Russia's Influence On The American Election
Comments
-
95% of America has no idea who Manafort is... you do realize that dont you?Halifax2TheMax said:
“Nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Pauley Manafort is just some passing schmoe? I mean, I know it’s complicated and kind of boring when the talking heads aren’t screaming about it and it is difficult to remember all the connected dots and all but this ain’t over until Team Mueller, and by extension the dem house say it’s over. Your desires mean squat in that equation.my2hands said:
The sentencing for crimes that have nothing to do with Trump? That sentencing?Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
Don't even start with the GOP platform change going into the convention, nobody cares and the people that do already know about it, forgot about it, and wont be voting Trump in 2020 anyway
All this Mueller shit is in a bubble and only the people that already hate Trump give a shit... unless there is a smoking gun implication of the POTUS, this is ALL going to backfire
Dont shoot the messenger
0 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOAtz8xWM0w
Are American the most paranoid people's on planet earth? Might be.Give Peas A Chance…0 -
Jr would be close enough that it would resonate with the general public, so then it may not be a fail.... but anything short of a family member showing direct collusion, is a failmrussel1 said:
So if there's evidence that the campaign coordinated with wiki to time the release of the emails, and that's a criminal conspiracy, but... there isn't evidence that Trump personally knew, you think it's a wasted investigation? Let's assume Don jr. Is implicated. So same... fail?my2hands said:
I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their teammrussel1 said:
Talking and coordinating are very different. You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy. Second, you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted. Third, you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel.my2hands said:
So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?mrussel1 said:
Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy. The cyber theft is serious. I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails, but members of his campaign would likely be, including Stone. You don't find that appalling and serious?my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
If that's it, this is all a fail
Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest
I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
If so, then any hope you had was misguided from the start. I never had any hope that he personally would be able to be indicted on campaign conspiracy. It's his entire staff, and the political damage that would result as a consequence.
You knew going into it that this wouldn't show trump was engaged in collusion or influence of Russia? I'm pretty sure that what everyone was hoping for, and that is how it has been built up in the public eye, so yes anything short of that is a fail and strengthens Trump and the GOP going into 20200 -
Backfire? It’s not some campaign strategy. It’s an investigation into potential law breaking by Team Trump Treason and his associates. It’s not a game. If Team Trump Treason is innocent, he’ll be vindicated and has nothing to worry about. If not, he’ll be indicted and charged, whether now or when he leaves office. My gut tells me he’s guilty but we’ll see, right?my2hands said:
95% of America has no idea who Manafort is... you do realize that dont you?Halifax2TheMax said:
“Nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Pauley Manafort is just some passing schmoe? I mean, I know it’s complicated and kind of boring when the talking heads aren’t screaming about it and it is difficult to remember all the connected dots and all but this ain’t over until Team Mueller, and by extension the dem house say it’s over. Your desires mean squat in that equation.my2hands said:
The sentencing for crimes that have nothing to do with Trump? That sentencing?Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
Don't even start with the GOP platform change going into the convention, nobody cares and the people that do already know about it, forgot about it, and wont be voting Trump in 2020 anyway
All this Mueller shit is in a bubble and only the people that already hate Trump give a shit... unless there is a smoking gun implication of the POTUS, this is ALL going to backfire
Dont shoot the messenger
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Yea, sure. And so what? What does that change?my2hands said:
95% of America has no idea who Manafort is... you do realize that dont you?Halifax2TheMax said:
“Nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Pauley Manafort is just some passing schmoe? I mean, I know it’s complicated and kind of boring when the talking heads aren’t screaming about it and it is difficult to remember all the connected dots and all but this ain’t over until Team Mueller, and by extension the dem house say it’s over. Your desires mean squat in that equation.my2hands said:
The sentencing for crimes that have nothing to do with Trump? That sentencing?Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
Don't even start with the GOP platform change going into the convention, nobody cares and the people that do already know about it, forgot about it, and wont be voting Trump in 2020 anyway
All this Mueller shit is in a bubble and only the people that already hate Trump give a shit... unless there is a smoking gun implication of the POTUS, this is ALL going to backfire
Dont shoot the messenger09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
95%? You sure about that number?my2hands said:
95% of America has no idea who Manafort is... you do realize that dont you?Halifax2TheMax said:
“Nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Pauley Manafort is just some passing schmoe? I mean, I know it’s complicated and kind of boring when the talking heads aren’t screaming about it and it is difficult to remember all the connected dots and all but this ain’t over until Team Mueller, and by extension the dem house say it’s over. Your desires mean squat in that equation.my2hands said:
The sentencing for crimes that have nothing to do with Trump? That sentencing?Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
Don't even start with the GOP platform change going into the convention, nobody cares and the people that do already know about it, forgot about it, and wont be voting Trump in 2020 anyway
All this Mueller shit is in a bubble and only the people that already hate Trump give a shit... unless there is a smoking gun implication of the POTUS, this is ALL going to backfire
Dont shoot the messenger0 -
I didn't say I knew, but I didn't think it likely. His crimes are probably more typical white collar, from his business dealings. The fact that he communicates like Paulie from Goodfellas eliminated a true smoking gun from him personally. I do believe his campaign conspired and if the report doesn't detail that, then I'll be disappointed.my2hands said:
Jr would be close enough that it would resonate with the general public, so then it may not be a fail.... but anything short of a family member showing direct collusion, is a failmrussel1 said:
So if there's evidence that the campaign coordinated with wiki to time the release of the emails, and that's a criminal conspiracy, but... there isn't evidence that Trump personally knew, you think it's a wasted investigation? Let's assume Don jr. Is implicated. So same... fail?my2hands said:
I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their teammrussel1 said:
Talking and coordinating are very different. You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy. Second, you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted. Third, you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel.my2hands said:
So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?mrussel1 said:
Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy. The cyber theft is serious. I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails, but members of his campaign would likely be, including Stone. You don't find that appalling and serious?my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
If that's it, this is all a fail
Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest
I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
If so, then any hope you had was misguided from the start. I never had any hope that he personally would be able to be indicted on campaign conspiracy. It's his entire staff, and the political damage that would result as a consequence.
You knew going into it that this wouldn't show trump was engaged in collusion or influence of Russia? I'm pretty sure that what everyone was hoping for, and that is how it has been built up in the public eye, so yes anything short of that is a fail and strengthens Trump and the GOP going into 2020
But I disagree that anything less strengthens them. He is damaged regardless, particularly with moderates. This is based on the existing indictments, rhetoric, policy, shutdown, etc He has only shrunk his support in the past two years0 -
Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.The Juggler said:
If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation.my2hands said:
I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their teammrussel1 said:
Talking and coordinating are very different. You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy. Second, you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted. Third, you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel.my2hands said:
So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?mrussel1 said:
Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy. The cyber theft is serious. I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails, but members of his campaign would likely be, including Stone. You don't find that appalling and serious?my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
If that's it, this is all a fail
Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest
I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.0 -
95% have no idea who Manafort is, and yet simultaneously the whole country is being brainwashed by 6 major news organizations.... most of whom have extensively covered Manafort’s doings and trial.my2hands said:
95% of America has no idea who Manafort is... you do realize that dont you?Halifax2TheMax said:
“Nothing to do with Team Trump Treason.” Pauley Manafort is just some passing schmoe? I mean, I know it’s complicated and kind of boring when the talking heads aren’t screaming about it and it is difficult to remember all the connected dots and all but this ain’t over until Team Mueller, and by extension the dem house say it’s over. Your desires mean squat in that equation.my2hands said:
The sentencing for crimes that have nothing to do with Trump? That sentencing?Halifax2TheMax said:
Guess you’re all caught up in the 6 corporations that control 90% of the media and not reading the source documents, like Manafort’s sentencing memo? And social media can’t possibly sway an election.my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
Don't even start with the GOP platform change going into the convention, nobody cares and the people that do already know about it, forgot about it, and wont be voting Trump in 2020 anyway
All this Mueller shit is in a bubble and only the people that already hate Trump give a shit... unless there is a smoking gun implication of the POTUS, this is ALL going to backfire
Dont shoot the messengermy small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
my2hands said:Yeah, the only one that matters...
Honestly, what do they have with those indictments? It's all ticky-tack bs like porn star payments or completely unrelated to the campaign/Trump.... this has been built up in the public eye and so far, I'm not seeing the money shot... he will come out of this untouched and it will play right into his hand in 2020...
Stormy payoffs? Nobody cares
Roger talked to Wikileaks? So what
What else so far?
The left leaning media like MSNBC is already saying a short report is a good report, and that it could lead to MORE investigations... hilarious, they are already preparing people for the soft landing that they have bupkus on Trump
This was built up to show direct COLLUSION between Trump campaign and Russia, and that maybe Trump was compromised and beholden to Putin.... well, if they dont produce a smoking gun showing that then this is a total fail and plays into the Trump narrative and works to his benefit in 2020
I think that is why Halifax is quiet, this is beginning to look like a flop
You know all the indictments are related to lying about russian collusion?
Do you recall the GOP and media firestorm when WJC spent five minutes on a plane with the AG? How that was the Democrats sabotoging the Hillary investigations?
Can you imagine if Obama fired the AG? And replaced with two AG appointments who literally interviewed publicly by stating they are against the Hilary investigation and would work to shut it down if they were AG?
Could you imagine if the roles were reversed? Heck, all the Rs thought Hillary belonged in jail for an improper server for cryin out loud. How silly.0 -
Just a strange series of posts...dignin said:
Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.The Juggler said:
If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation.my2hands said:
I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their teammrussel1 said:
Talking and coordinating are very different. You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy. Second, you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted. Third, you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel.my2hands said:
So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?mrussel1 said:
Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy. The cyber theft is serious. I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails, but members of his campaign would likely be, including Stone. You don't find that appalling and serious?my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
If that's it, this is all a fail
Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest
I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.www.myspace.com0 -
This thread got a lot more entertaining
hippiemom = goodness0 -
Look at the AMT bubble cabal get their shorts in a bunch and posse up... bwahahahaha.... look guys, someone is not blindly buying this report will destroy Trump, we better get him! It's entertaining
Where's the fucking impeachments you guys were all saying was coming??? *crickets*
When is this report going to touch the POTUS and show he's a Russian stooge? *crickets*
So far you have goofball Roger Stone, two fucking years for that? What else, please enlighten me gifted ones!
The left of center and moderate media is already hedging their bet and it seems obvious... Fox and the GOP will soon be doing a victory lap and ya'll will still be in here acting like Trumps days are numbered lol
By the way, I remember when progressives and the left LOVED Wikileaks... remember those days? Or has TDS fully kicked in now lol
0 -
I'm way out of my depth? You're an f'ing Canadian obsessed with American politics and have a Trump avatar... c'mon now poser, you don't really give AF, it's just entertainment to you... you don't add squat here, you just seem to follow me around and make wise ass comments in between nodding in agreement with the echo chamberdignin said:
Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.The Juggler said:
If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation.my2hands said:
I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their teammrussel1 said:
Talking and coordinating are very different. You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy. Second, you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted. Third, you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel.my2hands said:
So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?mrussel1 said:
Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy. The cyber theft is serious. I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails, but members of his campaign would likely be, including Stone. You don't find that appalling and serious?my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
If that's it, this is all a fail
Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest
I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
And you can use my name, no need to be a coward when you talk smack
Let me show you how to do it, nice and direct.... do you have a problem with me digning? If so, speak up
That goes for almost ALL of you.... you turn into a bunch of pricks when someone dare not agree or go with the bullshit echo chamber in here... you gang up, you talk shit, and you literally circle that person and try to bully them... been watching it, tried to call you guys out on it, but now it's time to not play so nice... and it's always the same clowns... here's my advice, get off my jock...
Disagree with me respectfully, or keep it moving... otherwise I'm calling your ass out
Post edited by my2hands on0 -
You voted for W twice, beat itThe Juggler said:
Just a strange series of posts...dignin said:
Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.The Juggler said:
If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation.my2hands said:
I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their teammrussel1 said:
Talking and coordinating are very different. You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy. Second, you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted. Third, you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel.my2hands said:
So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?mrussel1 said:
Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy. The cyber theft is serious. I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails, but members of his campaign would likely be, including Stone. You don't find that appalling and serious?my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
If that's it, this is all a fail
Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest
I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.0 -
I’m not buying what you’re selling, sale denied. Okay, say you’re right. So what?my2hands said:
I'm way out of my depth? You're an f'ing Canadian obsessed with American politics and have a Trump avatar... c'mon now poser, you don't really give AF, it's just entertainment to you... you don't add squat here, you just seem to follow me around and make wise ass comments in between nodding in agreement with the echo chamberdignin said:
Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.The Juggler said:
If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation.my2hands said:
I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their teammrussel1 said:
Talking and coordinating are very different. You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy. Second, you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted. Third, you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel.my2hands said:
So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?mrussel1 said:
Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy. The cyber theft is serious. I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails, but members of his campaign would likely be, including Stone. You don't find that appalling and serious?my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
If that's it, this is all a fail
Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest
I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
And you can use my name, no need to be a coward when you talk smack
Let me show you how to do it, nice and direct.... do you have a problem with me signing? If so, speak up
That goes for almost ALL of you.... you turn into a bunch of pricks when someone dare not agree or go with the bullshit echo chamber in here... you gang up, you talk shit, and you literally circle that person and try to bully them... been watching it, tried to call you guys out on it, but now it's time to not play so nice... and it's always the same clowns... here's my advice, get off my jock...
Disagree with me respectfully, or keep it moving... otherwise I'm calling your ass out
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I am fascinated with this direction as well.my2hands said:
I'm way out of my depth? You're an f'ing Canadian obsessed with American politics and have a Trump avatar... c'mon now poser, you don't really give AF, it's just entertainment to you... you don't add squat here, you just seem to follow me around and make wise ass comments in between nodding in agreement with the echo chamberdignin said:
Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.The Juggler said:
If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation.my2hands said:
I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their teammrussel1 said:
Talking and coordinating are very different. You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy. Second, you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted. Third, you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel.my2hands said:
So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?mrussel1 said:
Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy. The cyber theft is serious. I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails, but members of his campaign would likely be, including Stone. You don't find that appalling and serious?my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
If that's it, this is all a fail
Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest
I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
And you can use my name, no need to be a coward when you talk smack
Let me show you how to do it, nice and direct.... do you have a problem with me digning? If so, speak up
That goes for almost ALL of you.... you turn into a bunch of pricks when someone dare not agree or go with the bullshit echo chamber in here... you gang up, you talk shit, and you literally circle that person and try to bully them... been watching it, tried to call you guys out on it, but now it's time to not play so nice... and it's always the same clowns... here's my advice, get off my jock...
Disagree with me respectfully, or keep it moving... otherwise I'm calling your ass out0 -
The circling and attacking is spot on.my2hands said:
I'm way out of my depth? You're an f'ing Canadian obsessed with American politics and have a Trump avatar... c'mon now poser, you don't really give AF, it's just entertainment to you... you don't add squat here, you just seem to follow me around and make wise ass comments in between nodding in agreement with the echo chamberdignin said:
Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.The Juggler said:
If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation.my2hands said:
I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their teammrussel1 said:
Talking and coordinating are very different. You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy. Second, you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted. Third, you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel.my2hands said:
So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?mrussel1 said:
Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy. The cyber theft is serious. I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails, but members of his campaign would likely be, including Stone. You don't find that appalling and serious?my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
If that's it, this is all a fail
Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest
I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
And you can use my name, no need to be a coward when you talk smack
Let me show you how to do it, nice and direct.... do you have a problem with me digning? If so, speak up
That goes for almost ALL of you.... you turn into a bunch of pricks when someone dare not agree or go with the bullshit echo chamber in here... you gang up, you talk shit, and you literally circle that person and try to bully them... been watching it, tried to call you guys out on it, but now it's time to not play so nice... and it's always the same clowns... here's my advice, get off my jock...
Disagree with me respectfully, or keep it moving... otherwise I'm calling your ass outhippiemom = goodness0 -
He claims victory... is on the ballot in 2020 clean... and has a chance at re-electionHalifax2TheMax said:
I’m not buying what you’re selling, sale denied. Okay, say you’re right. So what?my2hands said:
I'm way out of my depth? You're an f'ing Canadian obsessed with American politics and have a Trump avatar... c'mon now poser, you don't really give AF, it's just entertainment to you... you don't add squat here, you just seem to follow me around and make wise ass comments in between nodding in agreement with the echo chamberdignin said:
Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.The Juggler said:
If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation.my2hands said:
I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their teammrussel1 said:
Talking and coordinating are very different. You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy. Second, you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted. Third, you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel.my2hands said:
So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?mrussel1 said:
Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy. The cyber theft is serious. I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails, but members of his campaign would likely be, including Stone. You don't find that appalling and serious?my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
If that's it, this is all a fail
Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest
I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
And you can use my name, no need to be a coward when you talk smack
Let me show you how to do it, nice and direct.... do you have a problem with me signing? If so, speak up
That goes for almost ALL of you.... you turn into a bunch of pricks when someone dare not agree or go with the bullshit echo chamber in here... you gang up, you talk shit, and you literally circle that person and try to bully them... been watching it, tried to call you guys out on it, but now it's time to not play so nice... and it's always the same clowns... here's my advice, get off my jock...
Disagree with me respectfully, or keep it moving... otherwise I'm calling your ass out
All the eggs have been put into the Mueller basket, and it's just not going to resonate with the average voter unless it sticks to Trump in a real way... and will likely energize the GOP heading into the election...
That's whatPost edited by my2hands on0 -
I disagree. Pelosi never argued impeachment and has aggressively kept the caucus in line about it. She remembers the 90s. Democrats won't run on Russia. They didn't at the midterms. The danger right now is the party being painted as too socialist. That's a much graver concern than a weak Mueller report.my2hands said:
He claims victory... is on the ballot in 2020 clean... and has a chance at re-electionHalifax2TheMax said:
I’m not buying what you’re selling, sale denied. Okay, say you’re right. So what?my2hands said:
I'm way out of my depth? You're an f'ing Canadian obsessed with American politics and have a Trump avatar... c'mon now poser, you don't really give AF, it's just entertainment to you... you don't add squat here, you just seem to follow me around and make wise ass comments in between nodding in agreement with the echo chamberdignin said:
Exactly. Someone's way out of their depth. They let the cat out of the bag when they bragged about how they ignore mainstream news.The Juggler said:
If you read the actual articles instead of just the headlines, maybe you’d know more. Like how the Stormy Daniels issue is unrelated to the Russia investigation.my2hands said:
I am not listening to any talking heads... I see headlines and I read between the lines... trust me, I dont waste my time listening to paid pundits who say anything to support their teammrussel1 said:
Talking and coordinating are very different. You are using verbs that deliberately downplay a criminal conspiracy. Second, you continue to ignore the multitude of crimes that have been prosecuted. Third, you are listening to talking heads that need something to discuss 24/7. How about letting it play out before you render judgment? That would be novel.my2hands said:
So that's your smoking gun? That's the result of a 2 year investigation? Roger f'ing Stone talking to Wikileaks is it?mrussel1 said:
Well wacky Stone coordinating the release of stolen emails on behalf of the campaign is a criminal conspiracy. The cyber theft is serious. I don't know that Trump will be personally implicated since here doesn't use emails, but members of his campaign would likely be, including Stone. You don't find that appalling and serious?my2hands said:
Tell that to the mainstream media... I'm just reading between the linesThe Juggler said:Report's not even out and people are already making declarations about what's in it. Ha.
If they had evidence of collusion or being compromised, it would have been out long ago and they would have taken him down... instead we have porn stars and whacky Roger Stone talking to Wikileaks... that's it from what I can tell, all the other indictments have nothing to do with Trump or the campaign, or am I missing something?
If that's it, this is all a fail
Ok... coordinating... if that's all you've got, it's a fail and wont effect Trump in the slightest
I'm not ignoring the other prosecutions, they have absolutely nothing to do with Trump, collusion, or being compromised.... so yeah, they mean squat at the end of the day
And let's not forget Manafort was giving detailed polling data to Russian agents. Yeah, nothing to see here, all a giant fail. Let's pack up and go home.
And you can use my name, no need to be a coward when you talk smack
Let me show you how to do it, nice and direct.... do you have a problem with me signing? If so, speak up
That goes for almost ALL of you.... you turn into a bunch of pricks when someone dare not agree or go with the bullshit echo chamber in here... you gang up, you talk shit, and you literally circle that person and try to bully them... been watching it, tried to call you guys out on it, but now it's time to not play so nice... and it's always the same clowns... here's my advice, get off my jock...
Disagree with me respectfully, or keep it moving... otherwise I'm calling your ass out
All the eggs have been put into the Mueller basket, and it's just not going to resonate with the average voter... and will likely energize the GOP heading into the election...
That's what0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help