Should I ask Agnes out on a date?
Comments
-
Yes
Okay okay, how about asking Agnes if she wants to be "fb's". You're both single. Both with needs. Maybe at least a casual lay would serve the both of you well?Spiritual_Chaos said:Why isn't this thread focusing on me anymore."A smart monkey doesn't monkey around with another monkey's monkey" - Darwin's Theory0 -
No
That's like asking someone for a bite of their food, having them say no, and then asking for all the food that surrounds that bite instead.darwinstheory said:
Okay okay, how about asking Agnes if she wants to be "fb's". You're both single. Both with needs. Maybe at least a casual lay would serve the both of you well?Spiritual_Chaos said:Why isn't this thread focusing on me anymore.0 -
Yes
Maybe they just wanted that particular bite and are willing to share the rest? Hey, if you don't ask, the answer is always no.OffSheGoes35 said:
That's like asking someone for a bite of their food, having them say no, and then asking for all the food that surrounds that bite instead.darwinstheory said:
Okay okay, how about asking Agnes if she wants to be "fb's". You're both single. Both with needs. Maybe at least a casual lay would serve the both of you well?Spiritual_Chaos said:Why isn't this thread focusing on me anymore."A smart monkey doesn't monkey around with another monkey's monkey" - Darwin's Theory0 -
Yes
If she said no to a date, she doesn't want a bite of his food.darwinstheory said:
Maybe they just wanted that particular bite and are willing to share the rest? Hey, if you don't ask, the answer is always no.OffSheGoes35 said:
That's like asking someone for a bite of their food, having them say no, and then asking for all the food that surrounds that bite instead.darwinstheory said:
Okay okay, how about asking Agnes if she wants to be "fb's". You're both single. Both with needs. Maybe at least a casual lay would serve the both of you well?Spiritual_Chaos said:Why isn't this thread focusing on me anymore.0 -
YesYeah bad idea
this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -0 -
YesCheck out the Louis Theroux doc that aired last night in the u.k. it's on
BBC .
Maybe s.c can get caught up in this friendly arrangement !
this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -0 -
Haha. She's not that type of person. And it's not really what I was after.darwinstheory said:
Maybe they just wanted that particular bite and are willing to share the rest? Hey, if you don't ask, the answer is always no.OffSheGoes35 said:
That's like asking someone for a bite of their food, having them say no, and then asking for all the food that surrounds that bite instead.darwinstheory said:
Okay okay, how about asking Agnes if she wants to be "fb's". You're both single. Both with needs. Maybe at least a casual lay would serve the both of you well?Spiritual_Chaos said:Why isn't this thread focusing on me anymore.
Friend(zone) beer this week. Will be interesting
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Yes
I see what you did there.OffSheGoes35 said:S_C, I think you sabotaged this thing, because you really want a woman named Beth.I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
Only one girl in my life, and it's not Beth -- its:dankind said:
I see what you did there.OffSheGoes35 said:S_C, I think you sabotaged this thing, because you really want a woman named Beth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWNYLMUg6B0
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
no, there isn't, so we make the point ourselves.bootlegger10 said:
Is that the point of life? If we are just a collection of cells that result from a big bang millions of years ago, is there a point at all to life?HughFreakingDillon said:
I stand by it. alright, assinine may have been a bit strong, but I still find it ridiculous that a content life is a wasted life. that makes zero sense.rgambs said:
It's not asinine, you just don't like it. Wouldn't you be perfectly willing to consider a life wasted if it was spent languishing in a heroin stupor? It makes them content and happy, but you'd still consider it a waste.HughFreakingDillon said:
I would agree. saying someone who is content and happy is wasting their life because it doesn't fit your definition of a full life is assinine.PJ_Soul said:rgambs said:
I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about people in real life.PJ_Soul said:Why do you think that people without kids and lots of free time waste their time?? I do indeed have tons of free time, which I relish, and I'm not wasting my life, thanks.
Watching dancing with the stars and shopping for junk at outlet malls and flea markets is a waste of a life, whether a person is content with it or not, IMO.In real life, I have tons of free time and am not wasting it, lol.
I figure that whatever makes a person content and satisfied in life is never a waste of time or a life. Who are we to judge how someone finds contentment in their own life?? Now if someone is lying there on the couch watching garbage TV all the time and they're miserable and depressed and fucking hate themselves for it, then that's a waste, yes (and they should really talk to a professional about it). But if they're content and happy doing that? Or get real joy out of going to flea markets everyday? Not at all. IMO.
I draw the line a few miles from there, but it's not as extreme as it sounds, I know people way more extreme than that.
People who live in a way that is essentially, if you aren't on the edge you are taking up too much space.
the entire point of life is to be happy, not someone else's version of happy.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
That's a pretty furry looking woman. If you're into that sort of thing, that's cool. We're not judgemental here.If hope can grow from dirt like me, it can be done. - EV0
-
but a large part of what makes good people happy is helping others, contributing to society, etc. I dont' equate personal happiness necessarily with selfishness.oftenreading said:HughFreakingDillon said:
I stand by it. alright, assinine may have been a bit strong, but I still find it ridiculous that a content life is a wasted life. that makes zero sense.rgambs said:
It's not asinine, you just don't like it. Wouldn't you be perfectly willing to consider a life wasted if it was spent languishing in a heroin stupor? It makes them content and happy, but you'd still consider it a waste.HughFreakingDillon said:
I would agree. saying someone who is content and happy is wasting their life because it doesn't fit your definition of a full life is assinine.PJ_Soul said:rgambs said:
I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about people in real life.PJ_Soul said:Why do you think that people without kids and lots of free time waste their time?? I do indeed have tons of free time, which I relish, and I'm not wasting my life, thanks.
Watching dancing with the stars and shopping for junk at outlet malls and flea markets is a waste of a life, whether a person is content with it or not, IMO.In real life, I have tons of free time and am not wasting it, lol.
I figure that whatever makes a person content and satisfied in life is never a waste of time or a life. Who are we to judge how someone finds contentment in their own life?? Now if someone is lying there on the couch watching garbage TV all the time and they're miserable and depressed and fucking hate themselves for it, then that's a waste, yes (and they should really talk to a professional about it). But if they're content and happy doing that? Or get real joy out of going to flea markets everyday? Not at all. IMO.
I draw the line a few miles from there, but it's not as extreme as it sounds, I know people way more extreme than that.
People who live in a way that is essentially, if you aren't on the edge you are taking up too much space.
the entire point of life is to be happy, not someone else's version of happy.
Interesting. I don't share the view that the point of life is to be happy. I cringe a bit when I hear parents tell their kids that they should do whatever makes them happy. I think life has to be about more than happiness; I think it has to have at least some purpose that involves giving of yourself to others, otherwise it's empty. The "others" absolutely don't have to be children, but it needs to be something other than an entire focus on yourself and your own wants.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
YesHughFreakingDillon said:
but a large part of what makes good people happy is helping others, contributing to society, etc. I dont' equate personal happiness necessarily with selfishness.oftenreading said:HughFreakingDillon said:
I stand by it. alright, assinine may have been a bit strong, but I still find it ridiculous that a content life is a wasted life. that makes zero sense.rgambs said:
It's not asinine, you just don't like it. Wouldn't you be perfectly willing to consider a life wasted if it was spent languishing in a heroin stupor? It makes them content and happy, but you'd still consider it a waste.HughFreakingDillon said:
I would agree. saying someone who is content and happy is wasting their life because it doesn't fit your definition of a full life is assinine.PJ_Soul said:rgambs said:
I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about people in real life.PJ_Soul said:Why do you think that people without kids and lots of free time waste their time?? I do indeed have tons of free time, which I relish, and I'm not wasting my life, thanks.
Watching dancing with the stars and shopping for junk at outlet malls and flea markets is a waste of a life, whether a person is content with it or not, IMO.In real life, I have tons of free time and am not wasting it, lol.
I figure that whatever makes a person content and satisfied in life is never a waste of time or a life. Who are we to judge how someone finds contentment in their own life?? Now if someone is lying there on the couch watching garbage TV all the time and they're miserable and depressed and fucking hate themselves for it, then that's a waste, yes (and they should really talk to a professional about it). But if they're content and happy doing that? Or get real joy out of going to flea markets everyday? Not at all. IMO.
I draw the line a few miles from there, but it's not as extreme as it sounds, I know people way more extreme than that.
People who live in a way that is essentially, if you aren't on the edge you are taking up too much space.
the entire point of life is to be happy, not someone else's version of happy.
Interesting. I don't share the view that the point of life is to be happy. I cringe a bit when I hear parents tell their kids that they should do whatever makes them happy. I think life has to be about more than happiness; I think it has to have at least some purpose that involves giving of yourself to others, otherwise it's empty. The "others" absolutely don't have to be children, but it needs to be something other than an entire focus on yourself and your own wants.
Sure. I probably didn't elaborate enough on my comment. I was more referring to what I would see as the self-involved quest for happiness as its own goal, rather than happiness coming from a rich life.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
YesI just want to play golf, eat steak, and sleep. Selfish? Perhaps.
0 -
yeah, I guess I just don't believe that a self-involved quest for happiness ever ends up successful. not long term anyway.oftenreading said:HughFreakingDillon said:
but a large part of what makes good people happy is helping others, contributing to society, etc. I dont' equate personal happiness necessarily with selfishness.oftenreading said:HughFreakingDillon said:
I stand by it. alright, assinine may have been a bit strong, but I still find it ridiculous that a content life is a wasted life. that makes zero sense.rgambs said:
It's not asinine, you just don't like it. Wouldn't you be perfectly willing to consider a life wasted if it was spent languishing in a heroin stupor? It makes them content and happy, but you'd still consider it a waste.HughFreakingDillon said:
I would agree. saying someone who is content and happy is wasting their life because it doesn't fit your definition of a full life is assinine.PJ_Soul said:rgambs said:
I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about people in real life.PJ_Soul said:Why do you think that people without kids and lots of free time waste their time?? I do indeed have tons of free time, which I relish, and I'm not wasting my life, thanks.
Watching dancing with the stars and shopping for junk at outlet malls and flea markets is a waste of a life, whether a person is content with it or not, IMO.In real life, I have tons of free time and am not wasting it, lol.
I figure that whatever makes a person content and satisfied in life is never a waste of time or a life. Who are we to judge how someone finds contentment in their own life?? Now if someone is lying there on the couch watching garbage TV all the time and they're miserable and depressed and fucking hate themselves for it, then that's a waste, yes (and they should really talk to a professional about it). But if they're content and happy doing that? Or get real joy out of going to flea markets everyday? Not at all. IMO.
I draw the line a few miles from there, but it's not as extreme as it sounds, I know people way more extreme than that.
People who live in a way that is essentially, if you aren't on the edge you are taking up too much space.
the entire point of life is to be happy, not someone else's version of happy.
Interesting. I don't share the view that the point of life is to be happy. I cringe a bit when I hear parents tell their kids that they should do whatever makes them happy. I think life has to be about more than happiness; I think it has to have at least some purpose that involves giving of yourself to others, otherwise it's empty. The "others" absolutely don't have to be children, but it needs to be something other than an entire focus on yourself and your own wants.
Sure. I probably didn't elaborate enough on my comment. I was more referring to what I would see as the self-involved quest for happiness as its own goal, rather than happiness coming from a rich life.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
"Sorry is the fool who trades his soul for a Corvette"HughFreakingDillon said:
yeah, I guess I just don't believe that a self-involved quest for happiness ever ends up successful. not long term anyway.oftenreading said:HughFreakingDillon said:
but a large part of what makes good people happy is helping others, contributing to society, etc. I dont' equate personal happiness necessarily with selfishness.oftenreading said:HughFreakingDillon said:
I stand by it. alright, assinine may have been a bit strong, but I still find it ridiculous that a content life is a wasted life. that makes zero sense.rgambs said:
It's not asinine, you just don't like it. Wouldn't you be perfectly willing to consider a life wasted if it was spent languishing in a heroin stupor? It makes them content and happy, but you'd still consider it a waste.HughFreakingDillon said:
I would agree. saying someone who is content and happy is wasting their life because it doesn't fit your definition of a full life is assinine.PJ_Soul said:rgambs said:
I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about people in real life.PJ_Soul said:Why do you think that people without kids and lots of free time waste their time?? I do indeed have tons of free time, which I relish, and I'm not wasting my life, thanks.
Watching dancing with the stars and shopping for junk at outlet malls and flea markets is a waste of a life, whether a person is content with it or not, IMO.In real life, I have tons of free time and am not wasting it, lol.
I figure that whatever makes a person content and satisfied in life is never a waste of time or a life. Who are we to judge how someone finds contentment in their own life?? Now if someone is lying there on the couch watching garbage TV all the time and they're miserable and depressed and fucking hate themselves for it, then that's a waste, yes (and they should really talk to a professional about it). But if they're content and happy doing that? Or get real joy out of going to flea markets everyday? Not at all. IMO.
I draw the line a few miles from there, but it's not as extreme as it sounds, I know people way more extreme than that.
People who live in a way that is essentially, if you aren't on the edge you are taking up too much space.
the entire point of life is to be happy, not someone else's version of happy.
Interesting. I don't share the view that the point of life is to be happy. I cringe a bit when I hear parents tell their kids that they should do whatever makes them happy. I think life has to be about more than happiness; I think it has to have at least some purpose that involves giving of yourself to others, otherwise it's empty. The "others" absolutely don't have to be children, but it needs to be something other than an entire focus on yourself and your own wants.
Sure. I probably didn't elaborate enough on my comment. I was more referring to what I would see as the self-involved quest for happiness as its own goal, rather than happiness coming from a rich life.
Star Lake 00 / Pittsburgh 03 / State College 03 / Bristow 03 / Cleveland 06 / Camden II 06 / DC 08 / Pittsburgh 13 / Baltimore 13 / Charlottesville 13 / Cincinnati 14 / St. Paul 14 / Hampton 16 / Wrigley I 16 / Wrigley II 16 / Baltimore 20 / Camden 22 / Baltimore 24 / Raleigh I 25 / Raleigh II 25 / Pittsburgh I 250 -
Yes
Definitely. If you’re trading your soul, make sure you get something better than a corvette.HesCalledDyer said:
"Sorry is the fool who trades his soul for a Corvette"HughFreakingDillon said:
yeah, I guess I just don't believe that a self-involved quest for happiness ever ends up successful. not long term anyway.oftenreading said:HughFreakingDillon said:
but a large part of what makes good people happy is helping others, contributing to society, etc. I dont' equate personal happiness necessarily with selfishness.oftenreading said:HughFreakingDillon said:
I stand by it. alright, assinine may have been a bit strong, but I still find it ridiculous that a content life is a wasted life. that makes zero sense.rgambs said:
It's not asinine, you just don't like it. Wouldn't you be perfectly willing to consider a life wasted if it was spent languishing in a heroin stupor? It makes them content and happy, but you'd still consider it a waste.HughFreakingDillon said:
I would agree. saying someone who is content and happy is wasting their life because it doesn't fit your definition of a full life is assinine.PJ_Soul said:rgambs said:
I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about people in real life.PJ_Soul said:Why do you think that people without kids and lots of free time waste their time?? I do indeed have tons of free time, which I relish, and I'm not wasting my life, thanks.
Watching dancing with the stars and shopping for junk at outlet malls and flea markets is a waste of a life, whether a person is content with it or not, IMO.In real life, I have tons of free time and am not wasting it, lol.
I figure that whatever makes a person content and satisfied in life is never a waste of time or a life. Who are we to judge how someone finds contentment in their own life?? Now if someone is lying there on the couch watching garbage TV all the time and they're miserable and depressed and fucking hate themselves for it, then that's a waste, yes (and they should really talk to a professional about it). But if they're content and happy doing that? Or get real joy out of going to flea markets everyday? Not at all. IMO.
I draw the line a few miles from there, but it's not as extreme as it sounds, I know people way more extreme than that.
People who live in a way that is essentially, if you aren't on the edge you are taking up too much space.
the entire point of life is to be happy, not someone else's version of happy.
Interesting. I don't share the view that the point of life is to be happy. I cringe a bit when I hear parents tell their kids that they should do whatever makes them happy. I think life has to be about more than happiness; I think it has to have at least some purpose that involves giving of yourself to others, otherwise it's empty. The "others" absolutely don't have to be children, but it needs to be something other than an entire focus on yourself and your own wants.
Sure. I probably didn't elaborate enough on my comment. I was more referring to what I would see as the self-involved quest for happiness as its own goal, rather than happiness coming from a rich life.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Hey now... the C7's are frickin sweet.
Star Lake 00 / Pittsburgh 03 / State College 03 / Bristow 03 / Cleveland 06 / Camden II 06 / DC 08 / Pittsburgh 13 / Baltimore 13 / Charlottesville 13 / Cincinnati 14 / St. Paul 14 / Hampton 16 / Wrigley I 16 / Wrigley II 16 / Baltimore 20 / Camden 22 / Baltimore 24 / Raleigh I 25 / Raleigh II 25 / Pittsburgh I 250 -
YesThere’s no such thing as a soul.I SAW PEARL JAM0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help









