Hillary won more votes for President

Godfather.

mrussel1 said:

Godfather. said:

It's no secrete that I am 100% none Hillary but I have to give credit where credit is due....she is my opinion an evil mastermind LOL !
and thought she was much smarter and more criminally organized than to make a stupid mistake like this even as petty as it may sound.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/13/new-email-release-shows-clinton-chose-not-to-use-secure-phone-line-acknowledged-blackberry-risk.html?intcmp=hpbt3

Godfather.

Why do you think the conversation with Cheryl Mills had to be secured? She said "call me on my home phone". Maybe they were talking about what toppings to get on their pizza, or what movie to rent. Point being, there is no law that says every conversation from a Sec'y must be secured. It's only when discussing classified information.

conversation topic does not matter, it's the Idea that no mater what she was talking about she knew better, cloning a phone or tapping a phone is not unheard of not to mention a personal phone can give your location away and beside we don't know what she was talking about.
it was just a goofball move for someone in her position to make in my opinion. Especially her.

Godfather.

Godfather.

Gern Blansten said:

mrussel1 said:

Godfather. said:

It's no secrete that I am 100% none Hillary but I have to give credit where credit is due....she is my opinion an evil mastermind LOL !
and thought she was much smarter and more criminally organized than to make a stupid mistake like this even as petty as it may sound.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/13/new-email-release-shows-clinton-chose-not-to-use-secure-phone-line-acknowledged-blackberry-risk.html?intcmp=hpbt3

Godfather.

Why do you think the conversation with Cheryl Mills had to be secured? She said "call me on my home phone". Maybe they were talking about what toppings to get on their pizza, or what movie to rent. Point being, there is no law that says every conversation from a Sec'y must be secured. It's only when discussing classified information.

Exactly...he's outraged because Faux News told him to be outraged

good lord glenn, really ???? your idea of who I am is almost great entertainment...for you anyway.

Godfather.

mrussel1

Godfather. said:

mrussel1 said:

Godfather. said:

It's no secrete that I am 100% none Hillary but I have to give credit where credit is due....she is my opinion an evil mastermind LOL !
and thought she was much smarter and more criminally organized than to make a stupid mistake like this even as petty as it may sound.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/13/new-email-release-shows-clinton-chose-not-to-use-secure-phone-line-acknowledged-blackberry-risk.html?intcmp=hpbt3

Godfather.

Why do you think the conversation with Cheryl Mills had to be secured? She said "call me on my home phone". Maybe they were talking about what toppings to get on their pizza, or what movie to rent. Point being, there is no law that says every conversation from a Sec'y must be secured. It's only when discussing classified information.

conversation topic does not matter, it's the Idea that no mater what she was talking about she knew better, cloning a phone or tapping a phone is not unheard of not to mention a personal phone can give your location away and beside we don't know what she was talking about.
it was just a goofball move for someone in her position to make in my opinion. Especially her.

Godfather.

I'm not sure that is news either to be honest. She certainly knew teh phone protocol. She has never denied knowing it. Her case has been, regarding the servers, that the information wasn't classified when it was passed. I'm not following this case super closely, but I'm fairly sure that is the argument.

Godfather.

mrussel1 said:

Godfather. said:

mrussel1 said:

Godfather. said:

It's no secrete that I am 100% none Hillary but I have to give credit where credit is due....she is my opinion an evil mastermind LOL !
and thought she was much smarter and more criminally organized than to make a stupid mistake like this even as petty as it may sound.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/13/new-email-release-shows-clinton-chose-not-to-use-secure-phone-line-acknowledged-blackberry-risk.html?intcmp=hpbt3

Godfather.

Why do you think the conversation with Cheryl Mills had to be secured? She said "call me on my home phone". Maybe they were talking about what toppings to get on their pizza, or what movie to rent. Point being, there is no law that says every conversation from a Sec'y must be secured. It's only when discussing classified information.

conversation topic does not matter, it's the Idea that no mater what she was talking about she knew better, cloning a phone or tapping a phone is not unheard of not to mention a personal phone can give your location away and beside we don't know what she was talking about.
it was just a goofball move for someone in her position to make in my opinion. Especially her.

Godfather.

I'm not sure that is news either to be honest. She certainly knew teh phone protocol. She has never denied knowing it. Her case has been, regarding the servers, that the information wasn't classified when it was passed. I'm not following this case super closely, but I'm fairly sure that is the argument.

you could be right, my sarcastic comments where pointing towards "if I were a criminal I'd be very careful when I used the phone"

Godfather.

mrussel1

Godfather. said:

mrussel1 said:

Godfather. said:

mrussel1 said:

Godfather. said:

It's no secrete that I am 100% none Hillary but I have to give credit where credit is due....she is my opinion an evil mastermind LOL !
and thought she was much smarter and more criminally organized than to make a stupid mistake like this even as petty as it may sound.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/13/new-email-release-shows-clinton-chose-not-to-use-secure-phone-line-acknowledged-blackberry-risk.html?intcmp=hpbt3

Godfather.

Why do you think the conversation with Cheryl Mills had to be secured? She said "call me on my home phone". Maybe they were talking about what toppings to get on their pizza, or what movie to rent. Point being, there is no law that says every conversation from a Sec'y must be secured. It's only when discussing classified information.

conversation topic does not matter, it's the Idea that no mater what she was talking about she knew better, cloning a phone or tapping a phone is not unheard of not to mention a personal phone can give your location away and beside we don't know what she was talking about.
it was just a goofball move for someone in her position to make in my opinion. Especially her.

Godfather.

I'm not sure that is news either to be honest. She certainly knew teh phone protocol. She has never denied knowing it. Her case has been, regarding the servers, that the information wasn't classified when it was passed. I'm not following this case super closely, but I'm fairly sure that is the argument.

you could be right, my sarcastic comments where pointing towards "if I were a criminal I'd be very careful when I used the phone"

Godfather.

Ah... didn't catch that.. Yeah, she's got a burner I'm sure.

rssesq

a boost mobile burner lol

JWPearl

you would see it or write about it

JWPearl

if i were to vote i would not be at hillarys party or trumps but probably bernies if i were to be involved but i wont voting or be involved got other things to focus on...

gimmesometruth27

JWPearl said:

if i were to vote i would not be at hillarys party or trumps but probably bernies if i were to be involved but i wont voting or be involved got other things to focus on...

bernie and hillary are in the same party.

forgive me for asking, but what could be more important than the future of the supreme court?

gimmesometruth27

^^^ i mean it is not like the old days where you would have to take 4 days to wagon train into the county seat to cast your ballot. it is typically something you can do quickly.

gimmesometruth27

or you could do an absentee ballot.

mrussel1

Nope, just too busy this next six months. Don't have a minute to focus on it.

Gern Blansten

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trey-gowdy-dana-chipman-benghazi-committee_us_5738db52e4b08f96c18373e2

This is hilarious. The General that the Benghazi committee hired to trash Hillary ended up siding with the admin over their actions that night.

Nice try assholes. Time to put Gowdy in his place.

Gern Blansten

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/280144-poll-dems-want-sanders-as-clintons-vp

Sanders or Warren would unite the clans

Gern Blansten

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/05/17/benghazi-chairman-contradicts-fox-report-admits-military-could-not-have-saved-lives-benghazi-attack/210468

Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) directly contradicted claims made by anonymous Fox News sources who argued the military could have done more to prevent loss of life during the 2012 attack on an American compound in Benghazi, Libya.

Fox correspondent Adam Housley cited two anonymous sources in an attempt to revive a debunked smear against the Obama administration and Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton that officials had readily available assets that could have saved lives during the attack. After Housley’s report aired during the May 11 edition of Fox News’ Special Report, Gowdy urged Housley’s two “witnesses” to appear before the select committee he heads and speak.

On May 17, Fox host Bill Hemmer asked Gowdy about reports that his attorney, Dana Chipman, said nothing more could have been done to save Americans in Benghazi. Gowdy responded, “I don’t think there’s any issue with respect to that -- they couldn’t,” directly contradicting the accounts of the anonymous sources appearing on Special Report on May 11. From the May 17 edition of Fox News’ America’s Newsroom:

Godfather.

Gern Blansten said:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/05/17/benghazi-chairman-contradicts-fox-report-admits-military-could-not-have-saved-lives-benghazi-attack/210468

Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) directly contradicted claims made by anonymous Fox News sources who argued the military could have done more to prevent loss of life during the 2012 attack on an American compound in Benghazi, Libya.

Fox correspondent Adam Housley cited two anonymous sources in an attempt to revive a debunked smear against the Obama administration and Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton that officials had readily available assets that could have saved lives during the attack. After Housley’s report aired during the May 11 edition of Fox News’ Special Report, Gowdy urged Housley’s two “witnesses” to appear before the select committee he heads and speak.

On May 17, Fox host Bill Hemmer asked Gowdy about reports that his attorney, Dana Chipman, said nothing more could have been done to save Americans in Benghazi. Gowdy responded, “I don’t think there’s any issue with respect to that -- they couldn’t,” directly contradicting the accounts of the anonymous sources appearing on Special Report on May 11. From the May 17 edition of Fox News’ America’s Newsroom:

seems a little convenient that this news is hitting the press now rather than when she was being questioned directly after it happened, just say'n.
besides Benghazi is just one of the things people have trouble trusting her about.

Godfather.

Gern Blansten

Godfather. said:

Gern Blansten said:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/05/17/benghazi-chairman-contradicts-fox-report-admits-military-could-not-have-saved-lives-benghazi-attack/210468

Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) directly contradicted claims made by anonymous Fox News sources who argued the military could have done more to prevent loss of life during the 2012 attack on an American compound in Benghazi, Libya.

Fox correspondent Adam Housley cited two anonymous sources in an attempt to revive a debunked smear against the Obama administration and Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton that officials had readily available assets that could have saved lives during the attack. After Housley’s report aired during the May 11 edition of Fox News’ Special Report, Gowdy urged Housley’s two “witnesses” to appear before the select committee he heads and speak.

On May 17, Fox host Bill Hemmer asked Gowdy about reports that his attorney, Dana Chipman, said nothing more could have been done to save Americans in Benghazi. Gowdy responded, “I don’t think there’s any issue with respect to that -- they couldn’t,” directly contradicting the accounts of the anonymous sources appearing on Special Report on May 11. From the May 17 edition of Fox News’ America’s Newsroom:

seems a little convenient that this news is hitting the press now rather than when she was being questioned directly after it happened, just say'n.
besides Benghazi is just one of the things people have trouble trusting her about.

Godfather.



huh? He was just interviewed TODAY!!!

Plus...they have been saying this stuff since it happened you just chose to not believe it

Godfather.

Gern Blansten said:

Godfather. said:

Gern Blansten said:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/05/17/benghazi-chairman-contradicts-fox-report-admits-military-could-not-have-saved-lives-benghazi-attack/210468

Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) directly contradicted claims made by anonymous Fox News sources who argued the military could have done more to prevent loss of life during the 2012 attack on an American compound in Benghazi, Libya.

Fox correspondent Adam Housley cited two anonymous sources in an attempt to revive a debunked smear against the Obama administration and Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton that officials had readily available assets that could have saved lives during the attack. After Housley’s report aired during the May 11 edition of Fox News’ Special Report, Gowdy urged Housley’s two “witnesses” to appear before the select committee he heads and speak.

On May 17, Fox host Bill Hemmer asked Gowdy about reports that his attorney, Dana Chipman, said nothing more could have been done to save Americans in Benghazi. Gowdy responded, “I don’t think there’s any issue with respect to that -- they couldn’t,” directly contradicting the accounts of the anonymous sources appearing on Special Report on May 11. From the May 17 edition of Fox News’ America’s Newsroom:

seems a little convenient that this news is hitting the press now rather than when she was being questioned directly after it happened, just say'n.
besides Benghazi is just one of the things people have trouble trusting her about.

Godfather.

huh? He was just interviewed TODAY!!!

Plus...they have been saying this stuff since it happened you just chose to not believe it

HAHAHAHHAHA DUDE it's all mud slinging....they all do it, maybe the people are being played for suckers, ever thought of that ?

Godfather.

Jason P

Gern Blansten

Godfather. said:

Gern Blansten said:

Godfather. said:

Gern Blansten said:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/05/17/benghazi-chairman-contradicts-fox-report-admits-military-could-not-have-saved-lives-benghazi-attack/210468

Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) directly contradicted claims made by anonymous Fox News sources who argued the military could have done more to prevent loss of life during the 2012 attack on an American compound in Benghazi, Libya.

Fox correspondent Adam Housley cited two anonymous sources in an attempt to revive a debunked smear against the Obama administration and Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton that officials had readily available assets that could have saved lives during the attack. After Housley’s report aired during the May 11 edition of Fox News’ Special Report, Gowdy urged Housley’s two “witnesses” to appear before the select committee he heads and speak.

On May 17, Fox host Bill Hemmer asked Gowdy about reports that his attorney, Dana Chipman, said nothing more could have been done to save Americans in Benghazi. Gowdy responded, “I don’t think there’s any issue with respect to that -- they couldn’t,” directly contradicting the accounts of the anonymous sources appearing on Special Report on May 11. From the May 17 edition of Fox News’ America’s Newsroom:

seems a little convenient that this news is hitting the press now rather than when she was being questioned directly after it happened, just say'n.
besides Benghazi is just one of the things people have trouble trusting her about.

Godfather.



huh? He was just interviewed TODAY!!!

Plus...they have been saying this stuff since it happened you just chose to not believe it

HAHAHAHHAHA DUDE it's all mud slinging....they all do it, maybe the people are being played for suckers, ever thought of that ?

Godfather.

I believe that YOU were played for a sucker. You believed it...I sure as hell didn't