Hillary won more votes for President

F Me In The Brain

Newsflash: a politician lied, nobody much cares.
Sort of status quo, no matter who the politician is.
They lie, we buy.

Dirtie_Frank

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

BS44325

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

mrussel1

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

BS44325

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Gern Blansten

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Hillary is the most wounded after a non indictment?

Your boy just tweeted anti-semitic garbage over the weekend.

BS44325

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Hillary is the most wounded after a non indictment?

Your boy just tweeted anti-semitic garbage over the weekend.

Not my boy and yes she is massively wounded.

Gern Blansten

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Hillary is the most wounded after a non indictment?

Your boy just tweeted anti-semitic garbage over the weekend.

Not my boy and yes she is massively wounded.

Nope...she's good. Fox News and all the nutters will freak for awhile but it's done.

Get ready for eight years of Clinton whether you like it or not.

mrussel1

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.

Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.

pjalive21

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.

Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.

Bill meets AG on a plane for 30mins "coincidentally" to exchange cooking recipes

Obama meets with director of FBI privately to play a friendly game of checkers

FBI meets with Hillary privately for yoga

July 5th-no indictment...nothing to see here

what she did is criminal regardless of what the FBI decided today because they were bought and paid for with promises and money...she should lose all clearances which would eliminate her from running for president.....might as well retract the punishment of Gen. Patreaus who did less than what she has


if we get 8 years of this fraud kiss this country goodbye...hell I already did today

mrussel1

pjalive21 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.

Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.

Bill meets AG on a plane for 30mins "coincidentally" to exchange cooking recipes

Obama meets with director of FBI privately to play a friendly game of checkers

FBI meets with Hillary privately for yoga

July 5th-no indictment...nothing to see here

what she did is criminal regardless of what the FBI decided today because they were bought and paid for with promises and money...she should lose all clearances which would eliminate her from running for president.....might as well retract the punishment of Gen. Patreaus who did less than what she has


if we get 8 years of this fraud kiss this country goodbye...hell I already did today

You're right. The FBI is corrupt. The AG is corrupt. The candidate is corrupt. The POTUS is corrupt.

Looks like you have two choices:
1. Go find yourself another country
2. Go occupy a wildlife refuge with 20 of your friends and see what happens.

Cliffy6745

pjalive21 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.

Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.

Bill meets AG on a plane for 30mins "coincidentally" to exchange cooking recipes

Obama meets with director of FBI privately to play a friendly game of checkers

FBI meets with Hillary privately for yoga

July 5th-no indictment...nothing to see here

what she did is criminal regardless of what the FBI decided today because they were bought and paid for with promises and money...she should lose all clearances which would eliminate her from running for president.....might as well retract the punishment of Gen. Patreaus who did less than what she has


if we get 8 years of this fraud kiss this country goodbye...hell I already did today

So America will cease to exist if Hillary gets elected? If true, pretty big. Thanks for bringing this to our attention

BS44325

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.

Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.

She has lied to the media and the American people since this began. Lie after lie after lie. She may not have been indicted but it is now proven beyond all doubt that she lied. That means something and for the Hillary supporters who actually value honesty in government it will be hard for them to look the other way.

http://time.com/4393705/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-james-comey/

mrussel1

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.

Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.

She has lied to the media and the American people since this began. Lie after lie after lie. She may not have been indicted but it is now proven beyond all doubt that she lied. That means something and for the Hillary supporters who actually value honesty in government it will be hard for them to look the other way.

http://time.com/4393705/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-james-comey/

How many emails do you send a day? I probably send 75-100. I get like 300. Quick math has me sending 75/day x 20 days per month x 12 x 4 years.. That's 72k emails. We have controls to prevent NPI (non-public information) from escaping our servers. They didn't exist in 2008, we had to self monitor. If someone were to ask me last year if I ever sent an email with NPI between 2008 and 2012 I would say, "I don't know.. not to my knowledge, or not intentionally". If it turns out I did send 30 of those over the course of 4 years (which I probably did), would that make me a liar? 30/72000 = six sigma quality.

And that's what she said. How the fuck can you know for 100% everything you did 8 years ago on email.

bootlegger10

In the five minutes that she has allowed for questions from the media in the last year she lied in a good portion of it for sure.

The FBI investigation was a waste of time if the conclusion was that she needed to have intent to harm the US in order to charge. Everyone and their mother knew she did it to hide as much of her correspondence as possible to avoid harming herself. I don't think she has intent to harm the US, but only to help herself. So the investigation was a giant waste of time.

Gern Blansten

pjalive21 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.

Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.

Bill meets AG on a plane for 30mins "coincidentally" to exchange cooking recipes

Obama meets with director of FBI privately to play a friendly game of checkers

FBI meets with Hillary privately for yoga

July 5th-no indictment...nothing to see here

what she did is criminal regardless of what the FBI decided today because they were bought and paid for with promises and money...she should lose all clearances which would eliminate her from running for president.....might as well retract the punishment of Gen. Patreaus who did less than what she has


if we get 8 years of this fraud kiss this country goodbye...hell I already did today

Please tell us what Petreaus was indicted for.....it was much different and CLEARLY INTENTIONAL.

Seriously....look it up and then please tell me how he did less.

mrussel1

Gern Blansten said:

pjalive21 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.

Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.

Bill meets AG on a plane for 30mins "coincidentally" to exchange cooking recipes

Obama meets with director of FBI privately to play a friendly game of checkers

FBI meets with Hillary privately for yoga

July 5th-no indictment...nothing to see here

what she did is criminal regardless of what the FBI decided today because they were bought and paid for with promises and money...she should lose all clearances which would eliminate her from running for president.....might as well retract the punishment of Gen. Patreaus who did less than what she has


if we get 8 years of this fraud kiss this country goodbye...hell I already did today

Please tell us what Petreaus was indicted for.....it was much different and CLEARLY INTENTIONAL.

Seriously....look it up and then please tell me how he did less.

He also violated the UCMJ with his extra-marital affair with the girl. His disclosure was willful and while violating the UCMJ.

Kat

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/286539-state-dept-feuds-with-fbi-after-criticism

BS44325

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.

Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.

She has lied to the media and the American people since this began. Lie after lie after lie. She may not have been indicted but it is now proven beyond all doubt that she lied. That means something and for the Hillary supporters who actually value honesty in government it will be hard for them to look the other way.

http://time.com/4393705/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-james-comey/

How many emails do you send a day? I probably send 75-100. I get like 300. Quick math has me sending 75/day x 20 days per month x 12 x 4 years.. That's 72k emails. We have controls to prevent NPI (non-public information) from escaping our servers. They didn't exist in 2008, we had to self monitor. If someone were to ask me last year if I ever sent an email with NPI between 2008 and 2012 I would say, "I don't know.. not to my knowledge, or not intentionally". If it turns out I did send 30 of those over the course of 4 years (which I probably did), would that make me a liar? 30/72000 = six sigma quality.

And that's what she said. How the fuck can you know for 100% everything you did 8 years ago on email.

Except you didn't intentionally set up your own server at the outset with minimal security in order to avoid transparency. There was a government system already in place that existed to catalogue and protect this data. Your claim that she instituted her own system to improve efficiency is absolutely laughable and she can't then use the deficiencies of this same system to insulate her from her lies.

mrussel1

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

mrussel1 said:

BS44325 said:

Gern Blansten said:

BS44325 said:

Kat said:

Thanks all. With all the retroactive classifying and stuff, it's not a surprise that mistakes are made. It's a huge amount of emails. I think it was something like 20+ million emails of the Bush Admin that used private RNC servers but the emails were never preserved so couldn't be investigated, wasn't it? Hopefully, they made no mistakes. I'm sure they were careful so no classified material was spread around.

Except classified material was spread around. That has been acknowledged today. It was also acknowledged that it is highly likely foreign agencies accessed this information.

No that wasn't acknowledged at all. He said that they saw no evidence that the info was accessed but he said it would be likely that they wouldn't detect that type of evidence if it had occurred.

This is what foreign agencies do you simply refuse to read between the lines.

This article just nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/

Why you all want to cover for her when you still have an opportunity to nominate someone else makes absolutely mo sense to me.

I don't have the opportunity to nominate someone else since I'm not a super delegate. So the choice continues to be Trump vs. Clinton. And there's still no comparison as to who has the judgment, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc. to be POTUS. It ain't Trump.

The GOP convention has favorable rules to nominate someone else. I'll flip over to Trump's thread and look for your condemnation over there.

Well I'm not "for" Trump and would be happy to see someone else but that being said Clinton's "judgement, wisdom, experience, acumen, etc." has just been completely indicted. You should be moving for a new nominee instead of blocking for her.

Thanks for telling me what I should do. But alas, I'm good.

No worries but I think you're being shortsighted. You don't want Trump but you are now all in on the most wounded of candidates and are giving him his best opportunity to win.

Negative. I don't believe this story will carry much longer. We still have a month until the conventions. After that it's debates, rallies, etc. There will also be a renewed focus on Trump and his tax returns which will show his low net worth and abysmal record on charity, plus whatever carnival show distraction he creates.

Here's the thing. For HRC supporters, nothing changed today. We knew it was a mistake to have your own server. She said that months ago herself. What happened today is the end of the criminal probe. Somehow you (and Trump) think that is some massive indictment.

She has lied to the media and the American people since this began. Lie after lie after lie. She may not have been indicted but it is now proven beyond all doubt that she lied. That means something and for the Hillary supporters who actually value honesty in government it will be hard for them to look the other way.

http://time.com/4393705/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-james-comey/

How many emails do you send a day? I probably send 75-100. I get like 300. Quick math has me sending 75/day x 20 days per month x 12 x 4 years.. That's 72k emails. We have controls to prevent NPI (non-public information) from escaping our servers. They didn't exist in 2008, we had to self monitor. If someone were to ask me last year if I ever sent an email with NPI between 2008 and 2012 I would say, "I don't know.. not to my knowledge, or not intentionally". If it turns out I did send 30 of those over the course of 4 years (which I probably did), would that make me a liar? 30/72000 = six sigma quality.

And that's what she said. How the fuck can you know for 100% everything you did 8 years ago on email.

Except you didn't intentionally set up your own server at the outset with minimal security in order to avoid transparency. There was a government system already in place that existed to catalogue and protect this data. Your claim that she instituted her own system to improve efficiency is absolutely laughable and she can't then use the deficiencies of this same system to insulate her from her lies.

It's documented that during her tenure there was no mobile use of email available at State. You had to be at a terminal. Do you travel for business? I do. I have a cell, a Surface, and an Ipad. And I use them all to work and retrieve email. If I could only get email when I got to one of my sites, I'd be fucked. That's how it was.