The Democratic Presidential Debates
Comments
-
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.0 -
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Lerxst1992 said:Great ending comment from Bill Maher last night about how difficult Democrats make it for voters by trying to outflank each other to the left
https://youtu.be/JtPQQjj01kMMaher nails it again!Here's what I think: I think far left (or as I'm beginning to see it, because they're not really left, they're just bat-shit crazy, the "out-to-lunch" Democrats) are doing their damnedest to get me to swing to the right. I won't, but the nonsense the uber-left is shoving down our throats is crazy making.Besides those Maher talks about in the video, here's another example of left going over that fence into the bleachers:Earlier this week, one of our local cops (a hell of a nice guy and damn good cop) was killed- shot dead by a couple of illegal immigrants working on an illegal pot farm. Our local Sheriff D'Agostini reached out to a grieving community as a result of this shooting but was then told by our uber-left total flake of a governor, Gov. Newsom, that D'Agostini is not allowed to contact U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) to find out more about the immigration statuses of both suspects because our state is a sanctuary state. Oh, so we provide sanctuary for killers. Right. Got it.Now all this does not mean that I am really going to swing right and become a Republican or a Trump supporter. But I might consider finding another, more sane planet to live on.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
Bri we are starting to see this crazy Uber left craze here in New Jersey. Our governor wants us to be the California of the east. It is terrible.
And that was a great watch! No way in hell should the Boston bomber be allowed to vote. What utter nonsense.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
No kidding! What is Sanders thinking? The wheels have come off!mcgruff10 said:Bri we are starting to see this crazy Uber left craze here in New Jersey. Our governor wants us to be the California of the east. It is terrible.
And that was a great watch! No way in hell should the Boston bomber be allowed to vote. What utter nonsense.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
so where then does newsome stand on illegal grows(cartel grows given the plot tenders)? and I may be wrong but I thought sancuary cities/state was meant to protect the otherwise law abiding undocumented persons when reporting crime against them. plus some other protections?brianlux said:Lerxst1992 said:Great ending comment from Bill Maher last night about how difficult Democrats make it for voters by trying to outflank each other to the lefthttps://youtu.be/JtPQQjj01kMMaher nails it again!Here's what I think: I think far left (or as I'm beginning to see it, because they're not really left, they're just bat-shit crazy, the "out-to-lunch" Democrats) are doing their damnedest to get me to swing to the right. I won't, but the nonsense the uber-left is shoving down our throats is crazy making.Besides those Maher talks about in the video, here's another example of left going over that fence into the bleachers:Earlier this week, one of our local cops (a hell of a nice guy and damn good cop) was killed- shot dead by a couple of illegal immigrants working on an illegal pot farm. Our local Sheriff D'Agostini reached out to a grieving community as a result of this shooting but was then told by our uber-left total flake of a governor, Gov. Newsom, that D'Agostini is not allowed to contact U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) to find out more about the immigration statuses of both suspects because our state is a sanctuary state. Oh, so we provide sanctuary for killers. Right. Got it.Now all this does not mean that I am really going to swing right and become a Republican or a Trump supporter. But I might consider finding another, more sane planet to live on.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
mcgruff10 said:
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.
False dilemma :
A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in reality more options are available. Also known as the either-or fallacy, the fallacy of the excluded middle, and the black and white fallacy.
If people don't like either candidate, they should get the fence post out of their ass and realize one candidate is clearly a better option than the other.
That candidate is nearly always a Democrat. By any and every metric, the Democratic party has outperformed the GOP.
Prove me wrong. Or sit down and shut up.0 -
I see you that you are unable to have a normal Rationale conversation. Moving on.CM189191 said:mcgruff10 said:
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.
False dilemma :
A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in reality more options are available. Also known as the either-or fallacy, the fallacy of the excluded middle, and the black and white fallacy.
If people don't like either candidate, they should get the fence post out of their ass and realize one candidate is clearly a better option than the other.
That candidate is nearly always a Democrat. By any and every metric, the Democratic party has outperformed the GOP.
Prove me wrong. Or sit down and shut up.
Post edited by mcgruff10 onI'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
It’s why Joe will be the nominee.mrussel1 said:Maher is 100% correct. It's possible to tack so far to one side during the primary, that you can't credibly move to the center afterwards.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Agreed.Halifax2TheMax said:
It’s why Joe will be the nominee.mrussel1 said:Maher is 100% correct. It's possible to tack so far to one side during the primary, that you can't credibly move to the center afterwards.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
so you post the definition of false dilemma, the fallacy of there being only two options, as your argument to mcgruff that there are only two options? interesting debate tactic.CM189191 said:mcgruff10 said:
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.
False dilemma :
A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in reality more options are available. Also known as the either-or fallacy, the fallacy of the excluded middle, and the black and white fallacy.
If people don't like either candidate, they should get the fence post out of their ass and realize one candidate is clearly a better option than the other.
That candidate is nearly always a Democrat. By any and every metric, the Democratic party has outperformed the GOP.
Prove me wrong. Or sit down and shut up.
shouting at people and insulting their intelligence isn't the way to get them to vote democrat.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
So I love an unreasonable argument. Over what period of time is this statement?CM189191 said:mcgruff10 said:
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.
False dilemma :
A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in reality more options are available. Also known as the either-or fallacy, the fallacy of the excluded middle, and the black and white fallacy.
If people don't like either candidate, they should get the fence post out of their ass and realize one candidate is clearly a better option than the other.
That candidate is nearly always a Democrat. By any and every metric, the Democratic party has outperformed the GOP.
Prove me wrong. Or sit down and shut up.0 -
I m going anytime pre 1964.mrussel1 said:
So I love an unreasonable argument. Over what period of time is this statement?CM189191 said:mcgruff10 said:
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.
False dilemma :
A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in reality more options are available. Also known as the either-or fallacy, the fallacy of the excluded middle, and the black and white fallacy.
If people don't like either candidate, they should get the fence post out of their ass and realize one candidate is clearly a better option than the other.
That candidate is nearly always a Democrat. By any and every metric, the Democratic party has outperformed the GOP.
Prove me wrong. Or sit down and shut up.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
nah , pre Gingrich. thats when the turn in Congress began.mcgruff10 said:
I m going anytime pre 1964.mrussel1 said:
So I love an unreasonable argument. Over what period of time is this statement?CM189191 said:mcgruff10 said:
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.
False dilemma :
A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in reality more options are available. Also known as the either-or fallacy, the fallacy of the excluded middle, and the black and white fallacy.
If people don't like either candidate, they should get the fence post out of their ass and realize one candidate is clearly a better option than the other.
That candidate is nearly always a Democrat. By any and every metric, the Democratic party has outperformed the GOP.
Prove me wrong. Or sit down and shut up.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Clinton over Reagan/Bush and Bush/Quayle and Obama over Bush. Team Trump Treason won’t surpass Obama because like Reagan and Bush, exploded the deficit and ultimately will leave the Economy in shambles. But you know, libs get blamed for the economy the repubs ruined.mickeyrat said:
nah , pre Gingrich. thats when the turn in Congress began.mcgruff10 said:
I m going anytime pre 1964.mrussel1 said:
So I love an unreasonable argument. Over what period of time is this statement?CM189191 said:mcgruff10 said:
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.
False dilemma :
A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in reality more options are available. Also known as the either-or fallacy, the fallacy of the excluded middle, and the black and white fallacy.
If people don't like either candidate, they should get the fence post out of their ass and realize one candidate is clearly a better option than the other.
That candidate is nearly always a Democrat. By any and every metric, the Democratic party has outperformed the GOP.
Prove me wrong. Or sit down and shut up.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
It is this sense of elitism displayed by CM that gives the dems a bad name and gives more and more ammo to trump.HughFreakingDillon said:
so you post the definition of false dilemma, the fallacy of there being only two options, as your argument to mcgruff that there are only two options? interesting debate tactic.CM189191 said:mcgruff10 said:
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.
False dilemma :
A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in reality more options are available. Also known as the either-or fallacy, the fallacy of the excluded middle, and the black and white fallacy.
If people don't like either candidate, they should get the fence post out of their ass and realize one candidate is clearly a better option than the other.
That candidate is nearly always a Democrat. By any and every metric, the Democratic party has outperformed the GOP.
Prove me wrong. Or sit down and shut up.
shouting at people and insulting their intelligence isn't the way to get them to vote democrat.
Post edited by mcgruff10 onI'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Well, if you want to re-elect Team Trump Treason, vote third party.mcgruff10 said:
It is this sense of elitism that gives the dems a bad name and gives more and more ammo to trump.HughFreakingDillon said:
so you post the definition of false dilemma, the fallacy of there being only two options, as your argument to mcgruff that there are only two options? interesting debate tactic.CM189191 said:mcgruff10 said:
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.
False dilemma :
A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in reality more options are available. Also known as the either-or fallacy, the fallacy of the excluded middle, and the black and white fallacy.
If people don't like either candidate, they should get the fence post out of their ass and realize one candidate is clearly a better option than the other.
That candidate is nearly always a Democrat. By any and every metric, the Democratic party has outperformed the GOP.
Prove me wrong. Or sit down and shut up.
shouting at people and insulting their intelligence isn't the way to get them to vote democrat.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I m not gonna vote for someone on the far left. Biden Or Pete I will vote for. Sander or warren? Hell no.Halifax2TheMax said:
Well, if you want to re-elect Team Trump Treason, vote third party.mcgruff10 said:
It is this sense of elitism that gives the dems a bad name and gives more and more ammo to trump.HughFreakingDillon said:
so you post the definition of false dilemma, the fallacy of there being only two options, as your argument to mcgruff that there are only two options? interesting debate tactic.CM189191 said:mcgruff10 said:
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.
False dilemma :
A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in reality more options are available. Also known as the either-or fallacy, the fallacy of the excluded middle, and the black and white fallacy.
If people don't like either candidate, they should get the fence post out of their ass and realize one candidate is clearly a better option than the other.
That candidate is nearly always a Democrat. By any and every metric, the Democratic party has outperformed the GOP.
Prove me wrong. Or sit down and shut up.
shouting at people and insulting their intelligence isn't the way to get them to vote democrat.
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Clinton over Reagan? I like bill a lot but I think Reagan wins. Regal definitely over carter.Halifax2TheMax said:
Clinton over Reagan/Bush and Bush/Quayle and Obama over Bush. Team Trump Treason won’t surpass Obama because like Reagan and Bush, exploded the deficit and ultimately will leave the Economy in shambles. But you know, libs get blamed for the economy the repubs ruined.mickeyrat said:
nah , pre Gingrich. thats when the turn in Congress began.mcgruff10 said:
I m going anytime pre 1964.mrussel1 said:
So I love an unreasonable argument. Over what period of time is this statement?CM189191 said:mcgruff10 said:
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.
False dilemma :
A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in reality more options are available. Also known as the either-or fallacy, the fallacy of the excluded middle, and the black and white fallacy.
If people don't like either candidate, they should get the fence post out of their ass and realize one candidate is clearly a better option than the other.
That candidate is nearly always a Democrat. By any and every metric, the Democratic party has outperformed the GOP.
Prove me wrong. Or sit down and shut up.
Eisenhower or jfk/lbj?I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
JFK but not LBJ. Ike would not have escalated Vietnam like Johnson, I don't believe.mcgruff10 said:
Clinton over Reagan? I like bill a lot but I think Reagan wins. Regal definitely over carter.Halifax2TheMax said:
Clinton over Reagan/Bush and Bush/Quayle and Obama over Bush. Team Trump Treason won’t surpass Obama because like Reagan and Bush, exploded the deficit and ultimately will leave the Economy in shambles. But you know, libs get blamed for the economy the repubs ruined.mickeyrat said:
nah , pre Gingrich. thats when the turn in Congress began.mcgruff10 said:
I m going anytime pre 1964.mrussel1 said:
So I love an unreasonable argument. Over what period of time is this statement?CM189191 said:mcgruff10 said:
So if people don't like either candidate then they should stay home and not vote?CM189191 said:
It's not holier than thou, or making assumptions.mcgruff10 said:
Lol. I always love the holier than thou attitude and ignorant assumptions by some people. Thanks for telling me how to vote.CM189191 said:
jfc not this shit againmcgruff10 said:
Correct. I might honestly vote third party if warren or sanders is the candidate. (Not that it matters in nj)mrussel1 said:
Fair enough, but hte 'terror' is from Warren and Sanders trying to outflank each other on the left on all of their policies, not just a wealth tax thing. Their escalating price tags is a problem.HughFreakingDillon said:I was responding to the "and moderates are terrified" article that was posted.
We are a two party system
Voting third party reflects a complete ignorance of how our government is set up
It's not edgy or cool or a protest. It's flat out ignorant.
Grass is green, sky is blue, USA has a two party political system. It's really not up for debate.
Voting third party is like buying a vowel on Jeopardy. You don't even deserve a participation ribbon.
False dilemma :
A fallacy of oversimplification that offers a limited number of options (usually two) when in reality more options are available. Also known as the either-or fallacy, the fallacy of the excluded middle, and the black and white fallacy.
If people don't like either candidate, they should get the fence post out of their ass and realize one candidate is clearly a better option than the other.
That candidate is nearly always a Democrat. By any and every metric, the Democratic party has outperformed the GOP.
Prove me wrong. Or sit down and shut up.
Eisenhower or jfk/lbj?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help