US
Attorney General William Barr listens during the International
Association of Chiefs of Police Annual Conference and Exposition at the
McCormick Place Convention Center October 28, 2019, in Chicago,
Illinois. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN
SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)
This article
appears in the Fall 2020 issue of Litigation – The Journal of the
Section of Litigation of the American Bar Association.
“With your law degrees, you will have immense power to do great
harm,” Harvard Law Professor Duncan Kennedy admonished our one-L torts
class in 1976.
A few months later, former President Richard M. Nixon (JD, Duke, ’37)
— who thought Watergate had been a political “witch hunt” — uttered his
infamous line, “Well, when the president does it, that means it is not
illegal.” And his former attorney general, John N. Mitchell (JD,
Fordham, ’38), was headed to prison.
More than 40 years after that class, United States Attorney General
William P. Barr (JD, George Washington, ’77) has driven home the gravity
of Prof. Kennedy’s admonition. When the story of the Trump era is
written, history will pose a single defining question to every American
lawyer: In the fight to preserve the rule of law, which side were you
on?
America has seen which side William Barr is on. As the nation’s top
law enforcement officer, the attorney general represents the “People of
the United States.” Early in his tenure, Barr jettisoned that role.
Operating as Trump’s personal advocate, Barr has abused the power of
his office to undermine the Trump-Russia investigation. Although
troublesome, Barr’s actions are best viewed as a case study in his modus
operandi. What Barr has done to that investigation and its key players,
he can do to anything and anyone. That makes Barr’s methods ominous for
the rule of law itself.
Hiring Barr was no accident. Early in 2017, before special counsel
Robert Mueller’s appointment, Trump feared that he was losing control of
the Trump-Russia investigation. He was furious at then-Attorney General
Jeff Sessions’ (JD, Alabama, 73) for recusing himself from the ongoing
probe. Referring to his former personal attorney, notorious fixer, and
top aide to Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy (R-WI) during the investigations of
communist activity in the 1950s, Trump lamented, “Where’s my Roy Cohn?”
A year later, he got his answer. Barr sent Deputy Attorney General
Rod Rosenstein (JD, Harvard, ’89) an unsolicited 19-page memo
challenging the premise of Mueller’s obstruction of justice
investigation and urging that the special counsel should not even be
permitted to question Trump. In William Barr, Trump had finally found
his Roy Cohn.
First came the lies and deceptions. According to The Washington Post,
as of July 9, 2020, Trump had made more than 20,000 “false or
misleading claims” since assuming office. Like Trump, Barr understands
the rhetorical and psychological concepts of primacy and repetition.
Whoever speaks first and most frequently on an important topic has the
upper hand in controlling the resulting narrative, regardless of its
veracity.
From his first days in office, Barr has reinforced Trump’s false
assertions that the Trump-Russia investigation never should have
happened. In the maelstrom that followed, truth became a casualty. So
it’s important to start with a brief reprise of the Mueller report’s key
conclusions:
“[T]he Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome.” (Vol. I, p. 5)
The Trump campaign “expected it would benefit electorally from
information stolen and released through Russian efforts.” (Vol. I, p. 5)
Trump tried repeatedly to obstruct the investigation into his campaign ties to Russia.
And Mueller concluded, “[I]f we had confidence after a thorough
investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit
obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that
judgment… Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the
President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.” (Vol. II,
p. 2)
Barr’s dissembling prevented the truth from gaining traction. Two
days after Mueller gave Barr his final report confidentially — including
summaries suitable for public dissemination — Barr sent a letter to
Congress with his own misleading “summary” of Mueller’s findings. It was
so deceptive that Mueller himself complained to Barr immediately,
saying that Barr’s letter “did not fully capture the context, nature,
and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions.” The result,
Mueller wrote, “is public confusion about critical aspects of the
results of our investigation.”
The Trump – Russia Timeline
But public confusion was the objective because it led to public
indifference. For another three weeks, Barr did not release even a
redacted version of Mueller’s report, and Mueller’s dissenting letter to
Barr did not surface until two weeks after that. During the intervening
month-and-a-half, Barr’s mischaracterizations became the only story of
Mueller’s findings, and they stuck. Primacy gave Barr the edge and
repetition then took over.
Immediately, Trump used Barr’s spin to reinforce his big lie. “No
collusion, No obstruction, Complete and Total EXONERATION,” Trump
tweeted — three lies in a single post.
Then Barr made things worse — or from Trump’s perspective, better.
Two hours before releasing a redacted version of Mueller’s report, Barr
held a press conference to spin its conclusions again. He repeated
Trump’s false “no collusion” meme four times.
On obstruction, Barr also made this disingenuous claim: “The White
House fully cooperated with the special counsel’s investigation,
providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents,
directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege
claims. And at the same time, the president took no act that in fact
deprived the special counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to
complete his investigation.”
Here’s the truth:
From its inception, Trump attacked Mueller’s investigation and
repeatedly pressured then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions and White House
counsel Don McGahn (JD, Widener, ’94) to curtail or terminate it. (Vol.
II, pp. 77-120)
Trump refused Mueller’s requests for an interview. (Vol. II, pp. C-1-2)
Mueller said Trump’s written answers to his questions were “inadequate.” (Vol. II, C-2)
Trump dangled pardons aimed at influencing key witnesses, including
his former national security adviser Mike Flynn, former campaign
chairman Paul Manafort (JD, Georgetown, ’74), and a person whose name
was initially redacted from Mueller’s report but who we now know is
Trump’s longtime confidant, Roger Stone. Trump also tried to influence
and intimidate his former personal attorney, Michael Cohen (JD, Thomas
M. Cooley, ’91). (Vol. II, pp. 120-156)
The Rule of Law
In 1789, Thomas Jefferson wrote that a well-informed electorate is a
prerequisite to democracy. Barr kneecapped the truth. When the redacted
version of Mueller’s report finally appeared, The Washington Post
awarded him “Three Pinocchios” for his “incomplete or misleading”
descriptions of Mueller’s investigation and conclusions. But Barr had
withheld even a redacted version so long that his false spin had
irrevocably infected the body politic.
Fortunately, the rule of law has courageous defenders who honor the
oath that every attorney takes to uphold the rule of law. In an opinion
on a Freedom of Information Act request for an unredacted copy of
Mueller’s report, U.S. District Court Judge Reggie B. Walton blasted
Barr’s pre-release “distortions” and “lack of candor.” In a remarkable
ruling, the respected federal judge wrote that he could not trust the
attorney general of the United States:
“The speed by which Attorney General Barr released to the public the
summary of Special Counsel Mueller’s principal conclusions, coupled with
the fact that Attorney General Barr failed to provide a thorough
representation of the findings in the Mueller Report, causes the Court
to question whether Attorney General Barr’s intent was to create a
one-sided narrative about the Mueller Report — a narrative that is
clearly in some respects substantively at odds with the redacted version
of the Mueller Report.” (Elec. Privacy Info. Ctr. v. US Dept. of
Justice, No-19-810 RBW, slip op. p. 17-18 (D.D.C. Mar 5, 2020)
Judge Walton could not reconcile “certain public representations made
by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report.” The
inconsistencies caused him “to seriously question whether Attorney
General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse
about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain
findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.”
(Op. p. 19)
The court’s Mar. 5, 2020 rebuke came a year too late. As Jonathan
Swift wrote more than two centuries ago, “Falsehood flies, and truth
comes limping after it.” With Barr’s help, Trump created a narrative
that was at odds with the evidence set forth in Mueller’s report. Barr
had fired his first bullet at the rule of law and it was a bulls-eye.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
barr will be remembered as a total disgrace to the profession.
And as a hero for the “cause.”
I wonder if he can be disbarred for his actions as ag?
There are calls in the house to impeach CYA Barr. That might give the ABA enough to disbar CYA Barr but I'm not sure what that process would be or how it'd work.
You guys all realize Barr was spoken favorably of by both sides of the aisle, including by Quid Pro Joe, who said “ You were one of the best I have ever worked with, and there have been a lot of attorneys general since I have been here, and I mean that sincerely." ?? This animosity is political at best, Russia hoax at worst. He’s a good example of what most in law strive to be, you’ve all just read the democratic fake news. Just like ACB, who they now attack. Yawn, after years of watching the circus, who can actually take the left seriously?!
You guys all realize Barr was spoken favorably of by both sides of the aisle, including by Quid Pro Joe, who said “ You were one of the best I have ever worked with, and there have been a lot of attorneys general since I have been here, and I mean that sincerely." ?? This animosity is political at best, Russia hoax at worst. He’s a good example of what most in law strive to be, you’ve all just read the democratic fake news. Just like ACB, who they now attack. Yawn, after years of watching the circus, who can actually take the left seriously?!
Speaking of a circus, how is Trump's campaign going?
You guys all realize Barr was spoken favorably of by both sides of the aisle, including by Quid Pro Joe, who said “ You were one of the best I have ever worked with, and there have been a lot of attorneys general since I have been here, and I mean that sincerely." ?? This animosity is political at best, Russia hoax at worst. He’s a good example of what most in law strive to be, you’ve all just read the democratic fake news. Just like ACB, who they now attack. Yawn, after years of watching the circus, who can actually take the left seriously?!
with all due respect, as a trump supporter, you forfeit the right to ever call anything a circus ever again.
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self.- Hemingway
You guys all realize Barr was spoken favorably of by both sides of the aisle, including by Quid Pro Joe, who said “ You were one of the best I have ever worked with, and there have been a lot of attorneys general since I have been here, and I mean that sincerely." ?? This animosity is political at best, Russia hoax at worst. He’s a good example of what most in law strive to be, you’ve all just read the democratic fake news. Just like ACB, who they now attack. Yawn, after years of watching the circus, who can actually take the left seriously?!
with all due respect, as a trump supporter, you forfeit the right to ever call anything a circus ever again.
You guys all realize Barr was spoken favorably of by both sides of the aisle, including by Quid Pro Joe, who said “ You were one of the best I have ever worked with, and there have been a lot of attorneys general since I have been here, and I mean that sincerely." ?? This animosity is political at best, Russia hoax at worst. He’s a good example of what most in law strive to be, you’ve all just read the democratic fake news. Just like ACB, who they now attack. Yawn, after years of watching the circus, who can actually take the left seriously?!
What year did Biden say this? Was this in the 80s when he was in the Reagan admin or something? You're going to have to take Democrats seriously quite soon.
You guys all realize Barr was spoken favorably of by both sides of the aisle, including by Quid Pro Joe, who said “ You were one of the best I have ever worked with, and there have been a lot of attorneys general since I have been here, and I mean that sincerely." ?? This animosity is political at best, Russia hoax at worst. He’s a good example of what most in law strive to be, you’ve all just read the democratic fake news. Just like ACB, who they now attack. Yawn, after years of watching the circus, who can actually take the left seriously?!
Did you come out with a C19 pie in honor of your Covidiot president?
You guys all realize Barr was spoken favorably of by both sides of the aisle, including by Quid Pro Joe, who said “ You were one of the best I have ever worked with, and there have been a lot of attorneys general since I have been here, and I mean that sincerely." ?? This animosity is political at best, Russia hoax at worst. He’s a good example of what most in law strive to be, you’ve all just read the democratic fake news. Just like ACB, who they now attack. Yawn, after years of watching the circus, who can actually take the left seriously?!
haha, i've watched that sack of shit talk absolute nonsense in interviews. he is 100% trump's stooge. i don't care who spoke about him favourably in the past. we're talking about now. the AG of the united states perpetuating dangerous BS like massive fraud with mail in voting for one. he's an emBARRassment.
barr will be remembered as a total disgrace to the profession.
If everything goes as planned, he’ll be remembered as one of the three most important architects of US dictatorship (alongside Mitch and Trump).
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
You should read the research done on those voters who prefer authoritarianism and how those who score high on the scale tend to support Team Trump Treason Tax Cheat. They sound just like a number of posters on here, particularly when you read the questions folks are asked to rate on a scale of 1-9.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
barr will be remembered as a total disgrace to the profession.
If everything goes as planned, he’ll be remembered as one of the three most important architects of US dictatorship (alongside Mitch and Trump).
still with this shit? jesus.
he's consistent. give him that
just constant "world is ending and trump will be king" nonsense.
thats the difference between possible and probable.
There have been a few academic studies on this, and @OnWis97 is not crying wolf here.
The most troubling was a joint study conducted by researchers from Harvard University and University of Melbourne less than five years ago that focused on millennials (i.e., the future of our fucking democracy!). Here's an introductory link to key takeaways from that study, which, I believe contains a link to the study itself.
But we like to ignore elitist stuff like academic studies and just let the goddamn world burn. So keep dismissing it as "this shit," and you should be just fine.
no one is dismissing anything. after a while the doom and gloom and hyperbole just get tiring.
if he wins, he wins. everyone understand that is still a decent possibility. but it's not going to be a fucking dictatorship with the eventual crowning of jared and ivanka and jailing of all political opponents without cause. that's the stuff i'm talking about.
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-senator-romney-calls-out-trump-and-vile-us-politics/ar-BB19YNmb?ocid=msedgntp
How the people that voted for McCain and Romney can still support tRump just blows my mind.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
The Long Read: Barr Battles the Rule of Law
BY Steven Harper | October 8, 2020
US Attorney General William Barr listens during the International Association of Chiefs of Police Annual Conference and Exposition at the McCormick Place Convention Center October 28, 2019, in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)
This article appears in the Fall 2020 issue of Litigation – The Journal of the Section of Litigation of the American Bar Association.
“With your law degrees, you will have immense power to do great harm,” Harvard Law Professor Duncan Kennedy admonished our one-L torts class in 1976.
A few months later, former President Richard M. Nixon (JD, Duke, ’37) — who thought Watergate had been a political “witch hunt” — uttered his infamous line, “Well, when the president does it, that means it is not illegal.” And his former attorney general, John N. Mitchell (JD, Fordham, ’38), was headed to prison.
More than 40 years after that class, United States Attorney General William P. Barr (JD, George Washington, ’77) has driven home the gravity of Prof. Kennedy’s admonition. When the story of the Trump era is written, history will pose a single defining question to every American lawyer: In the fight to preserve the rule of law, which side were you on?
America has seen which side William Barr is on. As the nation’s top law enforcement officer, the attorney general represents the “People of the United States.” Early in his tenure, Barr jettisoned that role.
Operating as Trump’s personal advocate, Barr has abused the power of his office to undermine the Trump-Russia investigation. Although troublesome, Barr’s actions are best viewed as a case study in his modus operandi. What Barr has done to that investigation and its key players, he can do to anything and anyone. That makes Barr’s methods ominous for the rule of law itself.
Hiring Barr was no accident. Early in 2017, before special counsel Robert Mueller’s appointment, Trump feared that he was losing control of the Trump-Russia investigation. He was furious at then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ (JD, Alabama, 73) for recusing himself from the ongoing probe. Referring to his former personal attorney, notorious fixer, and top aide to Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy (R-WI) during the investigations of communist activity in the 1950s, Trump lamented, “Where’s my Roy Cohn?”
A year later, he got his answer. Barr sent Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein (JD, Harvard, ’89) an unsolicited 19-page memo challenging the premise of Mueller’s obstruction of justice investigation and urging that the special counsel should not even be permitted to question Trump. In William Barr, Trump had finally found his Roy Cohn.
First came the lies and deceptions. According to The Washington Post, as of July 9, 2020, Trump had made more than 20,000 “false or misleading claims” since assuming office. Like Trump, Barr understands the rhetorical and psychological concepts of primacy and repetition. Whoever speaks first and most frequently on an important topic has the upper hand in controlling the resulting narrative, regardless of its veracity.
From his first days in office, Barr has reinforced Trump’s false assertions that the Trump-Russia investigation never should have happened. In the maelstrom that followed, truth became a casualty. So it’s important to start with a brief reprise of the Mueller report’s key conclusions:
“[T]he Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome.” (Vol. I, p. 5)
The Trump campaign “expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.” (Vol. I, p. 5)
Trump tried repeatedly to obstruct the investigation into his campaign ties to Russia.
And Mueller concluded, “[I]f we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment… Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.” (Vol. II, p. 2)
Barr’s dissembling prevented the truth from gaining traction. Two days after Mueller gave Barr his final report confidentially — including summaries suitable for public dissemination — Barr sent a letter to Congress with his own misleading “summary” of Mueller’s findings. It was so deceptive that Mueller himself complained to Barr immediately, saying that Barr’s letter “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions.” The result, Mueller wrote, “is public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation.”
The Trump – Russia Timeline
But public confusion was the objective because it led to public indifference. For another three weeks, Barr did not release even a redacted version of Mueller’s report, and Mueller’s dissenting letter to Barr did not surface until two weeks after that. During the intervening month-and-a-half, Barr’s mischaracterizations became the only story of Mueller’s findings, and they stuck. Primacy gave Barr the edge and repetition then took over.
Immediately, Trump used Barr’s spin to reinforce his big lie. “No collusion, No obstruction, Complete and Total EXONERATION,” Trump tweeted — three lies in a single post.
Then Barr made things worse — or from Trump’s perspective, better. Two hours before releasing a redacted version of Mueller’s report, Barr held a press conference to spin its conclusions again. He repeated Trump’s false “no collusion” meme four times.
On obstruction, Barr also made this disingenuous claim: “The White House fully cooperated with the special counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege claims. And at the same time, the president took no act that in fact deprived the special counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation.”
Here’s the truth:
From its inception, Trump attacked Mueller’s investigation and repeatedly pressured then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions and White House counsel Don McGahn (JD, Widener, ’94) to curtail or terminate it. (Vol. II, pp. 77-120)
Trump refused Mueller’s requests for an interview. (Vol. II, pp. C-1-2)
Mueller said Trump’s written answers to his questions were “inadequate.” (Vol. II, C-2)
Trump dangled pardons aimed at influencing key witnesses, including his former national security adviser Mike Flynn, former campaign chairman Paul Manafort (JD, Georgetown, ’74), and a person whose name was initially redacted from Mueller’s report but who we now know is Trump’s longtime confidant, Roger Stone. Trump also tried to influence and intimidate his former personal attorney, Michael Cohen (JD, Thomas M. Cooley, ’91). (Vol. II, pp. 120-156)
The Rule of Law
In 1789, Thomas Jefferson wrote that a well-informed electorate is a prerequisite to democracy. Barr kneecapped the truth. When the redacted version of Mueller’s report finally appeared, The Washington Post awarded him “Three Pinocchios” for his “incomplete or misleading” descriptions of Mueller’s investigation and conclusions. But Barr had withheld even a redacted version so long that his false spin had irrevocably infected the body politic.
Fortunately, the rule of law has courageous defenders who honor the oath that every attorney takes to uphold the rule of law. In an opinion on a Freedom of Information Act request for an unredacted copy of Mueller’s report, U.S. District Court Judge Reggie B. Walton blasted Barr’s pre-release “distortions” and “lack of candor.” In a remarkable ruling, the respected federal judge wrote that he could not trust the attorney general of the United States:
“The speed by which Attorney General Barr released to the public the summary of Special Counsel Mueller’s principal conclusions, coupled with the fact that Attorney General Barr failed to provide a thorough representation of the findings in the Mueller Report, causes the Court to question whether Attorney General Barr’s intent was to create a one-sided narrative about the Mueller Report — a narrative that is clearly in some respects substantively at odds with the redacted version of the Mueller Report.” (Elec. Privacy Info. Ctr. v. US Dept. of Justice, No-19-810 RBW, slip op. p. 17-18 (D.D.C. Mar 5, 2020)
Judge Walton could not reconcile “certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report.” The inconsistencies caused him “to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.” (Op. p. 19)
The court’s Mar. 5, 2020 rebuke came a year too late. As Jonathan Swift wrote more than two centuries ago, “Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it.” With Barr’s help, Trump created a narrative that was at odds with the evidence set forth in Mueller’s report. Barr had fired his first bullet at the rule of law and it was a bulls-eye.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
www.headstonesband.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I wonder if he can be disbarred for his actions as ag?
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
www.headstonesband.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
You're going to have to take Democrats seriously quite soon.
www.headstonesband.com
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
www.headstonesband.com
he's consistent. give him that
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
www.headstonesband.com
thats the difference between possible and probable.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Prague Krakow Berlin 2018. Berlin 2022
EV, Taormina 1+2 2017.
I wish i was the souvenir you kept your house key on..
Seems a great retirement locale for Team Trump Treason Tax Cheat.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
https://www.instagram.com/p/CGTrxn9n0xm/?igshid=rtuj5ou7zq1c
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
The most troubling was a joint study conducted by researchers from Harvard University and University of Melbourne less than five years ago that focused on millennials (i.e., the future of our fucking democracy!). Here's an introductory link to key takeaways from that study, which, I believe contains a link to the study itself.
But we like to ignore elitist stuff like academic studies and just let the goddamn world burn. So keep dismissing it as "this shit," and you should be just fine.
if he wins, he wins. everyone understand that is still a decent possibility. but it's not going to be a fucking dictatorship with the eventual crowning of jared and ivanka and jailing of all political opponents without cause. that's the stuff i'm talking about.
www.headstonesband.com