Trump

Gern Blansten

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/eric-schneiderman-trump-university-fraud-lawsuit

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/eric-schneiderman-trump-university-fraud-223812?cmpid=sf#ixzz4AQjjoB2o

This is great....Trump is a snake oil salesman

PJ_Soul

PJ_Soul said:

Trump is a scumbag - we already know this.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/01/trump-university-staff-testimony-fraudulent-scheme?CMP=fb_us

Seriously, why is no one talking about this? Seems like a pretty big deal to me.

mrussel1

PJ_Soul said:

PJ_Soul said:

Trump is a scumbag - we already know this.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/01/trump-university-staff-testimony-fraudulent-scheme?CMP=fb_us

Seriously, why is no one talking about this? Seems like a pretty big deal to me.

It's a big deal in the media. If you're asking why no one here is talking about, my guess is that the conservatives cannot really defend it. So there's no argument? I posted it about it the other night when the paper's were released.

josevolution

PJ_Soul said:

PJ_Soul said:

Trump is a scumbag - we already know this.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/01/trump-university-staff-testimony-fraudulent-scheme?CMP=fb_us

Seriously, why is no one talking about this? Seems like a pretty big deal to me.

I think this will be really tough for him to brush aside his supporters and him will say it's all crap and

Gern Blansten

The Trump U stuff falls in line with Mark Cuban's comments....why would Trump sell steaks? why would he sell this fake real estate crap? Dude needs money and will get it whatever way possible.

CH156378

2016 might actually be the first in about 20 years that Trump hasn't given money to the Clintons whether it be Bills foundation or to a Clinton campaign. I'm just guessing though.

g under p

Gern Blansten said:

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/eric-schneiderman-trump-university-fraud-lawsuit

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/eric-schneiderman-trump-university-fraud-223812?cmpid=sf#ixzz4AQjjoB2o

This is great....Trump is a snake oil salesman

I've tried very hard to believe some of the things Trump has spoken about in the pass but I find that an impossible task. It's going to be an extraordinary 5 months of political deceptions of which this country has never scene.

Peace

Gern Blansten

http://www.vox.com/2016/6/2/11833912/donald-trump-1994-women-buildings-misogyny

Let's start with this comment, though, where Trump says he had mixed feelings about his second wife, Marla Maples, an actress and television personality, working outside the home.

"I have days where I think it's great," Trump said. "And then I have days where, if I come home — and I don't want to sound too much like a chauvinist — but when I come home and dinner's not ready, I go through the roof."

Billionaire probs

PJ_Soul

mrussel1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJ_Soul said:

Trump is a scumbag - we already know this.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/01/trump-university-staff-testimony-fraudulent-scheme?CMP=fb_us

Seriously, why is no one talking about this? Seems like a pretty big deal to me.

It's a big deal in the media. If you're asking why no one here is talking about, my guess is that the conservatives cannot really defend it. So there's no argument? I posted it about it the other night when the paper's were released.

I guess so. I would be very interested to hear from the conservatives who are considering voting for Trump to be the POTUS. I would like to know how they will justify their vote for someone who is in charge of something like this... basically a ponzi scheme. Wondering if they are okay with a President who will purposefully and pointedly scam and take advantage of vulnerable people, and, if they aren't okay with that, how they are managing to sweep this under their mental rug.

Degeneratefk

PJ_Soul said:

mrussel1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJ_Soul said:

Trump is a scumbag - we already know this.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/01/trump-university-staff-testimony-fraudulent-scheme?CMP=fb_us

Seriously, why is no one talking about this? Seems like a pretty big deal to me.

It's a big deal in the media. If you're asking why no one here is talking about, my guess is that the conservatives cannot really defend it. So there's no argument? I posted it about it the other night when the paper's were released.

I guess so. I would be very interested to hear from the conservatives who are considering voting for Trump to be the POTUS. I would like to know how they will justify their vote for someone who is in charge of something like this... basically a ponzi scheme. Wondering if they are okay with a President who will purposefully and pointedly scam and take advantage of vulnerable people, and, if they aren't okay with that, how they are managing to sweep this under their mental rug.

They won't answer the question. Their response will be "I'd rather vote for a guy that tried to earn money than someone who used their own email account or someone who ignored our people in benghazi."

mrussel1

Degeneratefk said:

PJ_Soul said:

mrussel1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJ_Soul said:

Trump is a scumbag - we already know this.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/01/trump-university-staff-testimony-fraudulent-scheme?CMP=fb_us

Seriously, why is no one talking about this? Seems like a pretty big deal to me.

It's a big deal in the media. If you're asking why no one here is talking about, my guess is that the conservatives cannot really defend it. So there's no argument? I posted it about it the other night when the paper's were released.

I guess so. I would be very interested to hear from the conservatives who are considering voting for Trump to be the POTUS. I would like to know how they will justify their vote for someone who is in charge of something like this... basically a ponzi scheme. Wondering if they are okay with a President who will purposefully and pointedly scam and take advantage of vulnerable people, and, if they aren't okay with that, how they are managing to sweep this under their mental rug.

They won't answer the question. Their response will be "I'd rather vote for a guy that tried to earn money than someone who used their own email account or someone who ignored our people in benghazi."

What is clear, from the the Trump U to the steaks he is hawking to the Trump water, and everything in between, is that he has no interest in being a public servant. This is simply the ultimate sale for him and he knows it will guarantee long term income during and post presidency, better than he could imagine.

Gern Blansten

http://billmoyers.com/story/trump-conflict-interest-problem-no-white-house-candidate-ever/

In his most recent financial disclosure statement, Donald Trump notes he has billions of dollars in assets. But the presumptive GOP nominee also has a tremendous load of debt that includes five loans each over $50 million. (The disclosure form, which presidential candidates must submit, does not compel candidates to reveal the specific amount of any loans that exceed $50 million, and Trump has chosen not to provide details.) Two of those megaloans are held by Deutsche Bank, which is based in Germany but has US subsidiaries. And this prompts a question that no other major American presidential candidate has had to face: What are the implications of the chief executive of the US government being in hock for $100 million (or more) to a foreign entity that has tried to evade laws aimed at curtailing risky financial shenanigans, that was recently caught manipulating markets around the world and that attempts to influence the US government?

good question...

Jason P

Paul Ryan kind of endorses Trump. Maybe. At the very least, he will be voting for him.

InHiding80

The deflections from Trump fans on Facebook and Twitter dissing Hawking just because he can't walk would be hilarious if it weren't so real and a huge number of them.

Jesus could come back and say Trump bad man and they'd crucify him again.

InHiding80

Degeneratefk said:

PJ_Soul said:

mrussel1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJ_Soul said:

Trump is a scumbag - we already know this.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/01/trump-university-staff-testimony-fraudulent-scheme?CMP=fb_us

Seriously, why is no one talking about this? Seems like a pretty big deal to me.

It's a big deal in the media. If you're asking why no one here is talking about, my guess is that the conservatives cannot really defend it. So there's no argument? I posted it about it the other night when the paper's were released.

I guess so. I would be very interested to hear from the conservatives who are considering voting for Trump to be the POTUS. I would like to know how they will justify their vote for someone who is in charge of something like this... basically a ponzi scheme. Wondering if they are okay with a President who will purposefully and pointedly scam and take advantage of vulnerable people, and, if they aren't okay with that, how they are managing to sweep this under their mental rug.

They won't answer the question. Their response will be "I'd rather vote for a guy that tried to earn money than someone who used their own email account or someone who ignored our people in benghazi."

These are the same people who would rather vote for a worse Halliburton with Dubya than democratic less worse Benghazi because white republican male.

PJ_Soul

Jason P said:

Paul Ryan kind of endorses Trump. Maybe. At the very least, he will be voting for him.

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/06/02/paul-ryan-donald-trump-lamest-endorsement-modern-history.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+politicususa/fJAl+(Politicus+USA+)

The main point: Ryan is endorsing him solely because he "has to" as a Republican (and a pussy).

josevolution

Just waiting for him to go after Hawkins it's just a matter of time ...

PJfanwillneverleave1

The schadenfreude on the train for Trump is mesmerizing.

josevolution

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

The schadenfreude on the train for Trump is mesmerizing.

So are the accolades you seem to try to point out , so what you think when will he attack Hawkins ..

PJfanwillneverleave1

^^^
I don't see an attack coming because he is not against the science Hawking has lived for and presented to the world.