, as a Swede, but this fine line might be culturally too specific.Spiritual_Chaos said:
He is mocking Pete. To damage this opponent. Did you even watch the ad? And what has Petes "experience level" to do with firing black officers and firemen? Please move your goalposts all the way to an answer on that.mrussel1 said:
You really fail to comprehend my argument. Biden is not attacking Pete's character. He's attacking the experience level of Pete which is in bounds.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Like this?mrussel1 said:
Bernie seeks to damage his opponent. You simply don't do that if you want to win in the general.
Your attacks on Bernie actions in the primary sure is aging like milk :P
Berne is shining a light on that Billionaires are cozying up to some candidates like Biden and Pete and he thinks that is not a good thing. For Pete, Biden or anyone in the race.
But sure, try to skew it to try to not come off as a hypocrite. Notice me saying "try" twice.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help