Hillary won more votes for President

1…6970727475…488

Comments

  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    It was a dumb move by Bill and Lynch. It just sets up a bad perception regardless of the discussions.
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    She's a thief and a liar
    There's her church she sings in the choir
  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,956
    .
    mrussel1 said:

    It was a dumb move by Bill and Lynch. It just sets up a bad perception regardless of the discussions.

    It was a mistake for sure but even Andrea Mitchell (solid Republican I believe), talked this morning about how it was to cover Bill Clinton when he was President and how he's extremely friendly and if he saw someone he wanted to talk to, he'd just take off and go visit with them. I can see Bill not thinking it through and wanting to talk about his grandkids. I wish he hadn't done it though.
    Falling down,...not staying down
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    Kat said:

    .

    mrussel1 said:

    It was a dumb move by Bill and Lynch. It just sets up a bad perception regardless of the discussions.

    It was a mistake for sure but even Andrea Mitchell (solid Republican I believe), talked this morning about how it was to cover Bill Clinton when he was President and how he's extremely friendly and if he saw someone he wanted to talk to, he'd just take off and go visit with them. I can see Bill not thinking it through and wanting to talk about his grandkids. I wish he hadn't done it though.
    Andrea Mitchell a solid Republican?! C'mon Kat!
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    Gern Blansten said:

    BS44325 said:

    I think you all better be prepared...

    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/02/us/politics/loretta-lynch-hillary-clinton-email-server.html?referer=http://www.powerlineblog.com/

    This could be setting the table for something huge. The Lynch visit to Bill Clinton might have been a courtesy visit to a former President letting him know that charges could be on the way.

    LOL...have fun while you can
    You've got mad blinders on.
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    FBI interview tomorrow

    http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/01/exclusive-hillary-clinton-scheduled-to-meet-with-fbi-on-saturday/
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    And this behind the scenes account of the Clinton-Lynch meeting is interesting

    http://observer.com/2016/07/exclusive-security-source-details-bill-clinton-maneuver-to-meet-loretta-lynch/

    It looks like Bill snaked his way into a meeting
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    BS44325 said:

    And this behind the scenes account of the Clinton-Lynch meeting is interesting

    http://observer.com/2016/07/exclusive-security-source-details-bill-clinton-maneuver-to-meet-loretta-lynch/

    It looks like Bill snaked his way into a meeting

    Good ol' Slippery Willey never could resist snaking into places where he probably shouldn't...
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    BS44325 said:

    And this behind the scenes account of the Clinton-Lynch meeting is interesting

    http://observer.com/2016/07/exclusive-security-source-details-bill-clinton-maneuver-to-meet-loretta-lynch/

    It looks like Bill snaked his way into a meeting

    Hahaha it's funny how the "folks on the ground" always have smears at the ready for the Clintons, but they never have any evidence or anything more than the gossip they peddle.
    Benghazi. LOL
    "The Energizer". LOL
    There are plenty of others, but only a right wing nutjob (or consumer of nutjob media) would recognize more than those two stinky piles of poo.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    And this behind the scenes account of the Clinton-Lynch meeting is interesting

    http://observer.com/2016/07/exclusive-security-source-details-bill-clinton-maneuver-to-meet-loretta-lynch/

    It looks like Bill snaked his way into a meeting

    Hahaha it's funny how the "folks on the ground" always have smears at the ready for the Clintons, but they never have any evidence or anything more than the gossip they peddle.
    Benghazi. LOL
    "The Energizer". LOL
    There are plenty of others, but only a right wing nutjob (or consumer of nutjob media) would recognize more than those two stinky piles of poo.
    Here's a story for you

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/07/01/clinton-sought-secret-info-on-eu-bailout-plans-as-son-in-laws-doomed-hedge-fund-gambled-on-greece.html

  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    Yeah, it's not hard to find stories like this about the Clintons...masters of the graft they are. That's why it is so silly that people take security persons and the like at their word, there is enough real evidence of impropriety that the outlandish claims only serve to invalidate the argument against another President Clinton.
    I will still vote for her, because I care much more about the weighty decisions a President has to make than I care about money..who has it and how they got it.
    If it was almost anybody but Trump, she wouldn't get my vote, but her lacking integrity is not nearly as scary as lacking maturity in the way that Trump does.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    rgambs said:

    Yeah, it's not hard to find stories like this about the Clintons...masters of the graft they are. That's why it is so silly that people take security persons and the like at their word, there is enough real evidence of impropriety that the outlandish claims only serve to invalidate the argument against another President Clinton.
    I will still vote for her, because I care much more about the weighty decisions a President has to make than I care about money..who has it and how they got it.
    If it was almost anybody but Trump, she wouldn't get my vote, but her lacking integrity is not nearly as scary as lacking maturity in the way that Trump does.

    I find that to be strange calculus but if she gets charged you might be able to choose a third option.
  • rssesq
    rssesq Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
    I remember in 2000 thinking that the field couldn't possibly get any worse.
    Now I'm just longing for those days. lol
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited July 2016
    rgambs said:

    Yeah, it's not hard to find stories like this about the Clintons...masters of the graft they are. That's why it is so silly that people take security persons and the like at their word, there is enough real evidence of impropriety that the outlandish claims only serve to invalidate the argument against another President Clinton.
    I will still vote for her, because I care much more about the weighty decisions a President has to make than I care about money..who has it and how they got it.
    If it was almost anybody but Trump, she wouldn't get my vote, but her lacking integrity is not nearly as scary as lacking maturity in the way that Trump does.

    Wow.
    No wonder people don't like having to vote for her.
    You can't be serious, maturity over integrity?
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    rgambs said:

    Yeah, it's not hard to find stories like this about the Clintons...masters of the graft they are. That's why it is so silly that people take security persons and the like at their word, there is enough real evidence of impropriety that the outlandish claims only serve to invalidate the argument against another President Clinton.
    I will still vote for her, because I care much more about the weighty decisions a President has to make than I care about money..who has it and how they got it.
    If it was almost anybody but Trump, she wouldn't get my vote, but her lacking integrity is not nearly as scary as lacking maturity in the way that Trump does.

    Wow.
    No wonder people don't like having to vote for her.
    You can't be serious, maturity over integrity?
    Dead serious.

    A hothead bully of a child who can't control his schoolyard bravado has no business controlling the world's largest nuclear stockpile, military, and economy.
    Rash decisions have real consequences, the Brexit is evidence of how quickly a reactionary movement can impact the world. Trump has shown in his candidacy that he will make statements and decisions with ZERO forethought. That's scary.

    Clinton and her cronies will surely get richer with her in office, but she won't be jumping to ban religions or start trade wars.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    rgambs said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    rgambs said:

    Yeah, it's not hard to find stories like this about the Clintons...masters of the graft they are. That's why it is so silly that people take security persons and the like at their word, there is enough real evidence of impropriety that the outlandish claims only serve to invalidate the argument against another President Clinton.
    I will still vote for her, because I care much more about the weighty decisions a President has to make than I care about money..who has it and how they got it.
    If it was almost anybody but Trump, she wouldn't get my vote, but her lacking integrity is not nearly as scary as lacking maturity in the way that Trump does.

    Wow.
    No wonder people don't like having to vote for her.
    You can't be serious, maturity over integrity?
    Dead serious.

    A hothead bully of a child who can't control his schoolyard bravado has no business controlling the world's largest nuclear stockpile, military, and economy.
    Rash decisions have real consequences, the Brexit is evidence of how quickly a reactionary movement can impact the world. Trump has shown in his candidacy that he will make statements and decisions with ZERO forethought. That's scary.

    Clinton and her cronies will surely get richer with her in office, but she won't be jumping to ban religions or start trade wars.
    Maturity and temper can be controlled/altered towards a straighter path.
    Integrity well you have it or you don't.
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    BS44325 said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    And this behind the scenes account of the Clinton-Lynch meeting is interesting

    http://observer.com/2016/07/exclusive-security-source-details-bill-clinton-maneuver-to-meet-loretta-lynch/

    It looks like Bill snaked his way into a meeting

    Hahaha it's funny how the "folks on the ground" always have smears at the ready for the Clintons, but they never have any evidence or anything more than the gossip they peddle.
    Benghazi. LOL
    "The Energizer". LOL
    There are plenty of others, but only a right wing nutjob (or consumer of nutjob media) would recognize more than those two stinky piles of poo.
    Here's a story for you

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/07/01/clinton-sought-secret-info-on-eu-bailout-plans-as-son-in-laws-doomed-hedge-fund-gambled-on-greece.html

    It shows an astounding level of bias that you would see this as corruption and look at Cheney's Halliburton and the Iraq war and see no issues. It is virtually the same scenario, except one involves hundreds of thousands of human lives lost.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,956
    BS44325 said:

    Kat said:

    .

    mrussel1 said:

    It was a dumb move by Bill and Lynch. It just sets up a bad perception regardless of the discussions.

    It was a mistake for sure but even Andrea Mitchell (solid Republican I believe), talked this morning about how it was to cover Bill Clinton when he was President and how he's extremely friendly and if he saw someone he wanted to talk to, he'd just take off and go visit with them. I can see Bill not thinking it through and wanting to talk about his grandkids. I wish he hadn't done it though.
    Andrea Mitchell a solid Republican?! C'mon Kat!
    I could be wrong but I tend to think she is Republican...married to Alan Greenspan and I don't get a James Carville / Mary Matalin vibe from them. :grin: Anyway, that was what she said about President Clinton. Hopefully, it'll all be over soon. Have a wonderful weekend everyone!!!
    Falling down,...not staying down
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    And this behind the scenes account of the Clinton-Lynch meeting is interesting

    http://observer.com/2016/07/exclusive-security-source-details-bill-clinton-maneuver-to-meet-loretta-lynch/

    It looks like Bill snaked his way into a meeting

    Hahaha it's funny how the "folks on the ground" always have smears at the ready for the Clintons, but they never have any evidence or anything more than the gossip they peddle.
    Benghazi. LOL
    "The Energizer". LOL
    There are plenty of others, but only a right wing nutjob (or consumer of nutjob media) would recognize more than those two stinky piles of poo.
    Here's a story for you

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/07/01/clinton-sought-secret-info-on-eu-bailout-plans-as-son-in-laws-doomed-hedge-fund-gambled-on-greece.html

    It shows an astounding level of bias that you would see this as corruption and look at Cheney's Halliburton and the Iraq war and see no issues. It is virtually the same scenario, except one involves hundreds of thousands of human lives lost.
    But Cheney had exceptional maturity.
  • rssesq
    rssesq Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
    I get more of a Julius and Ethel vibe from Mitchell and Greenspan. lmao
    Kat said:

    BS44325 said:

    Kat said:

    .

    mrussel1 said:

    It was a dumb move by Bill and Lynch. It just sets up a bad perception regardless of the discussions.

    It was a mistake for sure but even Andrea Mitchell (solid Republican I believe), talked this morning about how it was to cover Bill Clinton when he was President and how he's extremely friendly and if he saw someone he wanted to talk to, he'd just take off and go visit with them. I can see Bill not thinking it through and wanting to talk about his grandkids. I wish he hadn't done it though.
    Andrea Mitchell a solid Republican?! C'mon Kat!
    I could be wrong but I tend to think she is Republican...married to Alan Greenspan and I don't get a James Carville / Mary Matalin vibe from them. :grin: Anyway, that was what she said about President Clinton. Hopefully, it'll all be over soon. Have a wonderful weekend everyone!!!
This discussion has been closed.

Categories