Also notable: he wasn’t able to refute anything else I mentioned.
Your linked blog post is old. The Byron York piece is current. Diana Denman’s “own words” confirm the York piece. There already was tough language. Denman...as if she has some overarching authority...wanted to add language on “lethal force”. This term was not adopted but pretty much the rest was. No plank was removed from the platform. Language wanted by Denman just wasn’t added. Fake news.
Also notable: I don’t need to refute anything else on Manafort. We agree that he was brought in to run the convention and as soon as that was over he was pretty much gone. Manafort’s shady business dealings are irrelevant to Trump. You are in tin foil hat territory.
Also notable: he wasn’t able to refute anything else I mentioned.
Your linked blog post is old. The Byron York piece is current. Diana Denman’s “own words” confirm the York piece. There already was tough language. Denman...as if she has some overarching authority...wanted to add language on “lethal force”. This term was not adopted but pretty much the rest was. No plank was removed from the platform. Language wanted by Denman just wasn’t added. Fake news.
Also notable: I don’t need to refute anything else on Manafort. We agree that he was brought in to run the convention and as soon as that was over he was pretty much gone. Manafort’s shady business dealings are irrelevant to Trump. You are in tin foil hat territory.
So why do you keep bringing up and responding to the issue of Manafort and his bearing on Team Trump Treason’s collusion with Russia, Russia, Russia, IF Manafort is a meaningless dot?
Your Examiner article was an opinion piece by a conservative columnist from last year. The link I posted was also from last year and includes Denam’s own words about what happened and seeing as how she is the delegate in question, bears a little more weight than some political hack like York’s opinion.
You might not think it’s a big deal to substitute “lethal defensive weapons” with “appropriate assistance” but many do and it absolutely is a softening of the GOP’s platform towards the Ukraine. And the change came from “New York. “ So, sure use your leader’s favorite catch phrase all you want. It’s what he does when he knows it’s a story that’s true and not complimentary of him. Fact of the matter is it’s true.
And I think your take on Manafort and him essentially being a minor part of the campaign is just laughable at this point. Sorry.
And your’s was a blog post. A blog post that is confirmed by the examiner article. She wanted to add language to an already tough policy. The addition was rejected. Nothing was removed from the platform. Who cares if New York made the rejection? It is their right to reject added language.
Lastly...the US government under Trump has in fact supplied Ukraine with lethal aid (progressives don’t usually like subsidizing other countries with lethal aid but I understand that in this case you all of a sudden do). So regardless of whether Denam’s language was rejected her policy wishes were in fact followed.
just to be clear. we know little of the Mueller investigation with regards to Trump. But we do have the Steele dossier.
Just from the 1st page alone:
-Kremlin has been cultivating Trump for 5 years w/ purpose of splitting Western alliances (2016)
-So far Trump has declined real estate deals offered to him by Russia, but has been accepting regular flow of information regarding political rivals
-Russian intelligence has comprised Trump through activities in Moscow to sufficiently blackmail him. This includes sexually perverse conduct arranged and monitored by Russian officials.
Your Examiner article was an opinion piece by a conservative columnist from last year. The link I posted was also from last year and includes Denam’s own words about what happened and seeing as how she is the delegate in question, bears a little more weight than some political hack like York’s opinion.
You might not think it’s a big deal to substitute “lethal defensive weapons” with “appropriate assistance” but many do and it absolutely is a softening of the GOP’s platform towards the Ukraine. And the change came from “New York. “ So, sure use your leader’s favorite catch phrase all you want. It’s what he does when he knows it’s a story that’s true and not complimentary of him. Fact of the matter is it’s true.
And I think your take on Manafort and him essentially being a minor part of the campaign is just laughable at this point. Sorry.
And your’s was a blog post. A blog post that is confirmed by the examiner article. She wanted to add language to an already tough policy. The addition was rejected. Nothing was removed from the platform. Who cares if New York made the rejection? It is their right to reject added language.
Lastly...the US government under Trump has in fact supplied Ukraine with lethal aid (progressives don’t usually like subsidizing other countries with lethal aid but I understand that in this case you all of a sudden do). So regardless of whether Denam’s language was rejected her policy wishes were in fact followed.
Some collusion...
laughable.
Yea, some collusion. Just like “some Team Trump Treason Tower wires tapped.” Or just like “some disappearing headlines.” Or maybe just like, “some fruit from a poisonous tree?”
just to be clear. we know little of the Mueller investigation with regards to Trump. But we do have the Steele dossier.
Just from the 1st page alone:
-Kremlin has been cultivating Trump for 5 years w/ purpose of splitting Western alliances (2016)
-So far Trump has declined real estate deals offered to him by Russia, but has been accepting regular flow of information regarding political rivals
-Russian intelligence has comprised Trump through activities in Moscow to sufficiently blackmail him. This includes sexually perverse conduct arranged and monitored by Russian officials.
Your Examiner article was an opinion piece by a conservative columnist from last year. The link I posted was also from last year and includes Denam’s own words about what happened and seeing as how she is the delegate in question, bears a little more weight than some political hack like York’s opinion.
You might not think it’s a big deal to substitute “lethal defensive weapons” with “appropriate assistance” but many do and it absolutely is a softening of the GOP’s platform towards the Ukraine. And the change came from “New York. “ So, sure use your leader’s favorite catch phrase all you want. It’s what he does when he knows it’s a story that’s true and not complimentary of him. Fact of the matter is it’s true.
And I think your take on Manafort and him essentially being a minor part of the campaign is just laughable at this point. Sorry.
And your’s was a blog post. A blog post that is confirmed by the examiner article. She wanted to add language to an already tough policy. The addition was rejected. Nothing was removed from the platform. Who cares if New York made the rejection? It is their right to reject added language.
Lastly...the US government under Trump has in fact supplied Ukraine with lethal aid (progressives don’t usually like subsidizing other countries with lethal aid but I understand that in this case you all of a sudden do). So regardless of whether Denam’s language was rejected her policy wishes were in fact followed.
Some collusion...
laughable.
Yea, some collusion. Just like “some Team Trump Treason Tower wires tapped.” Or just like “some disappearing headlines.” Or maybe just like, “some fruit from a poisonous tree?”
just to be clear. we know little of the Mueller investigation with regards to Trump. But we do have the Steele dossier.
Just from the 1st page alone:
-Kremlin has been cultivating Trump for 5 years w/ purpose of splitting Western alliances (2016)
-So far Trump has declined real estate deals offered to him by Russia, but has been accepting regular flow of information regarding political rivals
-Russian intelligence has comprised Trump through activities in Moscow to sufficiently blackmail him. This includes sexually perverse conduct arranged and monitored by Russian officials.
just to be clear. we know little of the Mueller investigation with regards to Trump. But we do have the Steele dossier.
Just from the 1st page alone:
-Kremlin has been cultivating Trump for 5 years w/ purpose of splitting Western alliances (2016)
-So far Trump has declined real estate deals offered to him by Russia, but has been accepting regular flow of information regarding political rivals
-Russian intelligence has comprised Trump through activities in Moscow to sufficiently blackmail him. This includes sexually perverse conduct arranged and monitored by Russian officials.
i wonder if Hillary paid extra for Steele to use the phrase "golden showers"?
However, there were other aspects to TRUMP's engagement with the
Russian authorities. One which had borne fruit for them was to exploit
personal obsesslons and sexual perversion in order to obtain
suitable 'kompromat' [compromising material] on him. According to
Source D, where s/he had been present, (perverted) conduct in
Moscow included hiring the presidential suite ofthe Ritz Carlton Hotel,
where he knew President and OBAMA {whom he hated] had stayed
on one ottherr orhcial trips to Russia, and deriling the bed where they had
slept by employing a number of prostitutes to perform a 'golden showers'
(urination) show in front of him. The hotel was known to be under FSE
control with microphones and concealed cameras in all the main rooms
just to be clear. we know little of the Mueller investigation with regards to Trump. But we do have the Steele dossier.
Just from the 1st page alone:
-Kremlin has been cultivating Trump for 5 years w/ purpose of splitting Western alliances (2016)
-So far Trump has declined real estate deals offered to him by Russia, but has been accepting regular flow of information regarding political rivals
-Russian intelligence has comprised Trump through activities in Moscow to sufficiently blackmail him. This includes sexually perverse conduct arranged and monitored by Russian officials.
just to be clear. we know little of the Mueller investigation with regards to Trump. But we do have the Steele dossier.
Just from the 1st page alone:
-Kremlin has been cultivating Trump for 5 years w/ purpose of splitting Western alliances (2016)
-So far Trump has declined real estate deals offered to him by Russia, but has been accepting regular flow of information regarding political rivals
-Russian intelligence has comprised Trump through activities in Moscow to sufficiently blackmail him. This includes sexually perverse conduct arranged and monitored by Russian officials.
wow...i read this thing a year and half ago before I ever heard the name Michael Cohen. He's in there though. Flying around Europe. Did he really need to go to Europe to hand Stormy her 130k check though?
Company Comment
We reported previously, in our Company Intelligence Report 2016/ 135 of 19 October 2016 from the
same source, that COHEN met officials from the PA Legal Department clandestinely in an EU
country in August 2016. This was in order to clean up the mess left behind by western media
revelations of TRUMP ex-campaign manager corrupt relationship with the former
pro-Russian YANUKOVYCH regime in Ukraine and TRUMP foreign policy advisor, Carter
secret meetings in Moscow with senior regime figures in July 2016. According to the
Kremlin advisor, these meetings were originally scheduled for COHEN in Moscow but shifted to what was considered an operationally ?soft? EU country when it was judged too compromising
Your Examiner article was an opinion piece by a conservative columnist from last year. The link I posted was also from last year and includes Denam’s own words about what happened and seeing as how she is the delegate in question, bears a little more weight than some political hack like York’s opinion.
You might not think it’s a big deal to substitute “lethal defensive weapons” with “appropriate assistance” but many do and it absolutely is a softening of the GOP’s platform towards the Ukraine. And the change came from “New York. “ So, sure use your leader’s favorite catch phrase all you want. It’s what he does when he knows it’s a story that’s true and not complimentary of him. Fact of the matter is it’s true.
And I think your take on Manafort and him essentially being a minor part of the campaign is just laughable at this point. Sorry.
And your’s was a blog post. A blog post that is confirmed by the examiner article. She wanted to add language to an already tough policy. The addition was rejected. Nothing was removed from the platform. Who cares if New York made the rejection? It is their right to reject added language.
Lastly...the US government under Trump has in fact supplied Ukraine with lethal aid (progressives don’t usually like subsidizing other countries with lethal aid but I understand that in this case you all of a sudden do). So regardless of whether Denam’s language was rejected her policy wishes were in fact followed.
Some collusion...
laughable.
Ha. A blog post with direct, lengthy, quotes from Denam herself. They rejected that language and didn’t change anything else. One has to wonder why they were so opposed to that since it goes beyond traditional republican foreign policy thinking.
And yes, a year and a half later the administration did spend 41 million in arms to Ukraine. As someone who is not a liberal or progressive, I supported that decision. I wonder if anything will change once Putin has Trump alone in a room in a couple weeks. We all know Trump delayed the decision was not happy about giving in to Mattis on that one:
The Trump administration - anti-breastfeeding and pro-formula, thanks to industry ties.
The USA almost torpedoed a WHO resolution in support of breastfeeding, going so far as to threaten punitive action to the sponsoring country and other countries that supported it.
U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials https://nyti.ms/2J0WJuV
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
The Trump administration - anti-breastfeeding and pro-formula, thanks to industry ties.
The USA almost torpedoed a WHO resolution in support of breastfeeding, going so far as to threaten punitive action to the sponsoring country and other countries that supported it.
U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials https://nyti.ms/2J0WJuV
Damn what else does this administration wanna do away with next ? They are gutting everything they can !
just to be clear. we know little of the Mueller investigation with regards to Trump. But we do have the Steele dossier.
Just from the 1st page alone:
-Kremlin has been cultivating Trump for 5 years w/ purpose of splitting Western alliances (2016)
-So far Trump has declined real estate deals offered to him by Russia, but has been accepting regular flow of information regarding political rivals
-Russian intelligence has comprised Trump through activities in Moscow to sufficiently blackmail him. This includes sexually perverse conduct arranged and monitored by Russian officials.
just to be clear. we know little of the Mueller investigation with regards to Trump. But we do have the Steele dossier.
Just from the 1st page alone:
-Kremlin has been cultivating Trump for 5 years w/ purpose of splitting Western alliances (2016)
-So far Trump has declined real estate deals offered to him by Russia, but has been accepting regular flow of information regarding political rivals
-Russian intelligence has comprised Trump through activities in Moscow to sufficiently blackmail him. This includes sexually perverse conduct arranged and monitored by Russian officials.
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Lastly...the US government under Trump has in fact supplied Ukraine with lethal aid (progressives don’t usually like subsidizing other countries with lethal aid but I understand that in this case you all of a sudden do). So regardless of whether Denam’s language was rejected her policy wishes were in fact followed.
Some collusion...
laughable.
Just from the 1st page alone:
-Kremlin has been cultivating Trump for 5 years w/ purpose of splitting Western alliances (2016)
-So far Trump has declined real estate deals offered to him by Russia, but has been accepting regular flow of information regarding political rivals
-Russian intelligence has comprised Trump through activities in Moscow to sufficiently blackmail him. This includes sexually perverse conduct arranged and monitored by Russian officials.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3259984-Trump-Intelligence-Allegations.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-russia-republican-pro-putin-ukraine-stance-rnc-ambassador-kislyak-meeting-a7610621.html
Laughable. Holla back, yo!
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
And yes, a year and a half later the administration did spend 41 million in arms to Ukraine. As someone who is not a liberal or progressive, I supported that decision. I wonder if anything will change once Putin has Trump alone in a room in a couple weeks. We all know Trump delayed the decision was not happy about giving in to Mattis on that one:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/05/ukrainians-stop-investigating-manafort-after-trump-sells-them-missiles-a-win-win-for-all-involved.html
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
Fuck that does look like the Animals cover.
If only it flew over Battersea power station.
Trump = Big man, pig man
Laughable.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
The USA almost torpedoed a WHO resolution in support of breastfeeding, going so far as to threaten punitive action to the sponsoring country and other countries that supported it.
U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials https://nyti.ms/2J0WJuV
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
https://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/trump-speeches-and-speech-pattern-analyzed-by-linguistics-professor-1272588867721
According to RCP aggregate polling...
Trump net approval is minus ten (that's bad for trump)
And generic congress is plus seven for Dems(that's bad for trump)
This is all during a decent economy when any other president and party would be plus ten minimum in polling
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/2018_generic_congressional_vote-6185.html